Skip to content
1981
Volume 11, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2050-0742
  • E-ISSN: 2050-0750

Abstract

This study explores how ideas of variety were created and practised among women and men of different social strata in Norway and Sweden before the big changes in the second half of the nineteenth century. Three researchers with in-depth knowledge of clothing during that period look at their material through questions they developed based on current clothing and sustainability discourse. The material consists of both written (diaries, inventories, etc.) and oral sources and clothes. We look at acquisition and use of clothes in the period of 1780–1850 to understand how variety was achieved to discuss whether historical research can inform today’s debate on clothing and the environment. Despite strong limitations in terms of regulations for trade, strict dressing codes, expensive textiles and a restricted economy, variety was achieved. An important prerequisite was that the fabrics themselves were seen as valuable and durable, while the shape, trimmings, accessories and the like could be varied. Buying new ready-made clothes was not yet an option. Access to clothes and accessories was an intricate web involving both caring, sharing (lending, renting, inheritance and shared access) and alterations done by amateurs and professionals. The wardrobe was a well-planned system with movement between occasions and over time, consisting of clothes with different functions and temporalities. The present debate with an emphasis on circular economy solutions and the industry as the main stakeholder overlook clothing as a complex cultural and historical phenomenon. Variety in clothes can be achieved in much less resource-intensive ways by focusing on more valuable fabrics.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Research Council of Norway (Award 315496)
© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/cc_00088_1
2025-10-24
2026-04-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. A Lady (1840), The Workwoman’s Guide, London: Simpkin, Marshall, and co.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. AIA:35 nr 1 (1819), Probate inventory, Ingeborg Jonsdotter, Sweden: Svegs tingslags häradsrätts arkiv, Riksarkivet Östersund.
  3. Aspinall, M. (2022), ‘Back to the future of fashion past: Re-fashioning future garment making’, in I. Cantista and D. Delille (eds), Fashion Heritage: Narrative and Knowledge Creation, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 81–112.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Banerjee, M. and Miller, D. (2003), The Sari, Oxford: Berg Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Baumgarten, L. (1998), ‘Altered historical clothing’, Dress, 25:1, pp. 42–57, https://doi.org/10.1179/036121198805297936.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Baumgarten, L. (2002), What Clothes Reveal: The Language of Clothing in Colonial and Federal America, Williamsburg, VA and New Haven, CT: The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation and Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Belk, R. (2010), ‘Sharing’, Journal of Consumer Research, 36:5, pp. 715–34, https://doi.org/10.1086/612649.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1986), ‘The forms of capital’, in J. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood, pp. 241–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Campbell, C. (1993), ‘Understanding traditional and modern patterns of consumption in eighteenth-century England: A character-action approach’, in U. Trunk, G. Harding-Rolls, X. Banegas and N. Urbancic (eds), Consumption and the World of Goods, London: Routledge, pp. 40–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Changing Markets Foundation (2021), ‘Fossil Fashion: The hidden reliance on fossil fuels’, http://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/FOSSIL-FASHION_Web-compressed.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2025.
  11. Changing Markets Foundation (2023), ‘Trashion: The stealth export of waste plastic clothes to Kenya’, http://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Trashion-Report-Web-Final.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2025.
  12. Christiansen, P. (1978), ‘Peasant adaptation to Borgeois culture’, Etnologica Scandinavica, 8, pp. 98–152.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. de Marly, D. (1987), Louis XIV & Versailles, London: B.T. Batsford Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. de Vries, J. (2008), The Industrious Revolution: Consumer Behavior and the Household Economy, 1650 to the Present, New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Døving, R. and Klepp, I. G. (2009), ‘Avlæring av ansvar: Normer og kunnskap om klær i skikk og bruk-bøker’, in K. Asdal and E. Jacobsen (eds), Forbrukernes ansvar, Oslo: Cappelen akademisk forlag, pp. 113–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Eicher, J. B. (ed.) (2010), Berg Encyclopedia of World Dress and Fashion, Oxford: Berg Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Eklund, B. (2016), Dräktalmanacka Boda socken, Dalarna, Uppsala: Institutet för språk och folkminnen.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Entwistle, J. (2000), The Fashioned Body: Fashion, Dress, and Modern Social Theory, Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Erdmann, N. (1926), Vid hovet och på adelsgodsen i 1700-talets Sverige: en tidskrönika, Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Fletcher, K. (2008), Sustainable Fashion & Textiles: Design Journeys, London: Earthscan.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Fletcher, K., Maldini, I., Klepp, I. G., Laitala, K., Måge, J. and Tobiasson, T. S. (2023), ‘Ecodesign position paper: Textiles and footwear’, Clothing Research, May, htps://clothingresearch.oslomet.no/ESPR-posion-paper. Accessed 1 April 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Foss, L. and Noss, A. (1973), Folkedrakt eller bunad, Norway: NRK.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Grostøl, A. (n.d.), Upublisert manuskript, Oslo: Norsk folkemuseum.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Hammar, B. and Rasmussen, P. (2001), Kvinnligt mode under två sekel, Lund: Bokförlaget Signum.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Haugen, B. S. H. (ed.) (2006), Norsk bunadleksikon, Oslo: Damm.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Haugen, B. S. H. (2009), ‘Folkelig motedrakt i Solør-Odal’, in L. A. Chumak, I. Aastebøl and K. S. Jacobsen (eds), Skoglandet: Solør-Odal, Kvinnemuseet: Museene i Glåmdal, pp. 55–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Haugen, B. S. H. (2014), ‘Virkningsfulle tekstiler – i østnorske bønders draktpraksiser på 1700-tallet’, Ph.D. thesis, Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Haugen, B. S. H. (2015), ‘En sanselig kjole’, Norsk museumstidsskrift, 1:1, pp. 7–32, https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-2525-2015-01-03.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Haugrønning, V., Klepp, I. G., Strandbakken, P., Laitala, K. and Throne-Holst, H. (2019), Leve av å reparere? En studie av økonomien i reparasjonsbransjen for klær og hvitevarer, Oslo: SIFO and OsloMet, http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12199/2878. Accessed 1 April 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Haugrønning, V. and Haugsrud, I. (2024), ‘Comparing male and female wardrobes: Gender dynamics in the practice of dressing’, in E. Jacobsen, P. Strandbakken, A. Dulsrud and S. E. Skuland (eds), Consumers and Consumption in Comparison, vol. 37, Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 139–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Haugsrud, I., Klepp, I. G. and Laitala, K. (2024), ‘Clothing care’, in C. E. Henninger, P. J. Alevizou, H. Goworek and D. Ryding (eds), Handbook on Sustainability in Fashion, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 47–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Holroyd, A. T., Gordon, J. F. and Hill, C. (2023), Historical Perspectives on Sustainable Fashion, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Hovland, B. (2014), Folkedrakter og bunader frå Sogn: Ei reise i tid og landskap, Leikanger: Skald.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Jensen, K. (2013), Beklædningsindustriens møde med globaliseringen: brancheorganisationer og individuelle virksomheder under pres, perioden 1960–2000, Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Kawamura, Y. (2005), Fashion-ology: An Introduction to Fashion Studies, Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Klepp, I. G. (2016), ‘Moten er død, leve kleda’, Syn og segn, 4:122, pp. 24–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Klepp, I. G. and Laitala, K. (2015), ‘His mother’s dress: Growth in the number of clothes’, in P. Strandbakken and J. Gronow (eds), The Consumer in Society, Oslo: Abstrakt forlag, pp. 311–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Klepp, I. G. and Laitala, K. (2018), ‘Shared use and owning of clothes: Borrow, steal, or inherit’, in I. S. Cruz, R. Ganga and S. Wahlen (eds), Contemporary Collaborative Consumption: Trust and Reciprocity Revisited, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 153–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Klepp, I. G., Haugrønning, V. and Laitala, K. (2022), ‘Local clothing: What is that? How an environmental policy concept is understood’, International Journal of Fashion Studies, 9:1, pp. 29–46, https://doi.org/10.1386/infs_00060_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Klepp, I. G., Fletcher, K., Maldini, I., Berg, L. L., Tobiasson, T. S., Måge, J. and Hvass, K. K. (2023), ‘Research briefing: Research input for policy development based on understanding of clothing consumption’, 15 March, pp. 1–9, https://clothingresearch.oslomet.no/research-briefing-on-clothing-consumption/. Accessed 19 August 2025.
  41. Knutsson, A. (2023), ‘Försäljning av utländska modevaror under 1700-talets sista decennier’, in M. Helsing and J. Ilmakunnas (eds), Shopping i Stockholm: Sociala praktiker på gatunivå, 1700–1850, Stockholm: Kriterium, pp. 154–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Koda, H. and Bolton, A. (2006), Dangerous Liaisons: Fashion and Furniture in the Eighteenth Century (ed. Metropolitan Museum of Art), New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Laitala, K. and Klepp, I. G. (2020a), Klær og miljø: Innkjøp, gjenbruk og vask, Oslo: SIFO and OsloMet, https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12199/3065. Accessed 1 April 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Laitala, K. and Klepp, I. G. (2020b), ‘What affects garment lifespans? International clothing practices based on wardrobe survey in China, Germany, Japan, the UK and the USA’, Sustainability, 12:21, 9151, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219151.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Laitala, K. and Klepp, I. G. (2022), ‘Review of clothing disposal reasons’, Clothing Research, 19 October, https://clothingresearch.oslomet.no/2022/10/19/review-of-clothing-disposal-reasons/. Accessed 1 April 2025.
  46. Lemire, B. (2011), Cotton, Oxford: Berg Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Lönnqvist, B. (1972), Dräkt och mode i ett landsbygdssamhälle 1870–1920, Helsingfors: Helsingfors universitet.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Lorenzen, E. and Thyrring, U. (1977), Folketøj på landet 1830–1880, Copenhagen: Arnold Busck.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Maldini, I. and Klepp, I. G (2025), ‘The EU textile strategy: How to avoid overproduction and overconsumption measures in environmental policy’, Journal of Sustainable Marketing, pp. 1–17, https://doi.org/10.51300/JSM-2025-141.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Maynard, M. (2013), ‘Fast fashion and sustainability’, in S. Black, A. de la Haye, J. Entwistle, A. Rocamora, R. Root and H. Thomas (eds), The Handbook of Fashion Studies, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Miller, D. (1998), A Theory of Shopping, Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Naturvårdsverket (2022), ‘Textilkonsumtion, kilo per person i Sverige’, Naturvårdsverket, https://www.naturvardsverket.se/data-och-statistik/textil/textilkonsumtion/. Accessed 1 April 2023.
  53. Neto, A. and Ferreira, J. (2023), ‘Lasting bonds: Understanding wearer-clothing relationships through interpersonal love-theory’, Fashion Theory, 27:5, pp. 677–707, https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704x.2023.2170706.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Niessen, S. (2020), ‘Fashion, its sacrifice zone, and sustainability’, Fashion Theory, 24:6, pp. 859–77, https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704x.2020.1800984.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Niinimäki, K., Peters, G., Dahlbo, H., Perry, P., Rissanen, T. and Gwilt, A. (2020), ‘The environmental price of fast fashion’, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1:4, pp. 189–200, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0039-9.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Noss, A. (1999), Klesskikk i Tinn i Telemark: frå tinndølklede til tinnbunad: kvinneklede, Oslo: Novus forlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Noss, A. (2003), Frå tradisjonell klesskikk til bunad i Vest-Telemark, Oslo: Novus forlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Noss, A. (2008), Stakkeklede i Setesdal: byklaren og valldølen, Oslo: Novus forlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Noss, A. (2010), Draktskikk i Aust-Telemark: mangfald og endring: Bø, Gransherad, Heddal, Hjartdal, Sauherad, Oslo: Novus forlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Noss, A. (2012), Kvinneklede i Sogn: døme på ein vestnorsk tradisjonell klesskikk, Oslo: Novus.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Payne, A. (2019), ‘Fashion futuring in the Anthropocene: Sustainable fashion as “taming” and “rewilding”’, Fashion Theory, 23:1, pp. 5–23, https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704x.2017.1374097.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Pedersen, K.-A. (2000), ‘Fra korsett til silikoninnlegg’, in L. H. Boe and A.-S. Hjemdahl (eds), Kropp og klær, Oslo: Norsk Folkemuseum, pp. 8–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Pedersen, K.-A. (2013), Folkedrakt blir bunad, Oslo: Cappelen Damm.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Persson, H. and Kindahl, A. (2009), Empirens döttrar: Kultur och mode under tidigt 1800-tal, Sweden: Bokforlaget Signum.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Rangström, L. (1997), Kläder för tid och evighet: Gustaf III sedd genom sina dräkter, Stockholm: Livrustkammaren.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Rasmussen, P. (2010), ‘Skräddaren, sömmerskan och modet: arbetsmetoder och arbetsdelning i tillverkningen av kvinnlig dräkt 1770–1830’, Ph.D. dissertation, Stockholm: Nordiska museets förlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Rasmussen, P. (2015), ‘Kläder för den moderiktiga damgarderoben: skräddares och sömmerskors arbete 1770–1830’, in M. Nockert (ed.), Konstnärlig kultur: Agnes Geijer och textilforskningen, Stockholm: Upplandsmuseet, pp. 265–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Rasmussen, P. (2016), ‘Recycling a fashionable wardrobe in the long eighteenth century in Sweden’, History of Retailing and Consumption, 2:3, pp. 193–222, https://doi.org/10.1080/2373518x.2016.1256738.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Rasmussen, P. (2021), ‘Mode och makt i frihetstidens hovdräkt’, in E. Severinsson and P. Warkander (eds), Modevetenskap: Nya perspektiv på mode, stil och estetik, Stockholm: Appell förlag, pp. 42–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Rasmussen, P. (2023), ‘Shoppingturer och shoppingupplevelser med Märta Helena Reenstierna vid sekelskiftet 1800’, in M. Hellsing and J. Ilmakunnas (eds), Shopping i Stockholm: Sociala praktiker på gatunivå, 1700–1850, Stockholm: Stockholmia förlag, pp. 30–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Reenstierna, M. H. (1993), Årstadagboken: journaler från åren 1793–1839, Stockholm: Generalstabens litografiska anstalts förlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Ricketts, L. and Skinner, B. (2023), Stop Waste Colonialism: Leveraging Extended Producer Responsibility to Catalyze a Justice-led Circular Textiles Economy, Ghana: The Or Foundation.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Riello, G. (2013), Cotton, The Fabric That Made the Modern World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Riello, G. and Rublack, U. (2019), The Right to Dress: Sumptuary Laws in a Global Perspective, 1200–1800, New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Rubach, S., Baxter, J., Berntsen, I. C., Lingås, D. B., Trezpecz, S. and Johansen, M. (2023), ‘Kunnskapsstatus for tekstiler og tekstilavfall i Norge’, Fredrikstad: NORSUS Norsk institutt for baerekraftsforskning, https://norsus.no/publikasjon/2023-kunnskapsstatus-fortekstiler-og-tekstilavfall-i-norge/. Accessed 1 April 2025.
  76. Sandberg, E. (1979), ‘Auksjoner i gamle dager’, in N. Historielag (ed.), Nes og Helgøya. Lokalhistorisk skrift, Nes på Hedmark: Historielaget, pp. 74–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Sigaard, A. S. and Laitala, K. (2023), ‘Natural and sustainable? Consumers’ textile fiber preferences’, Fibers, 11:2, https://doi.org/10.3390/fib11020012.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Simmel, G. (1904), ‘Fashion’, International Quarterly, 10:1, pp. 130–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Skauge, J. F. (2005), Folkedrakt – motedrakt – folkelig mote: Kvinnelig klesskikk i Orkdal fogderi og Trondheim by, 1790–1835, Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Smith, W. (2002), Consumption and the Making of Respectability, 1600–1800, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Solberg, H. (2023), ‘Første, andre tredje, solgt! En historisk undersøkelse av auksjonsne i Trondheim i august, oktober og desember 1797’, master’s thesis, Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3073067. Accessed 1 October 2024.
  82. Steorn, P. (2013), ‘Migrating motifs and productive instabilities: Images of fashion in eighteenth-century Swedish print culture’, Konsthistorisk tidskrift/Journal of Art History, 82:3, pp. 219–34, https://doi.org/10.1080/00233609.2013.822927.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Stobart, J. and Rothery, M. (2016), Consumption and the Country House, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Styles, J. and Vickery, A. (2007), Gender, Taste, and Material Culture in Britain and North America, 1700–1830, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Sundt, E. (1857), Om sædelighetstilstanden i Norge, Oslo: Pax forlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Svendsen, L. F. H. (2004), Mote. Et filosofisk essay, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Tarrant, N. (1996), The Development of Costume (Heritage: Care-Preservation-Management), Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Ulväng, M. (2012), Klädekonomi och klädkultur: böndernas kläder i Härjedalen under 1800–talet, Möklinta: Gidlunds förlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Ulväng, M. (2021), ‘Clothing economy and clothing culture: The farm wardrobe from a gendered perspective in nineteenth-century Sweden’, Gender & History, 33:2, pp. 365–89, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.12543.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Ulväng, M. (2024), ‘Kvalitet som ideal och strategi: Kappfabriken och konfektionsindustrins globalisering, 1940–70’, Historisk tidsskrift, 144:3, pp. 417–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Veblen, T. (1899), Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions, New York: Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/cc_00088_1
Loading
‘Creating’ variety without waste: Pre-industrial dress practices as inspiration for updating the sustainability discourse
Clothing Cultures 11, 125 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/cc_00088_1
/content/journals/10.1386/cc_00088_1
/content/journals/10.1386/cc_00088_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): apparel; clothing consumption; dress history; occasions; sustainability value; variety; wardrobe

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test