Skip to content
1981
1-2: In Transit: Mapping Digital and Transnational Narratives across Tunisian Borderlands
  • ISSN: 2040-4344
  • E-ISSN: 2040-4352

Abstract

Within the context of digital border technologies, this article undertakes an analysis of the use of social media by people on the move. The main case study analysed here consists of social media clips taken during the crossing of the Mediterranean liquid border by young (الحراقة), an Arabic word used in Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco to define ‘those who burn the borders’, in other words, those who try to reach Europe from the Maghreb via unauthorized routes. These videos represent an attempt to reframe the mainstream narrative of the undocumented and undesired migrants through what I define as a ‘counter-map of disagreement’. Going beyond the visual regime of criminality and establishing a new paradigm of self-determination and agency, these counter-maps reverse the logic of the border while transgressing it. Through a multimodal analysis, this article examines the Mediterranean border from the perspective of people on the move, who are shaping a new digital gaze and narrative. Rather than viewing borders solely as violent and divisive tools, they depict them as sites of contestation, porous and fluid.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • British Academy International Writing Workshops 2022
  • ‘Migrants in transit: A transdisciplinary writing programme for emerging scholars of migration in Tunisia’ (Award WW22\100216)
© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00111_1
2025-09-22
2026-04-15

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alencar, A., Kondova, K. and Ribbens, W. (2019), ‘The smartphone as a lifeline: An exploration of refugees’ use of mobile communication technologies during their flight’, Media, Culture & Society, 41:6, pp. 828–44, https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718813486.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Anon. (2022a), ‘Tunisian influencers glamorize risky migrant crossings to Europe’, Haaretz, 15 February, https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/2022-02-15/ty-article/tunisian-influencers-glamorize-risky-migrant-crossings-to-europe/0000017f-f1ae-d497-a1ff-f3aea5c70000. Accessed 4 June 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Anon. (2022b), ‘Tunisian women’s posts glamorize risky migrant crossings’, The Independent, 14 February, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/italy-tunis-experts-mediterranean-people-b2014511.html. Accessed 18 July 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Avraamidou, M. (2020), ‘The “refugee crisis” as a Eurocentric media construct: An exploratory analysis of pro-migrant media representations in The Guardian and the New York Times’, TripleC, 18:1, pp. 478–93, https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v18i1.1080.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Badalič, V. (2019), ‘Tunisia’s role in the EU external migration policy: Crimmigration law, illegal practices, and their impact on human rights’, Journal of International Migration and Integration, 20:1, pp. 85–100, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-018-0596-7.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bayramoğlu, Y. (2023), ‘Border countervisuality: Smartphone videos of border crossing and migration’, Media, Culture & Society, 45:3, pp. 595–611, https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221136013.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bello, V. (2020), ‘The spiralling of the securitisation of migration in the EU: From the management of a “crisis” to a governance of human mobility?’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48:6, pp. 1327–44, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2020.1851464.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bhandari, A. and Bimo, S. (2022), ‘Why’s everyone on TikTok now? The algorithmized self and the future of self-making on social media’, Social Media + Society, 8:1, https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221086241.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bischoff, C., Falk, F. and Kafehsy, S. (eds) (2010), Images of Illegalized Immigration: Towards a Critical Iconology of Politics, New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bishop, S. (2019), Undocumented Storytellers: Narrating the Immigrant Rights Movement, New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bowman, V. (2022), ‘Migrant TikTok influencers accused of “glamourising” dangerous Mediterranean crossing’, The Telegraph, 14 February, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/02/14/migrant-tiktok-influencer-films-dinghy-trip-italy-posing-bmws/. Accessed 4 June 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cantat, C., Pécoud, A. and Thiollet, H. (2023), ‘Migration as crisis’, American Behavioral Scientist, 69:6, https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642231182889. Accessed 4 June 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Chamekh, M. (2021), ‘Illegal migration in Tunisian rap’, Athens Journal of Mediterranean Studies, 7:1, pp. 45–58, https://doi.org/10.30958/ajms.7-1-3.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Chouliaraki, L. and Georgiou, M. (2022), The Digital Border: Migration, Technology, Power, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Chouliaraki, L. and Stolic, T. (2017), ‘Rethinking media responsibility in the refugee “crisis”: A visual typology of European news’, Media, Culture & Society, 39:8, pp. 1162–77, https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717726163.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Collyer, M. (2007), ‘In-between places: Trans-Saharan transit migrants in Morocco and the fragmented journey to Europe’, Antipode, 39:4, pp. 668–90, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00546.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Creta, S. and Denaro, C. (2022), ‘Counter-narrating the Mediterranean border regime and reclaiming rights: Refugee voices in Libya and across the sea’, in V. Galis, M. B. Jørgensen and M. Sandberg (eds), The Migration Mobile: Border Dissidence, Sociotechnical Resistance and the Construction of Irregularized Migrants, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 165–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Csernatoni, R. (2018), ‘Constructing the EU’s high-tech borders: FRONTEX and dual-use drones for border management’, European Security, 27:2, pp. 175–200, https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2018.1481396.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Davies, J. (2022), ‘The TikTok migrants: Tunisian influencers film their illegal immigration to Europe on a packed dinghy – then post boasting images of their spending sprees, BMW rides and trips to the Eiffel Tower’, Daily Mail, 14 February, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10510223/Tunisian-womens-posts-glamorize-risky-migrant-crossings.html. Accessed 4 June 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. De Genova, N. (2013), ‘Spectacles of migrant “illegality”: The scene of exclusion, the obscene of inclusion’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36:7, pp. 1180–98, [Crossref].
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Dekker, R., Engbersen, G., Klaver, J. and Vonk, H. (2018), ‘Smart refugees: How Syrian asylum migrants use social media information in migration decision-making’, Social Media + Society, 4:1, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764439.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Dijstelbloem, H. (2021), Borders as Infrastructure: The Technopolitics of Border Control, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Dijstelbloem, H. and Broeders, D. (2015), ‘Border surveillance, mobility management and the shaping of non-publics in Europe’, European Journal of Social Theory, 18:1, pp. 21–38, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431014534353.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Diminescu, D. (2008), ‘The connected migrant: An epistemological manifesto’, Social Science Information, 47:4, pp. 565–79, https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018408096447.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Ebel, F. (2022), ‘Tunisian women’s posts glamorize risky migrant crossings’, Associated Press, 14 February, https://apnews.com/article/business-africa-europe-italy-social-media-4a40324f87d8091c055f09aaa32fc456. Accessed 4 June 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Fakih, N. and Horchani, H. (2018), ‘L’émigration clandestine au miroir de l’art audio-visuel Tunisien:  “L’image de la harga vers Lampedusa: Une tragédie artistique ou une catastrophe humaine?”’, دراسات في العلوم  الإنسانية والاجتماعية,18:2, pp. 293–320.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Figge, M. (2017), ‘“Actions of the eyes of the fleeing?”: Reflections on the in/visibility of harraga videos’, Cinéma & Cie: Film and Media Studies Journal, 17:28, pp. 21–30, https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221136013.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Friese, H. (2014), Grenzen der Gastfreundschaft: Die Bootsflüchtlinge von Lampedusa und die Europäische Frage, Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Genova, N. de (2013), ‘Spectacles of migrant “illegality”: The scene of exclusion, the obscene of inclusion’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36:7, pp. 1180–98, https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.783710.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Gillespie, M., Osseiran, S. and Cheesman, M. (2018), ‘Syrian refugees and the digital passage to Europe: Smartphone infrastructures and affordances’, Social Media + Society, 4:1, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764440.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Glouftsios, G. (2018), ‘Governing circulation through technology within EU border security practice-networks’, Mobilities, 13:2, pp. 185–99, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2017.1403774.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Habermas, J. (1971), ‘Reflections on the linguistic foundations of sociology: The Christian Gauss lectures, Princeton University, February–March’, in On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction: Preliminary Studies in the Theory of Communicative Action (trans. B. Fultner), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 97.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Hadfi, Z. (2013), ‘“L’épopée” des clandestins’, Conserveries mémorielles: Revue transdisciplinaire de jeunes chercheurs, 13, https://journals.openedition.org/cm/1318. Accessed 4 June 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Hage, G. (2009), ‘Waiting out the crisis: On stuckedness and governmentality’, in G. Hage (ed.), Waiting, Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing, pp. 97–106.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hemmings, C. (2012), ‘Affective solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation’, Feminist Theory, 13:2, pp. 147–61, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700112442643.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Horsti, K. (2008), ‘Hope and despair: Representation of Europe and Africa in news coverage of “migration crisis”’, Communication Studies, 3, pp. 125–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Huc-Hepher, S. (2021), French London: A Blended Ethnography of a Migrant City, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Human Rights Watch (2019), No Escape from Hell: EU Policies Contribute to Abuse of Migrants in Libya, 21 January, https://www.hrw.org/report/2019/01/21/no-escape-hell/eu-policies-contribute-abuse-migrants-libya. Accessed 4 June 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. iBorderCtrl (n.d.), ‘Homepage’, https://www.iborderctrl.eu/. Accessed 4 June 2025.
  40. Isin, E. and Ruppert, E. (2020), Being Digital Citizens, London: Rowman & Littlefield.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Jacobsen, C. M., Karlsen, M.-A. and Khosravi, S. (eds) (2021), Waiting and the Temporalities of Irregular Migration, London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Kapitalis (2022), ‘Des Tunisiennes glorifient les traversées des migrants’, Kapitalis, 15 February, https://kapitalis.com/tunisie/2022/02/15/des-tunisiennes-glorifient-les-traversees-des-migrants-clandestins/. Accessed 4 June 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Kime, S. (2020), ‘Les harragates algériennes: La fuite vers un destin inconnu’, Recherches Internationales, 118, pp. 157–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Krasteva, G. (2022), ‘Tunisian TikTokers accused of “glamorising” deadly Mediterranean migrant crossing’, The Metro, 14 February, https://metro.co.uk/2022/02/14/tunisian-tiktokers-accused-of-glamorising-mediterranean-crossing-16102966/#:~:text=Experts%20have%20warned%20that%20Ms,boats%20and%20attempt%20the%20trip.&text=Upon%20her%20arrival%20in%20Italy,a%20coronavirus%20quarantine%20detention%20centre. Accessed 4 June 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Latonero, M. (2015), ‘For refugees, a digital passage to Europe’, Thomson Reuters Foundation News, 27 December, https://news.trust.org/item/20151227124555-blem7/. Accessed 4 June 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Latonero, M. and Kift, P. (2018), ‘On digital passages and borders: Refugees and the new infrastructure for movement and control’, Social Media + Society, 4:1, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764432.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Leurs, K. (2023), Digital Migration, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Leurs, K. and Smets, K. (2018), ‘Five questions for digital migration studies: Learning from digital connectivity and forced migration in(to) Europe’, Social Media + Society, 4:1, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764425.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Lghorba_tn7 (2024), ‘Lghorba_tn7’, Instagram, 12 September, https://www.instagram.com/p/C_0ikc1tKUt/. Accessed 4 June 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. M’Charek, A. (2020), ‘Harraga: Burning borders, navigating colonialism’, The Sociological Review, 68:2, pp. 418–34, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120905491.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Mastrangelo, S. (2018), ‘Parcours de harraga tunisiens: Représentations et lecture à la lumière de la foi en Dieu’, in N. Ortar, M. Salzbrunn and M. Stock Dirs (eds), Migrations, circulations, mobilités: Nouveaux enjeux épistémologiques et conceptuels à l’épreuve du terrain, Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires de Provence, pp. 127–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Mazzara, F. (2019), Reframing Migration: Lampedusa, Border Spectacle and the Aesthetics of Subversion, Oxford: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. McAuliffe, M. (ed.) (2021), Research Handbook on Migration and Technology, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Meddeb, H. and Louati, F. (2024), ‘Tunisia’s transformation into a transit hub: Illegal migration and policy dilemmas’, working paper, Beirut: Malcom H. Kerr: Carnegie Middle East Center, https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/03/tunisias-transformation-into-a-transit-hub-illegal-migration-and-policy-dilemmas?lang=en&center=middle-east. Accessed 4 June 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Mirzoeff, N. (2011), The Right to Look: A Counterhistory of Visuality, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Mulvey, L. (1975), ‘Visual pleasure and narrative cinema’, Screen, 16:3, pp. 6–18, https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Noori, S. (2020), ‘Navigating the Aegean Sea: Smartphones, transnational activism and viapolitical in(ter)ventions in contested maritime borderzones’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48:8, pp. 1856–72, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2020.1796265.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Orlando, V. K. (2018), ‘Harragas, global subjects, and failed deterritorializations: The tragedies of illegal Mediterranean crossings in Maghrebi cinema’, in C. Iheka and J. Taylor (eds), African Migration Narratives: Politics, Race, and Space, Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, pp. 2–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Pacciardi, A. and Berndtsson, J. (2022), ‘EU border externalisation and security outsourcing: Exploring the migration industry in Libya’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48:17, pp. 4010–28, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2022.2061930.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Papadopoulos, D. and Tsianos, V. S. (2013), ‘After citizenship: Autonomy of migration, organisational ontology and mobile commons’, Citizenship Studies, 17:2, pp. 178–96, https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2013.780736.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Ponzanesi, S. and Leurs, K. (2018), ‘Connected migrants: Encapsulation and cosmopolitanization’, Popular Communication, 16:1, pp. 4–20, https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2017.1418359.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Ponzanesi, S. and Leurs, K. (2022), ‘Digital migration practices and the everyday’, Communication, Culture and Critique, 15:2, pp. 103–21, https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcac016.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Ponzanesi, S. and Leurs, K. (eds) (2024), Doing Digital Migration Studies: Theories and Practices of the Everyday, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Rae, M., Holman, R. and Nethery, A. (2017), ‘Self-represented witnessing: The use of social media by asylum seekers in Australia’s offshore immigration detention centres’, Media, Culture & Society, 40:4, pp. 479–95, https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717746229.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Rancière, J. (2010), Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics, London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Rancière, J. (2011), ‘The thinking of dissensus: Politics and aesthetics’, in P. Bowman and R. Stamp (eds), Reading Rancière, New York: Continuum, pp. 1–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Rivera-Escartin, A. and Johansson-Nogués, E. (2022), ‘Harraga and Europe: The emotional geographies of undocumented migrants in Tunisian filmmaking’, Political Geography, 94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102580.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Rushton, S. (2022), ‘Tunisian social media influencers glamourise migrant crossings’, The National, 14 February, https://www.thenationalnews.com/world/europe/2022/02/14/tunisian-social-media-influencers-glamourise-migrant-crossings/. Accessed 4 June 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Salah, A. A., Korkmaz, E. E. and Bircan, T. (eds) (2022), Data Science for Migration and Mobility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Salzbrunn, M., Souiah, F. and Mastrangelo, S. (2015), ‘Les “brûleurs” de frontières dans la musique populaire tunisienne: La migration non documentée au prisme de chansons de rap et de mezoued’, Afrique Contemporaine, 254:2, pp. 37–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Sandberg, M., Rossi, L., Galis, V. and Bak Jørgensen, M. (eds) (2022), Research Methodologies and Ethical Challenges in Digital Migration Studies, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Schwarz, N. V. and Stierl, M. (2019), ‘Amplifying migrant voices and struggles at sea as a radical practice’, South Atlantic Quarterly, 118:3, pp. 661–69, https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-7616224.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Sheller, M. (2018), Mobility Justice: The Politics of Movement in an Age of Extremes, Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Smets, K., Leurs, K., Georgiou, M., Witteborn, S. and Gajjala, R. (eds) (2020), Handbook of Media and Migration, London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Souiah, F. (2013), ‘Les politiques migratoires restrictives: Une fabrique de harraga’, Hommes & Migrations, 1304, pp. 95–101.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Souiah, F. (2018), ‘Brûler les frontières: Fuite ou contestation’, in A. Allal and V. Geisser (eds), Tunisie: Une démocratisation au-dessus de tout soupçon?, Paris: CNRS-Éditions, pp. 399–416.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Souiah, F., Salzbrunn, M. and Mastrangelo, S. (2017), ‘Hope and disillusion: The representations of Europe in Algerian and Tunisian cultural production about undocumented migration’, in M. Davis and T. Serres (eds), Europe Seen from North Africa, New York: Bloomsbury, pp. 197–227.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Stumpf, J. (2006), ‘The crimmigration crisis: Immigrants, crime, and sovereign power’, American University Law Review, 56:2, pp. 367–419, https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2025.161018.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Tazzioli, M. (2023), ‘Counter-mapping the techno-hype in migration research’, Mobilities, 18:6, pp. 920–35, https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2023.2165447.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Tazzioli, M. and Garelli, G. (2017), Tunisia as a Revolutionised Space of Migration, New York: Palgrave.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Zagaria, V. (2019), ‘The morally fraught harga: Migration blame games in a Tunisian border town, The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 37:2, pp. 57–73, https://doi.org/10.3167/cja.2019.370205.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Zijlstra, J. and van Liempt, I. (2017), ‘Smart(phone) travelling: Understanding the use and impact of mobile technology on irregular migration journeys’, International Journal of Migration and Border Studies, 3:3, pp. 174–91, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMBS.2017.10001444.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Zitouni, K. (2025), ‘The (de)colonial dynamics of “im-mobility” in 21st century unauthorized migration representation: An interdisciplinary study of bilingual (counter)narratives around (North) African “harga” to EU-rope’, Ph.D. thesis, London: University of Westminster.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Zivi, K. (2012), Making Rights Claims: A Practice of Democratic Citizenship, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00111_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): agency and self-representation; border transgression; counter-mapping; digital border technologies; Mediterranean migration; migration; narrative resistance; social media activism

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test