Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Citizenship Teaching & Learning
  4. Volume 20, Issue 2
  5. Article
Citizenship Education and Social Action Towards Emancipatory Education
  • ISSN: 1751-1917
  • E-ISSN: 1751-1925

Abstract

Democratic education (DE) is contested for not contributing optimally to pupils’ agency or participation. Additionally, it is argued that DE’s focus on rationalistic agenda overlooks materiality, e.g. bodies and spaces. Therefore, this article explores how a school’s democratic practices are entangled with materiality as we study agency pupils in a youth-led project. The theoretical foundations of this study are based on feminist new materialism, which is rarely employed in the context of DE. Drawing on the research method of drifting, the empirical material was produced with eleven pupils, aged 13–14 years. In the analysis, we explore how bodies and spaces have thing-power, ability to affect, and are thus relevant to DE, because they contribute to children’s participation and school democracy. Focusing on materiality reveals power relations that hinder DE from being actualized. We conclude that adding material perspectives to DE and to the understanding of agency would provide a transformative and inclusive approach to foster children’s participation and citizenship in school and society.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation
© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00182_1
2025-09-24
2026-03-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adami, R. (2023), ‘Childism – on adult resistance to children’s rights’, in R. Adami, A. Kaldal and M. Aspán (eds), The Rights of the Child: Legal, Political, and Ethical Challenges, Leiden: Brill/Nijhoff, pp. 127–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Asenbaum, H. (2023), The Politics of Becoming: Anonymity and Democracy in the Digital Age, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Asenbaum, H., Machin, A., Gagnon, J.-P, Leong, D., Orlie, M. and Smith, J. L. (2023), ‘The nonhuman condition: Radical democracy through new materialist lenses’, Contemporary Political Theory, 22:4, pp. 584–615, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-023-00635-3.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Barad, K. (2007), Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennett, J. (2001), The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett, J. (2010), Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bernard-Powers, J. (2010), ‘Feminism and gender in education for citizenship and democracy’, in J. Arthur, I. Davies and C. Hahn (eds), The Sage Handbook of Education for Citizenship and Democracy, Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp. 314–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Biesta, G. (2006), Beyond Learning: Democratic Education for a Human Future, Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Biesta, G. (2011), Learning Democracy in School and Society: Education, Lifelong Learning, and the Politics of Citizenship, Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Biesta, G. (2020), ‘Risking ourselves in education: Qualification, socialization, and subjectification revisited’, Educational Theory, 70:1, pp. 89–104, https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12411.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Biesta, G. (2021), World-Centred Education: A View for the Present, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Biesta, G. and Tedder, M. (2007), ‘Agency and learning in the life course: Towards an ecological perspective’, Studies in the Education of Adults, 39:2, pp. 132–49, https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Braunmühl, C. (2017), ‘Beyond hierarchical oppositions: A feminist critique of Karen Barad’s agential realism’, Feminist Theory, 19:2, pp. 223–40, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700117741243.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Büscher, M. and Urry, J. (2009), ‘Mobile methods and the empirical’, European Journal of Social Theory, 12:1, pp. 99–116, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431008099642.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Campbell, S., Meynell, L. and Sherwin, S.(eds) (2009), Embodiment and Agency, University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Carr, P. (2007), ‘Experiencing democracy through neoliberalism: The role of social justice in democratic education’, Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 5:2, pp. 307–41, https://www.jceps.com/wp-content/uploads/PDFs/05-2-10.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Connolly, W.E. (2013), ‘The “new materialism” and the fragility of things’, Journal of International Studies, 41:3, pp. 399–412, https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813486849.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Coole, D. (2005), ‘Rethinking agency: A phenomenological approach to embodiment and agentic capacities’, Political Studies, 53:1, pp. 124–42, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00520.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Dewey, J.([1916] 2009), Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education, New York: The Free Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Ellingson, L. (2017), Embodiment in Qualitative Research, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A. (1998), ‘What is agency?’, The American Journal of Sociology, 103:4, pp. 962–1023, https://doi.org/10.1086/231294.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. FNAE (Finnish National Agency for Education) (2014), The National Core Curriculum for Primary and Lower Secondary Basic Education 2014, Helsinki: Finnish National Agency for Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. FNBRI (Finnish National Board on Research Integrity) (2019), The Ethical Principles of Research with Human Participants and Ethical Review in the Human Sciences in Finland, Helsinki: Finnish National Board on Research Integrity.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Gal, T. (2017), ‘An ecological model of child and youth participation’, Children and Youth Services Review, 79, pp. 57–64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.05.029.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. GENE (2022), ‘The European Declaration on Global Education to 2050: The Dublin Declaration’, GENE, 4 November, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5f6decace4ff425352eddb4a/t/65cbd5b4dbd08357e1f86d56/1707857361786/GE2050-declaration.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2024.
  26. Gretschel, A., Rautiainen, M., Vanhanen-Nuutinen, L. and Tarvainen, K. (2023), Demokratia-ja ihmisoikeuskasvatus Suomessa: Tilannekuva ja suositukset 2023 (‘Democracy and human rights education in Finland: A review with recommendations 2023’), Helsinki: Valtioneuvoston kanslia.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Grosz, E. (1994), Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Gunnarsson, L. (2017), ‘Why we keep separating the “inseparable”: Dialecticizing intersectionality’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 24:2, pp. 114–27, https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506815577114.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Hart, R. (2008), ‘Stepping back from “the ladder”: Reflections on a model of participatory work with children’, in A. Reid, B. B. Jensen and J. N. V. Simovska (eds), Participation and Learning: Perspectives on Education and the Environment, Health and Sustainability, New York: Springer, pp. 19–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hiltunen, K. and Campbell, G. (2024), ‘Creating feminist futures by imagining lessons differently: Using speculative fabulation and poetic inquiry as methods to trouble classroom expectations’, Australian Feminist Studies, 38:115–116, pp. 103–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2024.2315419.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Hipolito-Delgado, C. P. (2024), ‘Student voice and adult manipulation: Youth navigating adult agendas’, Urban Review, 56:1, pp. 122–49, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-023-00681-6.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Hitlin, S. and Elder, G. H. (2007), ‘Time, self, and the curiously abstract concept of agency’, Sociological Theory, 25:2, pp. 170–91, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.0030.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Honig, B. (2017), Public Things: Democracy in Disrepair, New York: Fordham University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Jackson, A.Y. (2017), ‘Thinking without method’, Qualitative Inquiry, 23:9, pp. 666–74, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417725355.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Jackson, A. Y. and Mazzei, L. A. (2013), ‘Plugging one text into another: Thinking with theory in qualitative research’, Qualitative Inquiry, 19:4, pp. 261–71, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412471510.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Jackson, A. Y. and Mazzei, L.A. (2023), Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research, 2nd ed., Milton, MA: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Jantunen, A., Heikonen, L., Ahtiainen, R., Fonsén, E. and Kallioniemi, A. (2023), ‘Conceptions of diversity among Finnish principals’, in R. Ahtiainen, E. Hanhimäki, J. Leinonen, M. Risku and A.-S. Smeds-Nylund (eds), Leadership in Educational Contexts in Finland: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, Educational Governance Research, vol. 23, Cham: Springer Nature, pp. 217–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Kiuru, J. (2019), ‘Alueiden kaupunkimaisuus ja sosioekonominen tila indeksien ja klusterianalyysin valossa: Espoon kaupungin asuinalueindeksit 2012–2015’ (‘Urban character and socio-economic status of areas in the light of indices and cluster analysis: The city of Espoo’s residential area indices 2012–2015’), Eetvartti, Espoon toimintaympäristökatsaus, 2, pp. 4–11, https://www.cupore.fi/wp-content/uploads/migrated-assets/EspooCult/eetvartti_2_2019_1.6_netti.pdf. Accessed 12 November 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Krause, S.R. (2011), ‘Bodies in action: Corporeal agency and democratic politics’, Political Theory, 39:3, pp. 299–324, https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591711400025.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Kubow, P. K., Webster, N., Strong, K. and Miranda, D.(eds) (2023), Contestations of Citizenship, Education, and Democracy in an Era of Global Change: Children and Youth in Diverse International Contexts, New York: Taylor & Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Machin, A. (2015), ‘Deliberating bodies: Democracy, identification, and embodiment’, Democratic Theory, 2:1, pp. 42–62, https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2015.020104.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Machin, A.(2018), ‘Bodies of knowledge and knowledge of bodies: “We can know more than we can tell”’, Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 55:4, pp. 84–97, https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201855470.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. MacLure, M. (2010), ‘The offence of theory’, Journal of Education Policy, 25:2, pp. 277–86, https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930903462316.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. MacLure, M. (2013), ‘Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26:6, pp. 658–67, https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788755.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Mayes, E. (2020), ‘Student voice in school reform? Desiring simultaneous critique and affirmation’, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 41:3, pp. 454–70, https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1492517.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. McNay, L. (2015), ‘Agency’, in L. Disch and M. Hawkesworth (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 39–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Menning, S. F. and Murris, K. (2023), ‘Reconfiguring the use of video in qualitative research through practices of filmmaking: A post-qualitative cinematic analysis’, Qualitative Research, 24:4, pp. 1000–20, https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941231206755.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Meylemans, E., De Wilde, L. and Bradt, L. (2022), ‘Fearing youth, fostering democracy: Conceptions of children and young people’s good citizenship and citizenship education in European policy (1976–2021)’, History of Education, 52:6, pp. 953–73, https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760x.2022.2117860.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Moghli, M. and Shuayb, M. (2022), ‘Reconceptualizing and reimagining citizenship education in light of youth-led global movements’, Citizenship Teaching & Learning, 17:3, pp. 333–40, https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl_00096_2.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Noddings, N. (2013), Education and Democracy in the 21st Century, New York: Teachers College Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Page, D. and Sidebottom, K. (2022), ‘The sensorium and fleshy schools’, British Educational Research Journal, 48:4, pp. 771–84, https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3793.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Pepper, A. (2020), ‘Political agency in humans and other animals’, Contemporary Political Theory, 20:2, pp. 296–317, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-020-00430-4.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Pugh, J. (2009), ‘The spaces of democracy and the democracy of space: A new network exploring the disciplinary effects of the spatial turn’, Space and Polity, 13:2, pp. 159–64, https://doi.org/10.1080/13562570902999825.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Puwar, N. (2004), Space Invaders: Race, Gender and Bodies out of Place, Oxford: Berg.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Rose, D. (2017), ‘Shimmer: When all you love is being trashed’, in A. L. Tsing, H. A. Swanson, E. Gan and N. Bubandt (eds), Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene, Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Press, pp. 51–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Sant, E. (2019), ‘Democratic education: A theoretical review (2006–2017)’, Review of Educational Research, 89:5, pp. 655–96, https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319862493.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Sotkasiira, T., Ryynänen, S., Rannikko, A. and Rapo, P. (2020), ‘Adrift in a borderland: Experimenting with participatory and embodied methodologies as a collective of asylum seekers, refugees, civic activists and academic scholars’, Migration Letters, 17:2, pp. 279–88, https://migrationletters.com/index.php/ml/article/view/769. Accessed 5 May 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. St Pierre, E.A. (1997), ‘Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10:2, pp. 175–89, https://doi.org/10.1080/095183997237278.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. St Pierre, E. A. and Jackson, A.Y. (2014), ‘Qualitative data analysis after coding’, Qualitative Inquiry, 20:6, pp. 715–19, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414532435.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Thrift, N. (2008), Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect, Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Tronto, J. (2012), ‘Democratic care politics in an age of limits’, in S. Razavi and S. Staab (eds), Global Variations in the Political and Social Economy of Care: Worlds Apart, New York: Routledge, pp. 29–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Tronto, J. (2013), Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Truman, S.E. (2019), ‘Feminist new materialisms’, in P. A. Atkinson, S. Delamont, M. A. Hardy and M. Williams (eds), The Sage Encyclopedia of Research Methods, London: Sage, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036808740.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Tuana, N. (2021), ‘Feminist new materialisms’, in K. Q. Hall and Ásta (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Philosophy, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 385–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Tujula, M. (2023), ‘Aktiiviseksi koulussa ja yhteiskunnassa – kouludemokratian toteuttaminen peruskoulussa’ (‘Becoming active in school and society – implementing school democracy in basic education’), Tiedepolitiikka, 48:2, pp. 22–27, https://doi.org/10.58957/tp.130480.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. UNCRC (1989), ‘United Nation’s Convention on the Rights of the Child Resolution 44/25’, https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_44_25.pdf. Accessed 8 December 2024.
  67. Vannini, P.(ed.) (2015), Non-Representational Methodologies: Re-Envisioning Research, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Wall, J. (2023), ‘Adultism and voting age discrimination’, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 36:2, pp. 327–40, https://journals.law.harvard.edu/hrj/2022/11/childrens-rights-and-voting-age-discrimination/. Accessed 30 November 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00182_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): citizenship education; democratic citizenship; embodiment; feminist new materialism; materiality; spatiality; youth participation

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test