Photographic public sphere: Identity building with vernacular photography

References

1. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., and Vinitzky, G.. ( 2010;), ‘ Social network use and personality. ’, Computers in Human Behavior, 26:6, pp. 1289–95.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barthes, R.. ( [1980] 1981), Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, New York:: Hill and Wang;.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bazin, A.. ( [1945] 1981;), ‘ The ontology of the photographic image. ’, in A. Trachtenberg. (ed.), Classic Essays on Photography, New Haven, CT:: Leete’s Island Books;, pp. 237–44.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blanchard, A., and Markus, M. L.. ( 2004;), ‘ The experienced “sense” of a virtual community: Characteristics and processes. ’, ACM SIGMIS Database, 35:1, pp. 64–79.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Blustein, J.. ( 2008), The Moral Demands of Memory, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chalfen, R.. ( 1987), Snapshot Versions of Life, Bowling Green, OH:: Bowling Green State University Popular Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cobley, P., and Haeffner, N.. ( 2009;), ‘ Digital cameras and domestic photography: Communication, agency and structure. ’, Visual Communication, 8:2, SAGE Journals , pp. 123–46.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fredrickson, B. L., and Roberts, T.-A.. ( 1997;), ‘ Objectification theory. ’, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21:2, pp. 173–206.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Frosh, P., and Pinchevski, A.. ( 2009;), ‘ Introduction: Why media witnessing? Why now?. ’, in P. Frosh, and A. Pinchevski. (eds), Media Witnessing; Testimony in the Age of Mass Communication, Hampshire:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 1–19.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Garde-Hansen, J.. ( 2014;), ‘ Friendship photography: Memory, mobility and social networking. ’, in L. Jonas, and M. Sandbye. (eds), Digital Snaps: The New Face of Digital Photography, London:: I.B. Tauris;, pp. 78–108.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Goffman, E.. ( 1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York:: Doubleday;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gosling, S. D.,, Augustine, A. A.,, Vazire, S.,, Holtzman, N., and Gaddis, S.. ( 2011;), ‘ Manifestations of personality in online social networks: Self-reported Facebook-related behaviors and observable profile information. ’, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14:9, pp. 483–88.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ito, M., and Okabe, D.. ( 2005), ‘Intimate Visual Co-presence’, unpublished paper presented at the 2005 Ubiquitous Computing Conference, Tokyo https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/49f3/e69d80fc014b5544aa0a61b3511bd9dff22d.pdf. Accessed 8 November 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Lange, P. G.. ( 2011;), ‘ Video-mediated nostalgia and the aesthetics of technical competencies. ’, Visual Communication, 10:1, pp. 25–44.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Larsen, J.. ( 2014;), ‘ The (im)mobile life of digital photographs: The case of tourist photography. ’, in L. Jonas, and M. Sandbye. (eds), Digital Snaps: The New Face of Digital Photography: London:: I.B. Tauris;, pp. 25–46.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Larsen, J., and Sandbye, M.. ( 2014;), ‘ Introduction: The new face of snapshot photography. ’, in L. Jonas, and M. Sandbye. (eds), Digital Snaps: The New Face of Digital Photography, London:: I.B. Tauris;, pp. xv–xxxii.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lee, D.-H.. ( 2010;), ‘ Digital cameras, personal photography and the reconfiguration of spatial experiences. ’, The Information Society, 26:4, Taylor & Francis Online , pp. 266–75.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lister, M.. ( 2014;), ‘ Overlooking, rarely looking and not looking. ’, in L. Jonas, and M. Sandbye. (eds), Digital Snaps: The New Face of Digital Photography, London:: I.B. Tauris;, pp. 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Litt, E., and Hargittai, E.. ( 2014;), ‘ Smile, snap, and share? A nuanced approach to privacy and online photo-sharing. ’, Poetics, 42, pp. 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lyu, S. O.. ( 2016;), ‘ Travel selfies on social media as objectified self-presentation. ’, Tourism Management, 54, June, pp. 185–95.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mäkiranta, M.. ( 2012;), ‘ Photography as family ritual: Visual narratives in a Finnish family photo album. ’, Visual Culture and Gender, 7:2012, pp. 39–48.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Malinen, S.. ( 2016;), ‘ Sociability and sense of community among users of online services. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Tampere:: Tampere University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Matikainen, J., and Villi, M.. ( 2015;), ‘ Aktiivinen yleisö? Tutkimus yleisön asenteista sisällön tuottamista ja jakelua sekä verkossa osallistumista kohtaan. ’ (‘An active audience? An end-user survey on the attitudes towards producing and sharing content online’) , Media and viestintä, 38:2015, p. 3, Media- ja viestintätieteellinen seura .
    [Google Scholar]
24. Moore, K., and McElroy, J. C.. ( 2012;), ‘ The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret. ’, Computers in Human Behavior, 28:1, pp. 267–74.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Morlot, E.. ( 2013;), ‘ Nostalgic consumption behaviours among young generations in photography. A comparative approach of Instagram and analogue photography. ’, MA dissertation, Umeå:: Umeå School of Business and Economics.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Näsi, A.. ( 2014;), ‘ The reader’s image: Amateur photographs in the Finnish newspaper. ’, in R. Brusila, and H. Vanhanen. (eds), Integrated Media in Change, Rovaniemi, Lapland University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Papacharissi, Z.. ( 2010), A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, New York:: Taylor and Francis;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Peters, J. D.. ( 2001;), ‘ Witnessing. ’, Media, Culture and Society, 23:707, pp. 707–23.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Petronio, S.. ( 2002), Boundaries of Privacy: Dialects of Disclosure, Albany:: State University of New York Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Poletti, A., and Rak, J.. ( 2014;), ‘ Introduction: Digital dialogues. ’, in A. Poletti, and J. Rak. (eds), Identity Technologies: Constructing the Self Online, Madison, WI:: University of Wisconsin Press;, pp. 3–22.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Prieto-Blanco, P.. ( 2016;), ‘ (Digital) photography, experience and space in transnational families. ’, in E. Gómez Cruz, and A. Lehmuskallio. (eds), Digital Photography and Everyday Life: Empirical Studies on Material Visual Practices, Oxon and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 122–40.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Rose, G.. ( 2010), Doing Family Photography: The Domestic, the Public and the Politics of Sentiment, Farnham and Burlington, VT:: Ashgate;.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Rose, G.. ( 2014;), ‘ How digital technologies do family snaps, only better. ’, in L. Jonas, and M. Sandbye. (eds), Digital Snaps: The New Face of Digital Photography, London:: I.B. Tauris;, pp. 67–86.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Ross, C.,, Orr, E. S.,, Sisic, M.,, Arseneault, J. M.,, Simmering, M. G., and Orr, R. R.. ( 2009;), ‘ Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. ’, Computers in Human Behavior, 25:2, pp. 578–86.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Rotman, D.,, Goldpeck, J., and Preece, J.. ( 2009;), ‘ The community is where the rapport is: On sense and structure in the YouTube community. ’, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies (CandT ’09), New York, June 2009, ACM Digital Library , pp. 41–49.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Rotman, D., and Wu, P.. ( 2014;), ‘ Sense of community in virtual environments. ’, in B. Leimeister, and J. M. Rajagopalan. (eds), Virtual Communities, Armonk, NY:: ME Sharpe;, pp. 36–48.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Rubinstein, D., and Sluis, K.. ( 2008;), ‘ A life more photographic; mapping the networked image. ’, Photographies, 1:1, pp. 9–28.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Sandbye, M.. ( 2014;), ‘ Play, process and materiality in Japanese Purikura. ’, in L. Jonas, and M. Sandbye. (eds), Photography: Digital Snaps: The New Face of Digital Photography, London:: I.B. Tauris;, pp. 109–30.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Sarvas, R., and Frohlich, D. M.. ( 2011), From Snapshots to Social Media: The Changing Picture of Domestic Photography, London:: Springer-Verlag;.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Schreiber, M.. ( 2015;), ‘ “The smartphone is my constant companion”: Digital photographic practices and the elderly. ’, in L. Kramp,, N. Carpentier,, A. Hepp,, I. Tomanić Trivundža,, H. Nieminen,, R. Kunelius,, T. Olsson,, E. Sundin, and R. Kilborn. (eds), Journalism, Representation and the Public Sphere, Bremen:: Edition lumière;, pp. 105–15.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Siibak, A.. ( 2009;), ‘ Constructing the self through the photo selection: Visual impression management on social networking websites. ’, Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3:1, p. 1.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Slater, D.. ( 1995;), ‘ Domestic photography and digital culture. ’, in M. Lister. (ed.), The Photographic Image in Digital Culture, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 129–46.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Snyder, M.. ( 1974;), ‘ Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. ’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30:4, American Psychological Association , pp. 526–37.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Sontag, S.. ( 1978), On Photography, New York:: Farrar, Straus and Giroux;.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Stebbins, R. A.. ( 1992), Amateurs, Professionals and Serious Leisure, Montreal:: McGill-Queen’s Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Stefanone, M. A.,, Lackaff, D., and Rosen, D.. ( 2011;), ‘ Contingencies of self-worth and social-networking-site behaviour. ’, Cyberpsychology, Behaviour and Social Networking, 14:1&2, pp. 41–49.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Tait, S.. ( 2011;), ‘ Bearing Witness, Journalism and, Moral Responsibility. ’, Media, Culture and Society, 33:8, pp. 1221–35.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Takala, T., and Lämsä, ja A.-M.. ( 2001;), ‘ Tulkitseva käsitetutkimus organisaatio- ja johtamistutkimuksen tutkimusmetodologisena vaihtoehtona’ (‘An English abstract: Interpretative study of concepts as a methodological alternative in the field of organization and management research’). , Liiketaloudellinen aikakauskirja, 50:3, pp. 371–90, http://lta.lib.aalto.fi/2001/3/lta_2001_03_s4.pdf. Accessed 12 April 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Van Dijck, J.. ( 2008;), ‘ Digital photography: Communication, identity, memory. ’, Visual Communication, 7:1, pp. 57–76.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Van House, N.. ( 2011;), ‘ Personal photography, digital technologies and the uses of the visual. ’, Visual Studies, 26:2, pp. 125–34.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Van House, N.. ( 2016;), ‘ Outlook. Photographic wayfaring, now and to come. ’, in E. Gómez Cruz, and A. Lehmuskallio. (eds), Digital Photography and Everyday Life: Empirical Studies on Material Visual Practices, Oxon and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 275–83.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Van House, N., and Davis, M.. ( 2005;), ‘ The social life of cameraphone images. ’, Proceedings of the Ubicomp 2005 Workshop on Pervasive Image Capture and Sharing: New Social Practices and Implications for Technology (PICS 2005), Tokyo, 11 September.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Venema, R., and Lobinger, K.. ( 2017;), ‘ “And somehow it ends up on the Internet”: Agency, trust and risks in photo-sharing among friends and romantic partners. ’, First Monday, 22:7, 3 July, https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/7860. Accessed 8 April 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Villi, M.. ( 2014;), ‘ Distance as the new punctum. ’, in L. Jonas, and M. Sandbye. (eds), Digital Snaps: The New Face of Photography, London:: I.B. Tauris;.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Wang, R.,, Yang, F., and Haigh, M. M.. ( 2017;), ‘ Let me take a selfie: Exploring the psychological effects of posting and viewing selfies and groupies on social media. ’, Telematics and Informatics, 34:4, pp. 274–83.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Näsi, Altti. ( 2020;), ‘ Photographic public sphere: Identity building with vernacular photography. ’, Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 12:1, pp. 21–36, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs_00012_1
    [Google Scholar]