Skip to content
1981
1-2: In Transit: Mapping Digital and Transnational Narratives across Tunisian Borderlands
  • ISSN: 2040-4344
  • E-ISSN: 2040-4352

Abstract

Tunisia has long been framed as both a geographic and symbolic crossroads, yet politically and institutionally it is usually cast as a space of departure rather than arrival. This paradox becomes more salient in light of the country’s evolving role as a transit zone for sub-Saharan migrants navigating ‘fragmented journeys’ towards Europe. While much academic work has examined the Maghreb’s role in these circulations, it often overlooks the experiences and self-expressed narratives of the transmigrants. Dominant discourses tend to reduce these transmigrants to passive subjects caught in transit, emphasizing structural constraints over individual agency. In contrast, this article adopts a discursive lens to examine sub-Saharan voices and investigate how transit is conceptualized not merely as a phase but as a dynamic space of ‘situated knowledges’, as per Mignolo, and identity negotiation. Hinging on scarce research on sub-Saharan transmigrants’ self-representations, I qualitatively analyse a corpus produced by sub-Saharan transmigrants on social media between 2018 and 2023. I use Doreen Massey’s conceptualization of space to deconstruct ‘transit’ as a geographic and virtual locus. Then, drawing on resources from decolonial thought, particularly Mignolo, and social actor theory, as developed by van Leeuwen, I focus on the discursive manifestations of ‘transit’ as a state of fluidity and dynamism. I examine the vehicles of solidarity and resistance through the analysis of rhetoric and discursive tactics they use to actively reconfigure transit spaces. Through digital platforms, transmigrants cultivate what Diminescu terms ‘access capital’ to articulate collective identity and enact forms of ‘epistemic disobedience’, a term theorized by Mignolo. Rather than passive victims, they emerge as mobile agents who resist being spoken for, asserting the right to define their journeys and identities on their own terms.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • British Academy International Writing Workshops 2022
  • ‘Migrants in transit: A transdisciplinary writing programme for emerging scholars of migration in Tunisia’ (Award WW22\100216)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00109_1
2025-09-22
2026-04-14

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. @AJLabs (2024), Mapbox OpenStreetMap, ‘Tunisia: The migration trap’, Al Jazeera, 9 May, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/5/10/tunisia-the-migration-trap. Accessed 23 February 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Africa Market Sfax (2022), Facebook, 4 January, https://www.facebook.com/groups/290464685512077/?locale=fr_FR. Accessed 27 June 2025.
  3. Agamben, G. (2008), State of Exception, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Alencar, A. (2018), ‘Refugee integration and social media: A local and experiential perspective’, Information, Communication & Society, 21:11, pp. 1588603, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1340500.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Andersson, R. (2014), ‘Time and the migrant other: European border controls and the temporal economics of illegality’, American Anthropologist, 116:4, pp. 795809.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Barbici Wagner, A., Catalano, T. and Meadows, B. (2023), ‘Migrants, COVID-19, and Italy: A multimodal critical discourse analysis of the construction of and resistance to nationalist discourses’, unpublished manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Butler, J. (2015), Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cassar, C., Heath, T. and Jäckle, S. (2016), ‘Digital media and migration: Understanding the role of internet access for Syrian refugees in Germany’, Media and Communication, 4:2, pp. 12333.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Certeau, M. de (1984), The Practice of Everyday Life (trans. S. Rendall), Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Collyer, M. (2007), ‘In-between places: Trans-Saharan transit migrants in Morocco and the fragmented journey to Europe’, Antipode, 39:4, pp. 66890, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00546.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cresswell, T. (2006), On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World, London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Diminescu, D. (2008), ‘The connected migrant: An epistemological manifesto’, Social Science Information, 47:4, pp. 56579.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Diminescu, D. (2020), ‘Researching the connected migrant’, in K. Smets, K. Leurs, M. Georgiou, S. Witteborn and R. G. K. Zaborowski (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Media and Migration, London: Sage, pp. 7478, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526476982.n12.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Düvell, F. (2006), ‘Irregular migration: A global, historical and economic perspective’, in F. Düvell (ed.), Illegal Immigration in Europe: Beyond Control?, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1439.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Eggins, S. (2004), Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics, London: A&C Black.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. (2016), ‘Refugee-refugee relations in contexts of overlapping displacement’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40:2, pp. 395402.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Genova, N. P. de (2002), ‘Migrant “illegality” and deportability in everyday life’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 31:1, pp. 41947, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085432.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Goffman, E. (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York: Doubleday Anchor.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Haas, H. de (2014), ‘Migration theory: Quo vadis?’, working paper, Oxford: International Migration Institute and University of Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hlioui, A. (2023), ‘Representations of sub-Saharans in Tunisian media: A discourse historical approach to silencing and othering’, in S. Marceno and G. Sajeva (eds), Migrations: Governance, Policies, and Rights, Milan: Mimesis International, pp. 11134.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hlioui, A. (2024), ‘The discursive (re)construction of migrant identity through self-representations: Sub Saharans on the maghreb “digiscapes”’, Proceedings of the International Conference on Communication & Identity, Monastir, Tunisia, 16–18 November 2023, Tunisia: Al-Mukhatabat, 51, pp. 5576, https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A15%3A12942351/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Ascholar&id=ebsco%3Agcd%3A179053055&crl=f&link_origin=www.google.com. Accessed 23 February 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Khosravi, S. and Keshavarz, M. (2022), ‘To see like a smuggler’, in S. Khosravi and M. Keshavarz (eds), Seeing Like a Smuggler: Borders from Below, Oakland, CA: PM Press, pp. 120.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Massey, D. B. (2005), For Space, London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mignolo, W. D. (2009), ‘Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom’, Theory, Culture & Society, 26:7–8, pp. 15981, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Papacharissi, Z. (2015), Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Papadopoulou-Kourkoula, A. (2008), Transit Migration: The Missing Link Between Emigration and Settlement, Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2009), ‘The discourse-historical approach (DHA)’, in R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds), Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage, pp. 87121.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Scott, J. C. (1990), Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sheller, M. and Urry, J. (2006), ‘The new mobilities paradigm’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38:2, pp. 20726, https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ticktin, M. I. (2011), Casualties of Care: Immigration and the Politics of Humanitarianism in France, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Türkay, B. (2020), ‘Social media and ICT use by refugees, immigrants and NGOs: A literature overview’, in V. Mahmutoğlu and J. M. González (eds), Communication of Migration in Media and Arts, London: Transnational Press, pp. 11129.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. van Leeuwen, T. (2008), Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. van Leeuwen, T. (2013), ‘The representation of social actors’, in C. R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Routledge, pp. 3270.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Witteborn, S. (2015), ‘Becoming (im)perceptible: Forced migrants and virtual practice’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 28:3, pp. 35067, https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feu036.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Nairi, A. H. (2025), ‘The representation of sub-Saharan African migrants in the Tunisian written media: A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis’, The Journal of North African Studies, 30:2, pp. 25993, https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2024.2396333.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00109_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test