Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Design Ecologies
  4. Volume 11, Issue 1
  5. Article
Towards a Transdisciplinary Practice
  • ISSN: 2043-068X
  • E-ISSN: 2043-0698

Abstract

Can we surpass the representational nature of architecture drawing to consider and discuss the agency of architectural drawing in process and result? Over the course of three years from 2019, a cohort of architect–drafters, architect–theoreticians and a curator are meeting every six months in a reflective exchange to discuss the production and exhibition of a collection of drawings and drawing-related artefacts. The varying cast of the bi-annual symposia are participants from the United States, Canada and Europe including Michael Webb, Perry Kulper, Laura Allen, Bryan Cantley, Nat Chard, Mark Dorrian, Arnaud Hendrickx, William Menking, Shaun Murray, Anthony Morey, Mark Smout, Neil Spiller, Natalija (Nada) Subotincic, Mark West, Michael Young and Riet Eeckhout. Surpassing the representational nature of architecture drawing, a group of architects and I consider and discuss the agency of architectural drawing in process and result. Drawing architecture implies materializing an architecture within the drawing, where it can be sought, found and experienced. This refers to an action in the present progressive, an action by the author in the process of bringing into the world through drawing – architectural research through drawing. The artefacts, as drawings, that we are looking at are an end in themselves and not a preparatory means to build an environment as in how drawings are used in architectural practices for buildings. These symposia aim to reveal and come closer to the individual agency of each practice within the drawn discipline of architecture, to establish a way in which we can show this agency in an Exhibition at Montreal Design Centre in August–December 2022. The bi-annual symposium days were structured by round-table conversations and discussions that take place based on drawings or drawing-related artefacts brought in by the participants. In ‘Drawing architecture’ Session 1 in New York, we had an in-depth introduction of each participant’s practice with Michael Webb, Perry Kulper, Bryan Cantley, Nat Chard, Arnaud Hendrickx, William Menking, Shaun Murray, Anthony Morey, Neil Spiller, Natalija (Nada) Subotincic, Mark West, Michael Young and Riet Eeckhout. Participants expanded on their bodies of work, tools and the nature of the drawing practice. For ‘Drawing architecture’ Session 2 in London, we sharpened the conversation between the participants by: (1) establishing an angle from which we talk through the artefact(s) (drawing or drawing practice-related artefact), each participant from the standpoint of their practice. Angle: Talking through the drawing or drawing practice-related artefact, can you expand on the agency of the drawing (practice) within the discipline of architecture? Questions that might be helpful: (a) How does the drawing work as a tool of investigation (technique of leveraging knowledge). (b) Where and what is the architecture within the resulting drawing/artefact? When is the architecture in the process? Is there architecture within the drawing? (2) By placing the drawing or artefact central during the symposium talk and organize a group conversation around it. It might be that you bring one or more current drawings/artefacts enabling you to expand on the specific drawing practice investigation. The artefact might be resolved or unresolved, finished, ongoing or just starting and in the thick of things. The presence of the drawing allows the group to come closer to and understand the agency of the artefact itself, supported by talking us through and unpacking the artefact.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/des_00014_1
2022-12-13
2025-03-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bateson, G.. ( 1972), Steps to an Ecology of Mind, New York:: Ballantine Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bateson, G.. ( 2002), Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity, Cresskill, NJ:: Hampton Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Blau, E., and Kaufman, E.. ( 1989), Architecture and Its Image, Montreal and Cambridge, MA:: Canadian Centre for Architecture and MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Blomfield, J.. ( 1912), Architectural Drawing and Draftsmen, New York:: Cassel and Company;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Capra, F.. ( 1991), The Tao of Physics: An Explanation of the Parallel Between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism, London:: Flamingo;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Ching, F.. ( 1985), Architectural Drawing, New York:: Van Nostrand Reinhold;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Elliot, T. S.. ( [1943] 2001;), ‘ Little gidding. ’, in Four Quartets, London:: Gardners Books;, n.pag.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Evans, R.. ( 1986;), ‘ Translation from drawing to building. ’, AA files, no. 12, London:: Architectural Association;, pp. 3–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Evans, R.. ( 1989;), ‘ Architectural projection. ’, in E. Blau, and E. Kaufman. (eds), Architecture and Its Image, Montreal and Cambridge, MA:: Canadian Centre for Architecture and MIT Press;, pp. 18–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Evans, R.. ( 1995), The Projective Cast: Architecture and Its Three Geometries, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Gebhard, D., and Nevins, D.. ( 1977), 200 Years of Architectural Drawing, New York:: Whitney Library of Design;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldie, M. B.. ( 2019), Scribe of Space: Place in the Middle English Literature and Late Medieval Science, Ithaca, NY:: Cornell University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Harley, B., and Woodward, D.. ( 1987), The History of Cartography, Vol 1, Cartographies in Prehistoric, Ancient and Medieval Europe and the Mediterranean, Chicago:: University of Chicago Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Harries-Jones, P.. ( 1995), A Recursive Vision: Ecological Understanding and Gregory Bateson, London:: University of Toronto Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hesse, M. B.. ( 1961), Forces and Fields, London:: Nelson;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Kiesler, F.. ( 1939;), ‘ On correalism and biotechnique: A definition and test of new approach to building design. ’, The Architectural Record, September, pp. 60–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Lambert, S.. ( 1984), Reading Drawings: An Introduction to Looking at Drawings, New York:: Pantheon Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Maturana, H. R.. ( 2004), From Being to Doing: The Origins of the Biology of Cognition, Heidelberg:: Carl-Auer Verlag;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. McTaggart, L.. ( 2003), The Field, London:: HarperCollins;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. O’Gorman, J.. ( 1986), Drawing towards Building, Philadelphia:: University of Pennsylvania Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Pascal, B.. ( 2002), Pensees (trans. W. F. Trotter.), Grand Rapids, MI:: Christian Classics Ethereal Library;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Porter, T.. ( 1979), How Architects Visualise, New York:: Van Nostrand Reinhold;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Rawson, P.. ( 1987), Drawing, , 2nd ed.., Philadelphia, PA:: University of Pennsylvania Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Robbins, E.. ( 1997), Why Architects Draw, Cambridge, MA and London:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Sheldrake, R.. ( 1981), A New Science of Life: The Hypothesis of Morphic Resonance, London:: Blond and Briggs;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Sheldrake, R.. ( 1995), Presence of the Past, Vermont:: Park Street Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Spiller, N.. ( 2002), Reflexive Architecture (Architectural Design), vol. 72, no. 3, Oxford:: Wiley and Academy Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Wainwright, A.. ( 1955–66), A Pictorial Guide to the Lakeland Fells, Kendal:: Westmorland Gazette Publishers and Printers;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Zukowsk, J., and Saliga, P.. ( 1982), Chicago Architects Design: A Century of Architectural Drawings from the Art Institute of Chicago, New York:: Rizzoli International;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Murray, Shaun. ( 2022;), ‘ Drawing architecture. ’, Design Ecologies, 11, pp. 11–33, https://doi.org/10.1386/des_00014_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/des_00014_1
Loading
Drawing architecture
Design Ecologies 11, 11 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1386/des_00014_1
/content/journals/10.1386/des_00014_1
/content/journals/10.1386/des_00014_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): artefacts; context; cybernetics; ecology; editor; field theory; landscape; reader

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test