1981
Volume 11, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 2042-8022
  • E-ISSN: 2042-8030

Abstract

Since the early 2000s social media has transformed the internet into a site for the exchange of stories through the mass democratization of publishing. And yet, new forms of digital and online storytelling have at the same time compromised one of the core functions of storytelling, namely its social aspect, the ability to build community when two or more people share stories in the same space, at the same time, breathing the same air. Somewhat ironically the advent of media may have broadened the audience for any one person’s storytelling, whilst diminishing the social intimacy of the storytelling experience. As part of its research work into storytelling as a means of engaging people in the public debate around environment, the Storytelling Academy at Loughborough University has been developing new forms and processes of digital storytelling to promote wider engagement and dissemination of environmentally driven personal stories. ‘The Reasons’, first staged in Cambridgeshire in 2016, was an attempt to create a live, community social event that provided a public forum for storytelling as a way of debating issues around drought and water governance in the Fens. Inspired by a re-staging of in Sardinia in 2015, a traditional form of conflict resolution, whereby a ‘mock’ court provides the means for the community to publicly tell its stories to each other, ‘The Reasons’ was co-designed for the Fenland context and was performed twice in 2016. It was then further adapted for use in the Korogocho slum in Nairobi for an event to discuss the issue of waste management with members of the local community, as part of an initiative with UN Live. ‘The Reasons’ is an attempt to bring together the advantages of digital storytelling as a reflective process with the social intimacy of the live storytelling event. The result is a new form of hybrid storytelling that seeks to build community and establish co-thinking processes to build resilience to environmental change. This article reflects critically upon the development and evolution of this work over the past five years.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/btwo_00047_1
2021-08-01
2022-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. African Population and Health Research Centre ( n.d.), https://aphrc.org/. Accessed 18 May 2021.
  2. Bakewell, Lyndsey,, Antonia, Liguori, and Michael, Wilson. ( 2018;), ‘ From Gallura to the Fens: Communities performing stories of water. ’, in L. Roberts, and K. Phillips. (eds), Water, Creativity and Meaning: Multidisciplinary Understandings of Human-Water Relationships, Earthscan Series. , London:: Routledge;, pp.7084.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg, Maggie, and Seeber, Barbara K.. ( 2016), The Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in the Academy, Toronto:: University of Toronto Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boal, Augusto. ( 1979), Theatre of the Oppressed, London:: Pluto Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brecht, Bertolt. ( 1966), Parables for the Theatre, London:: Penguin;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Di Nicola, Vincenzo. ( n.d.;,), ‘ Slow thought: A manifesto. ’, Aeon, https://aeon.co/essays/take-your-time-the-seven-pillars-of-a-slow-thought-manifesto. Accessed 2 July 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Drought Risk and You (DRY) ( n.d.,), http://dryproject.co.uk/. Accessed 18 May 2021.
  8. Honoré, Carl. ( 2004), In Praise of Slow, London:: Orion Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Honoré, Carl. ( 2005;), ‘ In praise of slowness. ’, TEDGlobal2005, July, https://www.ted.com/talks/carl_honore_in_praise_of_slowness?language=en#t-1138269. Accessed 18 May 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lambert, Joe. ( 2002), Digital Storytelling: Capturing Lives, Creating Community, Berkeley, CA:: Digital Diner Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Loughborough University ( n.d.;,), Storytelling Academy. , https://www.storytellingacademy.education. Accessed 18 May 2021.
  12. Ruiu, Maria Laura,, Maurizi, Sante,, Sassu, Simone,, Seddalu, Giovanna,, Zuin, Olga,, Blackmore, Chris, and Roggero, Pier Paolo. ( 2017;), ‘ Re-Staging La Rasgioni: Lessons learned from transforming a traditional form of conflict resolution to engage stakeholders in agricultural water governance. ’, Water, 9:4, p. 297, 10.3390/w9040297. Accessed 2 July 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Sobol, Joseph. ( 2020), Liars, Damn Liars and Storytellers, Knoxville, TN:: University of Tennessee Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Thomson, Peter. ( 1997), Mother Courage and Her Children, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. University of South Wales ( n.d.;,), George Ewart Evans Centre for Storytelling. , https://storytelling.research.southwales.ac.uk/. Accessed 18 May 2021.
  16. Wilson, Michael. ( 1997), Performance and Practice: Oral Narrative Traditions among Teenagers in Britain and Ireland, Aldershot:: Ashgate;.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wilson, Michael. ( 2014;), ‘ “Another fine mess”: The condition of storytelling in the digital age. ’, Narrative Culture, 1:2, pp. 12544.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Zipes, Jack. ( 1995), Creative Storytelling: Building Community, Changing Lives, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wilson, Michael. ( 2021;), ‘ Slow Storytelling and hybridity: Re-staging community storytelling as a tool for co-thinking. ’, Book 2.0, 11:1&2, pp. 10723, https://doi.org/10.1386/btwo_00047_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/btwo_00047_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/btwo_00047_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error