Skip to content
1981
Volume 9 Number 2
  • ISSN: 2050-070X
  • E-ISSN: 2050-0718

Abstract

Due to the homoerotic undertones of male underwear ad campaigns and their representations of sexualized bodies, male underwear and their packaging are formative objects in the realization of one’s same-sex desire. Underwear often projects a gay male gaze and becomes a symbolic object charged with ethos, desire and shame. In this article, I expand on my own relationship and encounters with this formative object, informed by this broader landscape of representations. I present projects from my fibre-based art practice that consists of the transformation and embellishment of male underwear. I contextualize the act of hand-embellishing a mass-produced object as a powerful agent for adaptation and appropriation, and I explore the potential to formally this normative object. Finally, I mention a project in which I receive worn and stained male underwear that I embroider on before sending them back to their owner. Accompanied by conversations with their owners, I trace individuals’ unique and similar relationship with this object. I argue that these different creative practices, which hand-alter, adapt or re-create the underwear, interrupt normative consumption cycles and misuse of undergarment functionality and can create a space ‘for us’.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/csmf_00056_1
2022-08-01
2024-09-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ash, J.. ( 1996;), ‘ Memory and objects. ’, in P. Kirkham. (ed.), The Gendered Object, Manchester:: Manchester University Press;, pp. 21924.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Auther, Elissa. ( 2010), String Felt Thread, the Hierarchy of Art and Craft in American Art, Minneapolis, MN and London:: University of Minnesota Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernstein, Jacob,, Schneier, Matthew, and Friedman, Vanessa. ( 2018;), ‘ Male models say Mario Testino and Bruce Weber sexually exploited them. ’, New York Times, 13 January.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bryan-Wilson, Julia. ( 2017), Fray, Art + Textile Politics, Chicago, IL and London:: The University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chhangur, Emelie and, Monk, Philip. ( 2012;), ‘ Rotate this, stitch that, paste this, poster that. ’, in M. Maranda. (ed.), Will Munro: History, Glamour, Magic, Toronto:: The Art Gallery of York University;, pp. 10315.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cole, Shaun. ( 2010), The Story of Men’s Underwear, New York:: Parkstone Press International;.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Halperin, David, and Traub, Valerie. (eds) ( 2009;), ‘ Beyond gay pride. ’, in Gay Shame: A Virus in the System, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;, pp. 339.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hill, Daniel Delis. ( 2011;), ‘ Men in briefs. ’, The Gay & Lesbian Review Worldwide, 18:6, pp. 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hobbs, Peter. ( 2001;), ‘ The sewing desire machine. ’, in J. Jefferies. (ed.), Textile Transitions: Gender, Body, Identity, London:: Telos Press;, pp. 34350.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jobling, Paul. ( 2003;), ‘ Underexposed: Spectatorship and pleasure in men’s underwear advertising in the twentieth century. ’, Paragraph, 26:1&2, pp. 14762.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kant, Immanuel. ( [1970] 2000), Critique of the Power of Judgement (ed. and trans. P. Guyer.), London:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Liss, Sarah. (ed.) ( 2013), Army of Lovers: A Community History of Will Munro, Toronto:: Coach House Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lönnqvist, B.. ( 2001;), ‘ Fashion and eroticism: Men’s underwear in the context of eroticism. ’, Ethnologia Europaea, 31:1, pp. 7582.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MacInnis, Neil, and Leemann, Judith. ( 2007;), ‘ Deco-jamming is eco-glam!. ’, in J. Livingstone, and J. Ploof. (eds), The Object of Labor, Art, Cloth, and Cultural Production, Chicago, IL:: School of the Art Institute of Chicago Press;, pp. 33756.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Miller, Daniel. ( 2010), Stuff, Cambridge:: Polity;.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sorkin, Jenni. ( 2000;), ‘ Stain: On cloth, stigma, and shame. ’, Third Text, 14:53, pp. 7780.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Stallybrass, P.. ( 1999;), ‘ Worn worlds: Clothing, mourning, and the life of things. ’, in D. Ben-Amos, and L. Weissberg. (eds), Cultural Memory and the Construction of Identity, Detroit, MI:: Wayne State University Press;, pp. 3550.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bignon, Théo. ( 2022;), ‘ Gussied up tighty-whities: On decoration, stains and exchange. ’, Critical Studies in Men’s Fashion, 9:2, pp. 13346, https://doi.org/10.1386/csmf_00056_1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/csmf_00056_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/csmf_00056_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): masculinity; needlework; ornamentation; queer; sexuality; stain; swapping
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error