Skip to content
1981
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2055-2106
  • E-ISSN: 2055-2114

Abstract

As design has been slowly embraced as an element of business research, a number of well-established organizational strategy concepts have been called into question. This article empirically examines the relationship between firm performance and market orientation (MO), one of the most commonly employed variables within business strategy, among design-driven firms. Our findings suggest that the positive relationship between MO and performance present in most business strategy literature does not appear to hold among organizations with a strong strategic focus on design. Design-driven firms seem to actively downplay MO, resulting in a statistically significant negative relationship between the concept and its three sub-factors: customer orientation (CUST), competitor orientation (COMP), and inter-functional coordination (INTER) on two measures of firm performance, project-level success and competitive advantage. Drawing on related literature and follow-up interviews with firm managers, we rationalize these results as evidence of design-driven firms efforts to avoid the so-called ‘tyranny of the served market’ where a narrow focus on current customers and established competitors within incremental markets can lead to myopia and limit innovation. The implications of this study may be to provide support to managers of design-driven organizations to de-emphasize MO’s narrow focus on close industry rivals and well-defined customers as well as much-needed empirical support for anecdotal accounts of how many traditional business strategy variables, such as MO, may be insufficient, or at least incomplete explanations of design-driven organizations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00006_1
2020-03-01
2026-04-20

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allen, J. H., and Potiowsky, T.. ( 2008;), ‘ Portland’s green building cluster economic trends and impacts. ’, Economic Development Quarterly, 22:4, pp. 30315.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Au, A. K., and Tse, A. C.. ( 1995;), ‘ The effect of marketing orientation on company performance in the service sector: A comparative study of the hotel industry in Hong Kong and New Zealand. ’, Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 8:2, pp. 7787.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bagozzi, R. P.. ( 1975;), ‘ Marketing as exchange. ’, The Journal of Marketing, 39:4, pp. 3239.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, J., and Lamb, C. W., Jr.. ( 1994;), ‘ Measuring architectural design service quality. ’, Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 10:1, pp. 89106.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker, W. E., and Sinkula, J. M.. ( 2009;), ‘ The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small businesses*. ’, Journal of Small Business Management, 47:4, pp. 44364.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Battistella, C.,, Biotto, G., and Toni, A. F. De. ( 2012;), ‘ From design driven innovation to meaning strategy. ’, Management Decision, 50:4, pp. 71843.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bloch, P. H.. ( 1995;), ‘ Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. ’, The Journal of Marketing, 59:3, pp. 1629.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Borja de Mozota, B. B.. ( 2003), Design Management: Using Design to Build Brand Value and Corporate Innovation, New York:: Skyhorse Publishing Inc;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Borja de Mozota, B. B.. ( 2006;), ‘ The four powers of design: A value model in design management. ', Design Management Review, 17:2, pp. 4453.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Borja de Mozota, B. B., and Kim, B. Y.. ( 2009;), ‘ Managing design as a core competency: Lessons from Korea. ’, Design Management Review, 20:2, pp. 6676.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Broffman, A.. ( 2015;), ‘ The building story: Architecture and inclusive design in remote aboriginal Australian communities. ’, The Design Journal, 18:1, pp. 10734.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Brown, T.. ( 2008;), ‘ Design thinking. ’, Harvard Business Review, 86:6, p. 84.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Brown, T., and Katz, B.. ( 2011;), ‘ Change by design. ’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28:3, pp. 38183.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bruce, M., and Daly, L.. ( 2007;), ‘ Design and marketing connections: Creating added value. ’, Journal of Marketing Management, 23:9&10, pp. 92953.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Calabretta, G., and Gemser, G.. ( 2017;), ‘ Building blocks for effective strategic design. ’, Journal of Design, Business & Society, 3:2, pp. 10924.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Casakin, H. P.. ( 2006;), ‘ Metaphors as an unconventional reflective approach in architectural design. ’, The Design Journal, 9:1, pp. 3750.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Caves, R. E.. ( 2003;), ‘ Contracts between art and commerce. ’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17:2, pp. 7384.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen, Y. S.,, Lai, S. B., and Wen, C. T.. ( 2006;), ‘ The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. ’, Journal of Business Ethics, 67:4, pp. 33139.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen, S., and Venkatesh, A.. ( 2013;), ‘ An investigation of how design-oriented organisations implement design thinking. ’, Journal of Marketing Management, 29:15&16, pp. 1680700.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Christensen, C. M.. ( 1997), The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Boston, MA:: Harvard Business School Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Christensen, C. M., and Bower, J. L.. ( 1996;), ‘ Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. ’, Strategic Management Journal, 17:3, pp. 197218.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Cross, N.. ( 2011), Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work, Oxford:: Berg;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Day, G. S., and Wensley, R.. ( 1988;), ‘ Assessing advantage: A framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. ’, The Journal of Marketing, 52:2, pp. 120.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Dell'Era, C., and Verganti, R.. ( 2010;), ‘ Collaborative strategies in design-intensive industries: Knowledge diversity and innovation. ’, Long Range Planning, 43:1, pp. 12341.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Dell'Era, C., and Verganti, R.. ( 2007;), ' Strategies of innovation and imitation of product languages. ', Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24:6, pp. 58099.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Deshpandé, R., and Farley, J. U.. ( 1998;), ‘ Measuring market orientation: Generalization and synthesis. ’, Journal of Market-Focused Management, 2:3, pp. 21332.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Dorst, K.. ( 2011;), ‘ The core of “design thinking” and its application. ’, Design Studies, 32:6, pp. 52132.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Evans, M.. ( 2011;), ‘ Empathizing with the future: Creating next-next generation products and services. ’, The Design Journal, 14:2, pp. 23151.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Frosch, R. A.. ( 1996;), ‘ The customer for R&D is always wrong!. ’, Research Technology Management, 39:6, p. 22.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gatignon, H., and Xuereb, J. M.. ( 1997;), ‘ Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. ’, Journal of Marketing Research, 34:1, pp. 7790.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gebauer, H., and Kowalkowski, C.. ( 2012;), ‘ Customer-focused and service-focused orientation in organizational structures. ’, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 27:7, pp. 52737.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Gemser, G., and Perks, H.. ( 2015;), ‘ Co-creation with customers: An evolving innovation research field. ’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32:5, pp. 66065.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Griffin, A., and Hauser, J. R.. ( 1996;), ‘ Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature. ’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13:3, pp. 191215.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Gounaris, S. P., and Avlonitis, G. J.. ( 2001;), ‘ Market orientation development: A comparison of industrial vs consumer goods companies. ’, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 16:5, pp. 35481.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hamel, G., and Prahalad, C. K.. ( 1994), Competing for the Future, 1994, Boston, MA:: Harvard Business School Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Han, J. K.,, Kim, N., and Srivastava, R. K.. ( 1998;), ‘ Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link?. ’, The Journal of Marketing, 62:4, pp. 3045.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Heskett, J.. ( 1980), Industrial Design, London:: Thames and Hudson;.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Heskett, J.. ( 2001;), ‘ Past, present, and future in design for industry. ’, Design Issues, 17:1, pp. 1826.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hillebrand, B., and Biemans, W. G.. ( 2004;), ‘ Links between internal and external cooperation in product development: An exploratory study. ’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21:2, pp. 11022.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Homburg, C.,, Schwemmle, M., and Kuehnl, C.. ( 2015;), ‘ New product design: Concept, measurement, and consequences. ’, Journal of Marketing, 79:3, pp. 4156.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Im, S., and Workman, J. P., Jr. ( 2004;), ‘ Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. ’, Journal of Marketing, 68:2, pp. 11432.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Karpen, I. O.,, Gemser, G., and Calabretta, G.. ( 2017;), ‘ A multilevel consideration of service design conditions: Towards a portfolio of organisational capabilities, interactive practices and individual abilities. ’, Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27:2, pp. 384407.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Kelley, T., and Kelley, D.. ( 2013), Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential Within Us All, New York:: Crown Business;.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Kirca, A. H.,, Jayachandran, S., and Bearden, W. O.. ( 2005;), ‘ Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. ’, Journal of Marketing, 69:2, pp. 2441.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kohli, A. K., and Jaworski, B. J.. ( 1990;), ‘ Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. ’, The Journal of Marketing, 54:2, pp. 118.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Krippendorff, K.. ( 1989;), ‘ On the essential contexts of artifacts or on the proposition that design is making sense (of things). ’, Design Issues, 5:2, pp. 939.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Kumar, V.,, Jones, E.,, Venkatesan, R., and Leone, R. P.. ( 2011;), ‘ Is market orientation a source of sustainable competitive advantage or simply the cost of competing?. ’, Journal of Marketing, 75:1, pp. 1630.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Kumar, M., and Noble, C. H.. ( 2016;), ‘ Beyond form and function: Why do consumers value product design?. ’, Journal of Business Research, 69:2, pp. 61320.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Langerak, F.. ( 2002;), ‘ What is the predictive power of market orientation?. ’, SSRN Paper , Rotterdam:: ERIM Report Series Research in Management;.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Leonard-Barton, D.. ( 1995), Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation, Urbana-Champaign, IL:: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship;.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Li, J. J., and Zhou, K. Z.. ( 2010;), ‘ How foreign firms achieve competitive advantage in the Chinese emerging economy: Managerial ties and market orientation. ’, Journal of Business Research, 63:8, pp. 85662.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Liedtka, J.. ( 2010;), ‘ Business strategy and design: Can this marriage be saved?. ’, Design Management Review, 21:2, pp. 611.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Markides, C. C.. ( 2008), Game Changing Strategies, San Francisco, CA:: Jossey-Bass;.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Miaskiewicz, T., and Kozar, K. A.. ( 2011;), ‘ Personas and user-centered design: How can personas benefit product design processes?. ’, Design Studies, 32:5, pp. 41730.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Moll, I.,, Montaña, J.,, Guzmán, F., and Parellada, F. S.. ( 2007;), ‘ Market orientation and design orientation: A management model. ’, Journal of Marketing Management, 23:9&10, pp. 86176.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Moorman, C., and Day, G. S.. ( 2016;), ‘ Organizing for marketing excellence. ’, Journal of Marketing, 80:6, pp. 635.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Morillo, M.,, Dell'Era, C., and Verganti, R.. ( 2015;), ‘ Exploring the role of “outsider” interpreters in the development of design-driven innovations. ’, International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 10:3&4, pp. 22253.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Muratovski, G.. ( 2016;), ‘ Empowerment by design. ’, Journal of Design, Business & Society, 2:2, pp. 12125.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Narver, J. C., and Slater, S. F.. ( 1990;), ‘ The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. ’, Journal of Marketing, 54:4, pp. 2035.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Nunnally, J.. ( 1978), Psychometric Methods, New York:: McGraw-Hill;.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Öberg, Å., and Verganti, R.. ( 2014;), ‘ Meaning: An unexplored path of innovation. ’, International Journal of Innovation in Management, 2:2, pp. 7792.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Parkman, I., and Malkewitz, K.. ( 2019;), ‘ Design briefs in design-driven new product development. ’, Journal of Design, Business & Society, 5:1, pp. 3558.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Poggenpohl, S. H., and Sato, K.. ( 2009), Design Integrations: Research and Collaboration, Bristol:: Intellect Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Ponzini, D.. ( 2014;), ‘ The values of starchitecture: Commodification of architectural design in contemporary cities. ’, Organizational Aesthetics, 3:1, pp. 1018.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Sargeant, A., and Mohamad, M.. ( 1999;), ‘ Business performance in the UK hotel sector-does it pay to be market oriented?. ’, Service Industries Journal, 19:3, pp. 4259.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Slater, S. F., and Narver, J. C.. ( 1994;), ‘ Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship?. ’, The Journal of Marketing, 58:1, pp. 4655.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Slater, S. F., and Narver, J. C.. ( 2000;), ‘ The positive effect of a market orientation on business profitability: A balanced replication. ’, Journal of Business Research, 48:1, pp. 6973.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Song, X. M., and Parry, M. E.. ( 1997;), ‘ The determinants of Japanese new product successes. ’, Journal of Marketing Research, 34:1, pp. 6476.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Stevens, J., and Moultrie, J.. ( 2011;), ‘ Aligning strategy and design perspectives: A framework of design's strategic contributions. ’, The Design Journal, 14:4, pp. 475500.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Stevenson, T.,, Wrigley, C., and Matthews, J.. ( 2016;), ‘ A design approach to innovation in the Australian energy industry. ’, Journal of Design, Business & Society, 2:1, pp. 4970.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Tellis, G. J.,, Prabhu, J. C., and Chandy, R. K.. ( 2009;), ‘ Radical innovation across nations: The preeminence of corporate culture. ’, Journal of Marketing, 73:1, pp. 323.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Tripsas M.. ( 2009;), ‘ Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of the digital photography company. ’, Organization Science, 20:2, pp. 44160.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Verganti, R.. ( 2003;), ‘ Design as brokering of languages: Innovation strategies in Italian firms. ’, Design Management Journal, 14:3, pp. 3442.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Verganti, R.. ( 2008;), ‘ Design, meanings, and radical innovation: A metamodel and a research agenda*. ’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25:5, pp. 43656.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Verganti, R.. ( 2013), Design Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating What Things Mean, Boston, MA:: Harvard Business Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Veryzer, R. W., and Borja de Mozota, B.. ( 2005;), ‘ The impact of user-oriented design on new product development: An examination of fundamental relationships. ’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22:2, pp. 12843.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Waldfogel, J.. ( 2009), The Tyranny of the Market: Why You Can't Always Get What You Want, Boston, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Weick, K. E.. ( 2012), Making Sense of the Organization, Volume 2: The Impermanent Organization, vol. 2, Hoboken, NJ:: John Wiley & Sons;.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Zahra, S. A., and George, G.. ( 2002;), ‘ Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. ’, Academy of Management Review, 27:2, pp. 185203.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Zahra, S. A.,, Nash, S., and Bickford, D. J.. ( 1995;), ‘ Transforming technological pioneering into competitive advantage. ’, The Academy of Management Executive, 9:1, pp. 1731.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Zhang, Q., and Doll, W. J.. ( 2001;), ‘ The fuzzy front end and success of new product development: A causal model. ’, European Journal of Innovation Management, 4:2, pp. 95112.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Zhou, K. Z.,, Brown, J. R., and Dev, C. S.. ( 2009;), ‘ Market orientation, competitive advantage, and performance: A demand-based perspective. ’, Journal of Business Research, 62:11, pp. 106370.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Parkman, Ian D., and Holloway, Samuel S.. ( 2020;), ‘ The tyranny of the served market: The negative relationship between market orientation and performance among design-driven organizations. ’, Journal of Design, Business & Society, 6:1, pp. 109128, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00006_1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00006_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00006_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test