Skip to content
1981
Volume 11, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2040-4344
  • E-ISSN: 2040-4352

Abstract

The political and social implications of the refugee crisis have positioned refugee studies as a crucial discipline to understand politics in contemporary times. This article aims to contribute to the discipline by exploring the example of a community of Muslim Afghan refugees in Lajpat Nagar, Delhi, India, and studying their ‘refugee experience’ through the theoretical concept of ‘boundaries’ as developed by noted American sociologist Richard Alba. The article studies the various aspects of the segregation of the refugee community by focusing on the different constituents of the boundary separating them from the citizens. The article initially discusses legal boundaries, that is the legal marginalization of refugees in general and Muslim refugees in particular by the Indian state. Through the perceptual boundary, which involves the negative perception held among citizens towards the refugee community and vice versa, social distance between the citizens and the refugee community is widened. The spatial boundary, which is the de facto ghettoization of the refugee community to a certain geographical space, forces the citizens and refugee communities to maintain minimal contact with each other. Through the linguistic boundary, further conditions leading to reduced social contact are created. In the presence of so many intersectional boundaries, this article showcases how the boundaries are sometimes blurred, and how aspects such as food or commerce can help the process of boundary breaching. The study of boundaries, their formation, effect and permeability also throws light onto other important aspects of the lives of members of the refugee community – their perception regarding mainstream Indians, their daily problems and challenges, aspirations and demands.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00025_1
2020-10-01
2025-03-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alba, R.. ( 2005;), ‘ Bright vs blurred boundaries: Second generation assimilation and exclusion on France Germany and the United States. ’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28:1, pp. 2049.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Sharmani, M.. ( 2003;), ‘ Livelihood and identity contractions of Somali refugees in Cairo. ’, working paper 2, Forced Migration and Refugee Studies , New Cairo:: The American University in Cairo;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Asian-African Legal Consultative Organization (AALCO) ( 1966), Bangkok Principles on the Status and Treatment of Refugees, 31 December, https://www.refworld.org/docid/3de5f2d52.html. Accessed 3 July 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Banerjee, S.. ( 2012), Legal Status of the Refugees in India, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2129225. Accessed 27 June 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baumann, Z.. ( 1955), Life in Fragments, Oxford:: Blackwell;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Field, J.,, Tiwari, A., and Mookherjee, Y.. ( 2017), Urban Refugees in Delhi – Identity, Entitlements and Well-Being, New Delhi:: International Institute for Environment and Development;, https://pubs.iied.org/10859IIED/. Accessed 23 June 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fozdar, F., and Torezani, S.. ( 2008;), ‘ Discrimination and well-being: Perceptions of refugees in Western Australia. ’, International Migration Review, 42:1, pp. 3063.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gayer, L., and Jaffrelot, C.. ( 2008;), ‘ Muslims of the Indian city: From centrality to marginality. ’, in L. Gayer, and C. Jaffrelot. (eds), Muslims in Indian Cities, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Grabska, K.. ( 2006;), ‘ Marginalization in urban spaces of the Global South: Urban refugees in Cairo. ’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 19:3, pp. 287307.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hansen, R.. ( 2014;), ‘ State controls: Borders, refugees, and citizenship. ’, in E. Fiddian-Qasmiyeh,, G. Loescher,, K. Long, and N. Sigona. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies, https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199652433.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199652433-e-032?rskey=rDvh1H&result=3. Accessed 5 July 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hussain, S.,, Usman, A.,, Habiba, U., and Amjad, A.. ( 2019;), ‘ Hate crimes against Muslims and increasing Islamophobia in India. ’, Journal of Indian Studies, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339933508_Hate_Crimes_against_Muslims_and_Increasing_Islamophobia_in_India. Accessed 5 July 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kumari, A.. ( 2013;), ‘ Delhi as refuge: Resettlement and assimilation of partition refugees. ’, Economic and Political Weekly, 48:44, pp. 6067.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Malkki, L.. ( 1995), Purity and Exile: Violence, Memory, and National Cosmology Among Hutu Refugees in Tanzania, Chicago:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Masih, N.. ( 2019;), ‘ A crackdown in India on suspected illegal immigrants could leave millions stateless. ’, Washington Post, 26 August, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/a-crackdown-in-india-on-suspected-illegal-immigration-could-leave-millions-stateless/2019/08/26/4f46b3a0-b471-11e9-8e94-71a35969e4d8_story.html. Accessed 4 July 2020
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mezzadra, S., and Neilson, B.. ( 2013), Border as Method, or, The Multiplication of Labor, Durham and London:: Duke University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Montreuil, A., and Bourhis, R. Y.. ( 2001;), ‘ Majority acculturation orientations toward “valued” and “devalued” immigrants. ’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32:6, pp. 698719.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Morrice, L.. ( 2005;), ‘ Lifelong learning and the social integration of refugees in the UK: The significance of social capital. ’, International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26:2, pp. 15572.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Passi, A.. ( 1999;), ‘ Boundaries as social practice and discourse: The Finnish Russian border. ’, Regional Studies, 33:7, pp. 66980.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Peisker, V. C., and Walker, I.. ( 2003;), ‘ Human capital, acculturation and social identity: Bosnian refugees in Australia. ’, Journal of Community and Applied Psychology, 13:5, pp. 33760.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Putnam, R.. ( 2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York:: Simon and Schuster;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rai, D.. ( 2019;), ‘ Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019: Everything important you should know about. ’, iPleaders: Intelligent Legal Solutions, 19 December, https://blog.ipleaders.in/citizenship-amendment-act-2019-everything-important-you-should-know-about/. Accessed 2 July 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Roy, P.. ( 2018), Delhi, India: A Case Study of Refugees in Towns, Feinstein International Center, Tufts University;, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/599720dc59cc68c3683049bc/t/5accadedaa4a998f3fa8ce89/1523363314195/Tufts+RIT+Delhi%2C+India.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Saikia, G.. ( 2017;), ‘ Aggressive Delhi: The capital needs to take a “chill pill”. ’, Newsbytes, 30 May, https://www.newsbytesapp.com/timeline/India/7482/43837/does-dilli-still-belong-to-the-dilwalas. Accessed 16 March 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sanyal, R.. ( 2012;), ‘ Refugees and the city: An urban discussion. ’, Geography Compass, 6:11, pp. 63334.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Sathyamala, C.. ( 2018;), ‘ Meat-eating in India: Whose food, whose politics, and whose rights?. ’, Policy Futures in Education, 17:7, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1478210318780553. Accessed 5 July 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Schmalz, D.. ( 2019;), ‘ A counterbalancing exception: The refugee concept as a normative idea. ’, The McGill Journal of International Law and Legal Pluralism, https://intergentes.com/a-counterbalancing-exception-the-refugee-concept-as-a-normative-idea/. Accessed 5 August 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Schlenk, J. C., and Kraas, F.. ( 2020;), ‘ Tibetan immigrant economy in Majnu Ka Tilla, Delhi (India). ’, paper from conference workshop ‘Tibetanness outside Tibet’ , Bonn:: Institute of Oriental and Asian Studies (IOA), University of Bonn;, 30–31 January.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sharma, M.. ( 2009), Refugees in Delhi, working paper number 229 , New Delhi:: Centre for Civil Society;, https://ccsindia.org/internship_papers/2009/refugees-in-delhi-229.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Stets, J. E., and Burke, P. J.. ( 2000;), ‘ Identity theory and social identity theory. ’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 63:3, pp. 22437.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C.. ( 1986;), ‘ The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. ’, in S. Worchel, and W. G. Austin. (eds), Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Chicago:: Nelson-Hall;, pp. 3348.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Thomas, D. R.. ( 2006;), ‘ A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. ’, American Journal of Evaluation, 27:2, pp. 23746.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. UNHCR ( 1969), OAU Convention: Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa, https://www.unhcr.org/about-us/background/45dc1a682/oau-convention-governing-specific-aspects-refugee-problems-africa-adopted.html. Accessed 27 June 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. UNHCR ( 2016;), ‘ Factsheet India February 2016. ’, UNHCR India, https://www.unhcr.org/protection/operations/50001ec69/india-fact-sheet.html. Accessed 27 June 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Weber, R. P.. ( 1990), Basic Content Analysis, Newbury Park, CA:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Roy, Sohom, and Mir, Raoof. ( 2020;), ‘ The Afghan refugees of Lajpat Nagar: The boundaries between them and Delhi. ’, Crossings: Journal of Migration & Culture, 11:2, pp. 201216, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/cjmc_00025_1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00025_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Afghans; boundaries; Delhi; India; refugee lives; refugees; separation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test