Skip to content
1981
Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2043-068X
  • E-ISSN: 2043-0698

Abstract

Architecture is caught in a conundrum. The motivation for building architecture is usually to satisfy someone’s desire to do something in a specific place. The architect professes to know how to facilitate that something yet knows that the architectural programme is reductive and does not cover the range and extent of likely and unlikely things that might take place in and around a built work. As a result, architects are caught between legitimizing their practice (and livelihood) to others through a rational exposition of explicit thoughts about how something can be accomplished while simultaneously knowing that what they really do has other unpredictable dimensions that are hard to grasp and harder to articulate.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The Bartlett ARF fund
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/des_00018_1
2024-01-10
2024-10-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baraduc, H. (1913), The Human Soul, Its Movements, Its Lights and the Iconography of the Fluidic Invisible, Paris: Libraire Internationale de la Pensée Nouvelle.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Molderings, H. (2012), Marcel Duchamp’s Studio as a Laboratory of Perception, in the Studio, London and Cambridge, MA: Whitechapel Gallery and MIT Press, p. 72.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Morrill, R. (1996), ‘A dual grid system for diorama layout’, Curator, 39:4, pp. 28087.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/des_00018_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/des_00018_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error