Skip to content
1981
1-2: In Transit: Mapping Digital and Transnational Narratives across Tunisian Borderlands
  • ISSN: 2040-4344
  • E-ISSN: 2040-4352

Abstract

Over the past decades, migratory flows have increased significantly, prompting host countries to implement forced return policies, particularly in Tunisia. However, the failure of a migration project and forced return have serious psychological and social consequences. While much research has focused on voluntary return, scant attention has been paid to forcibly repatriated individuals following migration failure. This study aims to fill this gap by examining the psychological impacts of forced return. More specifically, this research explores migrants’ decision-making processes, the identity transformations induced by migration and forced return, and the coping mechanisms they employ. Adopting an interactionist and situated approach, the study highlights that forced return generates profound identity disruptions, linked both to the migration project and the lived migration experience. To analyse these dynamics, autobiographical interviews were conducted with ten Tunisian migrants (aged 25 to 43) who, after emigrating to a European country, were forcibly repatriated. The interview analysis reveals the evolution of identity throughout the migration and return process, as well as the specific psychological effects of involuntary repatriation on migrants’ agency and well-being. These findings highlight the challenges faced by returning migrants and underscore the need for better reintegration support.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • British Academy International Writing Workshops 2022
  • ‘Migrants in transit: A transdisciplinary writing programme for emerging scholars of migration in Tunisia’ (Award WW22\100216)
© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00108_1
2025-09-22
2026-04-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdou, L. H. (2021), ‘Push or pull? Framing immigration in times of crisis in the European Union and the United States’, in B. Voltolini, M. Natorskiand C. Hay (eds), Crisis and Politicisation, London: Routledge, pp. 34–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Anghel, R. G., Botezat, A., Cosciug, A., Manafi, I. and Roman, M. (2016), ‘International migration, return migration, and their effects: A comprehensive review on the Romanian case’, SSRN, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2895293.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Arowolo, O. O. (2000), ‘Return migration and the problem of reintegration’, International Migration, 38:5, pp. 59–82, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2435.00128.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bardin, L. (2009), Análise de conteúdo, Lisbon: Edições 70.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Black, R. and Gent, S. (2004), Defining, Measuring and Influencing Sustainable Return: The Case of the Balkans, Brighton: Sussex Centre for Migration Research.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Cassarino, J. P. (2004), ‘Theorising return migration: The conceptual approach to return migrants revisited’, International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 6:2, pp. 253–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Chimni, B. S. (2004), ‘From resettlement to involuntary repatriation: Towards a critical history of durable solutions to refugee problems’, Refugee Survey Quarterly, 23:3, pp. 55–73, https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/23.3.55.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Connor, P. (2017), Still in Limbo: About a Million Asylum Seekers Await Word on Whether They Can Call Europe Home, Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2017/09/20/still-in-limbo/. Accessed 15 November 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Dubar, C. (1992), ‘Formes identitaires et socialisation professionnelle’, Revue Française de Sociologie, 33:4, pp. 505–29, https://doi.org/10.2307/3322224.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Eurostat (2023), Migration and Asylum in Europe: 2023 Edition, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/interactive-publications/migration-2023. Accessed 25 June 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Ghanem, T. (2003), When Forced Migrants Return Home: The Psychological Difficulties Returnees Encounter in the Reintegration Process, Oxford: Refugee Studies Centre.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Gingras, M. and Marielle, S. (1998), ‘Le modèle de Schlossberg pour expliquer les transitions personnelles et professionnelles’, L’Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 27:3, pp. 339–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Gmelch, G. (1980), ‘Return migration’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 9, pp. 135–234, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.09.100180.001031.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Guèye, D. D. and Mballo, A. (2023), ‘Retour et réintégration des migrants: Le rôle de la famille et de la communauté’, Sozialpolitik.ch, 2:2, https://doi.org/10.18753/2297-8224-4444.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Guèye, D. D., Jurt, L. and Odermatt, E. (2022), ‘Migration de retour et réintégration: Réussite collective et échec individuel?’, in N. Yemelong Temgoua, K. Celestin, H. L. Mboha Nyamsi and J. M. Nkenne (eds), Pratiques Migratoires et Réintégration des Migrants dans les Territoires de Départs, Cameroon: Edition de Midi, pp. 215–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Hagan, M. J. and Wassink, J. T. (2020), ‘Return migration around the world: An integrated agenda for future research’, Annual Review of Sociology, 46, pp. 533–52, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-120319-015855.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hammond, L. (1999), ‘Examining the discourse of repatriation: Towards a more proactive theory of return migration’, in R. Black and K. Koser (eds), The End of the Refugee Cycle? Refugee Repatriation and Reconstruction, Oxford: Berghahn, pp. 227–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Ibrahim, H., Al Sharif, F. Z., Satish, K. P., Hassen, L. and Nair, S. C. (2019), ‘Should I stay or should I go now? The impact of “pull” factors on physician decisions to remain in a destination country’, The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 34:4, pp. 1909–20, https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2819.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. King, R. and Kuschminder, K. (eds) (2022), Handbook of Return Migration, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Koser, K. and Black, R. (1999), ‘The end of the refugee cycle?’, in R. Black and K. Koser (eds), The End of the Refugee Cycle? Refugee Repatriation and Reconstruction, New York: Berghahn, pp. 2–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Koser, K. and Kuschminder, K. (2015), Comparative Research on the Assisted Voluntary Return and Reintegration of Migrants, Geneva: International Organization for Migration, https://www.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl486/files/our_work/DMM/AVRR/IOM-KoserKushminder-Comparative-Research-on-AVRR-2015.pdf. Accessed 20 December 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee, E. (1966), ‘A theory of migration’, Demography, 3:1, pp. 47–57, https://doi.org/10.2307/2060063.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Lhuillier, D. and Pestre, E. (eds) (2018), ‘Migrants, réfugiés, exilés: Résistances et créativités’, Nouvelle Revue de Psychosociologie, Special Issue: ‘Migrants, Réfugiés, Exilés: Résistances et Créativités’, 25, https://shs.cairn.info/revue-nouvelle-revue-de-psychosociologie-2018-1?lang=fr. Accessed 20 December 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Mégemont, J. L. and Baubion-Broye, A. (2001), ‘Dynamique identitaire et représentations de soi dans une phase de transition professionnelle et personnelle’, Connexions, 76:2, pp. 15–28, https://doi.org/10.3917/cnx.076.0015.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Mucchielli, M. (1992), L’identité, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Mullet, E., Cossin, S., Ihalouine, F. and Thomas, B. (2002), ‘La mobilité européenne des jeunes: Determinants émotionnels, attitudinaux et circonstanciels’, L’Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 31:3, pp. 393–416, https://doi.org/10.4000/osp.3275.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Mullet, E., Dej, V., Lemaire, I., Raïff, P. and Barthorpe, J. (2000), ‘Studying, working and living in another EU country: French youth’s point of view’, European Psychologist, 5:3, pp. 216–27, https://doi.org/10.1027//1016-9040.5.3.216.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Olry-Louis, I. (2020), ‘Introduction to the thematic issue “Migrations internationales et orientation”’, L’Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 49:3, pp. 383–99, https://doi.org/10.4000/osp.12366.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Organisation internationale pour les migrations (OIM) (2007), Glossaire de la migration, Droit international de la migration, 34, Geneva: OIM, https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/pub2024-059-l-glossaire-de-la-migration.pdf. Accessed 20 December 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Parkins, N. C. (2010), ‘Push and pull factors of migration’, American Review of Political Economy, 8:2, pp. 6–24, https://doi.org/10.38024/arpe.119.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Petit, V. (2007), Migrations internationales de retour et pays d’origine, Nogent-sur-Marne: CEPED.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Ruben, R., van Houte, M. and Davids, T. (2009), ‘What determines the embeddedness of forced-return migrants? Rethinking the role of pre- and post-return assistance’, International Migration Review, 43:4, pp. 908–37, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00789.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Schlossberg, N. K. (2005), Counseling Adults in Transition, New York: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Triandafyllidou, A., Bivand Erdal, M., Marchetti, S., Raghuram, P., Sahin Mencutek, Z., Salamońska, J. and Vintila, D. (2023), ‘Rethinking migration studies for 2050’, Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 22:1, https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2023.2289116.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (1997), The State of the World’s Refugees: A Humanitarian Agenda, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. World Health Organization (WHO) (2024), Refugee and Migrant Mental Health, Geneva: World Health Organization, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/refugee-and-migrant-mental-health. Accessed 25 June 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Zimmermann, K. F. (1995), ‘Migrations européennes: Répulsion et attraction’, in Actes de la Conférence annuelle de la Banque mondiale sur l’économie du développement, 1994, Supplement to The World Bank Economic Review, pp. 313–342.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. International Organization for Migration (IOM) (2019), World Migration Report 2020, Geneva: IOM, https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/wmr_2020.pdf. Accessed 20 December 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Koser, K. and Kuschminder, K. (2017), ‘Assisted voluntary return and reintegration of migrants: A comparative approach’, in M. McAuliffe and K. Koser (eds), A Long Way to Go: Irregular Migration Patterns, Processes, Drivers and Decision-Making, Acton: Canberra Press, pp. 255–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Thorel, P., Vayre, E. and Vonthron, A. M. (2016), ‘Identity dynamics, affective tone, and feelings of efficacy upon return from professional expatriation: The case of executives reintegrating their home organization’, L’Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 45:2, pp. 155–86, https://doi.org/10.4000/osp.4975.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00108_1
Loading
Reconstructing identity during migratory transitions: A qualitative analysis of the deported Tunisian migrants’ case
Crossings: Journal of Migration & Culture 16, 219 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1386/cjmc_00108_1
/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00108_1
/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00108_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): coping mechanisms; forced return migration; identity reconstruction; involuntary repatriation; migrant reintegration; psychological effects of deportation; qualitative narrative analysis; Tunisian returnees

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test