Skip to content
1981
Volume 14, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2040-4689
  • E-ISSN: 2040-4697

Abstract

Creative encounters with topography and attempts to record and represent the patina of place become of growing importance as we find ways to explore human impact on our environment and to foreground the role of craft as a geo-intervention. Ceramicist Adam Buick maintains an inherently physical connection with the landscape as he walks through the local environment and as he digs for clay and collects materials. His process forms a series of deep maps, which emerge through his ceramic work. Both a concept and a practice, ‘deep mapping’ refers to an approach in which artists, scientists and scholars attempt to capture the different meanings and textures that are associated with particular places. This article discusses the potential of deep mapping as a craft research methodology. To do so, it takes as a case study (2011–12), in which Buick documents the weathering away of his raw clay moon jar using time-lapse photography. His resulting film and photographic stills tell a story of movement, time and evolution. Buick’s jars draw attention to the matter we manipulate as being subject to its own environmental conversations and witnessing of change. The deep map offers the potential for a methodology that embraces multiplicity, simultaneity and complexity, encouraging a spatially facilitated understanding of our craft stories and products. Framed as a conversation and not a statement, deep maps are inherently unstable, continually unfolding and changing in response to new data and new insights. More than a collapsed or failed pot, Buick’s jars are a deep map of an adventure.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00106_1
2023-11-28
2024-11-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alberti, B. (2007), ‘Destabilising meaning in anthropomorphic forms of northwest Argentina’, Journal of Iberian Archaeology, Special Issue: ‘Overcoming the Modern Invention of Material Culture’, 9:10, pp. 20923.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnheim, R. (1957), Film as Art, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bevere Gallery (2019), ‘Adam Buick: Press release’, Bevere Gallery, 27 September, https://beveregallery.com/artists-makers/adam_buick/. Accessed 17 February 2022.
  4. Biggs, I. (2011a), ‘Mapping deep time-space’, Architectural Research Quarterly, 15:4, pp. 30203.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Biggs, I. (2011b), ‘The spaces of “deep mapping”: A partial account’, Journal of Arts and Communities, 2, pp. 525.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Biggs, I. (2014), ‘Deep mapping: A partial view’, Iain Biggs, 13 October, http://www.iainbiggs.co.uk/2014/10/deep-mapping-a-partial-view/. Accessed 15 March 2022.
  7. Bijvoet, M. (1994), Art as Inquiry: Toward New Collaborations between Art, Science and Technology, Rotterdam: University of Rotterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bodenhamer, D. (2013), ‘The potential of spatial humanities’, in D. Bodenhamer, J. Corrigan and T. Harris (eds), The Spatial Humanities: GIS and the Future of Humanities Scholarship, Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana University Press, pp. 1429.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bodenhamer, D., Corrigan, J. and Harris, T. (eds) (2013), The Spatial Humanities: GIS and the Future of Humanities Scholarship, Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Buick, A. (2010), ‘Earth to Earth’, Adam Buick, 3 June, https://www.adambuick.com/projects/earth-earth/. Accessed 12 January 2022.
  11. Buick, A. (2011a), ‘Arts Council of Wales Research Grant’, Adam Buick, 17 February, https://www.adambuick.com/blog/projects/land-art/arts-council-wales-research-grant/. Accessed 12 January 2022.
  12. Buick, A. (2011b), ‘Big fire, burn pot’, Adam Buick, 15 March, https://www.adambuick.com/blog/making/firing/big-fire-burn-pot/. Accessed 12 January 2022.
  13. Buick, A. (2011c), ‘Committing a jar to other elements’, Adam Buick, 21 October, https://www.adambuick.com/blog/projects/earth-to-earth/committing-jar-elements/. Accessed 12 January 2022.
  14. Buick, A. (2011d), ‘Earth to Earth 4: Time Lapse’, Adam Buick, 14 October, https://www.adambuick.com/blog/projects/earth-to-earth/earth-earth-4-time-lapse/. Accessed 12 January 2022.
  15. Buick, A. (2011e), ‘A night of rain’, Adam Buick, 23 October, https://www.adambuick.com/blog/projects/earth-to-earth/night-rain/. Accessed 12 January 2022.
  16. Buick, A. (2011f), ‘Seaweed’, Adam Buick, 22 June, https://www.adambuick.com/blog/making/local-materials/seaweed/. Accessed 12 January 2022.
  17. Buick, A. (2012), ‘Atencion I’, Adam Buick, 8 May, https://www.adambuick.com/blog/projects/earthto-earth/atencion/A. Accessed 12 January 2022.
  18. Buick, A. (2016), Inclusions, Edinburgh: Scottish Gallery.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Carter, P. (2004), Material Thinking: The Theory and Practice of Creative Research, Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Clifford, S. and King, A. (eds) (1993), Local Distinctiveness: Place, Particularity and Identity, Champaign, IL: Common Ground.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Cowley, J. (2006), ‘Cross platform: Annea Lockwood’, The Wire, 269, pp. 16–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Engels, M. (2018), ‘Deep mapping: Space, place, and narrative as urban interface’, in J. Sayers (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Media Studies and Digital Humanities, London: Routledge, pp. 21421.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gertz, C. (1973), The Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Giménez, C. (2004), ‘Endless Brancusi’, in C. Giménez and M. Gale (eds), Constantin Brancusi: The Essence of Things, London: Tate Publishing, pp. 1319.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Harrison, S., Pile, S. and Thrift, N. (2004), Patterned Ground: Entanglements of Nature and Culture, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Humphris, I., Horlings, L. G. and Biggs, I. (2022), ‘Getting deep into things: Deep mapping in a “vacant” landscape’, in A. Franklin (ed.), Co-Creativity and Engaged Scholarship, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 35790.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Ingold, T. (2010), ‘Bringing things to life: Creative entanglements in a world of materials’, Realities, working paper #15, Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kracauer, S. (1960), Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lackey, K. (1997), RoadFrames: The American Highway Narrative, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Least Heat-Moon, W. (1991), PrairyErth: A Deep Map, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lockwood, A. (2007), ‘What is a river?’, Soundscape: The Journal of Acoustic Ecology, 7:1, pp. 4344.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Maher, S. N. (2014), Deep Map Country: Literary Cartography of the Great Plains, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Malins, J. and Gray, C. (1995), Appropriate Research Methodologies for Artists, Designers & Craftspersons: Research as a Learning Process, Aberdeen: Gray’s School of Art, Robert Gordon University.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Malpas, W. (2013), Land Art: A Complete Guide to Landscape, Environmental, Earthworks, Nature, Sculpture and Installation Art, Maidstone: Crescent Moon Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Miss, M. (2008–11), ‘FLOW: Can you see the river?’, Mary Miss, http://marymiss.com/projects/flow-can-you-see-the-river/. Accessed 12 July 2022.
  36. Pearson, M. and Shanks, M. (2001), Theatre/Archaeology, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Pollard, J. (2004), ‘The art of decay and the transformation of substance’, in C. Renfrew, C. Gosden and E. DeMarrais (eds), Substance, Memory, Display, Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, pp. 4762.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Reynolds, N. (2004), Geographies of Writing: Inhabiting Places and Encountering Difference, Carbondale, IL: Southern University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Roberts, L. (2016), ‘Deep mapping and spatial anthropology’, in L. Roberts (ed.), Deep Mapping, Basel: MDPI, pp. VIIXV.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Schuppli, S. (2020), Material Witness: Media, Forensics, Evidence, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Shanks, M. (2004), ‘Three rooms: Archaeology and performance’, Journal of Social Archaeology, 4:2, pp. 14780.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Smith, D. W. (1996), ‘Deleuze’s theory of sensation: Overcoming the Kantian duality’, in P. Patton (ed.), Deleuze: A Critical Reader, New York: Blackwell, pp. 2956.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Springett, S. (2015), ‘Going deeper or flatter: Connecting deep mapping, flat ontologies and the democratizing of knowledge’, Humanities, 4, pp. 62336.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Springett, S. (2018), ‘Deep mapping the river: A palimpsest’, in R. Abeliovich and E. Seroussi (eds), Borderlines: Essays on Mapping and the Logic of Place, Warsaw: Sciendo, pp. 91105.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Thrift, N. (1999), ‘The place of complexity’, Theory, Culture and Society, 16:3, pp. 3169.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Tufnell, B. (2006), Land Art, London: Tate Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00106_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/crre_00106_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error