Skip to content
1981
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1751-1917
  • E-ISSN: 1751-1925

Abstract

This quantitative study of elementary teachers in Texas assesses the relationship between their stated preference for particular children’s books and aims of civic education. The books covered a variation of social studies and civic education topics including the perspectives of various racial or ethnic groups, antiracism, geography, ecology, relationships, LGBTQ+ rights and feminism. Exploratory factor analysis of books identified two factors that were labelled culture-oriented books and justice-oriented books. Additionally, latent class analysis found groupings of teacher’s that were labelled engaged and avoidant in relation to aims of civic education. Results of regression analysis found that engaged teachers were more likely to indicate use of both culture- and justice-oriented books. Also, female teachers, teachers in upper elementary, teachers with graduate degrees and Asian teachers are more likely to utilize culture-oriented books, while African American and Latinx teachers were more likely to utilize justice-oriented books.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00173_1
2025-06-30
2026-04-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adichie, C. N. (2009), ‘The danger of a single story’, TED, 6 October, https://www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_ngozi_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story. Accessed 5 May 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen, A. (2018), ‘Teach like Socrates: Encouraging critical thinking in elementary social studies’, Social Studies and the Young Learner, 31:1, pp. 410.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, C., Avery, P. G., Pederson, P. V., Smith, E. S. and Sullivan, J. L. (1997), ‘Divergent perspectives on citizenship education: A Q-method study and survey of social studies teachers’, American Educational Research Journal, 34:2, pp. 33364, https://doi.org/10.2307/1163361.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barton, K. C. and Levstik, L. S. (2004), Teaching History for the Common Good, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Beck, T. A. (2013), ‘Identity, discourse, and safety in a high school discussion of same-sex marriage’, Theory & Research in Social Education, 41:1, pp. 132, https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2013.757759.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bersh, L. C. (2013), ‘The curricular value of teaching about immigration through picture book thematic text sets’, The Social Studies, 104:2, pp. 4756, https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2012.720307.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bigler, E., Shiller, J. T. and Willox, L. (2013), ‘The teaching of race and class in American social studies classrooms’, in J. Passe and P. G. Fitchett (eds), The Status of Social Studies: Views from the Field, Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, pp. 15368.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bishop, R. S. (2012), ‘Reflections on the development of African American children’s literature’, Journal of Children’s Literature, 38:2, pp. 513.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bolgatz, J. (2005), ‘Revolutionary talk: Elementary teacher and students discuss race in a social studies class’, The Social Studies, 96:6, pp. 25964, https://doi.org/10.3200/tsss.96.6.259-264.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Botelho, M. J. and Rudman, M. K. (2009), Critical Multicultural Analysis of Children’s Literature: Mirrors, Windows, and Doors, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Camicia, S. P. (2008), ‘Deciding what is a controversial issue: A case study of social studies curriculum’, Theory & Research in Social Education, 36:4, pp. 298316, https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2008.10473378.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Camicia, S. P. and Zhu, J. (2019), ‘LGBTQ inclusion and exclusion in state social studies standards: Implications for critical democratic education’, in C. Haeussler Bohan, J. L. Pecore and F. S. Allaire (eds), Curriculum & Teaching Dialogue, Charlotte, vol. 21, NC: Information Age Publishing, pp. 720.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Campbell, D. E. (2019), ‘What social scientists have learned about civic education: A review of the literature’, Peabody Journal of Education, 94:1, pp. 3247, https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956x.2019.1553601.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Castro, A. J. and Knowles, R. T. (2017), ‘Democratic citizenship education: Researching across multiple contexts and landscapes’, in M. Manfra and C. Bolick (eds), The Wiley Handbook of Social Studies Research, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 287318.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cattell, R. B. (1966), ‘The screen test for the number of factors’, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1:2, pp. 24576, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Celeux, G. and Soromenho, G. (1996), ‘An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model’, Journal of Classification, 13:2, pp. 195212, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01246098.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Delgado, R. and Stefancic, J. (1999), Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge, 2nd ed., Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Demoiny, S. B. and Ferraras-Stone, J. (2018), ‘Critical literacy in elementary social studies: Juxtaposing historical master and counter narratives in picture books’, The Social Studies, 109:2, pp. 6473, https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2018.1451981.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. DeVellis, R. F. (2016), Scale Development: Theory and Applications, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dever, M. T., Sorenson, B. and Brodrick, J. (2005), ‘Using picture books as a vehicle to teach young children about social justice’, Social Studies and the Young Learner, 18:1, p. 18.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Duncan, K. E., Hall, D., Dunn, D. C. (2023), ‘Embracing the fullness of Black humanity: Centering Black joy in the social studies’, The Social Studies, 114, pp. 24149, https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2023.2174926.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fabrigar, L. R. and Wegener, D. T. (2011), Exploratory Factor Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Field, A. (2017), Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Fitchett, P. G. and Heafner, T. L. (2010), ‘A national perspective on the effects of high-stakes testing and standardization on elementary social studies marginalization’, Theory & Research in Social Education, 38:1, pp. 11430, https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2010.10473418.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Fitchett, P. G. and Heafner, T. L. (2017), ‘Student demographics and teacher characteristics as predictors of elementary-age students’ history knowledge: Implications for teacher education and practice’, Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, pp. 7992, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.012.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Fitchett, P. G. and Meuwissen, K. W. (2018), Social Studies in the New Education Policy Era, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fives, H. and Buehl, M. M. (2012), ‘Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us?’, in APA Educational Psychology Handbook, Vol. 2: Individual Differences and Cultural and Contextual Factors, in K.R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J.M. Royer and M. Zeidner (eds), Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 47199, https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/13274-019.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Foshay, A. W. and Burton, W. W. (1976), ‘Citizenship as the aim of the social studies’, Theory & Research in Social Education, 4:2, pp. 122.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Freedman, L. and Johnson, H. (2001), ‘Who’s protecting whom? “I hadn’t meant to tell you this”, a case in point in confronting self-censorship in the choice of young adult literature’, Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44:4, pp. 35669.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gailey, S. M. and Knowles, R. T. (2021), ‘Exploring preservice teachers’ civic education beliefs with Q Methodology’, Teaching Education, 33:4, pp. 47090, https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2021.1979511.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Geiser, C. (2013), Data Analysis with Mplus, New York: The Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Grant, S. G. and Vansledright, B. A. (1996), ‘The dubious connection: Citizenship education and the social studies’, The Social Studies, 87:2, pp. 5659, https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.1996.9958413.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Gray, E. S. (2009), ‘The importance of visibility: Students’ and teachers’ criteria for selecting African American literature’, The Reading Teacher, 62:6, pp. 47281, https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.62.6.2.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Halvorsen, A.-L. (2017), ‘Children’s learning and understanding in their Social World’, in M. Manfra and C. Bolick (eds), The Wiley Handbook of Social Studies Research, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 385413, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118768747.ch17.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hanna, P. R. (1937), ‘Social education for childhood’, Childhood Education, 14:2, pp. 7477, https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1937.10724151.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Harrington, J. M. (2016), ‘“We’re all kids!” Picture books and cultural awareness’, The Social Studies, 107:6, pp. 24456, https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2016.1214906.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hauver, J. (2019), Young Children’s Civic Mindedness: Democratic Living and Learning in an Unequal World, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hawkman, A. M. (2020), ‘Swimming in and through whiteness: Antiracism in social studies teacher education’, Theory & Research in Social Education, 48:3, pp. 40330, https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2020.1724578.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hawkman, A. M., Tofel-Grehl, C., Searle, K. and MacDonald, B. L. (2022), ‘Successes, challenges, and surprises: Teacher reflections on using children’s literature to examine complex social issues in the elementary classroom’, Teachers and Teaching, 28:5, pp. 584602, https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2022.2062747.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Heafner, T. L. and Fitchett, P. G. (2012), ‘Tipping the scales: National trends of declining social studies instructional time in elementary schools’, Journal of Social Studies Research, 36:2, pp. 190215.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Heafner, T. L. and Norwood, J. (2019), ‘An elementary social studies teacher’s quest to develop democratic citizens: The boundaries of ambitious teaching’, The Journal of Social Studies Research, 43:3, pp. 18798, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2018.07.001.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Hess, D. E. (2005), ‘How do teachers’ political views influence teaching about controversial issues?’, Social Education, 69:1, pp. 4748.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Hess, D. E. (2008), ‘Controversial issues and democratic discourse’, in L. Levstik and C. Tyson (eds), Handbook of Research in Social Studies Education, New York: Routledge, pp. 12436.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Hess, D. E. and McAvoy, P. (2015), The Political Classroom: Evidence and Ethics in Democratic Education, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Hope, J. (2008), ‘“One day we had to run”: The development of refugee identity in children’s literature and its function in education’, Children’s Literature in Education, 39:4, pp. 295304.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C. and Thorisdottir, H. (2009), Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Kelemen, D., Emmons, N. A., Schillaci, R. S. and Ganea, P. A. (2014), ‘Young children can be taught basic natural selection using picture-storybook intervention’, Psychological Science, 25:4, pp. 893902, https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613516009.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Kenyon, E. A. (2017), ‘Lived experience and the ideologies of preservice social studies teachers’, Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, pp. 94103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.006.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Kerr, D. (2002), ‘Citizenship education: An international comparison across sixteen countries’, International Journal of Social Education, 17:1, pp. 115.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. King, J. E. (1991), ‘Dysconscious racism: Ideology, identity, and the miseducation of teachers’, The Journal of Negro Education, 60:2, pp. 13346, https://doi.org/10.2307/2295605.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Knowles, R. T. (2018), ‘Teaching who you are: Connecting teachers’ civic education ideology to instructional strategies’, Theory and Research in Social Education, 46:1, pp. 68109, https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2017.1356776.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Knowles, R. T. (2019), ‘Ideology in the schools: Developing, validating, and implementing the teacher civic education ideology scale’, Education, Citizenship, and Social Justice, 14:3, pp. 26078, https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197918800664.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Knowles, R. T. and Castro, A. J. (2019), ‘The implications of ideology on teachers’ emphasized civic behavior in the classroom’, Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, pp. 22639, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.10.009.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Larrick, N. (1965), ‘The all-white world of children’s books’, The Saturday Review, pp. 6365.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Leland, C., Lewison, M. and Harste, J. (2017), Teaching Children’s Literature: It’s Critical!, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Leonardo, Z. (2013), ‘The story of schooling: Critical race theory and the educational racial contract’, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34:4, pp. 599610, https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2013.822624.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Libresco, A. S., Balantic, J. and Kipling, J. C. (2011), Every Book Is a Social Studies Book: How to Meet Standards with Picture Books, K-6s, Santa Barbara, CA:. ABC-CLIO LLC.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Llewellyn, K. R., Cook, S. A. and Molina, A. (2010), ‘Civic learning: Moving from the apolitical to the socially just’, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42:6, pp. 791812, https://doi.org/10.1080/00220271003587400.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Mankiw, S. and Strasser, J. (2013), ‘Tender topics: Exploring sensitive issues with pre-k through first grade children through read-alouds’, YC: Young Children, 68:1, pp. 8489.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Marshall, C. S. (1999), ‘Highlighting commonalities, differences, and diversity with picture books’, Social Studies and the Young Learner, 11:4, pp. 1821.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Martell, C. C. and Stevens, K. M. (2018), ‘Perceptions of teaching race and gender’, The High School Journal, 101:4, pp. 27499, https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2018.0015.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. McAdam, J. E. (2019), ‘Narratives of change: The role of storytelling, artefacts and children’s literature in building communities of inquiry that care’, Cambridge Journal of Education, 49:3, pp. 293307, https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764x.2018.1524001.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Moye, A. K., Slate, J. R., Lunenburg, F. C., Martinez-Garcia, M.-G. and Hemmen, J. W. (2021), ‘Texas elementary school teacher and student demography: A multiyear investigation’, Journal of Education and Recreation Patterns, 2:2, pp. 2139.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) (2013a), ‘Revitalizing civic learning in our schools’, Social Education, 77:3, pp. 15759.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) (2013b), The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards: Guidance for Enhancing the Rigor of K-12 Civics, Economics, Geography, and History, Silver Spring, MD: NCSS.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) (2017), ‘Powerful, purposeful pedagogy in elementary school social studies’, https://www.socialstudies.org/position-statements/powerful-purposeful-pedagogy-elementary-school-social-studies. Accessed 23 June 2025.
  67. National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) (2019), ‘Notable social studies trade books for young people’, Social Education, 83:3, supplement, https://www.socialstudies.org/notable-tradebooks/2019. Accessed 13 May 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) (2020), ‘Notable social studies trade books for young people’, Social Education, 84:3, supplement, https://www.socialstudies.org/notable-tradebooks/2020. Accessed 13 May 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Pace, J. L. (2019), ‘Contained risk-taking: Preparing preservice teachers to teach controversial issues in three countries’, Theory & Research in Social Education, 47:2, pp. 22860, https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2019.1595240.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Passe, J. and Fitchett, P. G. (eds) (2013), The Status of Social Studies: Views from the Field, Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Patterson, N., Doppen, F. and Misco, T. (2012), ‘Beyond personally responsible: A study of teacher conceptualizations of citizenship education’, Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 7:2, pp. 191206, https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197912440856.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Payne, K. A., Adair, J. K., Colegrove, K. S. S., Lee, S., Falkner, A., McManus, M. and Sachdeva, S. (2020), ‘Reconceptualizing civic education for young children: Recognizing embodied civic action’, Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 15:1, pp. 3546, https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197919858359.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Penguin (n.d.), ‘Antiracist Baby’, Penguin, https://powkidsbooks.com/books/franny-s-father-is-a-feminist/. Accessed 23 May 2025.
  74. Picower, B. (2009), ‘The unexamined whiteness of teaching: How white teachers maintain and enact dominant racial ideologies’, Race, Ethnicity and Education, 12:2, pp. 197215, https://doi.org/10.1080/13613320902995475.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. POW! (n.d.), ‘Franny’s Father is a Feminist’, POW Kids Books, https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/443701/antiracist-baby-by-kendi-ibram-x/9780241512371. Accessed 23 May 2025.
  76. Reichert, F. and Torney-Purta, J. (2019), ‘A cross-national comparison of teachers’ beliefs about the aims of civic education in 12 countries: A person-centered analysis’, Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, pp. 11225, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.005.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Rodriguez, N. N. and Kim, E. J. (2018), ‘In search of mirrors: An Asian Critical Race Theory content analysis of Asian American picturebooks from 2007 to 2017’, Journal of Children’s Literature, 44:2, pp. 1731.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Sampermans, D., Reichert, F. and Claes, E. (2021), ‘Teachers’ concepts of good citizenship and associations with their teaching styles’, Cambridge Journal of Education, 51:4, pp. 43350, https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764x.2020.1861219.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Losito, B., Agrusti, G. and Friedman, T. (2017), Becoming Citizens in a Changing World, Amsterdam: IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study, https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-73963-2. Accessed 21 March 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Stevens, K. M. and Martell, C. C. (2019), ‘Feminist social studies teachers: The role of teachers’ backgrounds and beliefs in shaping gender-equitable practices’, The Journal of Social Studies Research, 43:1, pp. 116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2018.02.002.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Stout, C. and Wilburn, T. (2022), ‘CRT Map: Efforts to restrict teaching racism and bias have multiplied across the U.S.’, Chalkbeat.org, https://www.chalkbeat.org/22525983/map-critical-race-theory-legislation-teaching-racism/. Accessed 23 June 2025.
  82. Swalwell, K. and Payne, K. A. (2019), ‘Critical civic education for young children’, Multicultural Perspectives, 21:2, pp. 12732, https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2019.1606641.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Thomas, E. E. (2016), ‘Stories Still matter: Rethinking the role of diverse children’s literature today’, Language Arts, 94:2, pp. 11219, https://doi.org/10.58680/la201628803.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Thomas, E. E. and Stornaiulolo, A. (2016), ‘Restorying the self: Bending toward textual justice’, Harvard Educational Review, 86:3, pp. 31338.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Thornhill, T. E. (2014), ‘Resistance and assent: How racial socialization shapes Black students’ experience learning African American history in high school’, Urban Education, 51:9, pp. 112651, https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085914566094.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Thornton, S. J. (1989), ‘Aspiration and practice: Teacher as curricular-instructional gatekeeper in social studies’, Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, 27 March.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Thornton, S. J. (2001), ‘From content to subject matter’, The Social Studies, 92:6, pp. 23742, https://doi.org/10.1080/00377990109604009.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Thornton, S. J. (2005), Teaching Social Studies that Matters: Curriculum for Active Learning, New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Tschida, C. M., Ryan, C. L. and Tichnor, A. S. (2014), ‘Building on windows and mirrors: Encouraging the disruption of “single stories” through children’s literature’, Journal of Children’s Literature, 40:1, pp. 2834.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Turner, R. K., Deliman, A. and Robertson, M. (2023), ‘Curriculum integration using picture books: Combining language arts and social studies standards to address controversial issues’, Social Studies and the Young Learner, 36:1, pp. 2732.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Vacca, R. T. and Vacca, J. L. (2005), Content Area Reading: Literacy and Learning across the Curriculum, 8th ed., Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Van Horn, S. E. (2015), ‘“How do you have two moms?”: Challenging heteronormativity while sharing LGBTQ-inclusive children’s literature’, Talking Points, 27:1, pp. 212, https://doi.org/10.58680/tp201527541.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Whitford, A.J. (2021), ‘Exploring the impact of interactive read-alouds on student perceptions of women’s history’, Social Studies Research and Practice, 16:2, pp. 14457, https://doi.org/10.1108/ssrp-07-2021-0020.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Wilson, E., Sunal, C., Haas, M. and Laughlin, M. (1999), ‘Teachers’ perspectives on incorporating current controversial issues into the curriculum’, Annual Meeting of the National Council for the Social Studies, Orlando, FL, 19–21 November, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED440907.pdf. Accessed 6 May 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Wolf, S. A. (2003), Interpreting Literature with Children, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Wollman-Bonilla, J. E. (1998), ‘Outrageous viewpoints: Teachers’ criteria for rejecting works of children’s literature’, Language Arts, 75:4, pp. 28795, https://doi.org/10.58680/la19983295.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00173_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00173_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test