Misleading content on encrypted platforms in Chile: WhatsApp vs. Telegram during constitutional elections

References

1. Amnesty International (2023), ‘Chile: Four years on from the social unrest, impunity and a lack of comprehensive reparations persist’, 17 October, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/10/chile-four-years-social-unrest-impunity. Accessed 28 April 2024.
2. Anguita, P., Bachmann, I., Brossi, L., Elórtegui, C., Escobar, M. J., Ibarra, P., Lara, J. C., Padilla, F. and Peña, P. (2023), The Phenomenon of Disinformation: A Review of International and Chilean Experiences, Santiago de Chile: Comité Asesor contra la Desinformación and Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología, Conocimiento e Innovación.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bär, D., Pröllochs, N. and Feuerriegel, S. (2023), ‘New threats to society from free-speech social media platforms’, Communications of the ACM, 66:10, pp. 37–40, https://doi.org/10.1145/3587094.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Basulto, O., Fuentealba, S. and Mendoza, C. (2023), ‘Social significance of violence in traditional Chilean print media narratives: A case study in the context of the social outburst in Chile (18-O)’, Prisma Social: Revista de investigación social, 40, pp. 289–326.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Benaissa Pedriza, S. (2021), ‘Sources, channels and strategies of disinformation in the 2020 US election: Social networks, traditional media and political candidates’, Journalism and Media, 2:4, pp. 605–24.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bennett, W. L. and Livingston, S. (2018), ‘The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions’, European Journal of Communication, 33:2, pp. 122–39, https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bradshaw, S. and Howard, P. N. (2018), Challenging Truth and Trust: A Global Inventory of Organized Social Media Manipulation, Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute and Oxford University, https://medleysites.oii.ox.ac.uk/demtech/wp-content/uploads/sites/127/2018/07/ct2018.pdf. Accessed 30 April 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bryanov, K., Vasina, D., Pankova, Y. and Pakholkov, V. (2022), ‘The other side of deplatforming: Right-wing Telegram in the wake of Trump’s Twitter ouster’, in D. A. Alexandrov, A. V. Boukhanovsky, A. V. Chugunov, Y. Kabanov, O. Koltsova, I. Musabirov and S. Pashakhin (eds), Digital Transformation and Global Society, Cham: Springer, pp. 417–28, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93715-7_30.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bucher, T. and Helmond, A. (2018), ‘The affordances of social media platforms’, in J. Burgess, A. Marwick and T. Poell (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Social Media, London: Sage Publications, pp. 233–53, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bustamante-Pavez, G. (2023), ‘“The news finds me and I don’t know if it is true or false”: Exploratory analysis of the development of information disorder situations of young Chileans through social networks’, Ph.D. thesis, Santiago de Chile: Universidad de los Andes.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Casero-Ripollés, A. (2018), ‘Research on political information and social media: Key points and challenges for the future’, El Profesional de la Información, 27:5, pp. 964–74, https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.sep.01.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cavalini, A., Malini, F., Gouveia, F. and Comarela, G. (2023), ‘Politics and disinformation: Analyzing the use of Telegram’s information disorder network in Brazil for political mobilization’, First Monday, 28:5, pp. 1–24, https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v28i5.12901.
    [Google Scholar]
13. CEP (2017), ‘Terrorists on Telegram’, Counter Extremism Project, May, https://www.counterextremism.com/terrorists-on-telegram. Accessed 28 April 2024.
14. Chan, M. (2018), ‘Mobile-mediated multimodal communications, relationship quality and subjective well-being: An analysis of smartphone use from a life course perspective’, Computers in Human Behavior, 87, pp. 254–62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.027.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Chaves-Montero, A., Relinque-Medina, F. and Fernández-Borrero, M. (2020), ‘Twitter, social services and social participation: Analysis of political discourse and citizen interactions’, Estudios Sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 26:4, pp. 1371–86, https://doi.org/10.5209/ESMP.67585.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Corporación Latinobarómetro (2023), Informe Latinobarómetro 2023: La recesión democrática de América Latina, Santiago de Chile: Corporación Latinobarómetro, https://www.latinobarometro.org/lat.jsp. Accessed 26 January 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Freelon, D. and Wells, C. (2020), ‘Disinformation as political communication’, Political Communication, 37:2, pp. 145–56, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1723755.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Freitas Melo, P. de, Vieira, C. C., Garimella, K., Melo, P. O. S. V. de and Benevenuto, F. (2019), ‘Can WhatsApp counter misinformation by limiting message forwarding?’, in H. Cherifi, S. Gaito, J. Mendes, E. Moro and L. Rocha (eds), Complex Networks and Their Applications VIII: Complex Networks 2019, Studies in Computational Intelligence, Cham: Springer, pp. 372–84, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36687-2_31.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Garimella, K. and Eckles, D. (2020), ‘Images and misinformation in political groups: Evidence from WhatsApp in India’, The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1:5, pp. 1–12, https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-030.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Ardèvol-Abreu, A. and Casero-Ripollés, A. (2021), ‘WhatsApp political discussion, conventional participation and activism: Exploring direct, indirect and generational effects’, Information, Communication and Society, 24:2, pp. 201–18, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1642933.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gil de Zúñiga, H. and Goyanes, M. (2023), ‘Fueling civil disobedience in democracy: WhatsApp news use, political knowledge, and illegal political protest’, New Media and Society, 25:12, pp. 3500–20, https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211047850.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gronemeyer, M. E. and Porath, W. (2013), ‘The levels of thematic coincidences in editorials of five leading Chilean newspapers in a context of media ownership concentration’, Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 19:1, pp. 433–52, https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_esmp.2013.v19.n1.42531.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Guess, A., Nyhan, B. and Reifler, J. (2018), Selective Exposure to Misinformation: Evidence from the Consumption of Fake News During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Campaign, Brussels: European Research Council, https://about.fb.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/fake-news-2016.pdf. Accessed 26 January 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Heiss, C. (2023), ‘The constituent process in Chile: Between utopia and a changing reality’, Nueva Sociedad, 305, pp. 126–35.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Herrada Hidalgo, N., Santos, M. and Barbosa, S. (2024), ‘Affordances-driven ethics for research on mobile instant messaging: Notes from the Global South’, Mobile Media & Communication, online first, https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579241247994.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hutchby, I. (2001), Conversation and Technology: From the Telephone to the Internet, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jaramillo-Castro, O. and Bustamante-Pavez, G. (2021), ‘The new strategic theory (NTE) and the paradigm shift in social network analysis (SNA): A case study of informative hashtags on Twitter during the Chilean Social Outburst of 2019’, Razón y Palabra, 25:110, pp. 73–93, https://doi.org/10.26807/rp.v25i110.1754.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Jungherr, A. and Schroeder, R. (2021), ‘Disinformation and the structural transformations of the public arena: Addressing the actual challenges to democracy’, Social Media + Society, 7:1, pp. 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121988928.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Karasz, P. (2018), ‘What is Telegram, and why are Iran and Russia trying to ban it?’, New York Times, 2 May, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/02/world/europe/telegram-iran-russia.html. Accessed 30 September 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kessel, S. van, Sajuria, J. and Hauwaert, S. M. van (2021), ‘Informed, uninformed or misinformed? A cross-national analysis of populist party supporters across European democracies’, West European Politics, 44:3, pp. 585–610.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Klus, M. (2022), ‘Politics, democracy and disinformation’, Hermès, La Revue, 15:1, pp. 95–99.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Lillo, D. (2023), ‘CEO of Fast Check: “In this process, fake news has been much less than in the previous one”’, El Desconcierto, 12 September, https://www.eldesconcierto.cl/reportajes/2023/12/09/experto-en-verificacion-en-este-proceso-la-fake-news-ha-sido-mucho-menor-al-anterior.html. Accessed 15 January 2024.
33. Luna, J. P., Toro, S. and Valenzuela, S. (2022), ‘Amplifying counter-public spheres on social media: News sharing of alternative versus traditional media after the 2019 Chilean uprising’, Social Media + Society, 8:1, pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221077308.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Lupu, N., Bustamante, M. V. R. and Zechmeister, E. J. (2020), ‘Social media disruption: Messaging mistrust in Latin America’, Journal of Democracy, 31:3, pp. 160–71, https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2020.0038.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Martínez, R. (2023), ‘Cadem: Bajo interés, desconocimiento de candidatos y desinformación ciudadana refleja nuevo proceso constitucional a 41 días de las elecciones’, La Tercera, 26 March, https://shorturl.at/SZLdU. Accessed 26 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Morales, M. (2020), ‘Social outburst in Chile 2019: Participation, representation, institutional trust and public scandals’, Análisis Político, 33:98, pp. 3–25.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T. and Kleis Nielsen, R. (2020), Digital News Report 2020, Oxford: Reuters Institute and University of Oxford, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-06/DNR_2020_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 30 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T. and Kleis Nielsen, R. (2023), Digital News Report 2023, Oxford: Reuters Institute and University of Oxford, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2023-06/Digital_News_Report_2023.pdf. Accessed 30 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Núñez-Mussa, E. (2021), ‘Chile: Crisis of trust and a precarious industry’, in J. Trappel and T. Tomaz (eds), The Media for Democracy Monitor 2021: How Leading News Media Survive Digital Transformation, Nordicom: University of Gothenburg, pp. 85–146.
    [Google Scholar]
40. OOSGA (2023), ‘Social media in Chile: 2023 stats and platform trends’, 30 October, https://oosga.com/social-media/chl/. Accessed 25 January 2024.
41. Orchard, X., Saldaña, M., Pavez, I. and Lagos, C. (2023), ‘“Does she know how to read?” An intersectional perspective to explore Twitter users’ portrayal of women Mapuche leaders’, Information, Communication and Society, 26:13, pp. 2554–74, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2252895.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Ozawa, J. V. S., Woolley, S. C., Straubhaar, J., Riedl, M. J., Joseff, K. and Gursky, J. (2023), ‘How disinformation on WhatsApp went from campaign weapon to governmental propaganda in Brazil’, Social Media + Society, 9:1, https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231160632.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Pang, N. and Woo, Y. T. (2020), ‘What about WhatsApp? A systematic review of WhatsApp and its role in civic and political engagement’, First Monday, 25:12, https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i12.10417.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Riffe, D., Lacy, S. and Fico, F. (2005), Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Analysis in Research, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Rogers, R. (2020), ‘Deplatforming: Following extreme internet celebrities to Telegram and alternative social media’, European Journal of Communication, 35:3, pp. 213–29.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Salazar Vergara, G. (2019), ‘El “reventón social” en Chile: Una mirada histórica’, Nueva Sociedad, October, https://nuso.org/articulo/protestas-Chile-estudiantes-neoliberalismo/. Accessed 30 April 2024.
47. Salikov, A. (2020), ‘Social media in Russian politics’, Politologija, 99:3, pp. 64–92, https://doi.org/10.15388/Polit.2020.99.3.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Santos, M. and Orchard, X. (forthcoming 2025), ‘Digital “guerrillas” and the changing influence industry’s impact on Latin American democracies: Lessons from Chile’, in E. Briant and V. Bakir (eds), The Routledge Handbook on the Influence Industry, London: Routledge, pp. 222–38.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Santos, M., Saldaña, M. and Tsyganova, K. (2024), ‘Subversive affordances as a form of digital transnational activism: The case of Telegram’s native proxy’, New Media + Society, 26:1, pp. 131–53.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Santos, M., Santos, J. G. B. and Ortiz Fuentes, J. (forthcoming 2025), ‘Misinformation behind the scenes: Political misinformation in WhatsApp public groups ahead of the 2022 constitutional referendum in Chile’, in S. Udupa and H. Wasserman (eds), Below the Radar? WhatsApp, Disinformation and Extreme Speech, New York: NYU Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Santos, M. and Valenzuela, S. (2022), ‘Changing media landscapes and political participation’, in M. Giugni and M. Grasso (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Participation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 841–57.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Scherman, A., Etchegaray, N., Browne, M., Mazorra, D. and Rojas, H. (2022), ‘WhatsApp, polarization, and non-conventional political participation: Chile and Colombia before the social outbursts of 2019’, Media and Communication, 10:4, pp. 77–93, https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5817.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Shah, D., McLeod, M., Rojas, H., Cho, J., Wagner, M. and Friedland, L. (2017), ‘Revising the communication mediation model for a new political communication ecology’, Human Communication Research, 43:4, pp. 491–504, https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12115.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Sierra-Iso, A., González-Tosat, C. and Rodríguez-Virgili, J. (2022), ‘The use of Telegram by Spanish political parties in the 2019 general elections’, Observatorio (OBS*), 16:1, pp. 138–59.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Statista (2024), ‘Ranking of messaging apps by global monthly active users 2023’, 20 February, https://es.statista.com/estadisticas/599043/aplicaciones-de-mensajeria-mas-populares-a-nivel-mundial-de/. Accessed 26 January 2024.
56. Stewart, N. K., Al-Rawi, A., Celestini, C. and Worku, N. (2023), ‘Hate influencers’ mediation of hate on Telegram: “We declare war against the anti-White system”’, Social Media + Society, 9:2, pp. 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177915.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Tardáguila, C., Benevenuto, F. and Ortellado, P. (2018), ‘Fake news is poisoning Brazilian politics: WhatsApp can stop it’, New York Times, 17 October, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/17/opinion/brazil-election-fake-news-whatsapp.html. Accessed 26 January 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Tirado-García, A. (2023), ‘The negative campaign on Telegram: The political use of criticism during the 2021 Community of Madrid elections’, Social Sciences, 12:2, https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12020093.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barbera, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D. and Nyhan, B. (2018), Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature, Merlo Park, CA: William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144139.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Vaccari, C. and Valeriani, A. (2018), ‘Digital political talk and political participation: Comparing established and third wave democracies’, Sage Open, 8:2, pp. 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018784986.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Valenzuela, S., Bachmann, I. and Bargsted, M. (2021), ‘The personal is the political? What do WhatsApp users share and how it matters for news knowledge, polarization and participation in Chile’, Digital Journalism, 9:2, pp. 155–75.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Valenzuela, S., Muñiz, C. and Santos, M. (2022), ‘Social media and belief in misinformation in Mexico: A case of maximal panic, minimal effects?’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 29:3, pp. 667–88.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Vogels, E. A., Perrin, A. and Anderson, M. (2020), ‘Most Americans think social media sites censor political viewpoints’, Pew Research Center, 19 August, https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/08/19/most-americans-think-social-media-sites-censor-political-viewpoints/. Accessed 26 January 2024.
64. Walther, S. and McCoy, A. (2021), ‘US extremism on Telegram’, Perspectives on Terrorism, 15:2, pp. 100–24.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Wardle, C. and Derakhshan, H. (2017), Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy Making, Strasbourg: Council of Europe Report, https://edoc.coe.int/en/media/7495-information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-research-and-policy-making.html. Accessed 30 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Weatherbed, J. (2023), ‘Parler goes offline after being sold to a new owner’, The Verge, 14 April, https://www.theverge.com/2023/4/14/23683207/parler-shutting-down-relaunch-aquisition-announcement-conservative-social-media. Accessed 30 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Weeks, B. E. and Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2021), ‘What’s next? Six observations for the future of political misinformation research’, American Behavioral Scientist, 65:2, pp. 277–89.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Wike, R., Simmons, K., Stokes, B. and Fetterolf, J. (2017), Globally, Broad Support for Representative and Direct Democracy: But Many Also Endorse Nondemocratic Alternatives, Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/10/17102729/Pew-Research-Center_Democracy-Report_2017.10.16.pdf. Accessed 26 January 2024.
    [Google Scholar]