Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies
  4. Volume 12, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1757-1898
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1901

Abstract

Interactivity is among the main characteristics of online journalism because it helps to build bridges between the media, journalists and the users to whom the news is directed. This article, based on in-depth interviews with 35 journalists, examines the concept of interaction as understood by media sources in Colombia, Peru and Ecuador. These three countries are culturally and historically similar and have similar levels of Internet access. Most of the journalists indicated that they have adjusted their practice to incorporate some aspects of Internet-based interaction, such as social network presence and increased transparency to users. However, the media organizations for which they work have adopted few such procedures and maintain limited capacity to manage online participation. The journalists expressed their desire for the development of further ways to facilitate interaction with users.

© 2020 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00016_1
2020-04-01
2025-12-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, C. W.. ( 2011;), ‘ Deliberative, agonistic, and algorithmic audiences: Journalism’s vision of its public in an age of audience transparency. ’, International Journal of Communication, 5, pp. 529–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Arboleda, P. B., and Aristizábal, J. F.. ( 2018;), ‘ Estudio jurisprudencial constitucional sobre la libertad de expresión y prensa en Colombia: medios de comunicación, censura y autocensura. ’, Revista de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas, 48:129, pp. 375–400.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Arévalo, J.. ( 2015;), ‘ Derecho a la comunicación y libertad de expresión en el Perú. ’, Canalé, 6, pp. 9–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Armstrong, C., and Gao, F.. ( 2010;), ‘ Now tweet this: How news organizations use Twitter. ’, Electronic News, 4:4, pp. 218–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Barredo, D.,, De la Garza, D.,, Freundt-Thurne, Ú.,, Pinto, K. T., and Días, D. L.. ( 2018;), ‘ Cuestionando la existencia del prosumer en Iberoamérica. Un estudio sobre los universitarios de Colombia, Perú, Chile y España. ’, Revista Letral, 20, pp. 183–205.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Barredo, D., and Díaz-Cerveró, E.. ( 2017;), ‘ La interactividad en el periodismo digital latinoamericano. Un análisis de los principales cibermedios de Colombia, México y Ecuador (2016). ’, Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 72, pp. 273–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Barredo, D.,, Palomo, B.,, Mantilla, A., and Gard, C.. ( 2015;), ‘ Una encuesta exploratoria para cuantificar la influencia de las redes sociales en las rutinas profesionales de los periodistas ecuatorianos: reflexiones sobre la mediamorfosis del Ecuador (2014). ’, Disertaciones, 8:1, pp. 52–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Blasco, T., and Otero, G.. ( 2008;), ‘ Técnicas conversacionales para la recogida de datos en investigación cualitativa: La entrevista (I). ’, Nure investigación, 33, pp. 2–5.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Broekhuizen, T., and Hoffmann, A.. ( 2012;), ‘ Interactivity perceptions and online newspaper preference. ’, Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12:2, pp. 29–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bruns, A.. ( 2009), Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production, New York:: Peter Lang;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Casero, A.. ( 2012;), ‘ Más allá de los diarios: el consumo de noticias de los jóvenes en la era digital. ’, Comunicar, 20:39, pp. 152–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Domingo, D.. ( 2008;), ‘ Interactivity in the daily routines of online newsrooms: Dealing with an uncomfortable myth. ’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13:3, pp. 680–704.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. García, D., and Abuín, N.. ( 2019;), ‘ The use of hypertextuality, multimedia, interactivity and updating on the websites of Spanish political parties. ’, Communication & Society, 32:1, pp. 351–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. García de Torres, E.. ( 2011), Cartografía del periodismo participativo, Valencia:: Tirant Lo Blanch;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. González, M. S., and Ortells, B. S.. ( 2012;), ‘ La polivalencia periodística de los profesionales en las redes sociales. ’, Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 18, pp. 455–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Grosser, K. M.,, Hase, V., and Wintterlin, F.. ( 2017;), ‘ Trustworthy or shady? Exploring the influence of verifying and visualizing user-generated content (UGC) on online journalism’s trustworthiness. ’, Journalism Studies, 20:4, pp. 500–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gutiérrez Coba, L.,, Prada, R.,, Valderrama, J.,, García, V.,, Guzmán, A., and Forero, A.. ( 2010;), ‘ Las condiciones laborales y la satisfacción de los periodistas colombianos. ’, Investigación y Desarrollo, 18:1, pp. 24–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Heise, N.,, Loosen, W.,, Reimer, J., and Hinrik, J.. ( 2014;), ‘ Including the Audience: Comparing the attitudes and expectations of journalists and users towards participation in German TV news journalism. ’, Journalism Studies 15:4, pp. 411–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hernández, F. J.. ( 2015;), ‘ E-SQ-MEDIA, creación e implementación de una escala de medición de la calidad percibida en cibermedios. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Lleida:: Universitat de Lleida.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Jahng, M. R., and Littau J.. ( 2016;), ‘ Interacting is believing: Interactivity, social cue, and perceptions of journalistic credibility on Twitter. ’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93:1, pp. 38–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Jönson, A. M., and Örnebring, H.. ( 2011;), ‘ User-generated content and the news: Empowerment of citizens or interactive illusion?. ’, Journalism Practice, 5:2, pp. 127–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Ksiazek, T. B.. ( 2015;), ‘ Civil interactivity: How news organizations’ commenting policies explain civility and hostility in user comments. ’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59:4, pp. 556–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Lawrence, R.,, Radcliffe, D., and Schmidt, T.. ( 2018;), ‘ Practicing engagement. ’, Journalism Practice, 12:10, pp. 1220–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Lewis, S. C.. ( 2012;), ‘ The tension between professional control and open participation. Journalism and its boundaries. ’, Information, Communication & Society, 15:6, pp. 836–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. López, X.. ( 2010), La metamorfosis del periodismo: Historia de lo que permanece y de lo que cambia en el ciberperiodismo del tercer milenio, Sevilla:: Comunicación Social Ediciones y Publicaciones;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Meso, K.. ( 2013;), ‘ Periodismo y audiencias: inquietudes sobre los contenidos generados por los usuarios. ’, Cuadernos.info, 33, pp. 63–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Mitchelstein, E., and Boczkowski, P.. ( 2009;), ‘ Between tradition and change: A review of recent research on online news production. ’, Journalism, 10:5, pp. 562–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Oller, M., and Barredo, D.. ( 2013), Las culturas periodísticas intermedias: Estudios comparativos internacionales en Periodismo, La Laguna:: Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Oriella, P.. ( 2010), Estudio Periodismo Digital 2010 Blogs, aplicaciones y pago por contenidos ¿Cómo está cambiando el mundo digital la forma de trabajar de periodistas y editoriales?, Barcelona:: Canela Public Relations;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Parmelee, J. H.,, Roman, N.,, Beasley, B., and Perkins, S. C.. ( 2018;), ‘ Comparing interactivity on Twitter by political reporters at TV networks, online-only news websites, and newspapers. ’, Electronic News, 12:3, pp. 151–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Reporteros sin Fronteras ( 2019;), ‘ Clasificación mundial 2019. La libertad de prensa en el mundo. ’, Reporteros sin Fronteras, https://www.rsf-es.org/grandes-citas/clasificacion-por-paises/. Accessed 27 November 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Rodríguez, J. G., and Sánchez, A.. ( 2017;), ‘ TIC y pobreza en América Latina. ’, Íconos: Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 57, pp. 141–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Rodríguez, R.,, Codina, L., and Pedraza, R.. ( 2012;), ‘ Indicadores para la evaluación de la calidad en cibermedios: análisis de la interacción y de la adopción de la Web 2.0. ’, Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 35:1, pp. 61–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Rodríguez, R., and Pedraza, R.. ( 2009;), ‘ Prensa digital y Web 2.0. ’, Hipertext.net, 7, https://www.upf.edu/hipertextnet/numero-7/prensa-digital.html. Accessed 18 September 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Salaverría, R., and García-Avilés, J. A.. ( 2008;), ‘ La convergencia tecnológica en los medios de comunicación: retos para el periodismo. ’, Trípodos, 23, pp. 31–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Scolari, C.. ( 2008), Hipermediaciones: elementos para una teoría de la comunicación digital interactiva, Barcelona:: Gedisa;.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Singer, J. B.. ( 2014;), ‘ User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. ’, New Media & Society, 16:1, pp. 55–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Taylor, S. J.,, Bogdan, R., and DeVault, M.. ( 2015), Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource, , 4th ed.., New York:: John Wiley & Sons;.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Toffler, A.. ( 1980), The Third Wave, New York:: Bantam;.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Trámpuz, J. P., and Barredo, D.. ( 2018;), ‘ Convergencia y medios universitarios: Una aproximación al nuevo escenario ecuatoriano. ’, Opción, 86, pp. 898–923.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. World Bank ( n.d.a;), ‘ GDP (current US$). ’, World Bank Data, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD. Accessed 27 November 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. World Bank ( n.d.b;), ‘ GINI index (World Bank estimate). ’, World Bank Data, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI. Accessed 27 November 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. World Bank ( n.d.c;), ‘ Individuals using the Internet (% of population). ’, World Bank Data, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.ZS. Accessed 27 November 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. World Bank ( n.d.d;), ‘ Population, total. ’, World Bank Data, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL. Accessed 27 November 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Yang, F., and Shen, F.. ( 2018;), ‘ Effects of web interactivity: A meta-analysis. ’, Communication Research, 45:5, pp. 635–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Zeng, M. A.,, Dennstedt, B., and Koller, H.. ( 2016;), ‘ Democratizing journalism: How user-generated content and user communities affect publishers’ business models. ’, Creativity and Innovation Management, 25:4, pp. 536–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Barredo-Ibáñez, Daniel,, Pinto-Garzón, Karen Tatiana,, Freundt-Thurne, Úrsula, and Medranda-Morales, Narcisa Jessenia. ( 2020;), ‘ Interaction and user-generated content on online informative platforms: A comparison of journalists in Colombia, Peru and Ecuador. ’, Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 12:1, pp. 99–117, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs_00016_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00016_1
Loading
Interaction and user-generated content on online informative platforms: A comparison of journalists in Colombia, Peru and Ecuador1
Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies 12, 99 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs_00016_1
/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00016_1
/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00016_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Colombia; Ecuador; journalism; online interaction; Peru; user-generated content

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test