Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Choreographic Practices
  4. Volume 15, Issue 1
  5. Article
Differing Bodyminds: Cripping Choreography
  • ISSN: 2040-5669
  • E-ISSN: 2040-5677

Abstract

This is an autoethnographic article that unpicks the author’s experiences of navigating the form and the social world of contact improvisation (CI) as a crip bodymind that routinely passes as normative and (very) ‘able’. Drawing on fieldnotes made across a year of practising and studying CI in London, it considers what kind of subjectivities and social relations this dance form summons, encourages and constitutes. This article proposes that the ideal subject of CI is characterized by vitality, agility, intense desire, openness to risk, an ability to attune to oneself and to others and a combination of self-reliance and willingness (and capacity) to cooperate. The article draws parallels and (dis)continuities between these features and the aspects of subjecthood fostered by late capitalist ‘risk society’ and the risk subjects it conjures. It then enquires whether this ideal subject is compatible with certain neurodivergent and other crip ways of being-in-the-world. The article proceeds to consider how, and if, space can be made in CI for what is ironically defined here as the ‘wimp’ subject: less disposed to embrace risk; not adept at quick decision-making; not thrill-seeking, and easily overwhelmed by sensory and nervous stimulation.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/chor_00075_1
2024-09-09
2024-10-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aitchison, Jean and Lewis, Diana (1995), ‘How to handle wimps: Incorporating new lexical items as an adult’, Folia Linguistica, 29:1–2, pp. 7–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Ben (2023), ‘1. Introduction: Concepts otherwise’, in B. Anderson, S. Aitken, J. Bacevic, F. Callard, K. D. (Mitsy) Chung, K. S. Coleman, R. F. Hayden Jr, S. Healy, R. L. Irwin, T. Jellis, J. Jukes, S. Khan, S. Marotta, D. K. Seitz, K. Snepvangers, A. Staples, C. Turner, J. Tse, M. Watson and E. Wilkinson, ‘Encountering Berlant part one: Concepts otherwise’, Geographical Journal, 189:1, pp. 117–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Baraitser, Lisa (2017), Enduring Time, London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Beck, Ulrich (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (trans. M. Ritter), London and Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Beck, Ulrich (2000), The Brave New World of Work, Cambridge: Polity.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Berlant, Lauren (2007), ‘On the case’, Critical Inquiry, 33:4, pp. 663–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Berlant, Lauren (2011), Cruel Optimism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Berlant, Lauren (2015), ‘Structures of unfeeling: Mysterious skin’, International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 28:3, pp. 191–213.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Binkley, Sam (2009), ‘The work of neoliberal governmentality: Temporality and ethical substance in the tale of two dads’, Foucault Studies, 6, pp. 60–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Boltanski, Luc and Chiapello, Eve (2007), The New Spirit of Capitalism, London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Coffey, Amanda and Atkinson, Paul (eds) (1996), Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies, London: SAGE.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cooper Albright, Ann (2013), ‘Feeling in and out: Contact improvisation and the politics of empathy’, in G. Brandstetter, G. Egert and S. Zubarik (eds), Touching and Being Touched: Kinesthesia and Empathy in Dance and Movement, Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter, pp. 263–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Curtis, Jess (2020), ‘“The way you look (at me) tonight”: Touch tours, haptic practices, and sensory strategies’, in M. Sarco-Thomas (ed.), Thinking Touch in Partnering and Contact Improvisation: Philosophy, Pedagogy, Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 10–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cvejić, Bojana and Laberenz, Lennart (2012), ‘…in a non-wimpy way’, Vimeo, https://vimeo.com/76095626. Accessed 19 July 2024.
  15. Dymoke, Katy (2023), Inclusive Dance: The Story of Touchdown Dance, Bristol: Intellect.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellis, Carolyn and Bochner, Arthur P. (2000), ‘Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 733–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Foucault, Michel (2008), The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie (1997), Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature, New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie (2011), ‘Misfits: A feminist materialist disability concept’, Hypatia, 26:3, pp. 591–609.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Giddens, Anthony (1990), The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Granovetter, Mark (1973), ‘The strength of weak ties’, American Journal of Sociology, 78:6, pp. 1360–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Hamraie, Aimi and Fritsch, Kelly (2019), ‘Crip technoscience manifesto’, Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 5:1, pp. 1–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hancock, David (2019), The Countercultural Logic of Neoliberalism, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Hennessy, Keith (2018), Questioning Contact Improvisation, San Francisco, CA: Circo Zero.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Ingold, Tim (1993), ‘The temporality of the landscape’, World Archaeology, 25:2, pp. 152–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kafer, Alison (2013), Feminist, Queer, Crip, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Khan, Salman (2022), ‘10. Attrition and the negative’, in B. Anderson, S. Aitken, J. Bacevic, F. Callard, K. D. (Mitsy) Chung, K. S. Coleman, R. F. Hayden Jr, S. Healy, R. L. Irwin, T. Jellis, J. Jukes, S. Khan, S. Marotta, D. K. Seitz, K. Snepvangers, A. Staples, C. Turner, J. Tse, M. Watson and E. Wilkinson, ‘Encountering Berlant part one: Concepts otherwise’, Geographical Journal, 189:1, pp. 117–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee, Wendy Anne (2018), Failures of Feeling: Insensibility and the Novel, Redwood, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lorde, Audre (1988), A Burst of Light, Ithaca, NY: Firebrand Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Lyotard, Jean-François (1993), Libidinal Economy, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. McRuer, Robert (2006), Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Melkumova-Reynolds, Jana (2021), ‘“Eating, sleeping, drinking fashion”: Subjectivity, space, time and affect in the work of fashion agents’, Ph.D. thesis, London: King’s College London.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Melkumova-Reynolds, Jana (2024a), ‘On crutches, choreography and (crip) care: Curative objects and palliative things in two performance pieces’, in D. Woolley, F. Johnstone, E. Sampson and P. Chambers (eds), Wearable Objects and Curative Things: Materialist Approaches to the Intersections of Fashion, Art, Health and Medicine, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 33–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Melkumova-Reynolds, Jana (2024b), ‘On the cusp of something huge: Anticipatory subjectivities in freelance fashion work’, Time & Society, online first, https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X241258520.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Melville, Herman ([1853] 1969), ‘Bartleby’, in W. Berthoff (ed.), Great Short Works of Herman Melville, New York: Harper and Row, pp. 39–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Ngai, Sianne (2005), Ugly Feelings, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Novack, Cynthia J. (1990), Sharing the Dance: Contact Improvisation and American Culture, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Papaioannou, Chrys (forthcoming), ‘The cruel optimism of contact improvisation: Dancing between neoliberal subjectivation and practices of commoning’, Maska: The Performing Arts Journal.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Price, Margaret (2015), ‘The bodymind problem and the possibilities of pain’, Hypatia, 30:1, pp. 268–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Puwar, Nirmal (2021), ‘Carrying as method: Listening to bodies as archives’, Body & Society, 27:1, pp. 3–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Ramazanoglu, Caroline (2002), Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices, London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Rose, Nikolas (1992), ‘Governing the enterprising self’, in P. Morris and P. Heelas (eds), The Values of the Enterprise Culture: The Moral Debate, London: Routledge, pp. 141–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Samuels, Ellen (2017), ‘Six ways of looking at crip time’, Disability Studies Quarterly, 37:3, https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v37i3.5824.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Sandahl, Carrie (2003), ‘Queering the crip or cripping the queer? Intersections of queer and crip identities in solo autobiographical performance’, GLQ, 9:1–2, pp. 25–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Sennett, Richard (1998), The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism, New York: Norton.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Sennett, Richard (2006), The Culture of the New Capitalism, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Stark Smith, Nancy (1987), ‘Editor note’, Contact Quarterly, 10:2, p. 3.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Watts Belser, Julia (2019), ‘Improv and the angel: Disability dance, embodied ethics, and Jewish Biblical narrative’, Journal of Religious Ethics, 47:3, pp. 443–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. ‘Wimp, n.²’ (2024), OED, https://www.oed.com/dictionary/wimp_n2?tab=meaning_and_use#14526897. Accessed 19 July 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/chor_00075_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): autoethnography; crip; improvisation; neurodivergence; risk; subjectivity; wimp

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error