Skip to content
1981
Volume 19, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1751-1917
  • E-ISSN: 1751-1925

Abstract

The youth population rate in Turkey is quite high compared to other European countries. According to official figures, there are 13 million people between the ages of 15 and 24 in Turkey. In the presidential election on 14 May 2023, 5 million young people will vote for the first time. This is a high number considering the total number of voters. In this article, we focus on political participation of high school students. This study has two main aims. First, it aims to determine the digital and traditional political participation of high school students ahead of the presidential elections in May 2023. Secondly, it aims to examine the relationship between digital and political participation. Exploratory sequential design, one of the mixed-method designs, was used in the study. Quantitative data were collected from 682 young people aged between 16 and 20 using the ‘Digital and Traditional Political Participation (DTPP)’ scale. In order to better understand the quantitative results, face-to-face interviews were conducted with fifteen young people. Multiple regression and correlation analysis techniques were used to analyse the quantitative data. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis, according to Milbrath’s (1965) classification of political participation theoretical framework. The results of the research show that young people’s political participation is low and at the level of spectator activities. Students mostly prefer to follow politics in digital environments through social media and young people do not prefer to participate in political transitional and gladiatorial activities, either traditionally or digitally.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00148_1
2024-06-04
2026-04-22

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andolina, M. W., Jenkins, K., Keester, S. and Zukin, C. (2002), ‘Searching for the meaning of youth civic engagement: Notes from the field’, Applied Developmental Science, 6:4, pp. 18995.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blanc, T. A. (2008), ‘Terms of engagement: Civic and political behavior among Arizona youth, Ph.D. thesis, Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boulianne, S. (2009), ‘Does internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research’, Political Communication, 26:2, pp. 193211.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carlisle, J. E. and Patton, R. C. (2013), ‘Is social media changing how we understand political engagement? An analysis of Facebook and the 2008 presidential election’, Political Research Quarterly, 66:4, pp. 88395.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Çobanoglu, Aktan, D. (2021), ‘Karma yöntem araştırmaları’, in L. Cohen, L. Manion and K. Morrison (eds), Eğitimde Arastirma Yöntemleri (trans. E. Dinç and K. Kıroğlu), Ankara: Pegem A, pp. 3151.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Çömlekçi, M. F. and Başol, O. (2019), ‘Gençlerin Sosyal Medya Kullanım Amaçları İle Sosyal Medya Bağımlılığı İlişkisinin İncelenmesi’, Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17:4, pp. 17388.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cook, F. L., Page, B. I. and Moskowitz, R. L. (2014), ‘Political engagement by wealthy Americans’, Political Science Quarterly, 129:3, pp. 38198.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2007), Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Creswell, J. W. and Plano Clark, L. V. (2020), Karma Yöntem Araştırmaları Tasarımı ve Yürütülmesi (trans. Y. Dede and S. B. Demir), Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cross, W. and Young, L. (2008), ‘Factors influencing the decision of the young politically engaged to join a political party: An investigation of the Canadian case’, Party Politics, 14:3, pp. 34569.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dalton, R. J. (2008), ‘Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation’, Political Studies, 56:1, pp. 7698.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ehman, L. H. (1980), ‘The American school in the political socialization process’, Review of Educational Research, 50:1, pp. 99119.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Eurofound (2014), Yaşam Kalitesi Eğilimleri – Türkiye: 2003–2012, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Habermas, J. (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (trans. W. Rehg), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hess, D. E. (2004), ‘Controversies about controversial issues in democratic education’, PS: Political Science and Politics, 37:2, pp. 25761.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hoffman, L. H. and Thomson, T. L. (2009), ‘The effect of television viewing on adolescents’ civic participation: Political efficacy as a mediating mechanism’, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 53:1, pp. 321.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Holt, K., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J. and Ljungberg, E. (2013), ‘Age and the effects of news media attention and social media use on political interest and participation: Do social media function as leveller?’, European Journal of Communication, 28:1, pp. 1934.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hong, Y. and Lin, T. T. C. (2017), ‘The impacts of political socialization on people’s online and offline political participation: Taking the youth of Singapore as an example’, Advances in Journalism and Communication, 5:1, pp. 5070.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hwang, J. Y. and Kiousis, S. (2010), ‘Social cognitive theory of political participation among adolescents’, in Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of International Communication Association, 22–26 June, Singapore: All Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Journell Jr., A. W. (2009), ‘Teaching politics: A study of high school government courses and the 2008 presidential election’, doctoral thesis, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kahne, J. E. and Sporte, S. E. (2008), ‘Developing citizens: The impact of civic learning opportunities on students’ commitment to civic participation’, American Educational Research Journal, 45:3, pp. 73866.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Karaca, M. (2007), ‘Sosyolojik Bir Olgu Olarak İnternet Gençliği’, doctoral thesis, Elazığ: Fırat Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Karp, J. A. and Banducci, S. A. (2008), ‘When politics is not just a man’s game: Women’s representation and political engagement’, Electoral Studies, 27:1, pp. 10515.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kenski, K. and Stroud, N. J. (2006), ‘Connections between internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation’, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 50:2, pp. 17392.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kimberlee, R. H. (2002), ‘Why don’t British young people vote at general elections?’, Journal of Youth Studies, 5:1, pp. 8598.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kuş, Z. (2013), ‘Politik Okuryazarlık ve Aktif Vatandaşlık’, in E. Gençtürk and K. Karatekin (eds), Sosyal Bilgiler Çoklu Okuryazarlik, Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık, pp. 20729.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kuş, Z. (2019), ‘Politik Okuryazarlık’, in B. Aksoy, B. Akbaba and B. Kılcan (eds), Sosyal Bilgilerde Beceri Eğitimi, Ankara: Pegem A, pp. 44569.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kuş, Z., Bertani, M., Ivan, L. and Mert, H. (2023), ‘Developing a digital and traditional political participation (DTPP) scale for youth: A validity and reliability study’, Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 25:1, pp. 721.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kuş, Z. and Ozan, H. (forthcoming 2024), ‘Should school be a political site? Concerns of Turkish parents’, Journal of International Social Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B. and Gaudet, H. (1968), How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lin, T. T. C. and Hong, A. H. (2015), ‘Different but not that different: Newmedia’s impact on young voters’ political participation’, in T. H. Tan, A. Mahizhnan and P. H. Ang (eds), Battle for Hearts and Minds: Newmedia and Elections in Singapore, Toh Tuck Link: World Scientific Publishing, pp. 12142.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Milbrath, L. W. (1965), Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics?, Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mondak, J. J. and Anderson, M. R. (2004), ‘The knowledge gap: A reexamination of gender-based differences in political knowledge’, Journal of Politics, 66:2, pp. 492512.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Muhlberger, P. (2004), ‘Access, skill and motivation in online political discussion: Testing cyberrealism’, in P. M. Shane (ed.), Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet, New York: Routledge, pp. 22538.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Muxel, A., Riou, C. and Le Hay, V. (2005), Political Participation of Young People in Europe: Development of Indicators for Comparative Research in the European Union (EUYOUPART), Paris: Fondation nationale des sciences politiques; CEVIPOF, https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03462230. Accessed 10 May 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Öztekin, A. (2003), Siyaset Bilimine Giriş, Ankara: Siyasal Yayınevi.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Palonsky, S. B. (1987), ‘Political socialization in elementary schools’, Elementary School Journal, 87:5, pp. 493505.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Papaoikonomou, A. (2017), ‘The impact of political socialization on students’ behavior: Empirical research in schools of central Macedonia in Greece’, International Journal of Educational Research Review, 2:2, http://dx.doi.org/10.24331/ijere.327468.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Punch, F. K. (2005), Sosyal Araştırmalara Giriş Nicel ve Nitel Yaklaşımlar (trans. D. Bayrak, H. B. Arslan and Z. Akyüz), Ankara: Siyasal Yayınevi.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Purdy, S. J. (2017), ‘Internet use and civic engagement: A structural equation approach’, Computers in Human Behavior, 71:1 pp. 31826.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Quan-Haase, A., Wellman, B., Witte, J. and Hampton, K. (2002), ‘Capitalizing on the net: Social contact, civic engagement, and sense of community’, in B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (eds), The Internet in Everyday Life, London: Blackwell, pp. 291324.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Quintelier, E. (2007), ‘Differences in political participation between young and old people’, Contemporary Politics, 13:2, pp. 16580.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Quintelier, E. (2013), ‘Engaging adolescents in politics: The longitudinal effect of political socialization agents’, Youth and Society, 14:1, pp. 5169.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Radina, N. K. and Belyashova, D. S. (2021), ‘Digital political participation of western and eastern parts of Germany residents (based on change.org online petitions)’, Changing Societies and Personalities, 5:1, pp. 6382.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sabucedo, J. M. and Cramer, D. (1991), ‘Sociological and psychological predictors of voting in Great Britain’, Journal of Social Psychology, 131:5, pp. 64754.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Smith, A., Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S. and Brady, H. (2009), ‘The internet and civic engagement’, Pew Research Center, 1 September, https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2009/09/01/the-internet-and-civic-engagement/. Accessed 10 May 2023.
  48. Tan, T. H., Chung, S. Y. and Zhang, W. Y. (2011), ‘Apathetic? Not Singaporean youth’, Straits Times, 27 May, https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ips/pa_th_st_apathetic-not-singaporean-youth_270511-11.pdf. Accessed 6 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Theocharis, Y. and Quintelier, E. (2016), ‘Stimulating citizenship or expanding entertainment? The effect of Facebook on adolescent participation’, New Media and Society, 18:5, pp. 81736.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. TÜİK (2021), ‘Nüfus ve Demografi Verileri’, Nüfus ve Konut Sayımı, 28 April, https://www.tuik.gov.tr/. Accessed 10 May 2023.
  51. Van Ditmars, M. M. (2017), ‘The enduring influence of the parental home in the development and transmission of political ideology’, Ph.D. thesis, Florence: European University Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N. and Lampe, C. (2011), ‘It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election’, Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14:3, pp. 10714.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Wattenberg, M. P. (2007), Is Voting for Young People?, New York: Pearson Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. West, A., Lewis, J. and Currie, P. (2009), ‘Students’ Facebook “friends”: Public and private spheres’, Journal of Youth Studies, 12:6, pp. 61527.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Wu, J. (2009), ‘Facebook politics: An exploratory study of American youth’s political engagement during the 2008 presidential election’, International Communication Association Conference, 24 May, Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhou, Y. (2010), ‘The role of communication of political participation: Exploring the social normative/cognitive processes related to political behavior’, MA thesis, Pullman, MA: Washington State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K. and Delli Carpini, M. X. (2006), A New Engagement? Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00148_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00148_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test