Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Citizenship Teaching & Learning
  4. Volume 20, Issue 2
  5. Article
Citizenship Education and Social Action Towards Emancipatory Education
  • ISSN: 1751-1917
  • E-ISSN: 1751-1925
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

Drawing on the theoretical insights of Gert Biesta, Judith Butler, Paulo Freire and Kevin Kumashiro, this article critically examines current trends in citizenship and emancipatory education and the challenges and opportunities associated with promoting social action and academic freedom. It considers how contemporary political, social, ideological, environmental and economic developments contribute to increased precarity, risk and insecurity. It also emphasizes the relational interdependence between adults and children and their ethical responsibilities towards others. Moreover, it points to the roles, capacities and responsibilities of adults and children in transformative processes. The starting point for critical discussion and analysis is five contemporary cases related to citizenship education, emancipatory education and approaches to social action, as presented in this Special Issue of . It explores the concepts of critical thinking, the importance of deliberative dialogue, the creation of a safe space and children’s capacity to imagine and resist. This article aims to analyse and engage in a dialogue with the central ideas presented in the articles in this Special Issue. We do not intend to dismiss or misinterpret the authors’ key concepts or perspectives. Instead, we emphasize the importance of critical dialogue, critical thinking and an open academic environment as the essential foundations for citizenship education and democracy.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00186_2
2025-09-24
2026-03-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ctl/20/2/ctl.20.2.137_Lozic.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00186_2&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alexander, Robin (2020), A Dialogic Teaching Companion, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen, Amy (2015), ‘Emancipation without Utopia: Subjection, modernity, and the normative claims of feminist critical theory’, Hypatia, 30:3, pp. 513–29, https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12160.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Amer Meziane, Mohamed (2023), ‘The sexular state: Race, gender, and the other “Woke Controversy”’, Contemporary French and Francophone Studies, 27:2, pp. 252–60, https://doi.org/10.1080/17409292.2023.2185420.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. An, Christopher J. (2020), ‘Participation, not paternalism: Moral education, normative competence and the child’s entry into the moral community’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52:2, pp. 192–205, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1619547.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Banks, James and Banks, Cherry McGee (2010), Multicultural Education: Issues and Perspectives, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Barat, Somjit (2024), ‘A micro-level perspective to fostering IDEAs in the classroom and beyond’, Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 34:1, pp. 108–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2023.2243987.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Biesta, Gert (2022), World-Centred Education: A View for the Present, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Biesta, Gert, Lawy, Robert and Kelly, Narcie (2009), ‘Understanding young people’s citizenship learning in everyday life: The role of contexts, relationships and dispositions’, Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 4:1, pp. 5–24, https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197908099374.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Butler, Judith (1999), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Butler, Judith (2012), ‘Precarious life, vulnerability, and the ethics of cohabitation’, The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 26:2, pp. 134–51, https://doi.org/10.5325/jspecphil.26.2.0134.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Butler, Judith (2024), Who’s Afraid of Gender?, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Dolk, Klara (2013), Bångstyriga barn: Makt, normer och delaktighet i förskolan, Stockholm: Ordfront.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Franklin-Hall, Andrew (2013), ‘On becoming an adult: Autonomy and the moral relevance of life’s stages’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 63:251, pp. 223–47, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.12014.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Freire, Paulo (2018), Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Glassman, Michael and Kang, Min J. (2011), ‘Five classrooms: Different forms of “democracies” and their relationship to cultural pluralism(s)’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43:4, pp. 365–86, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00616.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gupton, Jarrett T. and O’Sullivan, Andrea (2024), ‘Critically framing Florida’s anti-woke education reform movement’, Journal of Educational Administration and History, 56:4, pp. 419–23, https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2024.2376717.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gutmann, Amy (1980), ‘Children, paternalism, and education: A liberal argument’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 9:4, pp. 338–58, https://doi.org/10.1080/17449640701284909.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gutmann, A. (1999), Democratic Education, rev. ed., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hawkesworth, Mary (1989), ‘Knowers, knowing, known: Feminist theory and claims of truth’, Signs, 14:3, pp. 533–57, https://doi.org/10.1086/494523.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hess, Diana E. (2005), ‘How do teachers’ political views influence teaching about controversial issues?’, Social Education, 69:1, pp. 47–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Imoh, Afua T.-D. (2023), ‘Adults in charge: The limits of formal child participatory processes for societal transformation’, in B. Sandin, J. Josefsson, K. Hanson and S. Balagopalan (eds), The Politics of Children’s Rights and Representation, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 59–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Johansson Wilén, Evelina, Wemrell, Maria and Gunnarsson, Lena (2024), ‘Gender knowledge production and epistemology in the incelosphere’, Journal of Gender Studies, pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2024.2427192.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Josefsson, Jonathan and Wall, John (2020), ‘Empowered inclusion: Theorizing global justice for children and youth’, Globalizations, 17:6, pp. 1043–60, https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1736853.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kauppi, Veli-Mikko and Drerup, Johannes (2021), ‘Discussion and inquiry: A Deweyan perspective on teaching controversial issues’, Theory and Research in Education, 19:3, pp. 213–34, https://doi.org/10.1177/14778785211052199.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kelly, Thomas E. (1986), ‘Discussing controversial issues: Four perspectives on the teacher’s role’, Theory and Research in Social Education, 14:2, pp. 113–38, https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1986.10505516.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kumashiro, Kevin (2000), ‘Toward a theory of anti-oppressive education’, Review of Educational Research, 70:1, pp. 25–53, https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070001025.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Laclau, Ernesto (1996), Emancipation(s), New York: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Langman, Lauren and Lundskow, George (2022), ‘From grievance to insurrection: Authoritarian populism today’, Critical Sociology, 48:6, pp. 909–15, https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205221096830.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lettow, Susanne (2015), ‘Editor’s introduction–emancipation: Rethinking subjectivity, power, and change’, Hypatia, 30:3, pp. 501–12, https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12163.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Levinas, Emmanuel (1991), Totality and Infinity, Martinus Nijhoff Philosophy Texts, vol. 1, Dordrecht: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9342-6_13.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Ljungblad, Ann-Louise (2023), ‘Greta Thunberg: A unique voice in a post truth era’, Childhood & Philosophy, 19, pp. 1–31, https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2023.69835.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Lozic, Vanja (2018), Historieundervisningens utmaningar: Historiedidaktik för 2000-talet, Malmö: Malmö universitet.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Mercer, Joyce A. (2025), ‘What children know: Children, climate change, and epistemic injustice’, Pastoral Psychology, 74:1, pp. 49–68, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-024-01146-7.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Puustinen, Mikko, Marjokorpi, Jenni and Säntti, Janne (2025), Erimielisten tila: Vaikeiden aiheiden käsittely opetuksessa (‘The state of disagreement: Dealing with difficult topics in teaching’), Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Reiter, Bernd (2025), ‘Aggrieved White men and the danger they pose to democracy and peace’, Special Issue: ‘Selected papers from 54th NCOBPS annual conference: Democracy on the brink: Are we headed into an era of authoritarianism?’, Social Sciences, 14:2, https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14020093.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Schoorman, Dilys (2024), ‘Waking up to the “Anti-Woke” agenda’, Journal of Educational Administration and History, 56:4, pp. 404–10, https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2024.2364632.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Scott, Joan W. (1996), Only Paradoxes to Offer: French Feminists and the Rights of Man, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Ungdomsbarometern (2025), The Generation Report 2024: Swedish Youth, Stockholm: Ungdomsbarometern.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Biesta, Gert (2011), Learning Democracy in School and Society: Education, Lifelong Learning, and the Politics of Citizenship, Rotterdam: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Landström, Karl (2024), ‘On epistemic freedom and epistemic injustice’, Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, pp. 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2024.2323561.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ctl_00186_2
Loading
  • Article Type: Editorial
Keyword(s): academic freedom; activism; deliberative dialogue; exclusion; inclusivity; safe place; separatism; vulnerability

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test