Skip to content
1981
Beyond Climate Change Information: Communicating the Anthropocene
  • ISSN: 1757-1898
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1901

Abstract

Greta Thunberg pushed forward a new collective action frame for the climate movement with the necessary resonance to mobilize millions of people. However, the coronavirus outbreak forced Thunberg to adjust her strategy in an abrupt way, and the resonance of the activist’s frame decreased after achieving its peak in 2019. How has Thunberg’s frame evolved before, during and after the pandemic? Can we attribute the loss of resonance to a failed frame adaptation? This article studies the composition and resonance of the Swedish activist’s frame on Twitter between August 2018 and December 2022, making use of a methodological design that combines qualitative and quantitative methods to analyse 61 public interventions and 1692 tweets. The results show that, despite adapting successfully to the pandemic, the loss of the core elements of the original frame provoked a misalignment between her framing strategy and her storytelling, which reduced Thunberg’s ability to provide resonance.

© 2023 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00090_1
2023-10-10
2026-04-17

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ackland, R. and O’Neil, M. (2011), ‘Online collective identity: The case of the environmental movement’, Social Networks, 33:3, pp. 177–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.03.001.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Antonakaki, D., Fragopoulou, P. and Ioannidis, S. (2021), ‘A survey of Twitter research: Data model, graph structure, sentiment analysis and attacks’, Expert Systems with Applications, 164, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114006.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Auer, M. R. (2021), ‘Covid-19 crisis communications: The challenge for environmental organizations’, Environmental Science & Policy, 115, pp. 151–55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.009.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Benford, R. D. and Snow, D. A. (1994), ‘Marcos de acción colectiva y campos de identidad en la construcción social de los movimientos’, in J. Gusfield and E. L. Rodríguez-Cabello (eds), Los nuevos movimientos sociales: De la ideología a la identidad, Madrid: CIS, pp. 221–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Benford, R. D. and Snow, D. A. (2000), ‘Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment’, Annual Review of Sociology, 26:1, pp. 611–39, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett, W. L. and Segerberg, A. (2012), ‘The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics’, Information, Communication & Society, 15:5, pp. 739–68, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Boulianne, S. (2015), ‘Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research’, Information, Communication & Society, 18:5, pp. 524–38, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cassell, K. (2021), ‘The comparative effectiveness of populist rhetoric in generating online engagement’, Electoral Studies, 72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102359.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, K., Molder, A. L., Duan, Z., Boulianne, S., Eckart, C., Mallari, P. and Yang, D. (2022), ‘How climate movement actors and news media frame climate change and strike: Evidence from analyzing Twitter and news media discourse from 2018 to 2021’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 28:2, pp. 384–413, https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221106405.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Di Gangi, P. and Wasko, M. (2016), ‘Social media engagement theory: Exploring the influence of user engagement on social media usage’, Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 28:2, pp. 53–73, https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2016040104.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Díaz-Pérez, S. (2020), El futuro en llamas: Greta Thunberg y Fridays for Future, Barcelona: Beers & Politics, pp. 80–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Díaz-Pérez, S., Soler-i-Martí, R. and Ferrer-Fons, M. (2021), ‘From the global myth to local mobilization: Creation and resonance of Greta Thunberg’s frame’, Comunicar, 29:68, pp. 35–45, https://doi.org/10.3916/C68-2021-03.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Espejel-Gómez, L. and Hidalgo-Toledo, J. (2020), ‘Discursos de Greta Thunberg: Análisis de contenido y su impacto en YouTube’, Sintaxis, 1:5, pp. 46–61, https://doi.org/10.36105/stx.2020n5.03.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Flam, H. and King, D. (2007), Emotions and Social Movements, Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fridays for Future (2022), ‘Strikes statistics’, 31 August, https://fridaysforfuture.org/what-we-do/strike-statistics/list-of-countries/. Accessed 8 January 2023.
  16. Hamdi, S. A. (2022), ‘Mining ideological discourse on Twitter: The case of extremism in Arabic’, Discourse & Communication, 16:1, pp. 76–92, https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211043706.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Jung, J., Petkanic, P., Nan, D. and Kim, J. H. (2020), ‘When a girl awakened the world: A user and social message analysis of Greta Thunberg’, Sustainability, 12:7, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072707.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Kang, G. J., Ewing-Nelson, S. R., Mackey, L., Schlitt, J. T., Marathe, A., Abbas, K. M. and Swarup, S. (2017), ‘Semantic network analysis of vaccine sentiment in online social media’, Vaccine, 35:29, pp. 3621–38, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.052.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Laraña, E. (1999), La construcción de los movimientos sociales, Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee, F. L. F. and Man-Chan, J. (2016), ‘Digital media activities and mode of participation in a protest campaign: A study of the Umbrella Movement’, Information, Communication & Society, 19:1, pp. 4–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1093530.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Leung, L. E. (2020), ‘The Greta effect: How does Greta Thunberg use the discourse of youth in her movement for climate justice?’, bachelor dissertation, Calgary: University of Calgary, https://bit.ly/38HcgPe. Accessed 21 December 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Mattar, S. D., Jafry, T., Schröder, P. and Ahmad, Z. (2021), ‘Climate justice: Priorities for equitable recovery from the pandemic’, Climate Policy, 21:10, pp. 1307–17, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1976095.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. McCammon, H. (2013), ‘Resonance, frame’, in D. A. Snow, D. Della-Porta, B. Klandermans and D. McAdam (eds), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 1092–96, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm180.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Melucci, A. (1989), Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society, London: Hutchinson Radius.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Moor, J. De, Vydt, M. De, Uba, K. and Wahlström, M. (2021), ‘New kids on the block: Taking stock of the recent cycle of climate activism’, Social Movement Studies, 20:5, pp. 619–25, https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1836617.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Mulholland, M. (2020), ‘A moment of intersecting crises: Climate justice in the era of coronavirus’, Development, 63:2–4, pp. 257–61, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-020-00259-9.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Murray, S. (2020), ‘Framing a climate crisis: A descriptive framing analysis of how Greta Thunberg inspired the masses to take to the streets’, bachelor dissertation, Uppsala: Uppsala University, https://bit.ly/38zSVQc. Accessed 3 November 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Odeh, L. (2010), ‘A comparative analysis of global North and global South economies’, Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 12:3, pp. 338–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Olesen, T. (2022), ‘Greta Thunberg’s iconicity: Performance and co-performance in the social media ecology’, New Media & Society, 24:6, pp. 1325–42, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820975416.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Pinckney, J. and Rivers, M. (2020), ‘Sickness or silence: Social movement adaptation to COVID-19’, Journal of International Affairs, 73:2, pp. 23–42, https://doi.org/10.2307/26939964.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Pleyers, G. (2020), ‘The PANDEMIC is a battlefield: Social movements in the COVID-19 lockdown’, Journal of Civil Society, 16:4, pp. 295–312, https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2020.1794398.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Polletta, F. and Gardner, B. G. (2015), ‘Narrative and social movements’, in D. Della-Porta and M. Diani (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements, online ed., Oxford Academic, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199678402.013.32. Accessed 10 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Singh, A. and Glińska-Neweś, A. (2022), ‘Modeling the public attitude towards organic foods: A big data and text mining approach’, Journal of Big Data, 9:1, pp. 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00551-6.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Snow, D. A. (2016), ‘Frames and framing processes’, in K. Fahlenbrach, M. Klimke and J. Scharloth (eds), Protest Cultures: A Companion, New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 124–29, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvgs0b1r.15.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Soler-i-Martí, R., Fernández-Planells, A. and Pérez-Altable, L. (2022), ‘Bringing the future into the present: The notion of emergency in the youth climate movement’, Social Movement Studies, pp. 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2123312.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Soler-i-Martí, R., Ferrer-Fons, M. and Terren, L. (2020), ‘The interdependency of online and offline activism: A case study of Fridays for Future-Barcelona in the context of the COVID-19 lockdown’, Hipertext.net, 21, pp. 105–14, https://doi.org/10.31009/hipertext.net.2020.i21.09.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Sorce, G. (2022), ‘The “Greta effect”: Networked mobilization and leader identification among Fridays for Future protesters’, Media and Communication, 10:2, pp. 18–28, https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.5060.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Sorce, G. and Dumitrica, D. (2021), ‘#FightEveryCrisis: Pandemic shifts in Fridays for Future’s protest communication frames’, Environmental Communication, 17:3, pp. 263–75, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1948435.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Svensson, A. and Wahlström, M. (2021), ‘Climate change or what? Prognostic framing by Fridays for Future protesters’, Social Movement Studies, 22:1, pp. 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2021.1988913.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Thompson, C. (2020), ‘#FightEveryCrisis: Re-framing the climate movement in times of a pandemic’, Interface, 12:1, pp. 225–31, http://bit.ly/3nS795p. Accessed 9 June 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Valenzuela, S., Correa, T. and Gil de Zuniga, H. (2018), ‘Ties, likes, and tweets: Using strong and weak ties to explain differences in protest participation across Facebook and Twitter use’, Political Communication, 35:1, pp. 117–34, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334726.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Wahlström, M., Kocyba, P., Vydt, M. De and Moor, J. De (eds) (2019), Protest for a Future: Composition, Mobilization and Motives of the Participants in Fridays for Future Climate Protests on 15 March 2019 in 13 European Cities, OSFHOME, 27 June, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XCNZH.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Wickham, H. (2014), ‘Tidy data’, Journal of Statistical Software, 59:10, pp. 1–23, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v059.i10.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00090_1
Loading
The fall after the hatching: Evolution and engagement of Greta Thunberg’s frame on Twitter
Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies 15, 237 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs_00090_1
/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00090_1
/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00090_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): climate movement; discourse analysis; framing; resonance; social networks; text mining

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test