Shifting craft’s horizons: From individual makers to post-anthropocentric models of co-production | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 14, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2040-4689
  • E-ISSN: 2040-4697

Abstract

This issue features the work of individual practitioners who explore making through established decorative arts such as fine jewellery in Paris, mosaic glass making in Myanmar and a ceramic installation in the Cathedral of Palma de Majorca, alongside socially engaged groups employing co-production methodologies for designing everyday objects and experiences. Within each article, materials and the immediate and wider environment are considered as partners in the co-crafting process, albeit to varying degrees. The notion of serendipity and the influence of eastern philosophy on embracing imperfection in craft practice underpins some accounts and is questioned in others. As a collection, the articles evidence a palpable shift towards, and need for a more equal relationship and level of agency between the maker and the material, as argued in the Position Paper. This includes consideration of gender equality in particular crafts, where roles are traditionally linked to the properties of the materials and skills involved, as highlighted in the Craft and Industry Report. Social engagement through craft is echoed in the Portrait where stitch and embroidery are practised as forms of participatory expression, supporting human connectivity between cross-cultural and trans-national communities to influence issues of social justice. The affective role and emotive sensations evoked by textiles are also explored in the exhibition review of , staged in Hangzhou in 2022 and the first of three book reviews; (2021), the other two discussing (2021) and (2021).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00091_2
2023-03-07
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/crre/14/1/crre.14.1.3_Niedderer.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00091_2&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adams Stein, J.. ( 2021), Industrial Craft in Australia: Oral Histories of Creativity and Survival, Cham:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Coperthwaite, W.. ( 2007), A Handmade Life: In Search of Simplicity, White River Junction, VT:: Chelsea Green;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Corso-Esquivel, J.. ( 2021), Feminist Subjectivities in Fiber Art and Craft: Shadows of Affect, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Farrell, H., and Newman, A. L.. ( 2019;), ‘ Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. ’, International Security, 44:1, pp. 4279.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hansson, H.. ( 2021;), ‘ Designing together: A frugal design approach. Exploring participatory design in a global north-south cooperation context. ’, doctoral thesis, Gothenburg:: University of Gothenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lao-Tzu ( 1937), Tao Te Ching (trans. C. Ta-Kao), London:: Buddhist Society;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Marchand, T. H. J.. ( 2021), The Pursuit of Pleasurable Work: Craftwork in Twenty-First Century England, New York and Oxford:: Berghahn;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Shove, E.,, Watson, M.,, Hand, M., and Ingram, J.. ( 2007), The Design of Everyday Life, Oxford:: Berg;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. von Busch, O.. ( 2022), Making Trouble: Design and Material Activism, New York:: Bloomsbury;.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00091_2
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error