Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Citizenship Teaching & Learning
  4. Volume 20, Issue 2
  5. Article
Citizenship Education and Social Action Towards Emancipatory Education
  • ISSN: 1751-1917
  • E-ISSN: 1751-1925

Abstract

Democracy needs citizens who defend democratic principles against authoritarianism. In other words, it needs people who are willing and have the skills to rebel. Therefore, an important task of citizenship education is to strengthen people in this competence. However, most educational concepts have neglected rebellion and its meaning for democracy. In this article, I link Albert Camus’s theoretical reflections on rebellion and Erich Fromm’s thoughts on freedom to make them fruitful for recent concepts of citizenship education. From their arguments, I deduce the need for educational processes to devote attention to the resistance to authoritarianism, not only in the political context but also in everyday life, including educational settings. After the theoretical considerations, I discuss possibilities of embedding values and competences for rebellion in relevant concepts of democratic citizenship education like the Council of Europe’s Reference Framework for Competences of a Democratic Culture and Global Citizenship Education.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00184_1
2025-09-24
2026-03-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ali, Hager (2021), ‘Review: Crisis in Autocratic Regimes’, Democratization, 28:3, pp. 647–48, https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1808625.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Amlinger, Caroline and Nachtwey, Oliver (2022), Gekränkte Freiheit: Aspekte des libertären Autoritarismus, Suhrkamp: Suhrkamp Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Appiah, Kwame A. (2013), ‘Cosmopolitanism and difference’, Huffington Post, 14 May, https://www.huffpost.com/entry/cosmopolitanism-and-diffe_b_3274310. Accessed 22 September 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Appiah, Kwame A. (2017), Cosmopolitanisms, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Arendt, Hannah (1972), Wahrheit und Lüge in der Politik, Munich: Zwei Essays.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Aristotle (1995), Clarendon Aristotle Series: Politics: Books III and IV, (eds R. Robinson and D. Keyt, trans. R. Robinson), rev ed., Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bègue, Laurent and Vezirian, Kevin (2024), ‘The blind obedience of others: A better than average effect in a Milgram-like experiment’, Ethics & Behavior, 34:4, pp. 235–45, https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2023.2191322.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Ben-Ghiat, Ruth (2020), Strongmen: Mussolini to the Present, New York: WW Norton & Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bettache, Karim and Chiu, Chi-Yue (2018), ‘The populist effect: Threat and the handover of freedom’, Personality and Individual Differences, 130, pp. 102–06, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.055.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bosio, Emiliano (2024), Ethical Global Citizenship Education, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bosio, Emiliano and Torres, Carlos A. (2019), ‘Global citizenship education: An educational theory of the common good? A conversation with Carlos Alberto Torres’, Policy Futures in Education, 17:6, pp. 745–60, https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210319825517.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Brace, Laura (2015), ‘Reflections on the good citizen’, in B. Anderson and V. Hughes (eds), Citizenship and Its Others. Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship Series, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 10–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Camus, Albert (1991), The Rebel, New York: Vintage.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Camus, Albert (2001a), ‘Democracy is an exercise in modesty’, Sartre Studies International, 7:2, pp. 12–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Camus, Albert (2001b), The First Man, London: Penguin Classics.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Council of Europe (2018), Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture: Concept, Context and Models, vol. 1, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Cristol, Dean, Michell, Robert and Gimbert, Belinda (2010), ‘Citizenship education: A historical perspective (1951–present)’, Action in Teacher Education, 32:4, pp. 61–69, https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2010.549725.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Curzon-Hobson, Aidan (2003), ‘Between exile and the kingdom: Albert Camus and empowering classroom relationships’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35:4, pp. 367–80, https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-5812.00035.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Curzon-Hobson, Aidan (2014), ‘Extending the contribution of Albert Camus to educational thought: An analysis of The Rebel’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46:10, pp. 1098–10, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.795111.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Curzon-Hobson, Aidan (2017), ‘The experience of strangeness in education: Camus, Jean-Baptiste Clamence and the little ease’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49:3, pp. 264–72, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1215897.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Dewey, John (2024), Democracy and Education, New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Douglass, Frederick([1845] 2009), Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, Oxford World Classics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Ebbighausen, Rodion (2013), ‘Camus und der Terrorismus’, in W. Jung (ed.), Albert Camus oder der glückliche Sisyphos, Bonn: V&R, pp. 15–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Equiano, Olaudah ([1785] 2018), The Interesting Narrative, Oxford World Classics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Etzioni, Amitai (2011), ‘Citizenship in a communitarian perspective’, Ethnicities, 11:3, pp. 336–49, https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796811407850.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. European Commission: European Education and Culture Executive Agency, De Coster, Isabelle and Sigalas, Emmanuel (2018), Bürgererziehung an den Schulen in Europa 2017 (‘Citizenship Education at School in Europe 2017’), Brussels: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency, https://doi.org/10.2797/40405.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Freedom House (2023), Freedom in the World 2023, Washington, DC: Freedom House, https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2023-03/FIW_World_2023_DigtalPDF.pdf. Accessed 8 March 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Fromm, Erich (1957), ‘The authoritarian personality’, Deutsche Universitätszeitung, 12:9, pp. 3–4.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Fromm, Erich (1992), Gesellschaft und Seele: Beiträge zur Sozialpsychologie und zur psychoanalytischen Praxis (eds R. Funk), Weinheim and Basel: Beltz.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Gordon, Mordechai (2015), ‘Teachers as absurd heroes: Camus’ Sisyphus and the promise of rebellion’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48:6, pp. 589–604, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1058219.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Goren, Heela and Yemini, Miri (2017), ‘Global citizenship education redefined – a systematic review of empirical studies on global citizenship education’, International Journal of Educational Research, 82, pp. 170–83, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.02.004.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Habermas, Jürgen (2018), Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Hayden, Patrick (2013), ‘Albert Camus and rebellious cosmopolitanism in a divided world’, Journal of International Political Theory, 9:2, pp. 194–219, https://doi.org/10.3366/jipt.2013.0055.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Heater, Derek (2003), A History of Education for Citizenship, London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Heidegger, Martin (2006), Sein und Zeit, Tübingen: Max Niemayer Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Herrman, Helen, Stewart, Donna E., Diaz-Granados, Natalia, Berger, Elena L., Jackson, Beth and Yuen, Tracy (2011), ‘What is resilience?’, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56:5, pp. 258–65, https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371105600504.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Fleischacker, Samuel (2013), What is Enlightenment?, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Kester, Kevin (2023), ‘Global citizenship education and peace education: Toward a postcritical praxis’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55:1, pp. 45–56, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2040483.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. King, Martin L. (2003), A Testament of Hope: The Essential Writings and Speeches: The Essential Writings of Martin Luther King, New York and London: Harper Collins.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Leighton, Ralph (2023), ‘Radical citizenship education’, Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 18:2, pp. 246–60, https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979221080604.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Lozic, Vanja (2024), ‘Recognising, naming, and resisting racialisation and ethnicisation in Swedish compulsory schools’, Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social, 13:1, pp. 205–20, https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2024.13.1.011.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Lührmann, A. and Merkel, W.(eds) (2023), Resilience of Democracy: Responses to Illiberal and Authoritarian Challenges, Taylor & Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Mandela, Nelson (1995), Long Walk to Freedom: The Autobiography of Nelson Mandela, London: Abacus.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Mandela, Nelson (2018), The Prison Letters, New York City: Norton & Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. McConnell, Sean (2014), Philosophical Life in Cicero’s Letters, Cambridge: Cambridge Classical Studies.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. McLaren, Peter (2023), ‘Critical pedagogy: A look at the major concepts’, in The Critical Pedagogy Reader, London: Routledge, pp. 75–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Merkel, Wolfgang and Lührmann, Anna (2021), ‘Resilience of democracies: responses to illiberal and authoritarian challenges’, Democratization, 28:5, pp. 869–84, https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1928081.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Neuhouser, Frederick (2008), Rousseau’s Theodicy of Self-Love: Evil, Rationality and the Drive for Recognition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Pabst, Angela (2010), Die Athenische Demokratie,Munich: CH Beck.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Packer, Dominic J. (2008), ‘Identifying systematic disobedience in Milgram’s obedience experiments: A meta-analytic review’, Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 3:4, pp. 301–04, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00080.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Pais, Alexandre and Costa, Marta (2020), ‘An ideology critique of global citizenship education’, Critical Studies in Education, 61:1, pp. 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1318772.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Parsons, T. (2007), American Society: A Theory of the Societal Community, Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Pausch, Markus (2019), ‘Democracy needs rebellion: A democratic theory inspired by Albert Camus’, Theoria, 66:161, pp. 91–107, https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2019.6616105.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Pausch, Markus, Hladschik, Patricia, Pazderski, Filip and Nagem, Rasha (2021), Resilience against Anti-Democratic Tendencies through Education, Salzburg, Strasbourg, Toulouse, Vienna and Warsaw: Council of Europe, https://rm.coe.int/resilience-against-anti-democratic-tendencies-through-education-compet/1680a5e8f3. Accessed 4 August 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Poulter, Saila, Riitaoja, Anna L. and Kuusisto, Arniika (2016), ‘Thinking multicultural education “otherwise”: From a secularist construction towards a plurality of epistemologies and worldviews’, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 14:1, pp. 68–86, https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2014.989964.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Robbins, Bruce, Horta, Paulo L. and Appiah, Kwame A. (2017), Cosmopolitanisms, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Roberts, Peter, Gibbons, Andrew and Heraud, Richard (2013), ‘Introduction: Camus and education’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45:11, pp. 1085–91, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.772702.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Roberts, Peter, Gibbons, Andrew and Heraud, Richard (2018), Education, Ethics and Existence: Camus and the Human Condition, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1998), Emil oder Über die Erziehung, 13th ed., Paderborn: Schöningh.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Sakurai, Takamichi (2024), ‘The authoritarian orientation in liberal democracies: Labor market and workplace authoritarianism’, Constellations, 32:1, pp. 59–68, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12743.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Sander, Wolfgang (2005), ‘Auf dem Weg zu nationalen Bildungsstandards in der politischen Bildung? Der Entwurf der GPJE’, in E. Jung (ed.), Standards für die politische Bildung: Zwischen Weltwissen, Teilhabekompetenz und Lebenshilfe, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften Wiesbaden, pp. 30–40, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80750-2.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Sparks, H. (1997), ‘Dissident citizenship: Democratic theory, political courage, and activist women’, Hypatia, 12:4, pp. 74–110, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3810734. Accessed 30 July 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Tampio, Nicholas (2012), Kantian Courage: Advancing the Enlightenment in Contemporary Political Theory, New York: Fordham University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Thoreau, Henry D. (1993), Civil Disobedience and Other Essays, New York: Dover Thrift Editions.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. UNESCO (2015), Global Citizenship Education, Topics and Learning Objectives, Paris: UNESCO.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Van Gelderen, Martin(2006), ‘“So meerly humane”: Theories of resistance in early-modern Europe’, in A. Bett and J. Tully (eds), Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Vare, Paul (2022), ‘The competence turn’, in P. Vare, N. Lausselet and M. Rieckmann (eds), Competences in Education for Sustainable Development: Critical Perspectives, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 11–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Voltaire ([1867] 2017), The Essential Works of Voltaire: Philosophical writings, Novels, Poetry, Plays & Letters, n.p: Musaicum Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Zahabioun, Shalah, Yousefy, Alireza, Yarmohammadian, Mohammed H. and Keshtiaray, Narges (2013), ‘Global citizenship education and its implications for curriculum goals at the age of globalization’, International Education Studies, 6:1, pp. 195–206.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Aristotle (1998), Nicomachean Ethics (trans. D. P. Chase), Mineola, NY: Dover Thrift Editions.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Camus, Albert (1989), Carnets III, mars 1951– décembre 1959, Paris: Gallimard.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Cicero (2013), De Re Publica, Vom Staat: Lateinisch/Deutsch, Leipzig: Reclam.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Foucault, Michel (2011), The Courage of Truth, The Government of Self and Others II, London: Picador.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Gordon, Mordechai (2015), ‘Teachers as absurd heroes: Camus’ Sisyphus and the promise of rebellion’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48:6, pp. 589–604, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1058219.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Parsons, Talcott (1994), ‘The System of Modern Societies (1971: 79–85)’, Citizenship: Critical Concepts, vol. 1, p. 338.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Pausch, Markus (2017), Demokratie als Revolte: Zwischen Alltagsdiktatur und Globalisierung, Baden-Baden: Nomos.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Sparks, Holloway (1997), ‘Dissident citizenship: Democratic theory, political courage, and activist women’, Hypatia 12:4, pp. 74–110, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1997.tb00299.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Swanson, Judith A. (2019), The Public and the Private in Aristotle’s Political Philosophy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, Project MUSE, https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/book.68524.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00184_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Albert Camus; citizenship education; civic education; democracy; emancipation; Erich Fromm

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test