Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Choreographic Practices
  4. Volume 15, Issue 1
  5. Article
Differing Bodyminds: Cripping Choreography
  • ISSN: 2040-5669
  • E-ISSN: 2040-5677

Abstract

Representation of ‘differing bodyminds’ in dance has expanded how dancing bodies are imagined. Examining two performances in Helsinki, Finland, and through collaborative autoethnography we consider in what ways these works might choreograph for disabled spectators. We argue that choreography addressing disability and neurodivergence that does not consider the diverse access needs of spectators, risks creating hermeneutical injustice. This occurs when individuals experience harm due to their inability to understand or articulate their own experiences. Hermeneutical injustice is characterized by inequitable access to disability knowledge and a declarative approach to access where performances, venues and artists claim to be accessible for spectators without attention to what is necessary for access. Through this process, spectators without access needs have more access to the choreographic knowledge of disability. We alternate our experiences of these performances with reflections on spectator access and draw on framing materials to provide context. We focus on how the performance choreographs for disabled spectators – relating our own embodied experiences and observations as audience members. Ultimately, cripping choreography cannot just involve onstage representation; it must consider and welcome the disabled spectator.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The Fulbright Finland Foundation
© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/chor_00074_1
2024-09-09
2024-10-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Albright, A. C. (2010), Choreographing Difference: The Body and Identity in Contemporary Dance, Middleton, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Allsopp, R. and Lepecki, A. (2008), ‘Editorial: On choreography’, Performance Research, 13:1, pp. 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1080/13528160802465409.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ames, M. (2015), ‘Dancing place/disability’, Theatre Research International, 40:2, pp. 170–85, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0307883315000048.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Aujla, I. J. and Redding, E. (2013), ‘Barriers to dance training for young people with disabilities’, British Journal of Special Education, 40:2, pp. 80–85, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12021.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Aujla, I. J. and Redding, E. (2014), ‘The identification and development of talented young dancers with disabilities’, Research in Dance Education, 15:1, pp. 54–70, https://doi.org/10.1080/14647893.2012.721762.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Baltic Circle A (n.d.), ‘rampa landscape: lazy, late, absent’, https://www.balticcircle.fi/en/ohjelmisto/rampa-landscape-lazy-late-absent/. Accessed 9 February 2024.
  7. Baltic Circle B (n.d.), ‘rampa landscape accessibility information’, https://www.balticcircle.fi/en/rampa-landscapes-accessibility-information/. Accessed 9 February 2024.
  8. Baltic Circle C (n.d.), ‘rampa productions working group’, https://www.balticcircle.fi/en/rampa-productions-working-group/. Accessed 9 February 2024.
  9. Baltic Circle D (n.d.),  ‘Coming Stage’, https://www.balticcircle.fi/en/hankkeet/coming-stage/. Accessed 13 February 2024.
  10. Barnes, C. (2003), ‘Effecting change? Disability, culture and art’, Finding the Spotlight Conference, Liverpool Institute for the Performing Arts, Liverpool, UK, 28–31 May, https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/Barnes-Effecting-Change.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Botha, M., Chapman, R., Giwa Onaiwu, M., Kapp, S. K., Stannard Ashley, A. and Walker, N. (2024), ‘The neurodiversity concept was developed collectively: An overdue correction on the origins of neurodiversity theory’, Autism, 28:6, pp. 1591–94, https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613241237871.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Brand, S. A., Lindsay, G., Neelands, J. and Freakley, V. (2011), ‘Disabled students in the performing arts: Are we setting them up to succeed?’, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15:9, pp. 891–908, https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903452903.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Chang, H. (2008), Autoethnography as Method, Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F. and Hernandez, K.-A. C. (2012), Collaborative Autoethnography, Abingdon: Taylor and Francis Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Cheesman, S. (2011), ‘Facilitating dance making from a teacher’s perspective within a community integrated dance class’, Research in Dance Education, 12:1, pp. 29–40, https://doi.org/10.1080/14647893.2011.554976.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dolmage, J. (2017), Academic Ableism: Disability and Higher Education, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Dupagne, M. P. (2020), International Relaxed Performance Study, 2018–2020, Paris: Cinema Difference.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Ellcessor, E. (2016), Restricted Access, Media, Disability and the Politics of Participation, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ellis, C., Adams, T. E. and Bochner, A. P. (2011), ‘Autoethnography: An overview’, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12:1, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-12.1.1589.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Ellis, C. and Bochner, A. P. (2000), ‘Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject’, in N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 733–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Fricker, M. (2007), Epistemic Injustice: Power and Ethics of Knowing, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Fritsch, K. (2012), ‘Crip cuts: On the boundary work of enacting disability’, Annual Meeting of the Society for Disability Studies, Denver, CO, 20–23 June.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Fryer, L. and Cavallo, A. (2022), Integrated Access in Live Performance, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Garland-Thomson, R. (2009), Staring: How We Look, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Graeae (n.d.), ‘Access’, https://graeae.org/accessibility/. Accessed 10 February 2024.
  26. Greenberg, S. (2023), Animated Film and Disability: Cripping Spectatorship, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Hadley, B. (2020), ‘Allyship in disability arts: Roles, relationships, and practices’, Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 25:2, pp. 178–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Halliday, Z., Scullion, T. and Watson, A. (2021), House Lights Up! Researching Relaxed Performance for Neurodivergent Audiences in Scotland, Glasgow: Federation of Scottish Theatre and Birds of Paradise Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Hamraie, A. (2017), Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Heim, C. (2016), Audience as Performer: The Changing Role of Theatre Audiences in the Twenty-First Century, Milton Park: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Henner, J. (2023), ‘I need disability advocates who just discovered the concept of access friction to also remember that regardless of what the friction is in a specific situation, if you’re coming down on the side of the status quo then take a few steps back’, Twitter, 3 April, https://twitter.com/jmhenner/status/1642712135607123970. Accessed 23 April 2024.
  32. Janina Rajakangas Project (n.d.), ‘Dancer’, https://www.janinarajakangas.com/active-projects/dancer. Accessed 9 February 2024.
  33. Karhunen, M. (2020), ‘Yhdenvertaisuuden korjausvelka’, Liitos, 4, pp. 9–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Katsui, H. (2020), ‘The global disability rights realisation in Finland: Deinstitutionalization of persons with intellectual disabilities’, in H. Katsui and S. Chalken (eds), Disability, Globalization and Human Rights, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 61–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Kempe, A. (2015), ‘Widening participation in theatre through “relaxed performances”’, New Theatre Quarterly, 31:1, pp. 59–69, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X15000068.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Kendrick, L. (2011), ‘Applied aurality: Noise and the aesthetics of access in Graeae’s Reasons to Be Cheerful’, in L. Kendrick and D. Roesner (eds), Theater Noise: The Sound of Performance, Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 174–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Kiasma – Finnish National Gallery (n.d.), ‘Janina Rajakangas Project: Dancer’, https://kiasma.fi/en/performances/janina-rajakangas-project-dancer/. Accessed 9 February 2024.
  38. Kliën, M. (2008), ‘Choreography as an aesthetic of change’, Ph.D. dissertation, Edinburgh: Edinburgh College of Art.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Kuppers, P. (2001), ‘Deconstructing images: Performing disability’, Contemporary Theatre Review, 11:3–4, pp. 25–40, https://doi.org/10.1080/10486800108568636.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Kuppers, P. (2014), Studying Disability Arts and Culture: An Introduction, New York: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Kuppers, P. (2015), ‘Waltzing disability culture: Moving history with Raimund Hoghe’, Choreographic Practices, 6:1, pp. 41–57, https://doi.org/10.1386/chor.6.1.41_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Lapadat, J. C. (2017), ‘Ethics in autoethnography and collaborative autoethnography’, Qualitative Inquiry, 23:8, pp. 589–603, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704462.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Lazard, C. (2019), Accessibility in the Arts: The Promise and the Practice, New York: Recess, https://promiseandpractice.art/. Accessed 29 January 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Leon, A. (2022), Expanded Choreographies: Choreographic Histories: Trans-Historical Perspectives Beyond Dance and Human Bodies in Motion, Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Lindell, F. N. (2023), ‘19.9. ja 20.9: Esityksiä ja yleisökeskusteluja’ (‘Performances and artist talks on 19 and 20 September’), Janina Rajakangas Project, 19 September, https://www.janinarajakangas.com/dancer-notes-fin-tanssija-muistiinpanot/199-ja-209-esityksi-ja-yleiskeskustelua. Accessed 5 May 2024.
  46. MacLennan, K., O’Brian, S. and Tavassoli, T. (2021), ‘In our own words: The complex sensory experiences of autistic adults’, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52:7, pp. 3061–75, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05186-3.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. McRuer, R. (2013), Crip Theory, Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability, New York: NYU Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Miller, L. J., Schoen, S. A., Mulligan, S. and Sullivan, J. (2017), ‘Identification of sensory processing and integration symptom clusters: A preliminary study’, Occupational Therapy International, 2017:1, pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2876080.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Mingus, M. (2011), ‘Access intimacy, the missing link’, Leaving Evidence, 5 May, https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2011/05/05/access-intimacy-the-missing-link/. Accessed 14 January 2024.
  50. Østern, T. P. and Øyen, E. (2015), ‘Moving through change’, Choreographic Practices, 6:1, pp. 125–44, https://doi.org/10.1386/chor.6.1.125_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Phillips, P. (2011), ‘Spectator, audience, response’, in J. Neimes (ed.), Introduction to Film Studies, 5th ed., Milton Park: Taylor & Francis, pp. 113–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Potter, S. (2013), The Relaxed Performance Project Evaluation, London: The Relaxed Performance Project.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. rampa productions (2024), rampa landscape: lazy, late, absent, facilitated by I. Hukka, produced by N. Varga, Baltic Circle Festival, Iiris Centre, Helsinki, 20 November.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Rouhiainen, L. and Heimonen, K. (2024), ‘Motifs and insights: Textual choreography, dance studies and local conditions in Finland’, in L. Rouhiainen, K. Heimonen, R. Hilton and C. Parkinson (eds), Writing Choreography: Textualities of and Beyond Dance, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 9–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Sandahl, C. (2003), ‘Queering the crip or cripping the queer? Intersections of queer and crip identities in solo autobiographical performance’, GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 9:1–2, pp. 25–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Sandahl, C. (2018), ‘Disability art and culture: A model for imaginative ways to integrate the community’, Alter: The European Journal of Disability Research, 12:2, pp. 79–93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2018.04.004.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Siebers, T. (2010), Disability Aesthetics, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Simpson, H. (2018), ‘Tics in the theatre: The quiet audience, the relaxed performance, and the neurodivergent spectator’, Theatre Topics, 28:3, pp. 227–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Solvang, P. K. (2012), ‘From identity politics to dismodernism? Changes in the social meaning of disability arts’, Alter: The European Journal of Disability Research, 6:3, pp. 178–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Thom, J. (2016), ‘Relaxed performances: The FAQs’, Touretteshero, 16 March, https://www.touretteshero.com/2016/03/16/relaxed-performances-the-faqs/. Accessed 9 February 2024.
  61. Thom, J. (2023), ‘Don’t relax your commitment!’, Touretteshero, 26 October, https://www.touretteshero.com/2023/10/26/dont-relax-your-commitment/. Accessed 9 February 2024.
  62. Titchkosky, T. (2011), The Question of Access: Disability, Space, Meaning, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Väätäinen, H. (2023), ‘Ableism in dance and disabled dancers’, in K. Monni, R. Laakso and H. Järvinen (eds), Dance Arts: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Practices, Publication Series of the Theatre Academy, 79, Helsinki: Theatre Academy, University of the Arts Helsinki, https://disco.teak.fi/tanssin-historia/en/ableism-in-dance-and-disabled-dancers/. Accessed 10 February 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Van Goidsenhoven, L., Rutgeerts, J. and Sandahl, C. (2022), ‘Differing bodyminds: Cripping choreography’, Choreographic Practices, 13:2, pp. 197–202.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Walker, N. (2021), Neuroqueer Heresies: Notes on the Neurodiversity Paradigm, Autistic Empowerment and Postnormal Possibilities, Fort Worth, TX: Autonomous Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Whatley, S. (2007), ‘Dance and disability: The dancer, the viewer and the presumption of difference’, Research in Dance Education, 8:1, pp. 5–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Whatley, S. (2010), ‘The spectacle of difference: Dance and disability on screen’, The International Journal of Screendance, 1:1, pp. 41–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Zodiak (n.d.), ‘Janina Rajakangas Project: Dancer’, https://www.zodiak.fi/en/programme/dancer. Accessed 9 February 2024.
/content/journals/10.1386/chor_00074_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): choreography; cripping; disability; Finland; relaxed performance; spectatorship

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error