Skip to content
1981
1-2: Locating Menswear
  • ISSN: 2050-070X
  • E-ISSN: 2050-0718

Abstract

I have had a long love affair with the online auction website eBay. However, whilst conducting research with bespoke tailors in London and a network of Instagram sartorialists, this love grew into an obsession. Throughout this period of research I amassed a collection of mostly British menswear that resulted from this work, but which frequently languished in wardrobes, unloved and unseen. More recently I have returned to this collection to re-examine it, not merely as the consequence of research, but as a fertile resource in its own right. This article engages with a collection of garments from Joshua Kane, Paul Smith, Alexander McQueen, Anderson and Sheppard, Mark Powell and A Child of the Jago, among others, but primarily examines a process. This ranges from the routine of bidding for specific articles of clothing on online auction sites, to the process by which a collection is subsequently amassed, neglected and rediscovered. By considering the purchasing, collecting and ethnographic wearing of these items as part of a multi-stranded methodological toolkit, questions will be asked as to the role of acquiring and living with garments as a means of understanding them.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/csmf_00096_1
2025-12-31
2026-04-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ariely, D. and Simonson, I. (2008), ‘Buying, bidding, playing or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions’, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13:1–2, pp. 11323, https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP13-1&2_10.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aristides, N. (1988), ‘Calm and uncollected’, American Scholar, 57:3, pp. 32736, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41211543. Accessed 7 January 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barad, K. (2007), Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bateson, G. (1973), Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution and Epistemology, New York: Paladin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baudrillard, J. (2003), Passwords (trans. C. Turner), London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Belk, R. W. (1995), Collecting in a Consumer Society, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhattacharya, A. and Mathur, P. (2023), ‘YouTube “unboxing”: An influencer study of purchase intent – a qualitative study’, NMIMS Management Review, 31:3, pp. 20313, https://doi.org/10.1177/09711023231205509.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bluteau, J. M. (2021a), ‘Legitimising digital anthropology through immersive cohabitation: Becoming an observing participant in a blended digital landscape’, Ethnography, 22:2, pp. 26785, https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138119881165.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bluteau, J. M. (2021b), ‘The devil is in the detail: Why men still wear suits’, in S. Cole and M. Lambert (eds), Dandy Style: 250 Years of British Men’s Fashion, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 6373.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bluteau, J. M. (2022a), Dressing Up: Menswear in the Age of Social Media, New York: Berghahn.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bluteau, J. M. (2022b), ‘Uncertain masculinities: Hyperpolymediation and the advent of (the) post-particular man among well-dressed men on Instagram’, Journal of Bodies, Sexualities, and Masculinities, 3:2, pp. 3253, https://doi.org/10.3167/jbsm.2022.030203.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bluteau, J. M. (2022c), ‘Gazing on invisible men: Introducing the gallery gaze to establish that (in)visibility is in the eye of the beholder at Westminster Menswear Archive’, Journal of Material Culture, 27:2, pp. 192216, https://doi.org/10.1177/13591835211066821.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bluteau, J. M. (2023), ‘Turning around the camera: Self-portraits of an anthropologist on Instagram’, Ethnography, https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381231158945.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bluteau, J. M. (2024a), ‘Ethnographic wearing’, Wardrobe Studies: A Collection of Stories, Oslo Metropolitan University, https://clothingresearch.oslomet.no/2024/02/01/ethnographic-wearing. Accessed 1 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bluteau, J. M. (2024b), ‘Clothing’, virtual issue, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, https://rai.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/toc/10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9655.Clothing. Accessed 5 January 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Boughlala, A. and Smelik, A. (2024), ‘Tracing the history of digital fashion’, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 43:3, pp. 17186, https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302x241283504.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bourdieu, P. (2002), ‘Habitus’, in J. Hillier and E. Rooksby (eds), Habitus: A Sense of Place, Burlington: Ashgate, pp. 2734.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Carreau, L. and Gunn, I. (2024), ‘Moving on: Rethinking practice and transforming data at the Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge’, Collections: A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals, 20:1, pp. 826, https://doi.org/10.1177/15501906241234943.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Cobb, K., Orzanda, B. and López-Gydosh, D. (2019), ‘History is always in fashion: The practice of artifact-based dress history in the academic collection’, Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice, 8:1, pp. 423, https://doi.org/10.1080/20511787.2019.1580435.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Craciun, M. (2012), ‘Rethinking fakes, authenticating selves’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18:4, pp. 84663, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2012.01795.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Craciun, M. (2013), Material Culture and Authenticity: Fake Branded Fashion in Europe, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Csordas, T. J. (1990), ‘Embodiment as a paradigm for anthropology’, Ethos, 18:1, pp. 547, https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1990.18.1.02a00010.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Cui, X., Lai, V. S. and Liu, C. K. W. (2009), ‘Research on consumer behaviour in online auctions: Insights from a critical literature review’, Electronic Markets, 18:4, pp. 34561, https://doi.org/10.1080/10196780802420752.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Dilley, R. (2014), Nearly Native, Barely Civilized: Henri Gaden’s Journey through Colonial French West Africa (1894–1939), Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Durnad, C. A. (2010), ‘Indexing (in)authenticity: Art and artefact in ethnographic museums’, AlternNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 6:3, pp. 24860, https://doi.org/10.1177/117718011000600305.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Fuentes, A. (2023), ‘Damage, dirt and change over time: Documenting conditions at the University of Cambridge Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology’, Journal of the Institute of Conservation, 46:2, pp. 12740, https://doi.org/10.1080/19455224.2023.2203941.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gomes da Cunha, O. M. (2020), The Things of Others: Ethnographies, Histories and Other Artefacts, Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Groves, A. and Sprecher, D. (2024), Inside the Westminster Menswear Archive, New York: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Groves, A. and Sprecher, D. (2025), ‘Westminster Menswear Archive: University of Westminster, London’, Fashion Theory, 29:2, pp. 26779, https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704x.2024.2423585.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hayne, S. C., Smith, C. A. P. and Vijayasarathy, L. R. (2003), ‘Who wins on eBay? An analysis of bidders and their bid behaviours’, Electronic Markets, 13:4, pp. 28293, https://doi.org/10.1080/1019678032000135536.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Henry, R., Otto, T. and Wood, M. (2013), ‘Ethnographic artefacts and value transformations’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3:2, pp. 3351, https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.2.004.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hodder, I. (1994), ‘The interpretation of documents and material culture’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 673715.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Holy, L. (1988), ‘Theory, methodology and the research process’, in R. F. Ellen (ed.), Ethnographic Research: A Guide to General Conduct, London: Academic Press Limited, pp. 1334.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ingold, T. (2007), ‘Materials against materiality’, Archaeological Dialogues, 14:1, pp. 116, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1380203807002127.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Japutra, A., Gordon-Wilson, S., Ekinci, Y. and Adam, E. D. (2025), ‘The dark side of brands: Exploring fear of missing out, obsessive brand passion, and compulsive buying’, Journal of Business Research, 186, pp. 111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114990.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kawamura, Y. (2020), Doing Research in Fashion and Dress, New York: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. de la Haye, A. (2018), ‘A critical analysis of practices of collecting fashionable dress’, Fashion Theory, 22:4–5, pp. 381403, https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704x.2018.1429742.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lee, H. (2020), ‘Keynote: A living subject’, Biographers International Organization Annual Conference, 16 May, https://biographersinternational.org/resources/hermione-lee-2020-keynote. Accessed 10 June 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Luvaas, B. and Eicher, J. B. (2019), The Anthropology of Dress and Fashion: A Reader, New York: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Madianou, M. and Miller, D. (2011), Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Madianou, M. and Miller, D. (2013), ‘Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16:2, pp. 16987, https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877912452486.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002), Phenomenology of Perception, 2nd ed., London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Miller, D. (2010), Stuff, Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Miller, D. (2011), Tales from Facebook, Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Mowlabocus, S. (2018), ‘“Let’s get this thing open”: The pleasures of unboxing videos’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23:4, pp. 56479, https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549418810098.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Okely, J. and Callaway, H. (eds) (1992), Anthropology and Autobiography, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Pearce, S. M. (1992), Museums, Objects, and Collections: A Cultural Study, Leicester: Leicester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Pearce, S. M. (ed.) (1994), Interpreting Objects and Collections, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Pearce, S. M. (1995), On Collecting: An Investigation into Collecting in the European Tradition, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Pearce, S. M. (1999), ‘Museums of anthropology or museums as anthropology’, Anthropologica, 21:1, pp. 2533, https://doi.org/10.2307/25605915.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Pickles, A. (2023), ‘Gambling’, in F. Stein (ed.), The Open Encyclopaedia of Anthropology, n.p.: Open Knowledge Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Prown, J. D. (1982), ‘Mind in matter: An introduction to material culture theory and method’, Winterthur Portfolio, 17:1, pp. 119, https://doi.org/10.1086/496065.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Rocamora, A. (2017), ‘Mediatisation and digital media in the field of fashion’, Fashion Theory, 21:5, pp. 50522, https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704X.2016.1173349.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Sartre, J.-P. (2003), Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology, London: Routledge Classics.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Slater, D. (2000), ‘Consumption without scarcity: Exchange and normativity in an internet setting’, in P. Jackson, M. Lowe, D. Miller and F. Mort (eds), Commercial Cultures: Economies, Practices, Spaces, Oxford: Berg, pp. 12344.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Turner, V. (1967), The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Turner, V. (1969), The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure, Chicago, IL: Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Turner, T. S. (2012), ‘The social skin’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2:2, pp. 486504, https://doi.org/10.14318/hau2.2.026.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Whyman, B. (2019), ‘How can material culture analysis of fashionable menswear augment biographical and museological interpretations? A critical analysis of three wardrobes of menswear at the Victoria and Albert Museum and Fashion Museum, Bath’, doctoral thesis, London: University of the Arts London, https://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/id/eprint/16226/1/BWhyman_PhD_Submission_LCF_November2020.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/csmf_00096_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/csmf_00096_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test