The role of typicality and novelty in the aesthetic preference of industrial products: Product value transformation

References

1. Akiike, Atsushi, and Katsumata, Sotaro. ( 2014;), ‘ The multidimensionality of design newness: An empirical survey of product appearance and preference. ’, MMRC Discussion Paper Series No. 457, pp. 1–11.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Balaji, Adireddi, and Bisht, Dhananjay Singh. ( 2020;), ‘ Design evaluation of cars taillights in India based on novelty and typicality. ’, Innovative Product Design and Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, pp. 293–301, Singapore:: Springer;.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barsalou, Lawrence W.. ( 1985;), ‘ Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. ’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11:4, pp. 629–54.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Berlyne, Daniel E.. ( 1970;), ‘ Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. ’, Perception & Psychophysics, 8:5, pp. 279–86.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berlyne, Daniel E.. ( 1978;), ‘ Curiosity and learning. ’, Motivation and Emotion, 2:2, pp. 97–175.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Blijlevens, Janneke,, Gemser, Gerda, and Mugge, Ruth. ( 2012;), ‘ The importance of being “well-placed”: The influence of context on perceived typicality and esthetic appraisal of product appearance. ’, Acta Psychologica, 139:1, pp. 178–86.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Blijlevens, Janneke,, Thurgood, Clementine,, Hekkert, Paul,, Chen, Lin-Lin,, Leder, Helmut, and Whitfield, T. W.. ( 2017;), ‘ The aesthetic pleasure in design scale: The development of a scale to measure aesthetic pleasure for designed artifacts. ’, Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11:1, pp. 86–98.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Campbell, Robert Ian,, Haeseong Jee, and Yong Se Kim. ( 2013;), ‘ Adding product value through additive manufacturing. ’, DS 75-4: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13), Design for Harmonies, vol. 4: Product, Service and Systems Design, Seoul, Korea, 19–22 August, The Design Society.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Ceballos, Lina M.,, Hodges, Nancy Nelson, and Watchravesringkan, Kittichai. ( 2019;), ‘ The MAYA principle as applied to apparel products: The effects of typicality and novelty on aesthetic preference. ’, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 23:4, pp. 587–607.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chen, Xingwei,, Shinwon Kim, and Jaewoo Joo. ( 2019;), ‘ How do we nudge people to choose aesthetically pleasing products?. ’, Archives of Design Research, 32:1, pp. 61–73.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chung, Jaehee, and Jaewoo Joo. ( 2017;), ‘ Effect of empathy on designers and non-designers in concept evaluation. ’, Archives of Design Research, 30:3, pp. 57–70.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cohen, J.. ( 1988), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, , 2nd ed.., Hillsdale, NJ:: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers;.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Conway, H. G.. ( 1951;), ‘ Industrial design and its relation to machine design. ’, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 164:1, pp. 177–94.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Crolic, Cammy,, Zheng, Yanmei,, Hoegg, JoAndrea, and Alba, Joseph W.. ( 2019;), ‘ The influence of product aesthetics on consumer inference making. ’, Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 4:4, pp. 398–408.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hagtvedt, Henrik, and Patrick, Vanessa M.. ( 2014;), ‘ Consumer response to overstyling: Balancing aesthetics and functionality in product design. ’, Psychology & Marketing, 31:7, pp. 518–25.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hekkert, Paul,, Snelders, Dirk, and Van Wieringen,, Piet C. W.. ( 2003;), ‘ “Most advanced, yet acceptable”: Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. ’, British Journal of Psychology, 94, pp. 111–24.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hsu, Chia-Lin,, Yen-Chun Chen,, Tai-Ning Yang,, Wei-Ko Lin, and Yi-Hsuan Liu. ( 2018;), ‘ Does product design matter? Exploring its influences in consumers’ psychological responses and brand loyalty. ’, Information Technology & People, 31:3, pp. 886–907.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hung, Wei Ken, and Chen, Lin-Lin. ( 2009;), ‘ Exploring relationships between product aesthetics, typicality and preference. ’, 2009 IASDR International Design Research Conference, COEX Convention Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 18 September.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jordan, Patrick W.. ( 2000), Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors, London and New York:: CRC Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Keyson, David V., and Bruns Alonso, M.. ( 2009;), ‘ Empirical research through design. ’, Proceedings of the Conference of the International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR’09) – Rigor and Relevance in Design, Seoul, Korea, 18–22 October, pp. 4548–57.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Lee, Eun-Jung. ( 2021;), ‘ Impact of visual typicality on the adoption of wearables. ’, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20:3, pp. 762–75.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Mayer, Stefan, and Landwehr, Jan R.. ( 2017;), ‘ Objective measures of design typicality. ’, Design Studies, 54, pp. 146–61.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Monk, Andrew, and Lelos, Kira. ( 2007;), ‘ Changing only the aesthetic features of a product can affect its apparent usability. ’, in A. Venkatesh,, T. Gonsalves,, A. Monk,, and K. Buckner. (eds), IFIP International Federation for Information Processing. Home Informatics and Telematics: ICT for the Next Billion, Chennai, 22–25 August, Boston, MA:: Springer;, pp. 221–233.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Mugge, Ruth, and Schoormans, Jan P.. ( 2012a;), ‘ Newer is better! The influence of a novel appearance on the perceived performance quality of products. ’, Journal of Engineering Design, 23:6, pp. 469–84.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Mugge, Ruth, and Schoormans, Jan P.. ( 2012b;), ‘ Product design and apparent usability. The influence of novelty in product appearance. ’, Applied Ergonomics, 43:6, pp. 1081–88.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Nanda, Nurul Nadzfah. ( 2019;), ‘ The influence of e-commerce, product prices and product design on purchasing decisions in souvenir shop Tauko Medan. ’, Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 2:3, pp. 388–95.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Pérez Mata, Marta,, Ahmed-Kristensen, Saeema, and Yanagisawa, Hideyoshi. ( 2013;), ‘ Perception of aesthetics in consumer products. ’, DS 75-7: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13), Design for Harmonies, vol. 7: Human Behaviour in Design, Seoul, Korea, 18–22 August.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Reber, Rolf,, Schwarz, Norbert, and Winkielman, Piotr. ( 2004;), ‘ Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience?. ’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8:4, pp. 364–82.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Rosch, Eleanor. ( 1978;), ‘ Principles of categorization. ’, in E. Rosch, and B. B. Lloyd. (eds), Cognition and Categorization, Hillsdale, NJ:: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates;.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Seifert, Christin, and Chattaraman, Veena. ( 2020;), ‘ A picture is worth a thousand words! How visual storytelling transforms the aesthetic experience of novel designs. ’, Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29:7, pp. 913–26.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Talke, Katrin,, Müller, Sebastian, and Wieringa, Jaap E.. ( 2017;), ‘ A matter of perspective: Design newness and its performance effects. ’, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34:2, pp. 399–413.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Tang, Chak Yin,, Fung, K. Y.,, Lee, Eric W. M.,, Ho, George T. S.,, Siu, Kin W. M., and Mou, W. L.. ( 2013;), ‘ Product form design using customer perception evaluation by a combined superellipse fitting and ANN approach. ’, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 27, pp. 386–94.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Van De Kar, Elisabeth, and Hengst, Mariëlle Den. ( 2008;), ‘ Involving users early on in the design process: Closing the gap between mobile information services and their users. ’, Electronic Markets, 19:1, pp. 31–42.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Veryzer Jr, Robert. ( 1995;), ‘ The place of product design and aesthetics in consumer research. ’, Advances in Consumer Research, 22:1, pp. 641–45.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Veryzer Jr, Robert, and Hutchinson, J. Wesley. ( 1998;), ‘ The influence of unity and prototypicality on aesthetic responses to new product designs. ’, Journal of Consumer Research, 24:4, pp. 374–94.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Whitfield, T. W. A.. ( 1983;), ‘ Predicting preference for familiar, everyday objects: An experimental confrontation between two theories of aesthetic behaviour. ’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3:3, pp. 221–37.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Whitfield, T. W. Allan. ( 2000;), ‘ Beyond prototypicality: Toward a categorical-motivation model of aesthetics. ’, Empirical Studies of the Arts, 18:1, pp. 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Whitfield, T. W. Allan, and Slatter, Phillip E.. ( 1979;), ‘ The effects of categorization and prototypicality on aesthetic choice in a furniture selection task. ’, British Journal of Psychology, 70:1, pp. 65–75.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Winkielman, Piotr,, Jamin, Halberstadt,, Tedra, Fazendeiro, and Catty, Steve. ( 2006;), ‘ Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. ’, Psychological Science, 17:9, pp. 799–806.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Yahaya, Mohd Faiz. ( 2017;), ‘ Investigating typicality and novelty through visual and tactile stimuli. ’, doctoral dissertation, Melbourne:: Swinburne University of Technology;.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Yalch, Richard, and Brunel, Frédéric. ( 1996;), ‘ Need hierarchies in consumer judgments of product designs: Is it time to reconsider Maslow’s theory?. ’, in K. P. Corfman, and J. G. Lynch Jr. (eds), NA – Advances in Consumer Research, Provo, UT:: Association for Consumer Research;, vol. 23, pp. 405–10.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Suhaimi, Safia Najwa,, Kuys, Blair,, Barron, Deirdre,, Whitfield, T. W. Allan, and Abdul Rahman, Zainurul. ( 2022;), ‘ The role of typicality and novelty in the aesthetic preference of industrial products: Product value transformation. ’, Journal of Design, Business & Society, 8:1, pp. 87–110, https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00034_1
    [Google Scholar]