Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Craft Research
  4. Volume 10, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 10, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2040-4689
  • E-ISSN: 2040-4697
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between design for sustainability and traditional making practices. It presents results from key informant interviews and observational research into traditional hand making of functional goods in Santa Fe in the United States, Jingdezhen, China, various locations in New South Wales, Australia and Cumbria, United Kingdom. We find that such goods fall into three main categories, primarily utilitarian, symbolic and aesthetic. These practices are discussed in terms of their contemporary relevance, potential futures and relationship to current understandings of sustainability. More specifically, they are considered against the four elements of the Quadruple Bottom Line of Design for Sustainability (Walker 2014), a rigorous interpretation extended from the philosophy of Hick (1989), which comprises: practical meaning including environmental impacts; social meaning; personal meaning; and economic means. The originality of this research lies in the development of new arguments and insights with regard to the complex issues of design for sustainability and traditional making practices. Significantly, we find that many of these practices are intellectually consistent with broad, contemporary understandings of design for sustainability. However, we also find that it is often not easy to reconcile these practices with modern consumer culture. Our research shows that pursuing these practices part-time for their own sake, rather than for primarily commercial reasons can often facilitate the pursuit of excellence and the continuation of cultural traditions.

© Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00002_1
2019-09-01
2026-02-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/crre/10/2/crre_00002_1.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00002_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Appadurai, A.. (2001), Globalization, Durham, NC:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Battaglia, M.. (n.d.);, 'Purposive sample'. , Sage Knowledge, http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/survey/n419.xml. Accessed 18 June 2019 .
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bol, M. C.. (2018);, 'The case of the city different: The intersection of the museum, the artist, and the marketplace'. , in S. Walker,, M. Evans,, T. Cassidy,, J. Jung, and A. T. Holroyd. (eds), Design Roots: Culturally Significant Designs, Products and Practices, London:: Bloomsbury;, pp. 255-69.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. British Council (2019), Crafting Futures, London:: British Council;, https://www.britishcouncil.ro/sites/default/files/crafting_futures_presentation_romania_2019.pdf. Accessed 18 July 2019 .
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Candi, M.,, Haeran, J.,, Makarem, S., and Mohan, M.. (2017);, 'Consumer responses to functional, aesthetic and symbolic product design in online reviews'. , Journal of Business Research, 81, pp. 31-39, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0148296317302576. Accessed 22 July 2019 .
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Cash, M. R.. (1998), Living Shrines: Home Altars of New Mexico, Santa Fe:: NM Museum of New Mexico Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Crompton, T.. (2010), Common Cause: The Case for Working with our Cultural Values, Woking, Surrey:: WWF-UK;, http://assets.wwf.org.uk/downloads/common_cause_report.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2016 .
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Davison, A.. (2001), Technology and the Contested Meanings of Sustainability, Albany, NY:: State University of New York Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. DCMS. (2001), Creative Industries Mapping Document 2001, London:: Department for Culture, Media and Sport;, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/creative-industries-mapping-documents-2001. Accessed 3 July 2018 .
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Design Ecologies (2015);, 'Knowledge exchange visit conducted by authors with colleagues from the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijng in September, as part of the research for Design Ecologies'. , Arts and Humanities Research Council, UK funded project, https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FN006844%2F1. Accessed 4 October 2019 .
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Design Routes (2015);, 'Interviews conducted by authors with makers in September 2015, as part of the research for Design Routes: Culturally significant designs products and practices'. , Arts and Humanities Research Council, UK funded project, http://148.88.47.13/html/imagination/activities/Design_Routes. Accessed 18 July 2019 .
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Dillon, P., and Kokko, S.. (2017);, 'Craft as cultural ecologically located practice: Comparative case studies of textile crafts in Cyprus, Estonia and Peru'. , Craft Research, 8:2, pp. 193-222.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Elkington, J.. (1998), Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, Gabriola Island:: New Society Publishers;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Gateway to Research (2019a);, 'Design Routes: Developing effective design strategies to support designs, products and practices that have a strong origin in local or national cultures'. , https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FK008021%2F2. Accessed 22 July 2019 .
  15. Gateway to Research (2019b);, 'Design Ecologies: Sustaining ethno-cultural significance of products through urban ecologies of creative practice'. , https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FN006844%2F1. Accessed 22 July 2019 .
  16. Gateway to Research (2019c);, 'Living Design: The effective use of design for sustainability in maker enterprises'. , https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FN006615%2F1. Accessed 22 July 2019 .
  17. Gray, D. E.. (2004), Doing Research in the Real World, , 2nd. ed., London:: Sage Publications;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hangzhou Arts and Crafts Museum (2018);, 'Hangzhou Arts and Crafts Museum'. , Gongshu District, Hangzhou, http://www.zgdjss.com/#!/app/main/introduction. Accessed 27 June 2018 .
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hick, J.. (1989), An Interpretation of Religion: Human Responses to the Transcendent, New Haven, CT:: Yale University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Holm, B.. (2015), Northwest Coast Indian Art: An Analysis of Form, , 50th Anniversary. ed., Seattle, WA:: University of Washington Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Howard, K. L., and Pardue, D. F.. (1996), Inventing the Southwest: The Fred Harvey Company and Native American Art, Flagstaff, AZ:: Northland Publishing;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Jaffe, G.. (2015);, 'Jingdezhen, China: The birthplace of a nation and its "White Gold"'. , 13 April, The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk/travel/jingdezhen-china-the-birthplace-of-a-nation-and-its-white-gold-10172729.html. Accessed 27 June 2018 .
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Jones, O.. (2017);, 'What is an oak swill?'. , Owen Jones: Oak Swill Basket Maker, http://www.oakswills.co.uk/. Accessed 9 November 2017 .
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Jung, J., and Walker, S.. (2018);, 'Creative ecologies: Contextualizing culturally significant design, products and practices'. , in S. Walker,, M. Evans,, T. Cassidy,, J. Jung, and A.T. Holroyd. (eds), Design Roots: Culturally Significant Designs, Products and Practices, London:: Bloomsbury;, pp. 11-24.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kelly, L.. (2016), The Memory Code, London:: Atlantic Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim, G.,, Vaswani, R. T.,, Kang, W.,, Nam, M., and Lee, D.. (2017);, 'Enhancing ecoliteracy through traditional ecological knowledge in proverbs'. , Sustainability, 9:7, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/7/1182. Accessed 22 July 2019 .
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Kubiszewski, I.. (2014);, 'Beyond GDP: Are there better ways to measure well-being?'. , The Conversation, 1 December, https://theconversation.com/beyond-gdp-are-there-better-ways-to-measure-well-being-33414. Accessed 4 July 2018 .
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lansley, S.. (1994), After The Gold Rush – The Trouble Affluence: 'Consumer Capitalism' and the Way Forward, London:: Random House;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Link, M.. (2015);, 'Living twice in Ghana: What sort of box do you fancy?'. , GoNOMAD Travel, https://www.gonomad.com/1210-ghana-s-amazing-coffins-what-sort-of-box-do-you-fancy. Accessed 2 November 2018 .
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Linnaeus, C.. (1735), Systema naturae, Archive Facsimile, https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/10277#page/5/mode/1up. Accessed 3 September 2019 .
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Living Design (2019);, 'The effective use of design for sustainability in maker enterprises'. , Living Design, https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FN006615%2F1. Accessed 22 July 2019 .
     [Google Scholar]
  32. McDonough, W., and Braungart, M.. (2001), Cradle to Cradle – Remaking the Way We Make Things, Vancouver, BC:: Douglas & McIntyre;.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. McLeod, S.. (2018);, 'Maslow's hierarchy of needs'. , Simply Psychology, 21 May, https://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html. Accessed 23 June 2018 .
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Meroni, A.. (ed.) (2012);, 'Creative communities'. , Sustainable Everyday, April, https://issuu.com/strategicdesignscenarios/docs/creative_communities. Accessed 4 October 2018 .
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Mullagh, L, Walker, S., and Evans, M.. (2018);, 'Touch of genius: Traditional craft, its relationship to place, culture and nature, and design praxis'. , Cumulus, Wuxi, 31 October-4 November 2018 .
     [Google Scholar]
  36. New Craftsmen (2017);, 'The New Craftsmen showroom'. , Mayfair, London, https://www.thenewcraftsmen.com/handmade-craft-makers/lorna-singleton/. Accessed 10 November 2017 .
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Reo, N.. (2011);, 'The importance of belief systems in traditional ecological knowledge initiatives'. , International Indigenous Policy Journal, 2:4, https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/iipj/vol2/iss4/8. Accessed 22 July 2019 .
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Rosenzweig, L.. (2019);, 'Interview with "Laura's Loom" by authors in January 2019, as part of the research for Living Design'. , Gateway to Research, https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FN006615%2F1. Accessed 22 July 2019 .
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Ryn, S. van der, and Cowan, S.. (1996), Ecological Design, Washington, DC:: Island Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Schwartz, S.. (2012);, 'An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values'. , Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2:1, https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116. Accessed 27 June 2018 .
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Sennett, R.. (2008), The Craftsman, London:: Penguin Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Shanghai Municipal Administration of Culture, Radio, Film and Television (2010), The Album of the List of Shanghai Intangible Cultural Heritage Items, Shanghai:: Shanghai Municipal Administration of Culture, Radio, Film and Television;.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Singleton, L.. (2017);, 'Lorna Singleton Gallery'. , Cumbria, http://lornasingleton.co.uk/gallery/. Accessed 10 November 2017 .
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Sprigg, J., and Larkin, D.. (1987), Shaker – Life, Work and Art, Boston, MA:: Houghton Mifflin Company;.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Steele, T. J.. (1994), Santos and Saints: The Religious Folk Art of Hispanic New Mexico, Santa Fe, NM:: Ancient City Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Thompson, R.. (2013);, 'Robert Thompson's Home of Mouseman oak furniture'. , Robert Thompson's Craftsmen Ltd., Kilburn, North Yorkshire, http://www.robertthompsons.co.uk/. Accessed 9 November 2017 .
     [Google Scholar]
  47. UK Parliament (2017);, 'Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage: Written question – HL6360'. , UK Parliament, https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Lords/2017-03-27/HL6360. Accessed 4 July 2018 .
     [Google Scholar]
  48. UNESCO. (2017);, 'What is intangible cultural heritage?'. , UNESCO – Section of Intangible Cultural Heritage (CLT/CEH/ITH), Paris, https://ich.unesco.org/en/what-is-intangible-heritage-00003. Accessed 10 November 2017 .
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Väänänen, N.,, Pöllänen, S.,, Kaipainen, M., and Vartiainen, L.. (2017);, 'Sustainable craft in practice: From practice to theory'. , Craft Research, 8:2, pp. 257-84.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Walker, S.. (2011), The Spirit of Design: Objects, Environment and Meaning, Abingdon:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Walker, S.. (2014), Designing Sustainability: Making Radical Changes in a Material World, Abingdon:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. WCED (1987), Our Common Future, World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Wellcome (2017), Animal, Vegetable, Mineral – Organising Nature: A Picture Album, London:: Wellcome Collection;.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Yair, K.. (2010), Craft & Environmental Sustainability, London:: Crafts Council;.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Walker, S.,, Evans, M., and Mullagh, L.. (2019);, 'Meaningful practices: The contemporary relevance of traditional making for sustainable material futures'. , Craft Research, 10:2, pp. 183-210, doi: 10.1386/crre_00002_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00002_1
Loading
Meaningful practices: The contemporary relevance of traditional making for sustainable material futures
Craft Research 10, 183 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1386/crre_00002_1
/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00002_1
/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00002_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): design; handmade artefacts; meaning; place-based making; sustainability; traditional making practices

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test