Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies
  4. Volume 16, Issue 2
  5. Article
Disinformation, Fact-Checking and Civic Responsibility
  • ISSN: 1757-1898
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1901

Abstract

Disinformation, a pervasive issue in contemporary society, significantly influences citizens’ political decision-making. In response, fact-checking has emerged as a prominent movement, striving to enhance journalistic standards. Although this trend has sparked substantial academic research, only a few studies have thoroughly examined the impact of these journalistic practices on society. Moreover, while fact-checking agencies monitor parliamentary messages, research on the interplay between fact-checkers and legislative activity remains in its infancy. This research addresses the role of fact-checkers in the context of parliamentary disinformation in Spain and their presence in the speeches of MPs, as well as the importance given by fact-checking agencies themselves to parliamentary speeches and the perception citizens have when discussing disinformation. We are interested in knowing what presence they have in parliamentary speeches, what importance the fact-checkers themselves give to parliamentary speeches and what perception citizens have of them when disinformation in parliament is discussed. To this aim, we propose a mixed methodological approach in three phases: (1) documentary analysis of disinformation published in the Bulletins of Congress and the Spanish Parliament, as well as in the speeches made by the Joint Commission on National Security; (2) in-depth interviews with three journalists from the main Spanish verification agencies working on parliamentary activity: and ; (3) citizen focus groups to address different questions about the ecosystem of information disinformation in Spain. The results show growing attention to disinformation in the parliamentary context; verifiers occupy a relevant space in the political discourse, even replacing mentions of traditional journalists when discussing disinformation, and this contrasts with the lack of recognition by citizens who, despite referring to it as a problem for democracy, barely mention the work of verification agencies in their discourse.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The Fundación BBVA
  • The Ministry of Science and Innovation of the Government of Spain (Award MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033)
© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00114_1
2024-12-10
2025-06-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bennett, W. L. and Livingston, S. (2018), ‘The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions’, European Journal of Communication, 33:2, pp. 122–39, https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Campos-Domínguez, E., Esteve-Del-Valle, M. and Renedo-Farpón, C. (2022), ‘Rhetoric of parliamentary disinformation on Twitter’, Comunicar, 30:72, pp. 47–58, https://doi.org/10.3916/C72-2022-04.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Casero-Ripollés, A., Doménech-Fabregat, H. and Alonso-Muñoz, L. (2023), ‘Percepciones de la ciudadanía española ante la desinformación en tiempos de la COVID-19: Efectos y mecanismos de lucha contra las noticias falsas’, ICONO 14: Revista Científica De Comunicación y Tecnologías Emergentes, 21:1, https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v21i1.1988.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. De-Vreese, C. H., Esser, F., Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C. and Stanyer, J. (2018), ‘Populism as an expression of political communication content and style: A new perspective’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23:4, pp. 423–38, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218790035.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Egelhofer, J. L. and Lecheler, S. (2019), ‘Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: A framework and research agenda’, Annals of the International Communication Association, 43:2, pp. 97–116, https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Esteve–Del-Valle, M., Sijtsma, R., Stegeman, H. and Borge-Bravo, R. (2020), ‘Online deliberation and the public sphere: Developing a coding manual to assess deliberation in Twitter political networks’, Javnost: The Public, 27:3, pp. 211–29, https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2020.1794408.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Fallis, D. (2015), ‘The concept of disinformation’, in M. Khosrow-Pour (ed.), Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 4720–27, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch463.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Ferracioli, P., Butture Kniess, A. and Marques, F. P. (2022), ‘The watchdog role of fact-checkers in different media systems’, Digital Journalism, 10:5, pp. 717–37, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.2021377.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Hameleers, M. and Minihold, S. (2022), ‘Constructing discourses on (un)truthfulness: Attributions of reality, misinformation, and disinformation by politicians in a comparative social media setting’, Communication Research, 49:8, pp. 1176–99, https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220982762.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Hameleers, M. and Van der Meer, T. G. L. A. (2020), ‘Misinformation and polarization in a high-choice media environment: How effective are political fact-checkers?’, Communication Research, 47:2, pp. 227–50, https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218819671.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Howard, P., Kollanyi, B., Bradshaw, S. and Neudert, L. M. (2017), ‘Social media, news, and political information during the US election: Was polarizing content concentrated on swing states?’, arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.03573.
  12. Jagers, J. and Walgrave, S. (2007), ‘Populism as political communication style’, European Journal of Political Research, 46:3, pp. 319–45, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Karlova, N. A. and Fisher, K. E. (2013), ‘A social diffusion model of misinformation and disinformation for understanding human information behaviour’, Information Research, 18:1, pp. 1–17, https://bit.ly/3yJQBT9. Accessed 10 April 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Kouroutakis, A. E. (2019), ‘EU action plan against disinformation: Public authorities, platforms and the people’, The International Lawyer, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3472887. Accessed 10 April 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Lim, C. (2018), ‘Checking how fact-checkers check’, Research & Politics, 5:3, pp. 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018786848.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. López-García, G., Palau-Sampio, D., Palomo, B., Campos-Dominguez, E. and Masip, P. (2021), Politics of Disinformation: The Influence of Fake News on the Public Sphere, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Magallón-Rosa, R. (2019), Unfaking news: Cómo combatir la desinformación, Madrid: Pirámide.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. McKay, S. and Tenove, C. (2021), ‘Disinformation as a threat to deliberative democracy’, Political Research Quarterly, 74:3, pp. 703–17, https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920938143.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Morris, D., Morris, J. and France, P. L. (2020), ‘A fake news inoculation? Fact checkers, partisan identification, and the power of misinformation’, Politics, Groups, and Identities, 8:5, pp. 986–1005, https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2020.1803935.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T. and Nielsen, R. K. (2023), Reuters Institute: Digital News Report 2023, Oxford: Reuters Institute, University of Oxford, https://bit.ly/3Ub5N8m. Accessed 10 April 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Norton, P. (2017), ‘Speaking for parliament’, Parliamentary Affairs, 70:2, pp. 191–206, https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsw031.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Primig, F. (2022), ‘The influence of media trust and normative role expectations on the credibility of fact checkers’, Journalism Practice, 18:5, pp. 1137–57, https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2080102.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Sábada, C. and Salaverría, R. (2022), I Estudio sobre la desinformación en España, Pamplona: Uteca and Universidad de Navarra, https://dadun.unav.edu/handle/10171/63643. Accessed 10 April 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Salaverría, R. and Cardoso, G. (2023), ‘Future of disinformation studies: Emerging research fields’, Profesional de la información, 32:5, https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.sep.25.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Sánchez-Duarte, J. M. and Magallón-Rosa, R. (2020), ‘Infodemia y COVID-19: Evolución y viralización de informaciones falsas en España’, Revista Española de comunicación en salud, 2020:S1, pp. 31–41, https://doi.org/10.20318/recs.2020.5417.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Singer, J. (2018), ‘Fact-checkers as entrepreneurs: Scalability and sustainability for a new form of watchdog journalism’, Journalism Practice, 12:8, pp. 1070–80, https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1493946.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Singer, J. (2019), ‘Fact-checkers as entrepreneurs’, Journalism Practice, 13:8, pp. 976–81, https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1646613.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Singer, J. (2021), ‘Border patrol: The rise and role of fact-checkers and their challenge to journalists’ normative boundaries’, Journalism, 22:8, pp. 1929–46, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920933137.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Torcal, M. (2023), De votantes a hoolings: La polarización política en España, Madrid: Catarata.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Tsang, N., Feng, M. and Lee, F. L. F. (2023), ‘How fact-checkers delimit their scope of practices and use sources: Comparing professional and partisan practitioners’, Journalism, 24:10, pp. 2232–51, https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221100862.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Wardle, C. and Derakhshan, H. (2017), Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy Making, Strasbourg: Council of Europe, https://edoc.coe.int/en/media/7495-information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-research-and-policy-making.html. Accessed 10 April 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00114_1
Loading
Parliamentary discourse and fact-checkers: Strategies of verification and political agenda
Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies 16, 295 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs_00114_1
/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00114_1
/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00114_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): disinformation; information disorders; journalism; MPs; parliament information; political communication

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test