Splenic thinking: A speculative provocation in performance and practice

References

1. Anzaldúa, Gloria (1987), Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza, San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barad, Karen (2007), Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chauchat, Alice and Ingvartsen, Mette (2009), ‘Everybodys Berlin, November 2009’, in Everybodys Group Self-Interviews, n.p.: Everybodys Publications, pp. 1–10, http://www.metteingvartsen.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2009--everybodys--publiction--group-self-interviews-copy.pdf. Accessed 23 April 2025.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Connolly, William E. (2002), Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed, Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Crawley, Ashon T. (2017), Blackpentecostal Breath: The Aesthetics of Possibility, New York: Fordham University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Esposito, Roberto (2012), Terms of the Political: Community, Immunity, Biopolitics (trans. R. N. Welch), New York: Fordham University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Gesturing Towards Decolonial Futures (GTDF) (n.d.), ‘“Compass” questions’, GTDF, https://decolonialfutures.net/compass-questions/. Accessed 14 April 2025.
8. Gray, Henry (1854), On the Structure and Use of the Spleen, London: John W. Parker.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Lecercle, Jean-Jacques (2002), Deleuze and Language, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Mackinlay, Elizabeth (2019), Critical Writing for Embodied Approaches: Autoethnography, Feminism and Decoloniality, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Massumi, Brian and Manning, Erin (2014), Thought in the Act: Passages in the Ecology of Experience, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Nony, Anaïs (2024), ‘Care as invention: A tribute to Bernard Stiegler’, in B. Buseyne (eds), Memory for the Future: Thinking with Bernard Stiegler, London: Bloomsbury Press, pp. 53–62.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Puig de la Bellacasa, María (2017), Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds, Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Robles, Nicolas R. (2023), ‘Baudelaire’s spleen’, Hektoen International: A Journal of Medical Humanities, Frontispiece, 15:2, Spring, https://hekint.org/2023/02/16/baudelaires-spleen/. Accessed 20 April 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Roth, Moira (1990), ‘Archives of American art: Women in the arts in Southern California’, oral history interview with Suzanne Lacy, 16 March–27 September, Oral History Project, Berkeley, CA, transcript, Smithsonian, Archives of American Art, https://www.aaa.si.edu/download_pdf_transcript/ajax?record_id=edanmdm-AAADCD_oh_215585. Accessed 20 April 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Sempert, Mattie-Martha (2021), ‘The white coat’, in Sweet Spots: Writing the Connective Tissue of Relation, Santa Barbara, CA: Punctum Books, pp. 61–73.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Stiegler, Bernard (2020), ‘Elements for a general organology’, Derrida Today, 13:1, pp. 72–94, https://doi.org/10.3366/drt.2020.0220.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Strauss, Carolyn F. (2021), ‘Seeking radical affection’, in C. F. Strauss (eds), Slow Spatial Reader: Chronicles of Radical Affection, Amsterdam: Valiz, pp. 15–21.
    [Google Scholar]