Skip to content
1981
1-2: In Transit: Mapping Digital and Transnational Narratives across Tunisian Borderlands
  • ISSN: 2040-4344
  • E-ISSN: 2040-4352

Abstract

‘In Transit: Mapping Digital and Transnational Narratives across Tunisian Borderlands’ is a double Special Issue emerging from a cross-Mediterranean scholarly collaboration supported by the British Academy. Focusing on Tunisia as a key site for examining contemporary migration, the Special Issue traces the country’s shifting role from a ‘palimpsest of historical crossings’ to a space of mobility containment under the European Union’s externalized border regime. Amid Tunisia’s growing prominence as a transit hub for sub-Saharan migrants seeking entry into Europe, the contributions offer transdisciplinary insights into migration as both lived experience and mediated narrative. Divided into two parts – ‘The digital as medium and method’ and ‘Transnational narratives through transdisciplinary lenses’ – the double Special Issue explores how migration is represented, negotiated and contested online and across borders. It challenges static understandings of transit, (im)mobility and migrant identity by centring diverse actors: Tunisian , forcibly returned nationals, sub-Saharan unauthorized migrants and youth navigating formal migration channels. Rejecting binary frameworks, the articles examine the fluid intersections of movement and stasis through ethnographic, narrative and visual methodologies. Disciplines include digital migration studies, geography, anthropology, psychology, literature, media and photography. A decolonial lens grounds the Special Issue, emphasizing knowledge production from the south of the Mediterranean and prioritizing migrant voices, and reframing Tunisia not just as a site of passage but as a space of transition, border politics and contested narratives.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00120_2
2025-09-22
2026-04-20

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cjmc/16/1-2/cjmc.16.1-2.3_Hlioui.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00120_2&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Amnesty International (2024), ‘Joint statement: Tunisia is not a place of safety for people rescued at sea’, Amnesty International, 4 October, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/10/joint-statement-tunisia-is-not-a-place-of-safety-for-people-rescued-at-sea/. Accessed 27 June 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Badalič, V. (2019), ‘Tunisia’s role in the EU external migration policy: Crimmigration law, illegal practices, and their impact on human rights’, Journal of International Migration and Integration, 20:1, pp. 85100, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-018-0596-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boccagni, P. (2012), ‘Revisiting the “transnational” in migration studies: A sociological understanding’, Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales, 28:1, pp. 3350, https://doi.org/10.4000/remi.5744.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boubakri, H. (2004), Transit Migration Between Tunisia, Libya and Sub-Saharan Africa: Study Based on Greater Tunis, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boukhayatia, R. (2023), ‘Sub-Saharans in Tunisia: The untruths expounded by President Kais Saied’, Nawaat, 11 March, https://nawaat.org/2023/03/11/sub-saharans-in-tunisia-the-untruths-expounded-by-president-kais-saied/. Accessed 25 June 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Braudel, F. (1985), La Méditerranée: L’espace et l’histoire, Paris: Éditions Flammarion.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brouwer, J. L.de (2024), ‘A new way of thinking about transnationalism?’, Egmont, Royal Institute for International Relations, 5 December, https://www.egmontinstitute.be/transnationalism-a-new-way-of-thinking-about-migration/. Accessed 25 June 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chouliaraki, L. (2020), ‘Symbolic bordering: The self-representation of migrants and refugees in digital news’, in N. Thumim (ed.), Self-(Re) Presentation Now, London: Routledge, pp. 2541.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Collyer, M., Düvell, F. and Haas, H.de (2012), ‘Critical approaches to transit migration’, Population, Space and Place, 18:4, pp. 40714, https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.630.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dekker, R., Engbersen, G., Klaver, J. and Vonk, H. (2018), ‘Smart refugees: How Syrian asylum migrants use social media information in migration decision-making’, Social Media + Society, 4:1, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764439.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Diminescu, D. (2008), ‘The connected migrant: An epistemological manifesto’, Social Science Information, 47:4, pp. 56579, https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018408096447.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Diminescu, D. (2020), ‘Researching the connected migrant’, in K. Smets, K. Leurs, M. Georgiou, S. Witteborn and R. G. K. Zaborowski (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Media and Migration, London: Sage, pp. 7478.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Diminescu, D. and Loveluck, B. (2014), ‘Traces of dispersion: Online media and diasporic identities’, Crossings: Journal of Migration & Culture, 5:1, pp. 2339, https://doi.org/10.1386/cjmc.5.1.23_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Düvell, F. (2006), ‘Irregular migration: A global, historical and economic perspective’, in F. Düvell (ed.), Illegal Immigration in Europe: Beyond Control?, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1439.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Euractiv (2023), ‘€100 million for Tunisian border management, EU Commission states’, Euractiv, 29 September, https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/e100-million-for-tunisian-border-management-eu-commission-states/. Accessed 27 June 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Galis, V. and Makrygianni, V. (2022), ‘Analog flows in digital worlds: “Migration multiples” and digital heterotopias in Greek territory’, Political Geography, 95, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102599.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gangadharan, S. P. (2017), ‘The downside of digital inclusion: Expectations and experiences of privacy and surveillance among marginal Internet users’, New Media & Society, 19:4, pp. 597615, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815614053.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Garelli, G. and Tazzioli, M. (2016), ‘Tunisia as a revolutionized space of migration’, in C.-U. Schierup, P. Hansen and S. Castles (eds), Migration, Citizenship, and the European Welfare State: A European Dilemma, London: Springer, pp. 7796.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Genova, N. de (2015), ‘Spectacles of migrant “illegality”: The scene of exclusion, the obscene of inclusion’, in M. Schrover and W. Schinkel (eds), The Language of Inclusion and Exclusion in Immigration and Integration, London: Routledge, pp. 5876.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Genova, N. de, Mezzadra, S. and Pickles, J. (2014), ‘New keywords: Migration and borders’, Cultural Studies, 29:1, pp. 5587, https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2014.891630.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Genova, N. de and Tazzioli, M. (2015), ‘Europe/crisis: New keywords of “the crisis” in and of “Europe”: New Keywords Collective’, Near Futures Online, 1, https://nearfuturesonline.org/europecrisis-new-keywords-of-crisis-in-and-of-europe-part-3. Accessed 25 June 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Genova, N. de and Tazzioli, M. (2021), ‘Minor keywords of political theory: Migration as a critical standpoint: A collaborative project of collective writing’, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 40:4, pp. 781875, https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420988563.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gillespie, M., Osseiran, S. and Cheesman, M. (2018), ‘Syrian refugees and the digital passage to Europe: Smartphone infrastructures and affordances’, Social Media + Society, 4:1, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764440.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Huc-Hepher, S. (2017), ‘The French in London on-land and on-line: An ethnosemiotic analysis’, doctoral dissertation, London: University of Westminster.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Isin, E. and Ruppert, E. (2020), Being Digital Citizens, London: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Khosravi, S. (2019), ‘What do we see if we look at the border from the other side?’, Social Anthropology, 27:3, pp. 40924, https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12685.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Khosravi, S. (2021), ‘Waiting, a state of consciousness’, in C. M. Jacobsen, M. A. Karlsen and S. Khosravi (eds), Waiting and the Temporalities of Irregular Migration, London: Routledge, pp. 1732.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Khosravi, S. (2024), ‘Doing migration studies with an accent’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 50:9, pp. 234658, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2024.2307787.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Leese, P. (2022), Migrant Representations: Life Story, Investigation, Picture, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Leurs, K. (2024), Digital Migration, London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Massey, D. (2005), For Space, London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. McManus, P. (2022), Critical Theory and Dystopia, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Meddeb, H. and Louati, F. (2024), ‘Tunisia’s transformation into a transit hub: Illegal migration and policy dilemmas’, working paper, Beirut: Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mignolo, W. D. (2010), ‘Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom’, Theory, Culture & Society, 26:7–8, pp. 15981, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Nasraoui, M. (2017), ‘Les travailleurs migrants subsahariens en Tunisie face aux restrictions législatives sur l’emploi des étrangers’, Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales, 33:4, pp. 15978, https://doi.org/10.4000/remi.9244.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Papadopoulos, D. and Tsianos, V. S. (2013), ‘After citizenship: Autonomy of migration, organisational ontology and mobile commons’, Citizenship Studies, 17:2, pp. 17896, https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2013.780736.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ponzanesi, S. (2020), ‘Digital diasporas: Postcoloniality, media and affect’, Interventions, 22:8, pp. 97793, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801x.2020.1718537.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Schapendonk, J. (2008), ‘Stuck between the desert and the sea: The immobility of sub-Saharan African “transit migrants” in Morocco’, in H. Rittersberger-Tiliç, A. Erdemir and A. Ergun (eds), Rethinking Global Migration: Practices, Policies and Discourses in the European Neighbourhood, Ankara: KORA and METU, pp. 12943.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Scott, J. C. (1985), Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Tamboukou, M. (2020), ‘Narrative rhythmanalysis: The art and politics of listening to women’s narratives of forced displacement’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24:2, pp. 14962, https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1769271.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Timoumi, H. (2015), Comment les Tunisiens sont devenus Tunisiens: Le périple d’un Hannon contemporain dans l’immense arène de l’Histoire, Tunis: Med Ali Editions.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) (2016), A/HRC/31/35: Report on the Situation of Migrants in Transit, 27 January, Geneva: OHCHR, https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/reports/ahrc3135-report-situation-migrants-transit. Accessed 27 June 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Warburg, A. (2020), Mnemosyne Atlas (eds R. Ohrt and A. Heil), Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz and ZKM.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Boularès, H. (2012), Histoire de la Tunisie: Les grandes dates de la préhistoire à la révolution, Tunis: Ceres.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. European Commission (2024), ‘Pact on migration and asylum’, 21 May, https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/migration-and-asylum/pact-migration-and-asylum_en. Accessed 25 June 2025.
/content/journals/10.1386/cjmc_00120_2
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test