Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies
  4. Volume 16, Issue 2
  5. Article
Disinformation, Fact-Checking and Civic Responsibility
  • ISSN: 1757-1898
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1901

Abstract

The production and dissemination of disinformation is a global phenomenon in relation to sensitive issues such as climate change. This article analyses the activity (n = 419) of nine independent platforms debunking disinformation in North America, Europe and Latin America. Findings show that most fact-checking results were false or misleading (86.4%). Four main conclusions are drawn. Firstly, regardless of language, geographical or cultural differences, there is a consistent presence of manipulated content across countries, confirming the worrying levels of disinformation on climate change. Secondly, three central narratives for spreading disinformation have been identified: denial of scientific evidence, distortion of science and attribution of ulterior motives to action on climate change, often linked to conspiracy theories. Although there are differences in terms of representation, these narratives are prevalent in the three regions. Thirdly, these narratives revolve around topics such as meteorology, natural phenomena and temperature or the distortion of evidence about the effects of climate change. Finally, social media (52.5%) and websites and pseudo-media (25.8%) are the main sources of climate change disinformation.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The Generalitat Valenciana (2022–24)
© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00110_1
2024-12-10
2025-05-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baptista, J. P. and Gradim, A. (2021), ‘Brave new world of fake news: How it works’, Javnost, 28:4, pp. 426–43, https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2021.1861409.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barberá, P., Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D. and Nyhan, B. (2018), Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature, Menlo Park, CA: William + Flora Hewlett Foundation, https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/87402/. Accessed 11 October 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett, W. L. and Livingston, S. (2018), ‘The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions’, European Journal of Communication, 33:2, pp. 122–39, https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett, W. L. and Livingston, S. (2023), ‘A brief history of the disinformation age: Information wars and the decline of institutional authority’, in S. Salgado and S. Papathanassopoulos (eds), Streamlining Political Communication Concepts, Cham: Springer Studies in Media and Political Communication, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45335-9_4.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bjornberg, K. E., Karlsson, M., Gilek, M. and Hansson, S. O. (2017), ‘Climate and environmental science denial: A review of the scientific literature published in 1990–2015’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, pp. 229–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.066.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolsen, T. and Druckman, J. N. (2015), ‘Counteracting the politicization of science’, Journal of Communication, 65:5, pp. 745–69, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12171.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Boykoff, M. T. and Boykoff, J. M. (2004), ‘Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press’, Global Environmental Change, 14:2, pp. 125–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Boykoff, M. T. and Roberts, J. T. (2007), Media Coverage of Climate Change: Current Trends, Strengths, Weaknesses, Human Development Report 2007/2008, New York: Human Development Report Office, https://hdr.undp.org/content/media-coverage-climate-change. Accessed 10 October 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bradshaw, S. (2019), ‘Disinformation optimised: Gaming search engine algorithms to amplify junk news’, Internet Policy Review, 8:4, pp. 1–24, https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1442.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Brossard, D. (2013), ‘New media landscapes and the science information consumer’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110:3, pp. 14096–101, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212744110.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheng, H. and González-Ramírez, J. (2021), ‘Trust and the media: Perceptions of climate change news sources among US college students’, Postdigital Science and Education, 3:3, pp. 910–33, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00163-y.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cohen, J. (1960), ‘A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales’, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20:1, pp. 37–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Dias, N. and Sippitt, A. (2020), ‘Researching fact checking: Present limitations and future opportunities’, Political Quarterly, 91:3, pp. 605–13, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12892.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Drummond, C., Siegrist, M. and Árvai, J. (2020), ‘Limited effects of exposure to fake news about climate change’, Environmental Research Communications, 2:8, pp. 1–11, https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2515-7620/abae77. Accessed 11 October 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Eckstein, D., Künzel, V., Schäfer, L. and Winges, M. (2020), Global Climate Risk Index 2020: Who Suffers Most from Extreme Weather Events?: Weather-Related Loss Events in 2018 and 1999 to 2018, report no. 20-2-01e, Bonn: German Watch, https://germanwatch.org/sites/default/files/20-2-01e%20Global%20Climate%20Risk%20Index%202020_15.pdf. Accessed 11 October 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Eckstein, D., Künzel, V. and Schäfer, L. (2021), Global Climate Risk Index 2021: Who Suffers Most from Extreme Weather Events?: Weather-Related Loss Events in 2019 and 2000 to 2019, report no. 21-1-02e, Bonn: German Watch, https://www.germanwatch.org/en/19777. Accessed 11 October 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Ejaz, W., Mukherjee, M., Fletcher, R. and Kleis Nielsen, R. (2022), ‘How we follow climate change: Climate news use and attitudes in eight countries’, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 1 December, https://doi.org/10.60625/risj-89jy-c376.
  18. Esser, F. and Pfetsch, B. (2020), ‘Comparing political communication: A 2020 update’, in D. Caramani (ed.), Comparative Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 336–58, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340492601_Frank_Esser_Barbara_Pfetsch_2020_Comparing_Political_Communication_A_2020_Update. Accessed 10 October 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. European Parliament (2019), ‘El Parlamento Europeo declara la emergencia climática’, European Parliament, 28 November, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/es/press-room/20191121IPR67110/el-parlamento-europeo-declara-la-emergencia-climatica. Accessed 8 November 2023.
  20. Falkenberg, M., Galeazzi, A., Torricelli, M., Di Marco, N., Larosa, F., Sas, M., Mekacher, A., Pearce, W., Zollo, F., Quattrociocchi, W. and Baronchelli, A. (2022), ‘Growing polarization around climate change on social media’, Nature Climate Change, 12:12, pp. 1114–21, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01527-x.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Farrell, J. (2016), ‘Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113:1, pp. 92–97, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509433112.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Fleming, M. (2022), ‘Rampant climate disinformation online is distorting dangers, delaying climate action’, Medium, 12 August, https://medium.com/we-the-peoples/rampant-climate-disinformation-online-is-distorting-dangers-delaying-climate-action-375b5b11cf9b. Accessed 13 November 2023.
  23. Forchtner, B., Kroneder, A. and Wetzel, D. (2018), ‘Being skeptical?: Exploring far-right climate-change communication in Germany’, Environmental Communication, 12:5, pp. 589–604, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1470546.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Freelon, D. and Wells, C. (2020), ‘Disinformation as political communication’, Political Communication, 37:2, pp. 145–56, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1723755.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Groves, C. (2019), ‘Post-truth and anthropogenic climate change: Asking the right questions’, WIREs Climate Change, 10:6, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.620.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Häkkinen, K. and Akrami, N. (2014), ‘Ideology and climate change denial’, Personality and Individual Differences, 70:70, pp. 62–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.030.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Hameleers, M., Harff, D. and Schmuck, D. (2023), ‘The alternative truth kept hidden from us: The effects of multimodal disinformation disseminated by ordinary citizens and alternative hyper-partisan media’, Digital Journalism, 11:6, pp. 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2210616.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Harff, D., Bollen, C. and Schmuck, D. (2022), ‘Responses to social media influencers’ misinformation about COVID-19: A pre-registered multiple-exposure experiment’, Media Psychology, 25:6, pp. 831–50, https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2022.2080711.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Hassan, I., Musa, R. M., Latiff Azmi, M. N., Razali Abdullah, M. and Yusoff, S. Z. (2023), ‘Analysis of climate change disinformation across types, agents and media platforms’, Information Development, 40:3, pp. 504–16, https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669221148693.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Herrero, E. and Herrero Damas, S. (2021), ‘El fact-checker en español alrededor del mundo: Perfil, similitudes y diferencias entre verificadores hispanohablantes’, Revista de la SEECI, 54:14, pp. 49–77, https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2021.54.e725.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H. L. Miller), Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ar4-wg1-frontmatter-1.pdf. Accessed 10 December 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2023), ‘Summary for policymakers’, in H. Lee and J. Romero (eds), Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report: Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva: IPCC, pp. 1–34, https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.001.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Leiserowitz, A., Carman, J., Buttermore, N., Wang, X., Rosenthal, S., Marlon, J. and Mulcahy, K. (2021), International Public Opinion on Climate Change, New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and Facebook Data for Good, https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/international-public-opinion-on-climate-change/. Accessed 11 December 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Lewandowsky, S. (2021), ‘Climate change disinformation and how to combat it’, Annual Review of Public Health, 42, pp. 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102409.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Lockwood, M. (2018), ‘Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: Exploring the linkages’, Environmental Politics, 27:4, pp. 712–32, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. López, A. and Share, J. (2020), ‘Fake climate news: How denying climate change is the ultimate in fake news’, The Journal of Sustainability Education, 23, http://www.susted.com/wordpress/content/blog-post-fake-climate-news-how-denying-climate-change-is-the-ultimate-in-fake-news_2020_04/. Accessed 13 November 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. MacKay, B. and Munro, I. (2012), ‘Information warfare and new organizational landscapes: An inquiry into the ExxonMobil-Greenpeace dispute over climate change’, Organization Studies, 33:11, pp. 1507–36, https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612463318.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Maeseele, P. and Pepermans, Y. (2017), ‘Ideology in climate change communication: Climate science’, in H. von Storch (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science, 26 April, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.578. Accessed 11 November 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Moser, S. C. (2010), ‘Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process and future directions’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1:1, pp. 31–53, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.11.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Oreskes, N. and Conway, E. M. (2011), Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming, London: Bloomsbury Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Palau-Sampio, D. (2023), ‘Pseudo-media disinformation patterns: Polarised discourse, clickbait and twisted journalistic mimicry’, Journalism Practice, 17:10, pp. 2140–58, https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2126992.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Pérez-Escolar, M., Lilleker, D. and Tapia-Frade, A. (2023), ‘A systematic literature review of the phenomenon of disinformation and misinformation’, Media and Communication, 11:2, pp. 76–87, https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6453.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Pogson, M. (2021), ‘Climate disinformation adverts: Real-world indicators of an online problem’, Academia Letters, 512, pp. 1–10, http://dx.doi.org/10.20935/al512.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Pralle, S. B. (2009), ‘Agenda-setting and climate change’, Environmental Politics, 18:5, pp. 781–99, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010903157115.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Restrepo, H. (2021), ‘COP26: La desinformación sobre el cambio climático es la próxima infodemia por combatir’, Fundación Gabo, 1 November, https://fundaciongabo.org/es/etica-periodistica/recursos/cop26-la-desinformacion-sobre-el-cambio-climatico-es-la-proxima. Accessed 20 October 2023.
  46. Salaverría, R. and Cardoso, G. (2023), ‘Future of disinformation studies: Emerging research fields’, Profesional de la información, 32:5, https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.sep.25.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Schäfer, M. S. (2015), ‘Climate change and the media’, in J. D. Wright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, London: Elsevier, pp. 853–59, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.91079-1.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Scheufele, D. and Krause, M. (2019), ‘Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news’, PNAS, 116:16, pp. 7662–69, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805871115.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Schmidt, A., Ivanova, A. and Schäfer, M. S. (2013), ‘Media attention for climate change around the world: A comparative analysis of newspaper coverage in 27 countries’, Global Environmental Change, 23:5, pp. 1233–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.020.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Siwakoti, S., Shapiro, J. N. and Oledan, J. (2021), ‘How COVID drove the evolution of fact-checking’, HKS Misinformation Review, 6 May, https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/how-covid-drove-the-evolution-of-fact-checking/. Accessed 11 November 2023.
  51. Stencel, M., Ryan, E. and Luther, J. (2023), ‘Misinformation spreads, but fact-checking has leveled off’, Duke Reporters’ Lab, 21 June, https://reporterslab.org/misinformation-spreads-but-fact-checking-has-leveled-off/. Accessed 28 September 2023.
  52. Treen, K. M. D. I., Williams, H. T. and O’Neill, S. J. (2020), ‘Online misinformation about climate change’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 11:5, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.665.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. United Nations (2023), ‘What is climate change?’, https://www.un.org/es/climatechange/what-is-climate-change. Accessed 21 October 2023.
  54. van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S. and Maibach, E. (2017), ‘Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change’, Global Challenges, 1:2, 23 January, https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201600008.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Vu, H. T., Baines, A. and Nguyen, N. (2023), ‘Fact-checking climate change: An analysis of claims and verification practices by fact-checkers in four countries’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 100:2, pp. 286–307, https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990221138058.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Wardle, C. and Derakhshan, H. (2017), Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policymaking, Strasbourg: Council of Europe, https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-researc/168076277c. Accessed 15 October 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00110_1
Loading
Fuelling climate change disinformation: Global narratives distorting environmental risks in North America, Europe and Latin America
Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies 16, 217 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs_00110_1
/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00110_1
/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00110_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): climate scepticism; digital communication; environmental hazards; fact-checking; global warming; media influence; misinformation

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test