Skip to content
1981
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2040-4344
  • E-ISSN: 2040-4352

Abstract

Abstract

In rural Mexico, as in many other locations worldwide, women’s mobility is depicted as less natural or more problematic than men’s. Simultaneously, women are perceived as less mobile than their male peers. Does this mean that they move less? Where are these images derived from? Using ethnographic data, this article explores the social construction of (im)mobility in the context of a small village in central Mexico. Mobility and immobility are socially constructed and imbued with different meanings according to gender. Such differences rely on the fact that the borders are not equally significant for men and women. Borders become meaningful partly due to the reasons of border crossing, which are, in this ethnographic case, different according to gender.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc.8.2.151_1
2017-10-01
2025-03-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc.8.2.151_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test