Knittedness: On the expressivity of knitting as metaphoric process

References

1. Aktaş, Bilge (2018), ‘Material as the co-designer: Exploring a new practice in the nature and at the studio’, Research in Arts and Education, 2018:3, pp. 332–48.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arantes, Lydia Maria (2020a), ‘Unraveling knitting: Form creation, relationality, and the temporality of materials’, Journal of American Folklore, 133:528, pp. 193–204.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Arantes, Lydia Maria (2020b), ‘On knitted surfaces-in-the-making’, in M. Anusas and C. Simonetti (eds), Surfaces: Transformations of Body, Materials and Earth, London: Routledge, pp. 152–66.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Arantes, Lydia Maria (2021), ‘On the desired absence of knowledge: Knitting ethnography and navigating diaries’, in L. Di Puppo, M. D. Frederiksen and F. Martínez (eds), Peripheral Methodologies: Unlearning, Not-Knowing and Ethnographic Limits, London: Routledge, pp. 63–80.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Birnbaum, Paula (2008), ‘Elaine Reichek: Pixels, bytes, and stitches’, Art Journal, 67:2, pp. 18–35, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40598940. Accessed 13 January 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Buchczyk, Magdalena (2020), ‘Making certainty and dwelling through craft’, Journal of American Folklore, 133:528, pp. 178–92.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix (1987), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (trans. B. Massumi), London: Bloomsbury.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fisk, Anna (2017), ‘“So that you’ve got something for yourself”: Knitting and implicit spirituality’, in L. Doggett and A. Arat (eds), Foundations and Futures in the Sociology of Religion, London: Routledge, pp. 133–48.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Ingold, Tim (2007), Lines: A Brief History, London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ingold, Tim (2010), ‘The textility of making’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34:1, pp. 91–102, https://www.jstor.org/stable/24232023. Accessed 10 December 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ingold, Tim (2017), Correspondences, Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kenning, Gail (2015), ‘Creative craft-based textile activity in the age of digital systems and practices’, Leonardo, 48:5, pp. 450–56.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Mäkelä, Maarit (2007), ‘Knowing through making: The role of the artefact in practice-led research’, Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 20:3, pp. 157–63.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Mäkelä, Maarit (2016), ‘Personal exploration: Serendipity and intentionality as altering positions in a creative process’, FormAkademisk, 9:1, https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1461.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Mäkelä, Maarit and Nimkulrat, Nithikul (2018), ‘Documentation as a practice-led research tool for reflection on experiential knowledge’, FormAkademisk, 11:2, https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1818.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Nilsson, Malin (2022), ‘Introduction continuity and change: Gender, place, and skill formation in home-based production’, in M. Nilsson, I. Mazumdar and S. Neunsinger (eds), Home-Based Work and Home-Based Workers (1800–2021), Leiden: Brill, pp. 27–30.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Nimkulrat, Nithikul (2009), Paperness: Expressive Material in Textile Art from an Artist’s Viewpoint, Helsinki: University of Art and Design Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Pajaczkowska, Claire (2005), ‘On stuff and nonsense: The complexity of cloth’, Textile, 3:3. pp. 220–49.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Pedgley, Owain (2007), ‘Capturing and analysing own design activity’, Design Studies, 28:5, pp. 463–83.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Price, Laura (2015), ‘Knitting and the city’, Geography Compass, 9:2, pp. 81–95.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Puig de la Bellacasa, María (2015), ‘Making time for soil: Technoscientific futurity pace of care’, Social Studies of Science, 45:5, pp. 691–16.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Robins, Freddie (2018), ‘In conversation with Freddie Robins’, interviewed by C. Cameron, Knitting Industry Creative, 1 October, https://www.knittingindustry.com/creative/in-conversation-with-freddie-robbins/. Accessed 3 May 2020.
23. Schön, Donald (1983), The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, London: Maurice Temple Smith.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Stalp, Marybeth and Winge, Theresa (2017), ‘If at first you don’t succeed, rip it out and try again: The benefits of failure among DIY handcrafters’, Clothing Cultures, 4:2, pp. 87–104.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Steed, Josephine (2012), ‘Unravel: Revaluing the craft of knitting for new emergent design contexts within a post-industrial world’, Making Futures, 2, pp. 297–306.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Turney, Joanne (2009), The Culture of Knitting, Oxford: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Von Busch, Otto (2013), ‘Zen and the abstract machine of knitting’, Textile, 11:1, pp. 6–19.
    [Google Scholar]