Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Craft Research
  4. Volume 12, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 12, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2040-4689
  • E-ISSN: 2040-4697

Abstract

Artisan entrepreneurship has been increasing in developed economies in the past decade. In order for artisan enterprises to thrive, these businesses would benefit from using technology to access global marketplaces, add value to their consumers and market beyond their local area. Unless operating as a collective, most artisan entrepreneurs manage microbusinesses with ten or fewer employees. Microbusiness owners face challenges to adopting technology including limited financial resources, lack of technological expertise and owner’s attitudes about technology. Extant research has not examined why and how artisan entrepreneurs introduce technology into their businesses. Crochet is an artisanal craft that can only be produced by hand without requiring any contemporary technological solutions. This collective case study explored how five women crochet artisan microentrepreneurs navigated the process of introducing new technologies into their businesses. Findings indicate that crochet artisan microentrepreneurs have diverse income sources, which are enabled by technology adoption. The communitarian nature of the artisan entrepreneur ‘ecosystem’ provides a supportive environment that facilitates the process of identifying, selecting and learning new technologies. Cost and perceived lack of self-efficacy are significant obstacles to technology adoption for crochet artisan microentrepreneurs. This study adds to the existing research on artisan entrepreneurship by exploring technology adoption in this context and sharing the perceived benefits and challenges experienced with other artisan microentrepreneurs.

© 2021 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00053_1
2021-09-01
2025-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bernabei, Rina, and Power, Jacqueline. ( 2018;), ‘ Hybrid design: Combining craft and digital practice. ’, Craft Research, 9:1, pp. 119–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bleijenbergh, Inge. ( 2010;), ‘ Case selection. ’, in A. J. Mills,, G. Durepos, and E. Wiebe. (eds), Encyclopedia of Case Study Research, Los Angeles:: Sage Publications Inc;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bouette, Martin, and Magee, Florence. ( 2015;), ‘ Hobbyists, artisans and entrepreneurs. ’, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 22:2, pp. 337–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Brawley, Alice M., and Pury, Cynthia L. S.. ( 2017;), ‘ Little things that count: A call for organizational research on microbusinesses. ’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, pp. 917–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Browder, Russel E.,, Aldrich, Howard, and Bradley, Steven Walter. ( 2017;), ‘ Entrepreneurship research, makers, and the maker movement. ’, Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.14361abstract. Accessed 4 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Cochran-Smith, Marilyn, and Donnell, Kelly. ( 2006;), ‘ Practitioner inquiry: Blurring the boundaries of research and practice. ’, in J. L. Green,, G. Camilli, and P. B. Elmore. (eds), Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research, , 3rd ed.., New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Creswell, John W., and Poth, Cheryl N.. ( 2018), Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage Publications Inc;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cunningham, Sally Jo. ( 1996;), ‘ Crochet work: History and computer applications. ’, in J. C. Turner, and P. van de Griend. (eds), History and Science of Knots, Singapore:: World Scientific;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Curtis, Renée Bogin. ( 2016;), ‘ Ethical markets in the artisan economy: Portland DIY. ’, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40, pp. 235–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Danson, Mike,, Galloway, Laura,, Cabras, Ignazio, and Beatty, Tina. ( 2015;), ‘ Microbrewing and entrepreneurship. ’, The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 16:2, pp. 135–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Dawes Farquhar, Jillian. ( 2013), Case Study Research in Business, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage Publications Inc;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation ( 2019;), ‘ What are entrepreneurial ecosystems?. ’, Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Building Playbook 3.0, https://www.kauffman.org/ecosystem-playbook-draft-3/ecosystems/. Accessed 4 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Goddard, J. Tim. ( 2010;), ‘ Collective case study. ’, in A. J. Mills,, G. Durepos, and E. Wiebe. (eds), Encyclopedia of Case Study Research, Thousand Oaks:: Sage Publications Inc;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Ho, LaiYee. ( 2020;), ‘ The essential guide to coding qualitative data. ’, Delve, July https://delvetool.com/guide. Accessed 4 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Houston, Donald, and Reuschke, Darja. ( 2017;), ‘ City economies and microbusiness growth. ’, Urban Studies, 54:14, pp. 3199–217.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Howard, Charles,, Gerosa, Andrea,, Mejuto, Maria Carrasco, and Giannella, Gregor. ( 2014;), ‘ The maker movement: A new avenue for competition in the EU. ’, European View, 13:2, pp. 333–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoyte, Cherisse. ( 2019;), ‘ Artisan entrepreneurship: a question of personality structure?. ’, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25:4, pp. 615–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hracs, Brian J.,, Jakob, Doreen, and Hauge, Atle. ( 2013;), ‘ Standing out in the crowd: The rise of exclusivity-based strategies to compete in the contemporary marketplace for music and fashion. ’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 45:5, pp. 1144–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Iivari, Netta. ( 2018;), ‘ Using member checking in interpretive research practice: A hermeneutic analysis of informants’ interpretations of their organizational realities. ’, Information Technology & People, 31:1, pp. 111–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Jaouen, Annabelle, and Lasch, Frank. ( 2015;), ‘ A new typology of micro-firm owner-managers. ’, International Small Business Journal, 33:4, pp. 397–421.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Jones, Paul,, Simmons, Geoff,, Packham, Gary,, Beynon-Davies, Paul, and Pickernell, David. ( 2014;), ‘ An exploration of the attitudes and strategic responses of sole-proprietor micro-enterprises in adopting information and communication technology. ’, International Small Business Journal, 32:3, pp. 285–306.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Karp, Cary. ( 2018;), ‘ Defining crochet. ’, Textile History, 49:2, pp. 208–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kuhn, Kristine M., and Galloway, Tera L.. ( 2015;), ‘ With a little help from my competitors: Peer networking among artisan entrepreneurs. ’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39:3, pp. 571–600.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Lai, Anjali. ( 2021;), ‘ A consumer “tech-celeration” is advancing behaviors but straining emotions. ’, Forrester, 2 February, https://go.forrester.com/blogs/a-consumer-tech-celeration-is-advancing-behaviors-but-straining-emotions. Accessed 4 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Luckman, Susan. ( 2015;), ‘ Women’s micro-entrepreneurial homeworking: A “magical solution” to the work-life relationship?. ’, Australian Feminist Studies, 30:84, pp. 146–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. McGregor, Sue L. T.. ( 2018), Understanding and Evaluating Research: A Critical Guide, Thousand Oaks:: Sage Publications Inc;.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Meijers, Anthonie. ( 2009;), ‘ General introduction. ’, in D. M. Gabbay,, P. Thagard,, A. W. M. Meijers, and J. Woods. (eds), Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, Burlington:: Elsevier Science & Technology;.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Morris, Emily Michiko. ( 2014;), ‘ What is “technology?”. ’, Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law, 20:1, pp. 24–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Munro, Kirstin, and O’Kane, Chris. ( 2017;), ‘ Autonomy and creativity in the artisan economy and the New Spirit of Capitalism. ’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 49:4, pp. 582–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Myers, Michael D.. ( 2020), Qualitative Research in Business & Management, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage Publications Ltd;.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Padovani, Clio, and Whittaker, Paul. ( 2015;), ‘ Modern alchemy: Collaboration and the value of social capital. ’, Craft Research, 6:1, pp. 99–111.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Pret, Tobias, and Cogan, Aviel. ( 2019;), ‘ Artisan entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review and research agenda. ’, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25:4, pp. 592–614.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Queirós, André,, Faria, Daniel, and Almeida, Fernando. ( 2017;), ‘ Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. ’, European Journal of Education Studies, 3:9, pp. 369–87, http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.887089. Accessed 4 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Ratten, Vanessa,, Costa, Carlos, and Bogers, Marcel. ( 2019;), ‘ Artisan, cultural, and tourism entrepreneurship. ’, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25:4, pp. 582–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Saldaña, Johnny. ( 2016), The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, , 3rd ed.., Thousand Oaks:: Sage Publications Inc;.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Salmons, Janet. ( 2015), Qualitative Online Interviews, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage Publications Inc;.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Seiler, Daniella. (ed.) ( 2020;), ‘ How COVID-19 has pushed companies over the technology tipping point: And transformed business forever. ’, McKinsey & Company, 5 October, https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/how-covid-19-has-pushed-companies-over-the-technology-tipping-point-and-transformed-business-forever. Accessed 4 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Taherdoost, Hamed. ( 2018;), ‘ A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. ’, Procedia Manufacturing, 22, pp. 960–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Torres, Ann M.. ( 2002;), ‘ Marketing networks as a form of strategic alliance among craft enterprises. ’, International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 7:3, pp. 229–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. van Holm, Eric Joseph. ( 2017;), ‘ Makerspaces and local economic development. ’, Economic Development Quarterly, 31:2, pp. 164–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Ventura, Carol. ( 2018;), ‘ Tapesty crochet in the Americas, Europe, and the Middle East: Tradition and innovation. ’, Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings, Vancouver, 19–23 September, Digital Commons@Univeristy of Nebraska – Lincoln , https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tsaconf/1113/. Accessed 4 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Segares, Marie. ( 2021;), ‘ Crochet microentrepreneurs and technology: A collective case study. ’, Craft Research, 12:2, pp. 275–93, https://doi.org/10.1386/crre_00053_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00053_1
Loading
Crochet microentrepreneurs and technology: A collective case study
Craft Research 12, 275 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1386/crre_00053_1
/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00053_1
/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00053_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): artisan entrepreneurship; businesswomen; creative industry; microbusiness; microenterprise; qualitative research; technology adoption; woman entrepreneur

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test