Skip to content
1981
Volume 13, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2049-3010
  • E-ISSN: 2049-3029

Abstract

This article examines the discursive implications of , a participatory play created in 2017 to explore ambiguous moments of sexual consent – situations that often lead to shame and misunderstanding. While not originally conceived within an explicitly discursive framework, this retrospective analysis reveals how ’s use of participatory narrative structures enabled it to challenge the prevailing ‘permission discourse’ of affirmative consent. Drawing on concepts of discourse analysis and cultural framing, this study highlights how the play’s particular dramaturgy – through audience intervention, improvisation and structured decision-making – guided audiences from a legalistic, transactional model of consent towards a more relational, context-sensitive ‘discourse of understanding’ that better reflects the complexities of real-world consent negotiation. In tracing this shift, the study positions participatory theatre as a powerful space for reimagining social constructs, offering insights into its potential to reshape public understandings of power, agency and social responsibility.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/atr_00097_1
2025-10-23
2026-04-16

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Advocates for Youth (n.d.), ‘Sex education programs: Definitions and point-by-point comparison’, https://www.advocatesforyouth.org/resources/fact-sheets/sex-education-programs-definitions-and-point-by-point-comparison. Accessed 2 July 2025.
  2. Annex Teen Clinic (2017), ‘Comprehensive sex ed in U.S. schools: A brief history’, 16 August, https://annexteenclinic.org/2017/08/16/comprehensive-sex-ed-in-u-s-schools-a-brief-history-2. Accessed 2 July 2025.
  3. Bernstein, Micah and Sloan, Elon (2017), Gray Area: A New Play About Consent, unpublished manuscript.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Claiborne, William (1991), ‘When no means no in Canada’, Washington Post, 12 December, https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1991/12/13/when-no-means-no-in-canada/732c48db-3499-44be-bfe7-d85968bc8008/. Accessed 18 September 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Fischel, Joseph J. (2019), Screw Consent: A Better Politics of Sexual Justice, Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Friedman, Jaclyn and Valenti, Jessica (2008), Yes Means Yes! Visions of Female Sexual Power & a World Without Rape, Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. FYI. Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health (2017), ’FYI Performance Company’, https://www.icah.org/fyi#plays. Accessed 19 July 2024.
  8. Gagnon, John H. and Simon, William ([1973] 2005), Sexual Conduct: The Social Sources of Human Sexuality, 2nd ed., Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Gebreyes, Rahel (2015), ‘Does UCSC’s “consent is sexy” campaign miss the point?’, HuffPost, 16 November, https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ucsc-consent-is-sexy-campaign_us_5649fdf8e4b08cda3489a799. Accessed 30 April 2018.
  10. Gee, James Paul (1999), An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Gentile, Katie (2015), ‘Affirmative consent and neoliberal bodies’, Public Seminar, 3 September, https://publicseminar.org/2015/09/affirmative-consent-and-neoliberal-bodies. Accessed 19 July 2024.
  12. Goffman, Erving (1974), Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Harris, Kate Lockwood (2018), ‘Yes means yes and no means no, but both these mantras need to go: Communication myths in consent education and anti-rape activism’, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 46:2, pp. 155–78, https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2018.1435900.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Heathcote, Dorothy ([1976] 1995), ‘Drama as a process for change’, in R. Drain (ed.), Twentieth-Century Theatre: A Sourcebook, New York: Routledge, pp. 199–206.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Helbig, Jack (2018), ‘A pregnant teen tries to decide what to do with This Boat Called My Body’, Chicago Reader, 7 June, https://chicagoreader.com/arts-culture/a-pregnant-teen-tries-to-decide-what-to-do-with-this-boat-called-my-body. Accessed 30 July 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Hollway, Wendy ([1984] 2001), ‘Gender difference and the production of subjectivity’, in M. Wetherell, S. Taylor and S. Yates (eds), Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd, pp. 272–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Horton-Salway, Mary (2001), ‘The construction of ME: The discursive action model’, in M. Wetherell, S. Taylor and S. Yates (eds), Discourse as Data: A Guide to Analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd, pp. 147–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health (ICAH) (n.d.), ‘What is reproductive justice?’, 18 April, https://www.icah.org/blog/reproductive-justice. Accessed 26 March 2025.
  19. Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health (ICAH) (2017), ‘What are the national sexual education standards?’, 14 May, https://www.icah.org/blog/national-sexual-education-standards. Accessed 18 March 2025.
  20. Lamb, Sharon and Randazzo, Renee (2016), ‘From I to we: Sex education as a form of civics education in a neoliberal context’, Curriculum Inquiry, 46:2, pp. 148–67, https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2016.1144465.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Low, Katharine (2020), Applied Theatre and Sexual Health Communication: Apertures of Possibility, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Majid, Asif (2024), ‘Facilitating consent, voyeurism, and power: Improv and image theatre, sexual (mis)conduct, and the limits of critical pedagogy in drama workshops with British Muslim youth’, Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 29:4, pp. 583–99, https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2024.2304785.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Miri (2013), ‘“Consent is sexy” is useful but also kind of sketchy’, Brute Reason, 16 February, https://the-orbit.net/brutereason/2013/02/16/consent-is-sexy-is-useful-but-also-kind-of-gross. Accessed 30 April 2018.
  24. New, Jake (2014), ‘The “Yes Means Yes” world’, Inside Higher Ed., 16 October, https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/10/17/colleges-across-country-adopting-affirmative-consent-sexual-assault-policies. Accessed 18 September 2025.
  25. Nicholson, Helen (2005), Applied Drama: The Gift of Theatre, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Planned Parenthood (n.d.), ‘What is sexual consent? Facts about rape and sexual assault’, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/relationships/sexual-consent. Accessed 19 July 2024.
  27. Ponzetti, James J., Selman, Jan, Munro, Brenda, Esmail, Shaniff and Adams, Gerald (2009), ‘The effectiveness of participatory theatre with early adolescents in school-based sexuality education’, Sex Education, 9:1, pp. 93–103, https://doi.org/10.1080/14681810802639905.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Saketopoulou, Avgi (2023), Sexuality Beyond Consent: Risk, Race, Traumatophilia, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. SIECUS – Sex Ed for Social Change (2024), ‘SIECUS state profiles’, https://siecus.org/siecus-state-profiles. Accessed 18 March 2025.
  30. Sparks, Sarah (2019), ‘We’re teaching consent all wrong’, EdWeek, 8 January, https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/were-teaching-consent-all-wrong/2019/01. Accessed 19 July 2024.
  31. Taboada, Angela, Taggart, Tamara, Holloway, Ian, Houpt, Anne, Gordon, Ryan, Gere, Dawn, Milburn, Norweeta and Lightfoot, Alexandra F. (2016), ‘A critical review of the characteristics of theater-based HIV prevention interventions for adolescents in school settings’, Health Promotion Practice, 17:4, pp. 537–47, https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839916632567.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Watson, Ryan, McDonald, Daniel, Carter, Ruth and Russo, Joseph (2016), ‘Reducing youth risk behaviors through interactive theater intervention’, Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 4:1, pp. 70–77, https://doi.org/10.54718/WDXU4301.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Wells, Trish (2014), ‘Insights into approaching sexual health education through applied theatre methodology’, Applied Theatre Research, 1:2, pp. 203–15, https://doi.org/10.1386/atr.1.2.203_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Willig, Carla (2013), Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3rd ed., New York: McGraw Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Woodson, Stephani Etheridge, Quiroga, Seline Szkupinski, Underiner, Tamara and Karimi, Robert Farid (2017), ‘Of models and mechanisms: Towards an understanding of how theatre-making works as an “intervention” in individual health and wellness’, Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 22:4, pp. 465–81, https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2017.1366257.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Zaleski, Nik and Rohd, Michael (2021), ‘Rehearsing for life: HOPE IS VITAL, FYI, sexuality education for youth’, in L. S. Brenner, C. Ceraso and E. D. Cruz (eds), Applied Theatre with Youth: Education, Engagement, Activism, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 128–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Zaleski, Nik, Watson, Jacob, Oliver-O’Neil, Shannon, Lehner, Alison, Schwarz, Abby and Ramos, Alyssa (2022), The Sex Ed Playbook: Participatory Theatre for Health Education, self-published.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/atr_00097_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): consent; cultural frames; devising; discourse analysis; participatory theatre; sexual violence; sexuality education

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test