Skip to content
1981
Design and Interdisciplinarity
  • ISSN: 2055-2106
  • E-ISSN: 2055-2114

Abstract

The ability to think beyond disciplinary and geographical boundaries is essential for future designers to approach complex challenges and make a meaningful impact. Traditionally, these skills are developed in a studio environment where students can participate in mobility programmes and connect with peers from other disciplines; however, the COVID-19 pandemic has limited these opportunities due to social distance requirements. This article presents a framework for collaborative online international learning (COIL) for studio-based courses as an alternative for educators who want to foster interdisciplinary and intercultural learning in online and hybrid environments. The framework emerged from the development and delivery of a COIL initiative for an experience design studio course offered at an Australian University, in partnership with consumer behaviour and intercultural communication courses at a Brazilian University. The collaboration involved peer-to-peer online interactions between 43 undergraduate students enrolled in the three courses. Despite the renewed popularity of implementing COIL in higher education to overcome pandemic barriers, there is little documentation of applying the method in design disciplines and less evidence on how it corresponds to studio pedagogy. This type of computer-mediated collaboration offers an accessible and more inclusive alternative to mobility programmes and can continue to expand the opportunities for students to experience the world during and after the pandemic. The article focuses on the perspective of design education, reflecting on the benefits and challenges of online international collaboration, and provides new insights into the adaptations required to integrate the COIL and studio models.

© 2023 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00050_1
2023-04-25
2026-04-23

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amaral, C. C. B. do,, Romani-Dias, M., and Walchhutter, S.. ( 2022;), ‘ International Brazilian students: Motivators, barriers, and facilitators in higher education. ’, SAGE Open, 12:1, pp. 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221088022.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ang, S.. ( 2018;), ‘ Intercultural Dialogue through Design (iDiDe): A model of intercultural collaboration and student engagement. ’, in Information Resources Management Association (ed.), Student Engagement and Participation: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications, Hershey, PA:: IGI Global;, pp. 177–202, https://www-igi-global-com.ezproxy.lib.rmit.edu.au/chapter/intercultural-dialogue-through-design-idide/183508. Accessed 26 July 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandera, C.,, Somers, M.,, Passerini, K.,, Naatus, M. K., and Pon, K.. ( 2020;), ‘ Disruptions as opportunities for new thinking: Applying the studio model to business education. ’, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18:1, pp. 81–92, https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1621225.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Broadfoot, O., and Bennett, R.. ( 2003;), ‘ Design studios: Online? Comparing traditional face-to-face design studio education with modern internet-based design studios. ’, Proceedings of the Apple University Consortium Conference: The Apple University Consortium (AUC) Conference, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 28 September–1 October, https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/740.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Chamorro-Koc, M., and Kurimasuriyar, A.. ( 2020;), ‘ Insights from studio teaching practices in a creative industries faculty in Australia. ’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 19:2, pp. 172–85, https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022218802529.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Crowther, P.. ( 2013;), ‘ Understanding the signature pedagogy of the design studio and the opportunities for its technological enhancement. ’, Journal of Learning Design, 6:3, pp. 18–28, https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v6i3.155.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Desai, S.,, Stahl, I., and Chamorro-Koc, M.. ( 2021;), ‘ Global design studio: Advancing cross-disciplinary experiential education during the COVID-19 pandemic. ’, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26:4, pp. 165–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Design Council ( 2019;), ‘ Framework for innovation: Design Council’s evolved double diamond. ’, 17 May, https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-work/skills-learning/tools-frameworks/framework-for-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamond/. Accessed 15 January 2023.
  9. Dorner, H.. ( 2018;), ‘ Exploring students’ conceptions of internationalised learning: Experiences from international online collaborative seminars. ’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55:3, pp. 304–13, https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1210530.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Forsey, M.,, Broomhall, S., and Davis, J.. ( 2012;), ‘ Broadening the mind? Australian student reflections on the experience of overseas study. ’, Journal of Studies in International Education, 16:2, pp. 128–39, https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315311407511.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Garza, A. de la, and Maher, C.. ( 2022;), ‘ Decolonising the film curriculum through South–North collaborative online international learning (COIL) initiatives. ’, Film Education Journal, 5:1, pp. 34–40, https://doi.org/10.14324/FEJ.05.1.04.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Gray, M. I.,, Asojo, A.,, Lindgren, J.,, Nolan, D., and Nowak, A. V.. ( 2021;), ‘ COIL: A global experience for everyone. ’, Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21:4, pp. 64–79, https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i4.4209.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Hautala, J., and Schmidt, S.. ( 2019;), ‘ Learning across distances: An international collaborative learning project between Berlin and Turku. ’, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43:2, pp. 181–200, https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1599331.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Herrera-Pavo, M. Á.. ( 2021;), ‘ Collaborative learning for virtual higher education. ’, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100437.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Ingram, L. A.,, Monroe, C.,, Wright, H.,, Burrell, A.,, Jenks, R.,, Cheung, S., and Friedman, D. B.. ( 2021;), ‘ Fostering distance education: Lessons from a United States–England partnered collaborative online international learning approach. ’, Frontiers in Education, 6, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.782674. Accessed 26 July 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Jones, B. T.,, Power, A.,, Gray, T.,, Downey, G.,, Hall, T., and Truong, S.. ( 2016;), ‘ If you build it, they may not come: Why Australian university students do not take part in outbound mobility experiences. ’, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 13:3, pp. 144–59, https://doi.org/10.53761/1.13.3.9.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu, Y., and Shirley, T.. ( 2021;), ‘ Without crossing a border: Exploring the impact of shifting study abroad online on students’ learning and intercultural competence development during the COVID-19 pandemic. ’, Online Learning, 25:1, pp. 182–94, https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2471.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Mewburn, I.. ( 2012;), ‘ Lost in translation: Reconsidering reflective practice and design studio pedagogy. ’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 11:4, pp. 363–79, https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022210393912.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Meyer, M. W., and Norman, D.. ( 2020;), ‘ Changing design education for the 21st century. ’, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6:1, pp. 13–49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.12.002.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. OECD ( 2022;), ‘ The future of work. ’, https://www.oecd.org/future-of-work/reports-and-data/. Accessed 29 August 2022.
  21. Paatela-Nieminen, M.. ( 2012;), ‘ Intercultural design education. ’, Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 45, pp. 84–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.545.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Rubin, J.,, Gribble, C., and Coelen, R.. ( 2019;), ‘ Collaborative online international learning (COIL): Now preparing students for international virtual work. ’, in R. Coelen, and C. Gribble. (eds), Internationalization and Employability in Higher Education, London:: Routledge;, pp. 189–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Schön, D. A.. ( 1987), Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions, San Francisco, CA:: Jossey-Bass;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Suteu, I., and Pillan, M.. ( 2013;), ‘ Multidisciplinary design for intercultural learning: Crafting digital services for a multicultural society. ’, in Design Learning for Tomorrow Design Education from Kindergarten to PhD, 2nd International Conference for Design Education Researchers, Oslo, Norway, 14–17 May, Oslo:: ABM-Media;, pp. 1395–404, https://re.public.polimi.it/handle/11311/1019515. Accessed 26 July 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Vahed, A.. ( 2022;), ‘ Factors enabling and constraining students’ collaborative online international learning experiences. ’, Learning Environments Research, 25:3, pp. 895–915, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09390-x.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Webster, H.. ( 2007;), ‘ The analytics of power: Re-presenting the design jury. ’, Journal of Architectural Education, 60:3, pp. 21–27, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1531-314X.2007.00092.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Williams, A.,, Ostwald, M., and Askland, H.. ( 2010;), ‘ The design studio, models of creativity and the education of future designers. ’, in Proceedings of the 1st DESIRE Network Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design (DESIRE '10), Aarhus, Denmark, 16–17 August, Lancaster:: Desire Network;, pp. 131–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Wright, N., and Wrigley, C.. ( 2019;), ‘ Broadening design-led education horizons: Conceptual insights and future research directions. ’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29:1, pp. 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9429-9.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Wrigley, C., and Mosely, G.. ( 2022), Design Thinking Pedagogy: Facilitating Innovation and Impact in Tertiary Education, Abingdon:: Taylor & Francis Group;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Amaral, Carla,, Edral, Adriana, and Polson, Deb. ( 2023;), ‘ Collaborative online international learning for design education: A framework for studio-based learning. ’, Journal of Design, Business & Society, Special Issue: ‘Design and Interdisciplinarity’ , 9:1, pp. 145–58, https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00050_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00050_1
Loading
Collaborative online international learning for design education: A framework for studio-based learning
Journal of Design, Business & Society 9, 145 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00050_1
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00050_1
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00050_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): COIL; collaboration; design; intercultural; interdisciplinary; remote; studio model; teaching

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test