Lace legacies: How partnerships enhance understanding of craft and heritage | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Craft Research
  4. Volume 13, Issue 2
  5. Article
Craft Sciences
  • ISSN: 2040-4689
  • E-ISSN: 2040-4697

Abstract

Nottingham was once the centre of a global lace industry employing tens of thousands of people in its manufacture. Therefore, its slow decline and sudden demise in the early years of the twenty-first century impacted upon both the sense of identity of the citizens who were involved in its success and those who enjoyed its resonance. The cultural venues whose collections celebrated this once powerful industry closed and their collections were rendered invisible. This amplified the sense of being bereft of both individual and regional identity, but also the cohesion it brought to the city. It is within this context that we share a number of collaborations between cultural, educational, community and business partners to begin to address this sense of loss, to improve the visibility and legacy of Nottingham lace and continue to tell its story with renewed vigour and through the voices of those who worked within it. Through two funded projects Lace Unravelled and Textile Tales, we provide testimony from those still involved in lace production, now reduced to less than a 100 people, and from former lace workers. These current and former employees reflect upon the values implicit within lace manufacture, then and now, of skill, craft and a pride in work.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00084_1
2022-09-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abrams, L.. ( 2010), Oral History Theory, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bank of England Website ( 2020;), ‘ Inflation calculator. ’, https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetary-policy/inflation/inflation-calculator. Accessed 5 May 2021.
  3. Bornat, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ Oral history as a social movement: Reminiscence and older people. ’, Oral History Journal @ 50 The Voice of History, pp. 124–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Botticello, J., and Fisher, T.. ( 2020;), ‘ Introduction: Missing persons and hidden heritages in European lace making. ’, Textile: Cloth and Culture, 18:1, pp. 2–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brian, L.. ( 2019a;), oral history interview. , Textile Tales project recordings , 28 June.
  6. Brian, M.. ( 2019b;), oral history interview. , Textile Tales project recordings , 22 November.
  7. Briggs-Goode, A., and Donovan, N.. ( 2017;), ‘ Case study: Valuing and sustaining Nottingham’s industrial lace heritage in partnership with communities. ’, Intersections Conference, Loughborough University, London, UK, 13–14 September.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cluny Lace Website ( 2021;), ‘ Home page. ’, http://www.clunylace.com/page0002v01.htm. Accessed 5 May 2021.
  9. Eastop, D.. ( 2011;), ‘ Exploring the potential of the board of trade design register. ’, Text, 39, pp. 52–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Edgar, J.. ( 2013;), ‘ Nottingham City Museums and Galleries. ’, in A. Briggs-Goode, and D. Dean. (eds), Lace: Here: Now, London:: Black Dog Publishing;, pp. 36–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Fisher, T., and Botticello, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ Machine-made lace, the spaces of skilled practices and the paradoxes of contemporary craft production. ’, Cultural Geographies, 25:1, pp. 49–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Gibson, C.. ( 2016;), ‘ Material inheritances: How place, materiality, and labor processes underpin the path-dependent evolution of contemporary craft production. ’, Economic Geography, 92:1, pp. 61–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. High, S.. ( 2020;), ‘ Deindustrialisation and its consequences. ’, in M. Fazio,, C. Launius, and T. Strangleman. (eds), Routledge International Handbook of Working-Class Studies, London:: Routledge;, pp. 169–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Ingold, T.. ( 2018;), ‘ Five questions of skill. ’, Cultural Geographies, 25:1, pp. 159–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Joe, W.. ( 2019;), oral history interview. , Textile Tales project recordings , 6 September.
  16. Jones, C.. ( 1993), A History of Nottingham School of Design, Nottingham:: Nottingham Trent University;.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Joyce, B.. ( 2019;), oral history interview. , Textile Tales project recordings , 25 October.
  18. Lace Unravelled ( 2018;), ‘ Have you ever wondered how a lace design becomes a piece of lace?. ’, YouTube , 26 March, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isaNqJoyLpY. Accessed 5 September 2021.
  19. Lucas, G., and Robb, J.. ( 2021;), ‘ The terrain of thingworlds: Central objects and asymmetry in material culture systems. ’, Journal of Material Culture, 26:2, pp. 219–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Mason, S.. ( 2010), Nottingham Lace 1760s–1950s, Stroud:: Alan Sutton Publishing Ltd;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Mason, S.. ( 2013;), ‘ The machine made lace industry of Nottingham. ’, in A. Briggs-Goode, and D. Dean. (eds), Lace: Here: Now, London:: Black Dog Publishing;, pp. 14–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Mason, S.. ( 2014;), ‘ The lace market Nottingham: Decline of a world famous industry. ’, interview BBC Radio Nottingham (online sound clip) , World War One at Home, https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01qmh21. Accessed 5 May 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Peter, S.. ( 2019;), oral history interview. , Textile Tales project recordings , 20 September.
  24. Quarini, C.. ( 2020;), ‘ Unravelling the battle of Britain lace panel. ’, Textile: Cloth and Culture, 18:1, pp. 24–38, https://doi.org/10.1080/14759756.2019.1646497. Accessed 5 May 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Samuel, R.. ( 1994), Theatres of Memory: Volume 1: Past and Present in Contemporary Culture, London and New York:: Verso;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Smith, L., and Campbell, G.. ( 2017;), ‘ “Nostalgia for the future”: Memory, nostalgia and the politics of class. ’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 23:7, pp. 612–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Strangleman, T.. ( 2011;), ‘ Working class self representation and intangible heritage. ’, in L. Smith,, P. Shackel, and G. Campbell. (eds), Heritage, Labour and the Working Classes, London:: Routledge;, pp. 145–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Terry, R.. ( 2019;), oral history interview. , Textile Tales project recordings , 25 October.
  29. Thompson, P.. ( 1988;), ‘ Playing at being skilled men: Factory culture and pride in work skills among Coventry car workers. ’, Social History, 13:1, pp. 45–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Williams, R.. ( [1961] 1994;), ‘ The analysis of culture. ’, in J. Storey. (ed.), Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: A Reader, London:: Harvester Wheatsheaf;, pp. 56–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Yow, V.. ( 1997;), ‘ Do I like them too much? Effects of the oral history interview on the interviewer and vice versa. ’, The Oral History Review, 24:1, pp. 55–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Briggs-Goode, Amanda,, Outtram, Tonya, and Dean, Deborah. ( 2022;), ‘ Lace legacies: How partnerships enhance understanding of craft and heritage. ’, Craft Research, 13:2, pp. 367–86, https://doi.org/10.1386/crre_00084_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00084_1
Loading
Lace legacies: How partnerships enhance understanding of craft and heritage
Craft Research 13, 367 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1386/crre_00084_1
/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00084_1
/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00084_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): conservation; industry; Nottingham; oral history; skills; technology

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error