Remote proximity: Making immersive dance under COVID-19 lockdown | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 13, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2040-5669
  • E-ISSN: 2040-5677

Abstract

This article chronicles the various pivots one dance ensemble, Lenora Lee Dance, made in trying to bring our dance project to fruition under the COVID-19 pandemic and after both the murder of George Floyd and the spike in anti-Asian hate in the United States between 2020 and 2021. was intended to be an immersive, site-specific dance set throughout the courtyards, hallways and apartment interiors of the Ping Yuen public housing complex in San Francisco’s Chinatown in autumn 2020. The piece aimed to explore the lives of the residents and the history of their struggle for affordable housing and tenants’ rights, amidst a contemporary background of rising housing insecurity among communities of colour in San Francisco. We were three rehearsals into the project when COVID-19 hit the Bay Area in March 2020. This article documents our attempts to adapt from an immersive dance to an immersive screendance. I reflect upon the various options we moved through as the pandemic wore on, as well as the questions social distancing raised for us regarding the value of home, of sociality and also the value of remote dance performance. This article offers one case study, from an insider perspective, to understand wider artistic innovations this pandemic moment has initiated.

Together they board a boat that crosses the San Francisco Bay and pulls into Angel Island. They disembark and trek the mile to the Immigration Station. An immigration officer meets them and divides them into two groups. Names are called and individuals step forward, the rest are marched into the building in two streams. One stream goes to the women’s dormitory where earlier detainees are already settled; a man in a white medical coat enters and calls more names; these women are ushered to the medical examination room, the showers and the interrogation office. The new arrivees follow behind.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/chor_00049_1
2022-12-22
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anon. ( 2019;), Audience survey. , Within These Walls and Dreams of Flight, San Francisco, CA:.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Auslander, Philip. ( [1999] 2008), Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture, , 2nd ed.., London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bastos, Stephanie. ( 2019;), Audience survey. , Within These Walls and Dreams of Flight, San Francisco, CA:.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brannigan, Erin. ( 2011), Dancefilm: Choreography and the Moving Image, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Farman, Jason. ( 2012;), ‘ Mobile media performances as asynchronous embodiment. ’, The International Journal of Screendance, 2:1, pp. 4851.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Friedberg, Anne. ( 2009), The Virtual Window: From Alberti to Microsoft, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Healey, Sue. ( 2021;), ‘ Being seen: Screendance portraits. ’, interviewed by Siobhan Murphy, Dancehouse Melbourne, 23 July, https://soundcloud.com/dancehousemelbourne/dance-lens-focus-siobhan-1. Accessed 11 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Howard, Amy L.. ( 2014), More than Shelter: Activism and Community in San Francisco Public Housing, Minneapolis, MN:: University of Minnesota Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Jones, Amelia. ( 1997;), ‘ “Presence” in absentia: Experiencing performance as documentation. ’, Art Journal, 56:4, pp. 1118.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lai, H. Mark,, Lim, Genny, and Yung, Judy. ( 2014), Island: Poetry and History of Chinese Immigrants on Angel Island, 1910–1940, , 2nd ed.., Seattle, WA:: University of Washington Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Machon, Josephine. ( 2013), Immersive Theatres: Intimacy and Immediacy in Contemporary Performance, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Mikou, Ariadne. ( 2017;), ‘ Anarchitextures: Intermedial encounters on the screen. ’, The International Journal of Screendance, 8, pp. 7089.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Parish, Sarwang. ( 2019;), Audience survey. , Within These Walls and Dreams of Flight, San Francisco, CA:.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ritter, Julia M.. ( 2021), Tandem Dances: Choreographing Immersive Performance, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rosenberg, Douglas. ( 2015;), ‘ Video space: A site for choreography. ’, in V. Hunter. (ed.), Moving Sites: Investigating Site-Specific Dance Performance, New York:: Taylor and Francis;, pp. 14761.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Shapiro, Cedar Ranney. ( 2019;), Audience survey. , Within These Walls and Dreams of Flight, San Francisco, CA:.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Sillander, Kenneth. ( 2021;), ‘ Introduction: Qualifying sociality through values. ’, Anthropological Forum, 31:1, pp. 118.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Stahl, Jennifer. ( 2020;), ‘ Jacob Jonas has figured out the impossible: How to safely put on a live dance performance. ’, Dance Magazine, 20 May, https://www.dancemagazine.com/live-dance-performance-during-covid/. Accessed 11 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Stop AAPI Hate ( 2020;), ‘ Home page. ’, https://stopaapihate.org. Accessed 1 June 2022.
  20. Vansynghel, Margo. ( 2020;), ‘ Seattle drive-in dance event is part scavenger hunt, part performance. ’, Crosscut, 29 April, https://crosscut.com/2020/04/seattle-drive-dance-event-part-scavenger-hunt-part-performance. Accessed 11 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kwan, SanSan. ( 2022;), ‘ Remote proximity: Making immersive dance under COVID-19 lockdown. ’, Choreographic Practices, 13:2, pp. 16578, https://doi.org/10.1386/chor_00049_1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/chor_00049_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error