Does communication studies have an identity? Setting the bases for contemporary research | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1757-1898
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1901

Abstract

This article is a reflection on the identity of communication research, motivated by what we perceive as an important need for consolidating our field of study. It therefore takes the form of a self-inquiry into the nature of communication research. Whereas the field of communication has expanded and consolidated, its identity continues to be problematic. At this moment, communication studies is defined as a field rather than as a science; we would argue, however, that we have enough features to be something more than a field. This is the central argument of this article: communication research is more than a field but less than a science. Why are we more than a field? Why aren't we a real science? What exactly are the meanings of science and field? We will first consider the importance of the identity issue; second, we will list the main features of communication research in order to justify our identity as something other than a field. Finally, we will propose a multidisciplinary theoretical base for performing communication research in our contemporary period.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs.1.1.15_1
2009-08-01
2024-03-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs.1.1.15_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): cognition; communication studies; culture; epistemology; ontology; paradigm
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error