Skip to content
1981
Design and Interdisciplinarity
  • ISSN: 2055-2106
  • E-ISSN: 2055-2114

Abstract

This article examines the deliberations and actions of a group of communication design educators in replacing discretionary grading in eight core units of a design course with a combination of pass/fail grading, rich formative feedback and a reinvigorated studio environment. The changes sought to better focus students on their creative process and improve their awareness of their acquisition of attributes, skills and knowledge along the path to becoming work-ready graduates. The traditional studio model of graphic design education approaches student learning through immersion in practice, imagining novice designers absorbing abilities and dispositions through experimentation and proximity to discipline experts and peers. If this model ever truly operated in Australia’s design schools, it has been eviscerated by the massification, marketization and rationalization of tertiary education since the early 1990s. Australian design education now operates with significantly reduced contact hours, tightly scheduled classes and standardized administrative, classroom and assessment practices that do not effectively model professional practice and limit students’ development of creative confidence. Another barrier to fostering students’ design acumen is their frequent fixation on grades as markers of success. We looked to removing grades to revitalize students’ flagging creative ambitions within the constraints of a tertiary education system we could not change. In stressing that a move to pass/fail grading is not an action to be taken lightly, we discuss our research into its advantages and disadvantages, the integral reconceptualization of learning and teaching approaches required to make the change and the challenges in implementation. This included understanding how students and staff interacted in the studio, their emotional and philosophical attachment to graded assessment, the effort required to communicate the changes to staff and students and developing resources to combat the fragmentation of the educational experience, which risks stripping change of its meaning and purpose.

© 2023 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00046_1
2023-04-25
2026-04-19

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Algharaibeh, S. A. S.. ( 2020;), ‘ Cognitive flexibility as a predictor of subjective vitality among university students. ’, Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 15:5, pp. 1128–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, L. W.. ( 2018;), ‘ A critique of grading: Policies, practices, and technical matters. ’, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26:49, pp. 1–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashton, D.. ( 2015;), ‘ Creative work careers: Pathways and portfolios for the creative economy. ’, Journal of Education and Work, 28:4, pp. 388–406.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Aviles, C.. ( 2001;), ‘ Grading with norm-referenced or criterion-referenced measurements: To curve or not to curve, that is the question. ’, Social Work Education, 20:5, pp. 603–08.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Barnes, C.,, Wragg, N.,, Fisher, E.,, Tyagi, S., and Kruiff, A. De. ( 2022;), ‘ Portfolio literacy and the transition to work for graphic design graduates. ’, International Journal of Art and Design Education, 41:2, pp. 300–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Barrett, J. C.. ( 2013), Designing Your Fashion Portfolio from Concept to Presentation, New York:: Fairchild Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bilton, C.. ( 2007), Management and Creativity: From Creative Industries to Creative Management, Oxford:: Blackwell Publishing;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Black, P., and Wiliam, D.. ( 1998;), ‘ Assessment and classroom learning. ’, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5:1, pp. 7–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Blum, S. D.. ( 2020), Ungrading: Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to do Instead), Morgantown, WV:: West Virginia University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Boud, D.. ( 2007;), ‘ Reframing assessment as if learning were important. ’, in D. Boud, and N. Falchikov. (eds), Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term, London:: Taylor and Francis;, pp. 14–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Boud, D.,, Phillis, D.,, Bearmand, M.,, Bennette, S.,, Joughina, G., and Molloye, E.. ( 2018;), ‘ Reframing assessment research: Through a practice perspective. ’, Studies in Higher Education, 43:7, pp. 1107–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bromage, A.. ( 2006;), ‘ The management of planned change: An interdisciplinary perspective. ’, in L. Hunt,, L. A. Bromage, and B. Tomkinson. (eds), The Realities of Change in Higher Education: Interventions to Promote Learning and Teaching, London and New York:: Taylor and Francis;, pp. 1–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Broussard, S. C., and Garrison, M.. ( 2004;), ‘ The relationship between classroom motivation and academic achievement in elementary school-aged children. ’, Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 33:2, pp. 106–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Canally, C.. ( 2012;), ‘ Where’s our agency? The role of grading in the neoliberalization of public universities. ’, Antipode Online , 30 March, https://antipodeonline.org/2012/03/30/intervention-wheres-our-agency-the-role-of-grading-in-the-neoliberalization-of-public-universities. Accessed 22 August 2022.
  15. Carless, D.. ( 2015), Excellence in University Assessment: Learning from Award-Winning Practice, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Clarke, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Rethinking graduate employability: The role of capital, individual attributes and context. ’, Studies in Higher Education, 43:11, pp. 1923–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Dahlgren, L. O.,, Fejes, A.,, Abrandt-Dahlgren, M., and Trowald, N.. ( 2009;), ‘ Grading systems, features of assessment and students’ approaches to learning. ’, Teaching in Higher Education, 14:2, pp. 185–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Dziobczenski, P. R. N., and Person, O.. ( 2017;), ‘ Graphic designer wanted: A document analysis of the described skill set of graphic designers in job advertisements from the United Kingdom. ’, International Journal of Design, 11:2, pp. 41–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Fink, L. D.. ( 2013), Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses, San Francisco, CA:: Jossey-Bass;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Goldschmidt, G.,, Hochman, H., and Dafni, I.. ( 2010;), ‘ The design studio “crit”: Teacher–student communication. ’, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24:3, pp. 285–302.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. González, F.,, Pardo del Val, M., and Redondo Cano, A.. ( 2022;), ‘ Systematic literature review of interpretative positions and potential sources of resistance to change in organizations. ’, Intangible Capital, 18:2, pp. 145–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Gorichanaz, T.. ( 2022;), ‘ “It made me feel like it was okay to be wrong”: Student experiences with ungrading. ’, Active Learning in Higher Education, 20:5, pp. 603–08.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hattie, J., and Timperley, H.. ( 2007;), ‘ The power of feedback. ’, Review of Educational Research, 77:1, pp. 81–112.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Hawe, E., and Dixon, H.. ( 2017;), ‘ Assessment for learning: A catalyst for student self-regulation. ’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42:8, pp. 1181–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hickman, R.. ( 2015;), ‘ Assessment in art and design education: Further reflections upon whippet-fancying and Procrustes. ’, Visual Inquiry: Learning & Teaching Art, 4:1, pp. 23–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hinchliffe, G., and Jolly, A.. ( 2011;), ‘ Graduate identity and employability. ’, British Educational Research Journal, 37:4, pp. 563–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Kingston, N., and Nash, B.. ( 2011;), ‘ Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. ’, Educational Measurement, Issues and Practice, 30:4, pp. 28–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Kohn, A.. ( 2006;), ‘ The trouble with rubrics. ’, English Journal, 95:4, pp. 12–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Kohn, A.. ( 2011;), ‘ The case against grades: When schools cling to letter and number rating, students get stuck in a system that undermines learning. ’, Educational Leadership, 69:3, pp. 28–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kvale, S.. ( 2007;), ‘ Contradictions of assessment for learning in institutions of higher learning. ’, in D. Boud, and N. Falchnikov. (eds), Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 67–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Marshalsey, L.. ( 2020;), ‘ Examining the changing shape of the specialist studio/classroom model in communication design education today. ’, Journal of Learning Spaces, 9:1, pp. 1–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. McInnis, C.. ( 2006;), ‘ Assessment and change in higher education. ’, in L. Hunt,, A. Bromage, and B. Tomkinson. (eds), The Realities of Change in Higher Education: Interventions to Promote Learning and Teaching, London and New York:: Taylor and Francis;, pp. 40–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. McMorran, C., and Ragupathi, K.. ( 2020;), ‘ The promise and pitfalls of gradeless learning: Responses to an alternative approach to grading. ’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44:7, pp. 925–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. McRobbie, A.. ( 2015), Be Creative: Making a Living in the New Culture Industries, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Medland, E.. ( 2016;), ‘ Assessment in higher education: Drivers, barriers and directions for change in the UK. ’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41:1, pp. 81–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Melrose, S.. ( 2017;), ‘ Pass/fail and discretionary grading: A snapshot of their influences on learning. ’, Open Journal of Nursing, 7:2, pp. 185–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Paterson, R.. ( 2019;), ‘ From employment to employability: Uzbekistan and the higher education skills agenda. ’, Silk Road: A Journal of Eurasian Development, 1:1, pp. 1–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Peeters, E.,, Nelissen, J.,, Cuyper, N. De,, Forrier, A.,, Verbruggen, M., and Witte, H. De. ( 2019;), ‘ Employability capital: A conceptual framework tested through expert analysis. ’, Journal of Career Development, 46:2, pp. 79–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Pintrich, P. R., and Groot, E. V. De. ( 1990;), ‘ Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. ’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82:1, pp. 33–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Pippin, T.. ( 2014;), ‘ Roundtable on pedagogy: Response: Renounce grading?. ’, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 82:2, pp. 348–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Rohe, D. E.,, Barrier, P. A.,, Clark, M. M.,, Cook, D. A.,, Vickers, K. S., and Decker, P. A.. ( 2006;), ‘ The benefits of pass-fail grading on stress, mood, and group cohesion in medical students. ’, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 81:11, pp. 1443–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Rojstaczer, S., and Healy, C.. ( 2012;), ‘ Where A is ordinary: The evolution of American college and university grading, 1940–2009. ’, Teachers College Record, 114:7, pp. 1–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Römgens, I.,, Scoupe, R., and Beausaert, S.. ( 2020;), ‘ Unravelling the concept of employability, bringing together research on employability in higher education and the workplace. ’, Studies in Higher Education, 45:12, pp. 2588–603.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Sadler, D. R.. ( 2009;), ‘ Transforming holistic assessment and grading into a vehicle for complex learning. ’, in G. Joughin. (ed.), Learning and Judgement in Higher Education, Dordrecht:: Springer;, pp. 45–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Sadler, D. R.. ( 2010;), ‘ Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. ’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35:5, pp. 535–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Sadler, I.,, Reimann, N., and Sambell, K.. ( 2022;), ‘ Feedforward practices: A systematic review of the literature. ’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, article first , https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2073434.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Seligman, L.,, Abdullahi, A.,, Teherani, A., and Hauer, K.. ( 2021;), ‘ From grading to assessment for learning: A qualitative study of student perceptions surrounding elimination of core clerkship grades and enhanced formative feedback. ’, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 33:3, pp. 314–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Sorens-Unruh, C.. ( 2020;), ‘ Ungrading: What is it and why should we use it?. ’, ChemEd X , 14 January, https://www.chemedx.org/blog/ungrading-what-it-and-why-should-we-use-it. Accessed 15 August 2021.
  49. Spring, L.,, Robillard, D.,, Gehlbach, L., and Moore Simas, T. A.. ( 2011;), ‘ Impact of pass/fail grading on medical students’ well-being and academic outcomes. ’, Medical Education, 45:9, pp. 867–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Stommel, J.. ( 2021;), ‘ Ungrading: An introduction. ’, Jesse Stommel , 11 June, https://www.jessestommel.com/ungrading-an-introduction/. Accessed 20 August 2022.
  51. Strømme, T. J. F.. ( 2019;), ‘ Pass/fail grading and educational practices in computer science. ’, Norsk IKT-konferanse for forskning og utdanning, 2019: Norsk Informatikkonferanse;, 3 December, https://ojs.bibsys.no/index.php/NIK/article/view/724. Accessed 20 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Tannock, S.. ( 2017;), ‘ No grades in higher education now! Revisiting the place of graded assessment in the reimagination of the public university. ’, Studies in Higher Education, 42:8, pp. 1345–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Voorhees, R. A.. ( 2001;), ‘ Competency-based learning models: A necessary future. ’, New Directions for Institutional Research, 2001:110, pp. 5–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. White, C. B., and Fantone, J. C.. ( 2009;), ‘ Pass-fail grading: Laying the foundation for self-regulated learning. ’, Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 15:4, pp. 469–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Wilkinson, T.. ( 2011;), ‘ Pass/fail grading: Not everything that counts can be counted. ’, Medical Education, 45:9, pp. 860–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Yusoff, M.. ( 2013;), ‘ Associations of pass-fail outcomes with psychological health of first-year medical students in a Malaysian medical school. ’, Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 13:1, pp. 107–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Wragg, Nicole,, Barnes, Carolyn,, Haig, Andrew,, Wright, Emily,, Finley, Glenn, and Magee, Morganna. ( 2023;), ‘ Designing pedagogical change: Fostering creativity in communication design education by removing grades. ’, Journal of Design, Business & Society, Special Issue: ‘Design and Interdisciplinarity’ , 9:1, pp. 57–78, https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00046_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00046_1
Loading
Designing pedagogical change: Fostering creativity in communication design education by removing grades
Journal of Design, Business & Society 9, 57 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00046_1
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00046_1
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00046_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): assessment for learning; discretionary grading; formative feedback; pass/fail grading; transition to practice; ungrading

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test