Skip to content
1981
Volume 16, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2040-5669
  • E-ISSN: 2040-5677

Abstract

Inspired by historic protests in India’s capital city, New Delhi, queer and Sikh choreographer Mandeep Raikhy devised in 2020. is a performance work and an archive that exists as a series of short reels, posts and story highlights on Instagram. This article analyses as a dissident social practice and the dancing body as a mode of dissent against majoritarian nationalism. I critically reflect on the notion of secularism in the Indian context and where it stands in reference to the rising religious fundamentalist politics in India. I ask: How is secularism embodied and enacted by its citizens, both in private and public spaces, in contemporary India? How does the dancing body intervene or help us understand the values of a democracy shifting into an authoritarian regime? I employ ethnographic research methods – participant observation, qualitative interviewing and field notes – with choreographic analysis of the work on social media to address the politics of secularism and corporeal dissent in this work. I argue that Raikhy’s choreographic work not only brings activism and dance together but also exemplifies the connection between individual dissent and desired collectivity for social change.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • UCLA International Institute Fieldwork Fellowship
© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/chor_00096_1
2026-02-20
2026-04-17

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bayraktar, S. (2019), ‘Choreographies of dissent and the politics of public space in the state-of-emergency Turkey’, Performance Philosophy, 5:1, pp. 90–108, https://doi.org/10.21476/pp.2019.51269.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhattacharya, A., Raj, P. and Pathak, N. (2023), ‘Average 30 farmer suicides per day in Modi govt years points to a systemic apathy’, The Wire, 18 December, https://thewire.in/agriculture/average-30-farmer-suicides-per-day-in-modi-govt-years-points-to-a-systemic-apathy. Accessed 26 November 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler, J. (2015), ‘Bodies in alliance and the politics of the street’, Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, pp. 66–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Chatterjea, A. (2004), ‘In search of a secular in contemporary Indian dance: A continuing journey’, Dance Research Journal, 36:2, pp. 102–16, https://doi.org/10.2307/20444595.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Geertz, C. (1973), ‘Thick description: Towards an interpretive theory of culture’, The Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books Inc, pp. 3–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. India Inclusive India Inclusive (2021), ‘Voices of dissent: Romila Thapar’, YouTube, 9 October, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v803leLM0Kg. Accessed 29 September 2025.
  7. Kannuri, N. K. and Jadhav, S. (2021), ‘Cultivating distress: Cotton, caste and farmer suicides in India’, Anthropology & Medicine, 28:4, pp. 558–75, https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2021.1993630.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Karwaan Heritage (2021), ‘Defining dissent | Prof. Romila Thapar’, YouTube, 16 May, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdL5d0qAWos. Accessed 29 September 2025.
  9. Kedhar, A. (2020), ‘Choreographing tolerance: Narendra Modi, Hindu nationalism, and International Yoga Day’, Race and Yoga, 5:1, pp. 42–58, https://doi.org/10.5070/R351046987.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee, J. (2021), Deceptive Majority: Dalits, Hinduism, and Underground Religion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Lepecki, A. (2013), ‘Choreopolice and choreopolitics: Or, the task of the dancer’, TDR: The Drama Review, 57:4, pp. 13–27, https://doi.org/10.1162/DRAM_a_00300.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Manning, E. (2007), Politics of Touch: Sense, Movement, Sovereignty, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Nandy, A. (1997), ‘The twilight of certitudes: Secularism, Hindu nationalism, and other masks of deculturation’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 22:2, pp. 157–76, https://doi.org/10.1177/030437549702200201.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Narthaki Official (2021), ‘Dance India Today: In conversation with Mandeep Raikhy’, YouTube, 14 March, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrJ-yKgSJd8&list=PLawHnKB4UjotvTtPFU7mD42FEq2ac_nDo&index=4. Accessed 29 September 2025.
  15. Needham, A. D. and Rajan, R. S. (eds) (2007), The Crisis of Secularism in India, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Prakash, G. (2007), ‘Secular nationalism, Hindutva, and the minority’, in A. D. Needham and R. S. Rajan (eds), The Crisis of Secularism in India, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 177–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Raikhy, M. (2020), ‘The Secular Project’, https://mandeepraikhy.wordpress.com/thesecularproject/. Accessed 29 January 2024.
  18. Raikhy, M. (2022), personal interview with S. Sharma, Vasant Kunj, Delhi, 29 July.
  19. Schechner, R. (1994), ‘Ritual and performance’, in T. Ingold (ed.), Common Encyclopedia of Anthropology, London: Routledge, pp. 613–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Setalvad, T. (2022), ‘CAA-NPR-NRC: The law is being weaponised against the constitution’, The Wire, 24 November, https://thewire.in/government/caa-npr-nrc-the-law-is-being-weaponised-against-the-constitution. Accessed 29 September 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Speakola (n.d.), ‘Babasaheb Ambedkar: “Why is the idea of Union completely affected from this Resolution?”, Anti-Partition Speech to parliament on Constitution – 1949: 17 December 1946, Constituent Assembly, Delhi, India’, Speakola, https://speakola.com/political/dr-b-r-ambedkar-speech-to-parliament-constitution-1949. Accessed 29 September 2025.
  22. Tejani, S. (2007), ‘Reflections on the category of secularism in India: Gandhi, Ambedkar, and the ethics of communal representation, c. 1931’, in A. D. Needham and R. S. Rajan (eds), The Crisis of Secularism in India, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 45–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Thapar, R. (2007), ‘Secularism, history, and contemporary politics in India’, in A. D. Needham and R. S. Rajan (eds), The Crisis of Secularism in India, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 191–207.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Thapar, R. (2020), Voices of Dissent, Calcutta: Seagull Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Thapar, R., Noorani, A. G. and Menon, S. (2016), On Nationalism, New Delhi: Aleph Book Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. The Secular Project [@thesecularproject] (2020a), ‘Instagram’, https://www.instagram.com/thesecularproject/. Accessed 28 September 2025.
  27. The Secular Project [@thesecularproject] (2020b), ‘Secular as shared skin’, Instagram, 27 December, https://www.instagram.com/p/CJS6JKKpuP4/. Accessed 28 September 2025.
  28. The Secular Project [@thesecularproject] (2021a), ‘Breaking culture’, Instagram, 13 November, https://www.instagram.com/p/CWOP-3AFxFW/. Accessed 28 September 2025.
  29. The Secular Project [@thesecularproject] (2021b), ‘Down with Islamophobia’, Instagram, 12 August, https://www.instagram.com/p/CSeHg2TlUjg/. Accessed 28 September 2025.
  30. The Secular Project [@thesecularproject] (2021c), ‘If we march long enough’, Instagram, 25 February, https://www.instagram.com/p/CLvPoAeJP4r/. Accessed 28 September 2025.
  31. The Secular Project [@thesecularproject] (2021d), ‘In search of a ritual’, Instagram, 9 February, https://www.instagram.com/p/CLGD4HcJd7b/. Accessed 28 September 2025.
  32. The Secular Project [@thesecularproject] (2021e), ‘Sowing seeds for a better tomorrow’, Instagram, 10 July, https://www.instagram.com/p/CRJwnZgFwCI/. Accessed 28 September 2025.
  33. The Secular Project [@thesecularproject] (2021f), ‘Unki Saans Chal Rahi Thi’, Instagram, 4 March, https://www.instagram.com/p/CMBkqwkFyf4/. Accessed 28 September 2025.
  34. The Secular Project [@thesecularproject] (2022), ‘The dance of independence’, 15 August, Instagram, https://www.instagram.com/p/ChSNBvsFXZv/. Accessed 28 September 2025.
  35. Upadhyay, N. (2020), ‘Hindu nation and its queers: Caste, Islamophobia, and de/coloniality in India’, Interventions, 22:4, pp. 464–80, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801x.2020.1749709.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/chor_00096_1
Loading
Imagining choreography as a dissident social practice in contemporary dance in India
Choreographic Practices 16, 197 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1386/chor_00096_1
/content/journals/10.1386/chor_00096_1
/content/journals/10.1386/chor_00096_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): assembly; corporeal dissent; majoritarian nationalism; performative action; public space; secularism; social media

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test