Skip to content
1981
1-2: In Transit: Mapping Digital and Transnational Narratives across Tunisian Borderlands
  • ISSN: 2040-4344
  • E-ISSN: 2040-4352

Abstract

By studying the Schengen visa regime from the perspective of applicants – ‘youth on the move’ in Tunisia – and their subjective experiences of (im)mobility and ‘stuckedness’, this article sheds light on the bordering practices of the EU border regime in post-2011 Tunisia and its entanglement with the multiple axes of power between the two shores of the Mediterranean. In this local political context, the process of externalizing the European Union’s borders is reflected upon by unpacking the labels of ‘cooperation’ and ‘Euro–Mediterranean partnership’. Indeed, the emphasis on the ‘border spectacle’ images of the undocumented sea crossing from the Maghreb to Europe, known as , has contributed to the prominence of the crisis discourse and the securitization of mobilities in the Mediterranean Maghreb. As a result, this setting obscured mobility inequalities and the broader extractive political economy of EU–Maghreb relations. Alternatively, this article embraces the crucial role of anthropology in challenging the inherent nature of border regimes. It adopts an ethnographic approach of ‘looking at the border from the other side’ to shift the gaze and examine the ‘regular mobilities’, governed by the Schengen visa regime. This shift in perspective enables us to examine the regime’s various invisible borders – material, symbolic and affective – and reveal the subjects they produce and their struggles.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • British Academy International Writing Workshops 2022
  • ‘Migrants in transit: A transdisciplinary writing programme for emerging scholars of migration in Tunisia’ (Award WW22\100216))
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) (Award SFB 1604–501120656))
© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00110_1
2025-09-22
2026-04-13

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bigo, D. and Guild, E. (2005), ‘Policing at a distance: Schengen visa policies’, in D. Bigo and E. Guild (eds), Controlling Frontiers: Free Movements Into and Within Europe, London: Routledge, pp. 233–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Boubakri, H. (2013), Revolution and International Migration in Tunisia, MPC Research Report 2014/04, Florence: European University Institute, https://cadmus.eui.eu/server/api/core/bitstreams/40ae01a1-e6e7-5799-966a-59f91f5492dd/content. Accessed 23 January 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Casas-Cortes, M., Cobarrubias, S., Genova, N. de, Garelli, G., Grappi, G., Heller, C., Hess, S., Kasparek, B., Mezzadra, S., Neilson, B., Peano, I., Pezzani, L., Pickles, J., Rahola, F., Riedner, L., Scheel, S. and Tazzioli, M. (2015), ‘New keywords: Migration and borders’, Cultural Studies, 29:1, pp. 55–87, https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2014.891630.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Cassarino, J. (2014), ‘Channelled policy transfers: EU-Tunisia interactions on migration matters’, European Journal of Migration and Law, 16:1, pp. 97–123, https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-00002050.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cuttitta, P. (2022), ‘Over land and sea: NGOs/CSOs and EU border externalisation along the central Mediterranean route’, Geopolitics, 30:1, pp. 19–45, https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2124158.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Dahinden, J. (2016), ‘A plea for the “de-migranticization” of research on migration and integration’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39:13, pp. 2207–25, https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1124129.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Dini, S. and Giusa, C. (2020), Externalising Migration Governance Through Civil Society: Tunisia as a Case Study, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Elleuch, M., Jemaa, A. and Khelifa, B. E. (2020), Fortress Europe: A Study on the Tightening of Schengen Visa Policy, Its Consequences and Its Victims, Tunis: FTDES – Forum Tunisien pour les Droits Economiques et Sociaux, https://ftdes.net/rapports/shengenvisa.en.pdf. Accessed 11 February 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. and Nyberg Sorensen, N. (eds) (2012), The Migration Industry and the Commercialization of International Migration, London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Garelli, G. and Tazzioli, M. (2016), Tunisia as a Revolutionized Space of Migration, New York: Palgrave Pivot.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Genova, N. de (2013), ‘Spectacles of migrant “illegality”: The scene of exclusion, the obscene of inclusion’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36:7, pp. 1180–98, https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.783710.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Genova, N. de (ed.) (2017), ‘Introduction: The borders of “Europe” and the European question’, in The Borders of ‘Europe’: Autonomy of Migration, Tactics of Bordering, New York: Duke University Press, pp. 1–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Giglioli, I. (2016), ‘Producing Sicily as Europe: Migration, colonialism and the making of the Mediterranean border between Italy and Tunisia’, Geopolitics, 22:2, pp. 407–28, https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1233529.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Hage, G. (2009), ‘Waiting out the crisis: On stuckedness and governmentality’, in G. Hage (ed.), Waiting, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, pp. 97–106.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hmed, C. (2016), ‘Au-delà de l’exception tunisienne: Les failles et les risques du processus révolutionnaire’, Pouvoirs, 156:1, pp. 137–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Infantino, F. (2019), Schengen Visa Implementation and Transnational Policymaking: Bordering Europe, New York: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Khosravi, S. (2010), ‘Illegal’ Traveller: An Auto-Ethnography of Borders, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Khosravi, S. (2019), ‘What do we see if we look at the border from the other side?’, Social Anthropology, 27:3, pp. 409–24, https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12685.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Khosravi, S. (ed.) (2021), Waiting: A Project in Conversation, Bielefeld and London: Transcript Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Limam, M. (2020), Sur un Pont Aux Ânes: La Coopération Entre l’UE et La Tunisie En Matière Migratoire, Tunis: Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung North Africa Office, https://rosaluxna.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Sur-un-pont-aux-anes.pdf. Accessed 5 February 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. M’charek, A. (2020), ‘Harraga: Burning borders, navigating colonialism’, The Sociological Review, 68:2, pp. 418–34, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120905491.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Mabrouk, M. (2010), Voiles et sel: Culture, foyers et organisation de la migration clandestine en Tunisie, Tunis: Nirvana and Éditions Sahar.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Mazzara, F. (2019), Reframing Migration: Lampedusa, Border Spectacle and the Aesthetics of Subversion, Oxford: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Mezzadra, S. (2010), ‘The gaze of autonomy: Capitalism, migration and social struggles’, in V. Squire (ed.), The Contested Politics of Mobility: Borderzones and Irregularity, London: Routledge, pp. 121–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Mezzadra, S. and Brett, N. (2012), ‘Between inclusion and exclusion: On the topology of global space and borders’, Theory, Culture & Society, 29:4–5, pp. 58–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Mezzadra, S. and Brett, N. (2013), Border as Method, or the Multiplication of Labor: Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Observatoire National de la Migration and Institut National de la Statistique (ONM and INS) (2020), Rapport de l’enquête Nationale Sur La Migration Internationale Tunisia HIMS, 7 December, Tunis: Observatoire National de la Migration and Institut national de la statistique, https://www.ins.tn/publication/rapport-de-lenquete-nationale-sur-la-migration-internationale-tunisia-hims. Accessed 29 January 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Pécoud, A. (2013), ‘Introduction’, in M. Geiger and A. Pécoud (eds), Disciplining the Transnational Mobility of People, International Political Economy Series, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Pécoud, A. and van Desse, J. (2021), ‘Campagnes de dissuasion massive’, Le Monde Diplomatique, 1 March, https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2021/03/PECOUD/62833. Accessed 4 February 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Saïb Musette, M. (2016), ‘Brain drain from the Southern Mediterranean’, Barcelona: European Institute of the Mediterranean, https://www.iemed.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Brain-Drain-from-the-Southern-Mediterranean.pdf. Accessed 29 January 2025.
  31. Sayad, A. (1999), La double absence: Des illusions de l’émigré aux souffrances de l’immigré, Paris: Seuil.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Scheel, S. (2017), ‘“The secret is to look good on paper”: Appropriating mobility within and against a machine of illegalization’, in N. de Genova (ed.), The Borders of ‘Europe’: Autonomy of Migration, Tactics of Bordering, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 37–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Scheel, S. (2019), Autonomy of Migration? Appropriating Mobility Within Biometric Border Regimes, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Scheel, S. and Tazzioli, M. (2022), ‘Who is a migrant? Abandoning the nation-state point of view in the study of migration’, Migration Politics, 1:1, https://doi.org/10.21468/MigPol.1.1.002.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Shore, C., Wright, S. and Però, D. (eds) (2011), Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power, New York: Berghahn.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Souiah, F. (2019), ‘“My Visa application was denied, I decided to go anyway”: Interpreting, experiencing, and contesting visa policies and the (im)mobility regime in Algeria’, Migration and Society, 2:1, pp. 68–80, https://doi.org/10.3167/arms.2019.020107.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Stierl, M. (2017), ‘Excessive migration, excessive governance: Border entanglements in Greek EU-rope’, in N. de Genova (ed.), The Borders of ‘Europe’: Autonomy of Migration, Tactics of Bordering, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 210–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Tababi, K. (2023), ‘Le mémorandum entre la Tunisie et l’Union Européenne: Vers un renforcement de la dépendance, de l’autoritarisme et de l’Europe forteresse?’, working paper, Brussels: European Council of Refugees and Exiles, https://ecre.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/ECRE-Working-Paper-20_Le-Memorandum-entre-la-Tunisie-et-lUnion-europeenne.pdf. Accessed 17 February 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Teti, A., Abbott, P., Talbot, V. and Maggiolini, P. (2020), Democratisation Against Democracy: How EU Foreign Policy Fails the Middle East, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Walters, W. (2002), ‘Mapping schengenland: Denaturalizing the border’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20:5, pp. 561–80, https://doi.org/10.1068/d274t.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Walters, W. (2010), ‘Foucault and frontiers: Notes on the birth of the humanitarian border’, in U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann and T. Lemke (eds), Governmentality, London: Routledge, pp. 146–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Zitouni, K. (2025), ‘The (de-)colonial dynamics of im-mobility in 21st century representations of migration: An interdisciplinary study of (counter-)narratives around (North-) African “harga” to EU-rope’, Ph.D. thesis, London: University of Westminster.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Garnaoui, W. (2022), Harga et désir d’occident, Tunis: Nirvana and Éditions Sahar.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Jemaa, A. (2022), ‘The Schengen visa regime in practice: Externalization and uneven mobilities in post-2011 Tunisia, a perspective from the other side’, MA dissertation, Vienna: Central European University, https://sierra.ceu.edu/record=b1441613. Accessed 21 January 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Zagaria, V. (2019), ‘The morally fraught harga: Migration blame games in a Tunisian border town’, The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 37:2, pp. 57–73, https://doi.org/10.3167/cja.2019.370205.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00110_1
Loading
Harga and the visa nexus: The securitization of youth mobility in Tunisia
Crossings: Journal of Migration & Culture 16, 185 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1386/cjmc_00110_1
/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00110_1
/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00110_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): (im)mobility; bordering; externalization; invisible borders; neocolonialism; Schengen regime; stuckedness

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test