Digital transformation of doing documentary: Committed documentary and the knitting of networks of co-creation

References

1. Aguayo, A.. ( 2005;), ‘ Documentary and social change: An investigation of participatory media cultures. ’, University of Texas Libraries, http://www.library.utexas.edu/etd/d/2005/aguayoa11349/aguayoa11349.pdf. Accessed 21 November 2019.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aston, J.. ( 2017;), ‘ Interactive documentary and live performance: From embodied to emplaced interaction. ’, in M. Rose,, S. Gaudenzi, and J. Aston. (eds), The Evolving Practices of Interactive Documentary, New York:: Wallflower Columbia University Press;, pp. 222–36.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aston, J., and Gaudenzi, S.. ( 2012;), ‘ Interactive documentary: Setting the field. ’, Studies in Documentary Film, 6:2, pp. 125–39.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Aston, J., and Odorico, S.. ( 2018;), ‘ The poetics and politics of polyphony: Towards a research method for interactive documentary. ’, Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media, 15, pp. 63–93.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Castells, M.. ( 2013), Communication Power, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cizek, K.. ( n.d.;), ‘ Manifesto for interventionist media: Because art is a hammer. ’, NFB, https://www.nfb.ca/playlists/katerina_cizek/manifesto-interventionist-media-bec/. Accessed 21 November 2019.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cizek, K., and Uricchio, W.. ( 2019a;), ‘ Collective wisdom: Co-creating media with communities, across disciplines and with algorithms. ’, Works in Progress, https://wip.mitpress.mit.edu/collectivewisdom/. Accessed 21 July 2019.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cizek, K., and Uricchio, W.. ( 2019b;), ‘ Collective wisdom: Executive report. ’, MIT PubPub, May, https://wip.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/collective-wisdom-exec-sum-biographies/release/3. Accessed 4 June 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Couldry, N.. ( 2012), Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice, Cambridge and Malden, MA:: Polity;.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Court, M.,, Lerner, R., and Melo, S.. ( 2015;), ‘ The Quipu Project. ’, Proyecto Quipu, https://interactive.quipu-project.com/#/es/quipu/intro. Accessed 21 November 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Daniel, S.. ( 2011;), ‘ Collaborative systems: Redefining public art. ’, in M. Lovejoy,, C. Paul, and V. Vesna Bulajić. (eds), Context Providers: Conditions of Meaning in Media Arts, Bristol:: Intellect;, pp. 55–83.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Daniel, S.. ( 2012;), ‘ On politics and aesthetics: A case study of “Public Secrets” and “Blood Sugar”. ’, Studies in Documentary Film, 2:2, pp. 215–27.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Daniel, S.. ( 2014;), ‘ Argument, inquiry and political narrative: Navigating an aesthetics of database documentary. ’, in M. Soar, and M. Gagnon. (eds), Database | Narrative | Archive, http://dnaanthology.com/anvc/dna/case-study-public-secrets-and-blood-sugar. Accessed 21 November 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dourish, P.. ( 2001), Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Finneran, P.. ( 2015;), ‘ Documentary impact: Social change through storytelling. ’, http://s3.amazonaws.com/assets.hotdocs.ca/doc/HD14_Documentary_Impact_Report.PDF. Accessed 26 September 2020.
16. Gaudenzi, S.. ( 2013;), ‘ The living documentary: From representing reality to co-creating reality in digital interactive documentary. ’, Ph.D. thesis, London:: Goldsmith University;.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gaventa, J.. ( 1980), Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley, Oxford:: Clarendon Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hight, C.. ( 2014;), ‘ Shoot, edit, share: Cultural software and user-generated documentary practice. ’, in K. Nash,, C. Hight, and C. Summerhayes. (eds), New Documentary Ecologies: Emerging Platforms, Practices and Discourses, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 129–236.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Howes, D.. (ed.) ( 2004), Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader, Oxford:: Berg;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jenkins, H.. ( 2006), Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, New York:: New York Univ. Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Law, J.. ( 1999;), ‘ After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. ’, in J. Law. (ed.), Actor Network Theory and After, Oxford:: Blackwell;, pp. 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Low, C.. ( 1967), The Fogo Island Film Series, Montreal:: National Film Board of Canada;.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Media Ecology Association ( 2009;), ‘ What is media ecology?. ’, https://www.media-ecology.org/What-Is-Media-Ecology. Accessed 26 September 2020.
24. Mill, J. S.. ( [1861] 2003), Utilitarianism: And, on Liberty, Oxford, MA:: Blackwell Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Mitchell, M.. ( 2015;), ‘ Where voice and listening meet: Participation in and through interactive documentary in Peru. ’, Glocal Times, 22&23, pp. 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Nash, K., and Corner, J.. ( 2016;), ‘ Strategic impact documentary: Contexts of production and social intervention. ’, European Journal of Communication, 31:3, p. 227–42.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Nash, K.,, Hight, C., and Summerhayes, C.. (eds) ( 2014), New Documentary Ecologies: Emerging Platforms, Practices and Discourses, New York:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Pink, S.. ( 2009), Doing Sensory Ethnography, London:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Renov, M.. ( 2012;), ‘ Towards a poetic of documentary. ’, in M. Renov. (ed.), Theorizing Documentary, Hoboken, NJ:: Taylor and Francis;, pp. 12–36.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Rose, M.. ( 2014;), ‘ Documentary as DIY citizenship. ’, in M. Ratto, and M. Bolder. (eds), DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media, Boston, MA:: MIT Press;, pp. 201–12.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Rose, M.. ( 2017;), ‘ Not media about, but media with: Co-creation for activism. ’, in S. Gaudenzi,, M. Rose, and J. Aston. (eds), I-docs: The Evolving Practices of Interactive Documentary, New York:: Wallflower;, pp. 49–65.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Tucker, K., and Brown, M.. ( 2014a;), ‘ The Quipu Project. ’, Proyecto Quipu, http://interactive.quipu-project.com/#/en/quipu/intro. Accessed 21 November 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Tucker, K., and Brown, M.. ( 2014b;), ‘ The Quipu project: Participatory story-telling can help rebuild community in post-authoritarian societies. ’, Policy Briefing 4/2014, Bristol:: University of Bristol;.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Tucker, K., and Brown, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ The Quipu Project by numbers. ’, Facebook, 21 February, https://www.facebook.com/quipuproject/photos/a.687367184692983/1641157302647295/?type=3&theater. Accessed 27 September 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Wiehl, A.. ( 2019), The Digital Moment in Interactive Documentary, Hamburg:: Avinus;.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Winston, B.,, Vanstone, G., and Chi, W.. ( 2017), The Act of Documenting: Documentary Film in the 21st Century, New York:: Bloomsbury Academic;.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Wintonick, P.. ( 2007;), ‘ Doc the world. ’, Point of View Magazine, 65, n.pag.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Zimmermann, P., and DeMichiel, H.. ( 2013;), ‘ Documentary as open space. ’, in B. Winston. (ed.), The Documentary Film Book, Basingstoke:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 355–65.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Anna, Wiehl. ( 2020;), ‘ Digital transformation of doing documentary: Committed documentary and the knitting of networks of co-creation. ’, Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 12:2, pp. 181–196, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs_00026_1
    [Google Scholar]