Skip to content
1981
Volume 19, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1751-1917
  • E-ISSN: 1751-1925

Abstract

Young people’s social participation has numerous benefits, and universities can play an important role in promoting it. The aim of this study is to broaden our understanding of the impact of social relationships on the development of social participation among university students. We also aimed to determine to what extent previous social participation experiences may modulate said impact. A total of 827 undergraduate students completed a questionnaire assessing their previous experience with social participation, the likelihood of their engaging in social participation in the future and the composition of their social networks, distinguishing between contacts on the basis of the type of relationship and its context (on or off campus). Although a clear relationship was found between social networks and previous experience with social participation, the association with the likelihood of engaging in social participation in the future was weaker and more complex. Previous experience was not found to modulate this association, and relationships with friends seem to be the most important factor in predicting future participation. The differences between civic and political participation are analysed, along with the practical implications of the results in light of, among other things, the potential role played by social norms.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER, EU
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00167_1
2024-12-09
2025-05-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Albanesi, C., Zani, B. and Cicognani, E. (2012), ‘Youth civic and political participation through the lens of gender: The Italian case’, Human Affairs, 22:3, pp. 36074, https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-012-0030-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andolina, M. W., Jenkins, K., Zukin, C. and Keeter, C. (2003), ‘Habits from home, lessons from school: Influences on youth civic engagement’, Political Science and Politics, 36:2, pp. 27580.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chua, V. and Erickson, B. H. (2016), ‘Associations and social networks’, in D. H. Smith, R. A. Stebbins and J. Grotz (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Volunteering, Civic Participation, and Nonprofit Associations, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 189205.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cicognani, E., Mazzoni, D., Albanesi, C. and Zani, B. (2015), ‘Sense of community and empowerment among young people: Understanding pathways from civic participation to social well-Being’, Voluntas, 26:1, pp. 2444.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen, J. E. (1988), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Coleman, J. S. (1988), ‘Social capital in the creation of human capital’, The American Journal of Sociology, 94, pp. 95120.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cornejo, M., Rocha, C., Castro, D., Varela, M., Manzi, J., González, R., Jiménez-Moya, G., Charvacho, H., Álvarez, B., Valdenegro, D., Cheyre, M. and Livingstone, A. G. (2021), ‘The intergenerational transmission of participation in collective action: The role of conversation and political practices in the family’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 60, pp. 2949.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Crossley, N. (2008), ‘Social networks and student activism: On the politicising effect of campus connections’, The Sociological Review, 56:1, pp. 1838, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2008.00775.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dávila, M. C., Zlobina, A. and Álvarez, G. (2020), ‘La influencia diferencial de las redes sociales en la participación social de mujeres y varones’ (‘The differential influence of social networks on the social participation of women and men’), Redes, 31:1, pp. 118.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dávila, M. C., Zlobina, A. and Álvarez-Hernández, G. (2021), ‘Young people’s social engagement: Personal motivations and social networks’, Voluntas, 33:3, pp. 58798, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00355-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Diani, M. and McAdam, D. (2003), Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action, New York: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/0199251789.001.0001.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Do Something (2012), ‘The Dosomething.org national survey: Index on young people and volunteering’, http://files.dosomething.org/files/pictures/blog/2012-Web-Singleview_0.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2022.
  13. Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. (1993), An Introduction to the Bootstrap, New York and London: Chapman and Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Farkas, G. M. and Linberg, E. (2015), ‘Voluntary associations’ impact on the composition of active members’ social networks: Not an either/or matter’, Sociological Forum, 30:4, pp. 1082105, https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12209.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Feld, S. L. (1981), ‘The focused organization of social ties’, American Journal of Sociology, 86:5, pp. 101535.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Flanagan, C. A. (2013), Teenage Citizens: The Political Theories of the Young, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674067233.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Friedkin, N. E. (2001), ‘Norm formation in social influence networks’, Social Networks, 23:3, pp. 16789, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(01)00036-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gerber, S. and Hefner, D. (2019), ‘Social norms as communicative phenomena: A communication perspective on the theory of normative social behavior’, SCM: Studies in Communication and Media, 8:1, pp. 628, https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2019-1-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Glynn, C. J., Huge, M. E. and Lunney, C. A. (2009), ‘The influence of perceived social norms on college students’ intention to vote’, Political Communication, 26:1, pp. 4864, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802622860.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. González, E. (2020), ‘Una mirada al estudio de las redes egocéntricas desde el enfoque de métodos mixtos y la teoría social’ (‘A look at the study of egocentric networks from the mixed methods approach and social theory’), Redes, 31:2, pp. 20204.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Granovetter, M. S. (1973), ‘The strength of weak ties’, American Journal of Sociology, 78:6, pp. 136080.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Greenfield, E. A. and Moorman, S. M. (2018), ‘Extracurricular involvement in high school and later-life participation in voluntary associations’, The Journals of Gerontology. Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 73:3, pp. 48291, https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw168.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Haski-Leventhal, D., Ronel, N., York, A. S. and Ben-David, B. M. (2008), ‘Youth volunteering for youth: Who are they serving? How are they being served?’, Children and Youth Services Review, 30:7, pp. 83446.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hatcher, J. A. (2011), ‘Assessing civic knowledge and engagement’, New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011:149, pp. 8192, https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.382.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hayes, A. F. (2013), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hoskins, B. L. and Mascherini, M. (2009), ‘Measuring active citizenship through the development of a composite indicator’, Social Indicators Research, 90:3, pp. 45988.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hustinx, L., Vanhove, T., Declercq, A., Hermans, K. and Lammertyn, F. (2005), ‘Bifurcated commitment, priorities, and social contagion: The dynamics and correlates of volunteering within a university student population’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26:4, pp. 52338, https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690500200111.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jach, E. A. and Trolian, T. (2022), ‘Applied learning and student views of social and political involvement’, Higher Education Research & Development, 42:1, pp. 7892, https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2043248.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Janoski, T., Musick, M. and Wilson, J. (1998), ‘Being volunteered? The impact of social participation and pro-social attitudes on volunteering’, Sociological Forum, 13, pp. 495519, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022131525828.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kashima, Y., Wilson, S., Lusher, D., Pearson, L. J. and Pearson, C. (2013), ‘The acquisition of perceived descriptive norms as social category learning in social networks’, Social Networks, 35:4, pp. 71119, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.06.002.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lilley, K., Barker, M. and Harris, N. (2015), ‘Educating global citizens: A good “idea” or an organisational practice?’, Higher Education Research & Development, 34:5, pp. 95771, https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1011089.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lim, C. (2008), ‘Social networks and political participation: How do networks matter?’, Social Forces, 87:2, pp. 96182.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lin, A. (2013), ‘Citizenship education in American schools and its role in developing civic engagement: A review of the research’, Educational Review, 67:1, pp. 3563.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lott, J., Hernandez, J., King, J., Brown, T. and Fajardo, I. (2013), ‘Public versus private colleges: Political participation of college graduates’, Research in Higher Education, 54, pp. 895929.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Malak-Minkiewicz, B. and Torney-Purta, J. (eds) (2021), Influences of the IEA Civic and Citizenship Education Studies: Practice, Policy, and Research across Countries and Regions, Cham: IEA/Springer, https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-030-71102-3. Accessed 2 December 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Mason, W., Conrey, R. and Smith, E. R. (2007), ‘Situating social influence processes: Dynamic, multidirectional flows of influence within social networks’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11:3, pp. 279300.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. McAdam, D. and Paulsen, R. (1993), ‘Specifying the relationship between social ties and activism’, American Journal of Sociology, 99:3, pp. 64067.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. McCartly, C., Lubbers, M. L., Vacca, R. and Molina, J. L. (2019), Conducting Personal Network Research: A Practical Guide, New York: The Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Morgan, D. L. and Davis III, C. H. (2019), Student Activism, Politics, and Campus Climate in Higher Education, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Paik, A. and Navarre-Jackson, L. (2011), ‘Social networks, recruitment, and volunteering: Are social capital effects conditional on recruitment?’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40:3, pp. 47696.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Pascarella, E. T., Salisbury, M. H., Martin, G. L. and Source, C. B. (2012), ‘Some complexities in the effects of diversity experiences on orientation toward social/political activism and political views in the first year of college’, The Journal of Higher Education, 83:4, pp. 46796.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Passy, F. (2003), ‘Social networks matter: But how?’, in M. Diani and D. McAdam (eds), Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective, New York: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/0199251789.003.0002.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Passy, F. and Giugni, M. (2000), ‘Life-spheres, networks, and sustained participation in social movements: A phenomenological approach to political commitment’, Sociological Forum, 15, pp. 11744, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007550321469.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pavlova, M. K. and Silbereisen, R. K. (2015), ‘Supportive social contexts and intentions for civic and political participation: An application of the theory of planned behaviour’, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 25, pp. 43246.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Putnam, R. D. (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Touchstone Books/Simon & Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Quéniart, A. (2008), ‘The form and meaning of young people’s involvement in community and political work’, Youth & Society, 40:2, pp. 20323, https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X08314261.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Reis, H. (2008), ‘Reinvigorating the concept of situation in social psychology’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12:4, pp. 31129, https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308321721.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Serrat, R., Petriwskyj, A., Villar, F. and Warburton, J. (2017), ‘Barriers to the retention of older participants in political organizations: Evidence from Spain’, Ageing and Society, 37:3, pp. 581606.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Shepherd, H. R. (2017), ‘The structure of perception: How networks shape ideas of norms’, Sociological Forum, 32:1, pp. 7293.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Sloam, J., Kisby, B., Henn, M. and Oldfield, B. (2020), ‘Voice, equality and education: The role of higher education in defining the political participation of young Europeans’, Comparative European Politics, 19:3, pp. 296322, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-020-00228-zç.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Stefani, S., Prati, G., Tzankovaa, I., Ricci, E., Albanesi, C. and Cicognani, E. (2021), ‘Gender differences in civic and political engagement and participation among Italian young people’, Social Psychological Bulletin, 16:1, https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.3887.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Takács, K., Janky, B. and Flache, A. (2008), ‘Collective action and network change’, Social Networks, 30:3, pp. 17789, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2008.02.003.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Tindall, D. B. (2002), ‘Social networks, identification and participation in an environmental movement: Low-medium cost activism within the British Columbia Wilderness Preservation Movement’, Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 39:4, pp. 41352, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.2002.tb00628.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Vestergren, S., Drury, J. and Chiriac, E. H. (2019), ‘How participation in collective action changes relationships, behaviours, and beliefs: An interview study of the role of inter- and intragroup processes’, Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7:1, pp. 7699.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Yang, J. and Hoskins, B. (2020), ‘Does university have an effect on young people’s active citizenship in England?’, Higher Education, 80:5, pp. 83956.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Youniss, J., Bales, S., Christmas-Best, V., Diversi, M., McLaughlin, M. and Silbereisen, R. (2002), ‘Youth civic engagement in the twenty-first century’, Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12:1, pp. 12148.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Zimmerman, M. A. and Rappaport, J. (1988), ‘Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment’, American Journal of Community Psychology, 16:5, pp. 72550, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00930023.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00167_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00167_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test