Skip to content
1981
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1751-1917
  • E-ISSN: 1751-1925

Abstract

Teachers have a crucial role in establishing an ‘open classroom climate’ (OCC) that enables open discussions on societal issues. Recent research has mainly measured OCC through individual students’ perceptions. This study explores the teacher competences that foster an OCC for effective citizenship education. Thematic analysis of interviews with eighteen primary school teachers reveals that how and which competences can contribute to an OCC varies by teacher, context and process. In sum, most teachers feel competent to create an OCC and perceive their classroom as democratic, involving students only in practical and organizational matters and not, for example, in curricular matters.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00176_1
2025-06-30
2026-04-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Advisory Group on Citizenship (1998), Education for Citizenship and the Teaching of Democracy in Schools, London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alivernini, F. and Manganelli, S. (2011), ‘Is there a relationship between openness in classroom discussion and students’ knowledge in civic and citizenship education?’, Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, pp. 3441–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.315.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Barber, C., Clark, C. H. and Torney-Purta, J. (2021), ‘Learning environments and school/classroom climate as supports for civic reasoning, discourse, and engagement’, in C. D. Lee, G. White and D. Dong (eds), Educating for Civic Reasoning and Discourse, Washington, DC: National Academy of Education, pp. 273–318.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Biesta, G. (2008), ‘A school for citizens: Civic learning and democratic action in the learning democracy’, in B. Lingard, J. Nixon and S. Ranson (eds), Transforming Learning in Schools and Communities, London: Continuum, pp. 170–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bryman, A. (2016), Social Research Methods, 5th ed., London: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell, D. E. (2008), ‘Voice in the classroom: How an open classroom climate fosters political engagement among adolescents’, Political Behavior, 30:4, pp. 437–54, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9063-z.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Claes, E. and Hooghe, M. (2010), ‘Schools and citizenship education: A comparative investigation of socialization effects of citizenship education on adolescents’, doctoral dissertation, Leuven: K.U. Leuven.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Claes, E., Maurissen, L. and Havermans, N. (2017), ‘Let’s talk politics: Which individual and classroom compositional characteristics matter in classroom discussions?’, Young, 25:4_suppl, pp. 18S–35S, https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308816673264.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Coster, I. de and Sigalas, E. (2018), Citizenship Education at School in Europe 2017: Eurydice Brief, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2797/536166.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Creswell, J. W. and Creswell, J. D. (2018), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed., Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. De Maeyer, S. and Kavadias, D. (2008), ‘An open classroom climate as a “can opener”: Examining Dewey’s theory of democratic schools using IEA CES data’, in D. Sandra, R. Rymenans, P. Cuvelier and P. V. Petegem (eds), Tussen taal, spelling en onderwijs: Essays bij het emeritaat van Frans Daems, Gent: Academia Press, pp. 413–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. De Schaepmeester, L. (2021), Social Citizenship Competences of Primary School Students: The Relationship with Classroom Diversity, Teacher Beliefs and Practices, Ghent: Ghent University.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Dewey, J. (1916), Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education, New York: Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Fjeldstad, D. and Mikkelsen, R. (2003), ‘Strong democratic competence does not automatically lead to strong engagement and participation’, International Journal of Educational Research, 39:6, pp. 621–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2004.07.009.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Flanagan, C. A., Cumsille, P., Gill, S. and Gallay, L. S. (2007), ‘School and community climates and civic commitments: Patterns for ethnic minority and majority students’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 99:2, pp. 421–31, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.421.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Franck, E., De Groof, S., Kavadias, D. and Elchardus, M. (2011), International Civic and Citizenship Education Study (ICCS): Flemish Technical Report – PART 3: Frequency, questionnaire for Teachers and Schools, Brussels and Antwerp: VUB-UA.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gainous, J. and Martens, A. M. (2016), ‘Civic education: Do liberals do it better?’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 21:3, pp. 261–79, https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2016.1205965.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gallie, W. B. (1956), ‘Essentially contested concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society: New Series, 56:1, pp. 167–98, https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.167.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. García-Albacete, G. and Hoskins, B. (2024), ‘The gender gap in political efficacy: The accelerating effect of classroom discussions’, Social Forces, 103:3, pp. 1167–85, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soae100.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Geboers, E., Geijsel, F., Admiraal, W. and ten Dam, G. (2013), ‘Review of the effects of citizenship education’, Educational Research Review, 9, pp. 158–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.02.001.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Godfrey, E. B. and Grayman, J. K. (2014), ‘Teaching citizens: The role of open classroom climate in fostering critical consciousness among youth’, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43:11, pp. 1801–17, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-0084-5.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Hess, D. and Avery, P. G. (2008), ‘Discussion of controversial issues as a form and goal of democratic education’, in J. Arthur, I. Davies and C. L. Hahn (eds), Sage Handbook of Education for Citizenship and Democracy, London: Sage Publications, pp. 506–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Jeliazkova, M. I. (2015), ‘Citizenship education: Social science teachers’ views in three European countries’, doctoral dissertation, Enschede: Universiteit Twente, https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036540056.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Jeliazkova, M. I. and Hoppe, R. (2012), ‘Critical thinking about political issues’, in M. H. Bernaerts and C. van Kesteren (eds), Maatschappijleer hoofdzaak: Een sociaal- wetenschappelijk denkkader voor politieke oordeelsvorming, Amsterdam: LEMM, pp. 7–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Journell, W. (2012), ‘Ideological homogeneity, school leadership, and political intolerance in secondary education: A study of three high schools during the 2008 presidential election’, Journal of School Leadership, 22:3, pp. 569–99, https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461202200306.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kavadias, D. and Dehertogh, B. (2010), Schools and Citizenship Education: The Demand for Support within Schools, Brussels: KBS, https://data-onderwijs.vlaanderen.be/documenten/bestand.ashx?nr=6258.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Knowles, R. T. and McCafferty-Wright, J. (2015), ‘Connecting an open classroom climate to social movement citizenship: A study of 8th graders in Europe using IEA ICCS data’, The Journal of Social Studies Research, 39:4, pp. 255–69, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2015.03.002.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Knowles, R. T., Torney-Purta, J. and Barber, C. (2018), ‘Enhancing citizenship learning with international comparative research: Analyses of IEA civic education datasets’, Citizenship Teaching & Learning, 13:1, pp. 7–30, https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl.13.1.7_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Kudrnáč, A. and Lyons, P. (2017), ‘Can political inequality be reduced in the classroom? Testing the compensation hypothesis and the BFLPE on youth civic competence’, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29:2, pp. 204–24, https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1400444.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Marshall, T. H. (1977), ‘Citizenship and social class’, in T. H. Marshall (ed.), Class, Citizenship, and Social Development. Essays by T.H. Marshall, Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 71–134.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Matthieu, J. and Junius, N. (2023), ‘Searching for a democratic equalizer: Citizenship education’s moderating effect on the relationship between a political home and internal political efficacy’, Social Science Research, 115, p. 102928, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102928.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Maurissen, L., Claes, E. and Hooghe, M. (2018a), ‘Civic engagement of Adolescents: A quantitative study of the relation between citizenship education, democratic attitudes, and political participation’, doctoral dissertation, Leuven: K.U. Leuven.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Maurissen, L., Claes, E. and Barber, C. (2018b), ‘Deliberation in citizenship education: How the school context contributes to the development of an open classroom climate’, Social Psychology of Education, 21:4, pp. 951–72, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9449-7.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. McCafferty-Wright, J. and Knowles, R. T. (2016), ‘Unlocking the civil potential of current events with an open classroom climate’, Social Studies Research and Practice, 11:3, pp. 112–21, https://doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-03-2016-B0009.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Nieuwelink, H., Boogaard, M., Dijkstra, A. B., Kuiper, E. J. and Ledoux, G. (2016), Teaching Citizenship: What Schools Can Do. Lessons from Science and Practice, Amsterdam: Kohnstamm Instituut, https://pure.hva.nl/ws/files/4875625/Hessel_Nieuwelink_Boogaard_Dijkstra_Kuiper_Ledoux_Onderwijs_in_burgerschap._Wat_scholen_kunnen_doen.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Persson, M. (2015), ‘Classroom climate and political learning: Findings from a Swedish panel study and comparative data’, Political Psychology, 36:5, pp. 587–601, https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12179.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Quintelier, E. (2009), ‘Political participation in late adolescence: Political socialization patterns in the Belgian Political Panel Survey’, doctoral dissertation, Leuven: K.U. Leuven.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Rapa, L. J., Bolding, C. W. and Jamil, F. M. (2020), ‘(Re)examining the effects of open classroom climate on the critical consciousness of preadolescent and adolescent youth’, Applied Developmental Science, 26:3, pp. 471–87, https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2020.1861946.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Reichert, F., Chen, J. and Torney-Purta, J. (2018), ‘Profiles of adolescents’ perceptions of democratic classroom climate and students’ influence: The effect of school and community contexts’, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47:6, pp. 1279–98, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0831-8.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Sampermans, D., Claes, E. and Hooghe, M. (2019), ‘The democratic school climate: Active citizenship at school’, doctoral dissertation, Leuven: K.U. Leuven.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Sampermans, D., Maurissen, L., Louw, G., Hooghe, M. and Claes, E. (2017), ICCS 2016 Flanders Report: An Examination of Citizenship Education in Flanders, Leuven: Centrum voor Politicologie, https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/2019-07/ICCS_2016_National_Report_Flanders.pdf. Accessed 18 November 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D. and Losito, B. (2010) ICCS 2009 International Report: Civic Knowledge, Attitudes, and Engagement among Lower- Secondary School Students in 38 Countries, Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/2019-04/ICCS_2009_International_Report.pdf. Accessed 20 October 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Siegel-Stechler, K. (2023), ‘“Conversation is everything”: How teachers and students create environments where open discussion can thrive’, Theory & Research in Social Education, 51:4, pp. 626–60, https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2023.2219638.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Teacher 1 (2021), Microsoft Teams interview with M. Pyls, 19 January.
  45. Teacher 2 (2021), Microsoft Teams interview with M. Pyls, 20 January.
  46. Teacher 3 (2021), Microsoft Teams interview with M. Pyls, 20 January.
  47. Teacher 4 (2021), Microsoft Teams interview with M. Pyls, 21 January.
  48. Teacher 5 (2021), Microsoft Teams interview with M. Pyls, 22 January.
  49. Teacher 6 (2021), Microsoft Teams interview with M. Pyls, 23 January.
  50. Teacher 7 (2021), Microsoft Teams interview with M. Pyls, 25 January.
  51. Teacher 8 (2021), Microsoft Teams interview with M. Pyls, 25 January.
  52. Teacher 9 (2021), Microsoft Teams interview with M. Pyls, 26 January.
  53. Teacher 10 (2021), Microsoft Teams interview with M. Pyls, 27 January.
  54. Teacher 12 (2021), Microsoft Teams interview with M. Pyls, 30 January.
  55. Teacher 13 (2021), Microsoft Teams interview with M. Pyls, 1 February.
  56. Teacher 15 (2021), Microsoft Teams interview with M. Pyls, 2 February.
  57. Teacher 16 (2021), Microsoft Teams interview with M. Pyls, 20 January.
  58. Teacher 17 (2021), Microsoft Teams interview with M. Pyls, 2 February.
  59. Teacher 18 (2021), Microsoft Teams interview with M. Pyls, 17 February.
  60. Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H. and Schulz, W. (2001), Citizenship and Education in Twenty-eight Countries: Civic Knowledge and Engagement at Age Fourteen, Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, https://www.iea.nl/publications/study-reports/international-reports-iea-studies/citizenship-and-education-twenty-eight. Accessed 19 October 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Van Alstein, M. (2018), Dealing with Controversy and Polarisation in the Classroom, Belgium: Pelckmans Pro. Vlaams Vredesinstituut.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Wanders, F. H. K., Dijkstra, A. B., Maslowski, R. and van der Veen, I. (2020), ‘The effect of teacher-student and student-student relationships on the societal involvement of students’, Research Papers in Education, 35:3, pp. 266–86, https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1568529.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00176_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): citizenship education; elementary education; interviews; teacher competences; teacher perceptions; thematic analysis

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test