Skip to content
1981
Design Education: Interdisciplinary Perspectives
  • ISSN: 2055-2106
  • E-ISSN: 2055-2114

Abstract

This article provides a critical commentary of Design Thinking education and proposes a new model for incorporating responsibility within these teaching and learning practices. The need for this approach becomes more urgent as Design Thinking is increasingly integrated across disciplinary boundaries into business schools where it is seen as a pathway to commercial innovation that ultimately impacts society. Within this article, Responsible Design literature is reviewed to identify principles and practices that can inform Design Thinking education, bringing critical depth, as well as social and environmental impact into its broader ambit. It is argued that principles of social responsibility, environmental sustainability, ethics, critical thinking and accountability can be combined with feasibility, viability and desirability to create a new model for Responsible Design Thinking education. Based on these principles, three different conceptualizations are presented to indicate how Responsible Design Thinking may be applied in teaching practice. This model is proposed with the intention of supporting educators who are seeking to introduce Responsible Design Thinking into their teaching practice, as well as provoking discussion about the current and future state of Design Thinking education.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00037_1
2022-12-22
2024-06-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Accountability’ ( 2022), Merriam-Webster , https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/accountability. Accessed 29 August 2022.
  2. Anaissie, T.,, Cary, V.,, Clifford, D.,, Malarkey, T., and Wise, S.. ( 2021;), ‘ Liberatory design: Mindsets and modes to design for equity. ’, Liberatory Design , June, https://www.liberatorydesign.com/s/Liberatory-Design-Deck_June_2021.pdf. Accessed 28 September 2022.
  3. Andrews, D.. ( 2015;), ‘ The circular economy, design thinking and education for sustainability. ’, Local Economy, 30:3, pp. 30515, https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094215578226. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Archer, B.. ( 1976;), ‘ The three Rs. ’, in B. Archer,, K. Baynes, and P. Roberts. (eds), A Framework for Design and Design Education, Banbury:: The Design and Technology Association;, pp. 815.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Badke-Schau, P.,, Roozenburg, N., and Cardoso, C.. ( 2010;), ‘ Design thinking: A paradigm on its way from dilution to meaninglessness?. ’, Proceedings of the 8th Design Thinking Research Symposium (DTRS8) Interpreting Design Thinking, Sydney, Australia, 19–20 October.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bardzell, J., and Bardzell, S.. ( 2013;), ‘ What is “critical” about critical design?. ’, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France, 27 April–2 May, New York:: Association for Computing Machinery;, pp. 3297306, https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466451. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bardzell, S.,, Bardzell, J.,, Forlizzi, J.,, Zimmerman, J., and Antanitis, J.. ( 2012;), ‘ Critical design and critical theory: The challenge of designing for provocation. ’, in Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 11–15 June, New York:: Association for Computing Machinery;, pp. 28897, https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318001. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Barry, D.. ( 2017;), ‘ Design sweets, c-suites, and the candy man factor. ’, Journal of Marketing Management, 33:3&4, pp. 30511, https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2017.1282727. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Beverland, M. B.,, Gemser, G., and Karpen, I. O.. ( 2017;), ‘ Design, consumption and marketing: Outcomes, process, philosophy and future directions. ’, Journal of Marketing Management, 33:3&4, pp. 15972, https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2017.1283908. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bissett-Johnson, K., and Radcliffe, D. F.. ( 2021;), ‘ Engaging engineering students in socially responsible design using global projects. ’, European Journal of Engineering Education, 46:1, pp. 426, https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1674785. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Boehnert, J.. ( 2015;), ‘ Ecological literacy in design education: A theoretical introduction. ’, FormAkademisk, 8:1, pp. 111, https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1405. Accessed 8 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Boehnert, J.,, Sinclair, M., and Dewberry, E.. ( 2022;), ‘ Sustainable and responsible design education: Tensions in transitions. ’, Sustainability, 14:11, pp. 125, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116397. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Borthwick, M.,, Tomitsch, M., and Gaughwin, M.. ( 2022;), ‘ From human-centred to life-centred design: Considering environmental and ethical concerns in the design of interactive products. ’, Journal of Responsible Technology, 10, pp. 110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100032. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Brown, T.. ( 2009), Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation, New York:: Harper Business;.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Brown, T., and Wyatt, J.. ( 2010;), ‘ Design thinking for social innovation. ’, Development Outreach, 12:1, pp. 2943, https://doi.org/10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Buwert, P.. ( 2018;), ‘ Examining the professional codes of design organisations. ’, Design as a Catalyst for Change: DRS International, Limerick, Ireland, 25–28 June, London:: Digital Research Society;, pp. 17287, https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.493. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Çeviker-Çınar, G.,, Mura, G., and Demirbağ-Kaplan, M.. ( 2017;), ‘ Design thinking: A new road map in business education. ’, The Design Journal, 20:sup1, pp. S97787, https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1353042. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cook, R.. ( 2019;), ‘ Design thinking, neoliberalism, and the trivialisation of social change in higher education. ’, in B. Gray,, S. C. Cook,, T. Toffa, and A. Soudien. (eds), Standing Items: Critical Pedagogies in South African Art, Design & Architecture, Johannesburg:: University of Johannesburg;, pp. 1225.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Cross, N.. ( 1982;), ‘ Designerly ways of knowing. ’, Design Studies, 3:4, pp. 22127, https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Davey, C. L.,, Wootton, A. B.,, Thomas, A.,, Cooper, R., and Press, M.. ( 2005;), ‘ Design for the surreal world?: A new model of socially responsible design. ’, in The Sixth International Conference of the European Academy of Design, Bremen, Germany, 29–31 March, Bremen:: University of the Arts Bremen;, pp. 116.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Delft University of Technology ( n.d.;), ‘ Responsible innovation (LDE). ’, https://www.tudelft.nl/en/tpm/education/minors/responsible-innovation-lde. Accessed 29 August 2022.
  22. Design Council ( 2022;), ‘ The design value framework. ’, 9 June, https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/fileadmin/uploads/dc/Tools_and_Frameworks/DC_DE_Design_Value_Framework.pdf. Accessed 29 August 2022.
  23. Dorland, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Didn’t we solve this one? The function of practice routines in design thinking. ’, Communication Design, 5:1&2, pp. 11530, https://doi.org/10.1080/20557132.2017.1385260. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Dunne, A.. ( 2005), Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design, , 2nd ed.., Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Dunne, A., and Raby, F.. ( 2007;), ‘ Critical design FAQ. ’, http://dunneandraby.co.uk/content/bydandr/13/0. Accessed 28 September 2022.
  26. Eggink, W.,, Ozkaramanli, D.,, Zaga, C., and Liberati, N.. ( 2020;), ‘ Setting the stage for responsible design. ’, in Synergy: DRS International Conference 2020, 11–14 August, Design Research Society, pp. 71330, https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2020.116. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Ely, P., and Geneste, L.. ( 2020;), ‘ Spinning in helices: Design and the question of value. ’, Design Management Journal, 15:1, pp. 4457, https://doi.org/10.1111/dmj.12059. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Frascara, J.. ( 2022;), ‘ Revisiting “graphic design: Fine art or social science?” The question of quality in communication design. ’, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 8:2, pp. 27088, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2022.05.002. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Fry, T.. ( 2009), Design Futuring: Sustainability, Ethics and New Practice, London:: Bloomsbury;.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Glen, R.,, Suciu, C., and Baughn, C.. ( 2014;), ‘ The need for design thinking in business schools. ’, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13:4, pp. 65367, https://doi.org/10/5465/amle2012.0308. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Glen, R.,, Suciu, C.,, Baughn, C., and Anson, R.. ( 2015;), ‘ Teaching design thinking in business schools. ’, The International Journal of Management Education, 13:2, pp. 18292.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Goldschmidt, G.. ( 2017;), ‘ Design thinking: A method or a gateway into design cognition?. ’, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3:2, pp. 10712, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.10.009. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Grocott, L.. ( 2010;), ‘ Design research & reflective practice: The facility of design-oriented research to translate practitioner insights into new understandings of design. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Melbourne:: RMIT University;, https://researchrepository.rmit.edu.au/esploro/outputs/9921861244801341. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Gruber, M.,, Leon, N. de,, George, G., and Thompson, P.. ( 2015;), ‘ Managing by design. ’, Academy of Management Journal, 58:1, pp. 17, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.4001. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Haug, A.. ( 2017;), ‘ Educating ethical designers. ’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27:4, pp. 65565, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9367-y. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ibinarriaga, D. H., and Martin, B.. ( 2021;), ‘ Critical co-design and agency of the real. ’, Design and Culture, 13:3, pp. 25376, https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2021.1966731. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Jen, N.. ( 2017;), ‘ Natasha Jen: Design thinking is bullsh*t. ’, 99U Conference, New York, USA, https://99u.adobe.com/videos/55967/natasha-jen-design-thinking-is-bullshit. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Johansson-Sköldberg, U.,, Woodilla, J., and Çetinkaya, M.. ( 2013;), ‘ Design thinking: Past, present and possible futures. ’, Creativity and Innovation Management, 22:2, pp. 12146, https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12023. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Joost, G.,, Bredies, K.,, Christensen, M.,, Conradi, F., and Unteidig, A.. ( 2016), Design as Research: Positions, Arguments, Perspectives, Basel, Berlin and Boston, MA:: Walter de Gruyter GmbH;.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kilbourne, K.. ( 2013;), ‘ Tools and movements of engagement: Design anthropology’s style of knowing. ’, in W. Gunn,, T. Otto, and R. C. Smith. (eds), Design Anthropology, London:: Bloomsbury;, pp. 6882.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Kimbell, L.. ( 2011;), ‘ Rethinking design thinking: Part I. ’, Design and Culture, 3:3, pp. 285306, https://doi.org/10.2752/175470811X13071166525216. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kimbell, L.. ( 2012;), ‘ Rethinking design thinking: Part II. ’, Design and Culture, 4:2, pp. 12948, https://doi.org/10.2752/175470812X13281948975413. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Lawson, B.. ( 1990), How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified, , 2nd ed.., Oxford:: Butterworth Architecture;.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Learning Network on Sustainability ( n.d.;), ‘ Resources. ’, http://www.lens-international.org/. Accessed 29 August 2022.
  45. Light, A., and Akama, Y.. ( 2019;), ‘ The nature of “obligation” in doing design with communities: Participation, politics and care. ’, in T. Fisher, and L. Gamman. (eds), Tricky Design: The Ethics of Things, London:: Bloomsbury;, pp. 13142.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Lutnæs, E.. ( 2017;), ‘ Responsible creativity in design education. ’, in DS 88: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Oslo, Norway, 7–8 September, Glasgow:: The Design Society;, pp. 66873.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Lutnæs, E.. ( 2020;), ‘ Empowering responsible design literacy: Identifying narratives in a new curriculum. ’, RChD: creación y pensamiento, 5:8, pp. 1122, https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-837X.2020.56120. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Martin, B., and Hanington, B.. ( 2012), Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions, Beverly, MA:: Rockport;.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Melles, G.,, Vere, I. de, and Misic, V.. ( 2011;), ‘ Socially responsible design: Thinking beyond the triple bottom line to socially responsive and sustainable product design. ’, CoDesign, 7:3&4, pp. 14354, https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.630473. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Micheli, P.,, Wilner, S. J. S.,, Bhatti, S. H.,, Mura, M., and Beverland, M. B.. ( 2018;), ‘ Doing design thinking: Conceptual review, synthesis, and research agenda. ’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36:2, pp. 12448, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12466. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Monteiro, M.. ( 2019), Ruined by Design: How Designers Destroyed the World, and What We Can Do to Fix It, San Francisco, CA:: Mule;.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Papanek, V.. ( 1971), Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change, , 2nd ed.., Chicago, IL:: Academy Chicago;.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Salamanca, J.,, Briggs, M., and Mercer, L.. ( 2019;), ‘ Responsible innovation: A model for holistic design pedagogy. ’, in Proceedings of the International Association of Societies of Design Research, Manchester, UK, 2–5 September, Manchester:: Manchester Metropolitan University;, pp. 112.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Saunders, D.. ( 2007;), ‘ The impact of neoliberalism on college students. ’, Journal of College and Character, 8:5, pp. 19, https://doi.org/10.2202/1940-1639.1620. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Schön, D. A.. ( 1992;), ‘ Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. ’, Knowledge-Based Systems, 5:1, pp. 314, https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-7051(92)90020-G. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Seitz, T.. ( 2017), Design Thinking and the New Spirit of Capitalism: Sociological Reflections on Innovation Culture, Cham:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Shapira, H.,, Ketchie, A., and Nehe, M.. ( 2017;), ‘ The integration of design thinking and strategic sustainable development. ’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140:1, pp. 27787, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.092. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Sonneveld, M. H.. ( 2016;), ‘ Ethics in design education: An integrated approach. ’, in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Aalborg, Denmark, 8–9 September, Glasgow:: The Design Society;, pp. 60813.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Stern, A., and Siegelbaum, S.. ( 2019;), ‘ Design and neoliberalism. ’, Design and Culture, 11:3, pp. 26577, https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2019.1667188. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Tatum, J. S.. ( 2004;), ‘ The challenge of responsible design. ’, Design Issues, 20:3, pp. 6680.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Tuttle, G.. ( 2021;), ‘ What is design thinking and why is it important?. ’, We Work Ideas , 24 February, https://www.wework.com/ideas/professional-development/creativity-culture/what-is-design-thinking. Accessed 29 August 2022.
  62. University of the Arts London ( 2019;), ‘ Responsible design framework. ’, 15 February, https://www.arts.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0023/63716/ResponsibleDesignFramework.pdf. Accessed 29 August 2022.
  63. Vere, I. de,, Bissett-Johnson, K., and Thong, C.. ( 2009;), ‘ Educating the responsible engineer; socially responsible design and sustainability in the curriculum. ’, in DS 59: Proceedings of E&PDE 2009, Brighton, UK, 10–11 September, Glasgow:: The Design Society;, pp. 16.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Walker, S.. ( 2017;), ‘ Research in graphic design. ’, The Design Journal, 20:5, pp. 54959, https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1347416. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Wrigley, C., and Mosely, G.. ( 2022), Design Thinking Pedagogy: Facilitating Innovation and Impact in Tertiary Education, Abingdon:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Wrigley, C., and Straker, K.. ( 2017;), ‘ Design Thinking pedagogy: The educational design ladder. ’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54:4, pp. 37485, https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1108214. Accessed 29 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. WritingPrincess ( 2020;), ‘ Stop bastardizing design with false empathy. ’, Medium , 31 December, https://medium.com/swlh/stop-bastardizing-design-with-false-empathy-6a06d431bab3. Accessed 29 August 2022.
  68. Fridman, Ilya,, Meron, Yaron, and Roberts, Julie. ( 2022;), ‘ Responsible design thinking: Informing future models of cross-disciplinary design education. ’, Journal of Design, Business & Society, 8:2, pp. 14566, https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00037_1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00037_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00037_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error