Supercomplex systems and constitutional (dis)order: The consequences of the Anthropocene in the law¹

References

1. Allen, M. R. and Lord, R. (2004), ‘The blame game’, Nature, 432:7017, pp. 551–52, https://www.nature.com/articles/432551a. Accessed 22 September 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arias Maldonado, M. (2018), Antropoceno: La política en la era humana, Barcelona: Taurus.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Böckenförde, E.-W. (2006), ‘Sviluppo storico e mutamento di significato della costituzione’, in M. Nicoletti and O. Brino (eds), Stato, costituzione, democrazia: Studi di teoria della costituzione e di diritto costituzionale (trans. M. Nicoletti and O. Brino), Milano: Giuffrè, pp. 29–60.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bonfigli, F., Schwartz, G. A. D. and Pontin, F. (2020), ‘Social movements and the law: The legal group inside the occupation of Porto Alegre city council in 2013’, Oñati Socio-legal Series, 10:1, pp. 193–219.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bonneuil, C. and Fressoz, J.-B. (2017), The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History and Us (trans. D. Fernbach), London and Brooklyn, CA: Verso Books.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Burdeau, G. (1970), L’État, Paris: Points.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chandler, D. (2018), Ontopolitics in the Anthropocene: An Introduction to Mapping, Sensing and Hacking, London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Connelly, J. and Smith, G. (1999), Politics and the Environment: From Theory to Practice, London and New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Crutzen, P. J. (2002), ‘Geology of mankind’, Nature, 415:6867, p. 23, https://www.nature.com/articles/415023a. Accessed 31 August 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Crutzen, P. J. (2006), ‘Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: A contribution to resolve a policy dilemma?’, Climatic Change, 77:3, pp. 211–19.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Crutzen, P. J. and Stoermer, E. F. (2000), ‘The “Anthropocene”’, Global Change Newsletter, 41, pp. 17–18.
    [Google Scholar]
12. De Cabo Martín, C. (2014), Pensamiento crítico, constitucionalismo crítico, Madrid: Trotta.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Delanda, M. (2002), Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy, London and New York: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Domeisen, N. (1978), Schweizer Verfassungsgeschichte, Geschichtphilosophie und Ideologie, Bern: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dryzek, J. S. (2005), The Politics of the Earth. Environmental Discourses, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dunlap, R. E. (2001), ‘La sociología medioambiental y el nuevo paradigma ecológico’, Sistema, 162&163, pp. 11–31.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fischer-Kowalski, M. and Haberl, H. (1998), ‘Sustainable development: Socio-economic metabolism and colonization of nature’, International Social Science Journal, 50:158, pp. 573–87.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fremaux, A. and Barry, J. (2019), ‘The “Anthropocene” and green political theory: Rethinking environmentalism, resisting eco-modernism’, in F. Biermann and E. Lövbrand (eds), Anthropocene Encounters: New Directions in Green Political Thinking, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne and Nova Delhi: Cambridge University Press, pp. 171–90.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fukuyama, F. (1992), The End of History and the Last Man, New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Galaz, V. (2014), Global Environmental Governance, Technology and Politics, Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
    [Google Scholar]
21. García-Pelayo, M. (1984), Derecho constitucional comparado, Madrid: Alianza.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gillings, M. R. and Hagan-Lawson, E. L. (2014), ‘The cost of living in the Anthropocene’, Earth Perspectives, 1:2, p. 2, https://earth-perspectives.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/2194-6434-1-2#:~:text=The%20true%20economic%20costs%20of,attention%20from%20diverse%20research%20standpoints. Accessed 22 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Gómez Pin, V. (2019), Tras la física: Arranque jónico y renacer cuántico de la filosofía, Madrid: Abada.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Grear, A. (2015), ‘Deconstructing Anthropos: A critical legal reflection on “Anthropocentric” law and Anthropocene “Humanity”’, Law Critique, 26:3, pp. 225–49.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gruszczynski, L. (2010), Regulating Health and Environmental Risks under WTO Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Häberle, P. (2011), Europäische Verfassungslehre, 6th ed., Baden-Baden: Nomos.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hamilton, C. (2016), ‘The Anthropocene as rupture’, The Anthropocene Review, 3:2, pp. 93–106.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Jaria-Manzano, J. (2011), La cuestión ambiental y la transformación de lo público, Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Jaria-Manzano, J. (2020a), La constitución del Antropoceno, Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Jaria-Manzano, J. (2020b), ‘La pandemia, el Antropoceno y el Derecho: Ensayo de interpretación’, in J. R. Fuentes i Gasó, J. Jaria-Manzano, V. Merino-Sancho and P. Villavicencio-Calzadilla (eds), El impacto social de la Covid-19: Una visión desde el Derecho, Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, pp. 25–63.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Jaria-Manzano, J. (2021), ‘La constitución es un campo de batalla: Apuntes sobre el constitucionalismo global en el antropoceno’, Persona e Amministrazione, 8:1, pp. 789–844.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Jaria-Manzano, J. (2022), ‘La insolación de Miréio: Seis tesis y un corolario sobre los derechos (ambientales) en la era del Antropoceno’, Anuario de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 26, pp. 449–84.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Koskenniemi, M. (2007), ‘Constitutionalism as mindset: Reflections on Kantian themes about international law and globalization’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8:1, pp. 9–36.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Llanque, M. (2008), Politische Ideengeschichte: Ein Gewebe politischer Diskurse, Munich: Oldenbourg.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Manemann, J. (2014), Kritik des Anthropozäns: Plädoyer für eine neue Humanökologie, Bielefeld: Transcript.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Peel, J. and Osofsky, H. M. (2015), Climate Change Litigation: Regulatory Pathways to Cleaner Energy, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Delhi and Singapore: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Povinelli, E. (2017), ‘Three figures of geontology’, in R. Grusin (ed.), Anthropocene Feminism, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Reid, W. V., Chen, D., Goldfarb, L., Hackmann, H., Lee, Y. T., Mohele, K., Ostrom, E., Raivio, K., Rockström, J., Schellnhuber, H. J. and Whyte, A. (2010), ‘Earth system science for global sustainability: Grand challenges’, Science, 330:6006, pp. 916–17.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S. III, Lambin, E., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R. W., Fabry, V. J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P. and Foley, J. (2009), ‘Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity’, Ecology and Society Home, 14:2, pp. 1–33, https://www.stockholmresilience.org/download/18.8615c78125078c8d3380002197/ES-2009-3180.pdf. Accessed 22 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Schneider, E. D. and Sagan, D. (2005), Into the Cool: Energy Flow, Thermodynamics and Life, Chicago, IL and London: The Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Smil, V. (2008), Energy in Nature and Society: General Energetics of Complex Systems, Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J. and McNeill, J. R. (2007), ‘The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature?’, Ambio, 36:8, pp. 614–21.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O. and Ludwig, C. (2017), ‘The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The great acceleration’, The Anthropocene Review, 2:1, pp. 81–98.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Szerszynski, B. (2017), ‘Gods of the Anthropocene: Geo-spiritual formations in the Earth’s New Epoch’, Theory, Culture & Society, 34:2&3, pp. 253–75.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Taleb, N. N. (2010), The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, 2nd ed., New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Touraine, A. (1992), Critique de la modernité, Paris: Fayard.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Wulf, A. (2016), La invención de la naturaleza: El nuevo mundo de Alexander von Humboldt (trans. M. L. Rodríguez Tapia), Barcelona: Taurus.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Zumbasen, P. (2012), ‘Carving our typologies and accounting for differences across Systems: Towards a methodology of transnational constitutionalism’, in M. Rosenfeld and A. Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 75–97.
    [Google Scholar]