f Design education: Interdisciplinary perspectives

References

1. Carvalho, L., and Goodyear, P.. ( 2018;), ‘ Design, learning networks and service innovation. ’, Design Studies, 55, pp. 27–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.09.003.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Dalziel, J.. (ed.) ( 2016), Learning Design: Conceptualizing a Framework for Teaching and Learning Online, New York:: Routledge;.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Goodyear, P.. ( 2015;), ‘ Teaching as design. ’, HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 2, pp. 27–50.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Goodyear, P., and Retalis, S.. (eds) ( 2010), Technology-Enhanced Learning: Design Patterns and Pattern Languages, Rotterdam:: Sense;.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Kali, Y.,, McKenney, S., and Sagy, O.. ( 2015;), ‘ Teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning. ’, Instructional Science, 43:2, pp. 173–79, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9343-4.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Markauskaite, L., and Goodyear, P.. ( 2017), Epistemic Fluency and Professional Education: Innovation, Knowledgeable Action and Actionable Knowledge, Dordrecht:: Springer;.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Mosely, G.,, Markauskaite, L., and Wrigley, C.. ( 2021;), ‘ Design facilitation: A critical review of conceptualisations and constructs. ’, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100962. Accessed 11 November 2022.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Schön, D. A.. ( 1987), Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions, San Francisco, CA:: Jossey-Bass;.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Wiggins, G. P., and McTighe, J.. ( 2007), Schooling by Design: Mission, Action, and Achievement, Alexandria, VA:: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development;.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Wrigley, C., and Mosely, G.. ( 2022), Design Thinking Pedagogy: Facilitating Innovation and Impact in Tertiary Education, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]