Socially valid tools: Sloydtrukk and co-crafting togetherness

References

1. Adamson, G.. ( 2018), Fewer, Better Things: The Hidden Wisdom of Objects, New York:: Bloomsbury;.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Coperthwaite, W.. ( 2007), A Handmade Life: In Search of Simplicity, White River Junction, VT:: Chelsea Green;.
   [Google Scholar]
3. EAC ( n.d;.), ‘ Eco Agroforestry Re-Creation Center. ’, http://www.ecoagroforestrycenter.org. Accessed 1 February 2022.
4. Hallberg, K.. ( 2022;), workshop statement and summary. , e-mail correspondence to H. Hansson, 9 January.
5. Hamdi, N.. ( 2004), Small Change: About the Art of Practice and the Limits of Planning in Cities, New York:: Earthscan;.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Hansson, H.. ( 2021;), ‘ Designing together: A frugal design approach: Exploring participatory design in a Global North-South cooperation context. ’, doctoral thesis, Gothenburg:: University of Gothenburg Faculty of Fine, Applied and Performing Arts.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hansson, H., and Raviola, E.. ( 2021;), ‘ Lek i staden, att samskapa en scen/utebio. ’, 1st Conference about Design and the Lived Environment, Röhsska Museum, Gothenburg, 18 November.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ingold, T.. ( 2013), Making: Anthropology, Archeology, Art and Architecture, London:: Routledge;.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Latour, B.. ( 2003;), ‘ The promises of constructivism. ’, in D. Idhe. (ed.), Chasing Technology: Matrix of Materiality, Indiana Series for the Philosophy of Science. , Bloomington, IN:: Indiana University Press;, pp. 27–46.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Latour, B.. ( 2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor–Network Theory, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Nussbaum, M. C.. ( 2013), Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. OHCHR, United Nations, Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner ( n.d;.), ‘ The Convention on the Rights of the Child. ’, https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx. Accessed 1 February 2022.
13. Robeyns, I., and Fibieger Byskov, M.. ( 2021;), ‘ The capability approach. ’, in E. N. Zalta. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford, CA:: Stanford University;, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/capability-approach. Accessed 18 January 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Sennett, R.. ( 2008), The Craftsman, New Haven, CT:: Yale University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Sennett, R.. ( 2012), Together: The Rituals, Pleasures and Politics of Cooperation, New Haven, CT:: Yale University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Shove, E.,, Watson, M.,, Hand, M., and Ingram, J.. ( 2007), The Design of Everyday Life, Oxford:: Berg;.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Van Eycken, A.. ( 2020;), ‘ Designing “for” and “with” ambiguity: Actualising democratic processes in participatory design practices with children. ’, doctoral thesis, Gothenburg:: HDK-Valand-Academy of Art and Design University of Gothenburg, Faculty of Fine, Applied and Performing Arts.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Von Busch, O.. ( 2008), Fashion-Able: Hacktivism and Engaged Fashion Design, Gothenburg:: ArtMonitor;.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Von Busch, O.. ( 2012;), ‘ Molecular management: Protocols in the maker culture. ’, Creative Industries Journal, 5:1&2, pp. 55–68.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Von Busch, O.. ( 2022), Making Trouble: Design and Material Activism, New York:: Bloomsbury;.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hansson, Helena, and von Busch, Otto. ( 2023;), ‘ Socially valid tools: Sloydtrukk and co-crafting togetherness. ’, Craft Research, 14:1, pp. 59–79, https://doi.org/10.1386/crre_00094_1
    [Google Scholar]