Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Dramatherapy
  4. Volume 46, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 46, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0263-0672
  • E-ISSN: 2157-1430
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

This article challenges the concept of evidence as proposed by established empirical research as an exclusive form of evidence in dramatherapy. In recent decades, health policy has increasingly called for evidence-based practice and research in the arts therapies without considering current insights from decolonial and feminist theories. This literature points to the traces of oppression embedded in scientific terminology, the epistemic violence inherent in it, the limited, sometimes clearly reduced understanding of identity and nature, and the ignorance and devaluation of culturally divergent conceptions of health. Poetic evidence as an inherent quality of dramatherapy practice is presented as an alternative paradigm committed to providing an intersectional ethical lens with the aim of creating space for ‘subaltern’ voices (Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak) and facilitating a ‘polyphony of all languages’ (Édourad Glissant). The polyphonic approach in Glissant’s ‘poetics of relation’ and Haraway’s concept of ‘sympoiesis’ as a ‘worlding-with’ are contextualised to enrich the humus of poetic evidence as a new form of empirical evidence that remains inextricably linked to dramatherapy processes. The concepts of ‘dramatic reality’ and ‘dramatic resonances’ (Susana Pendzik) are shown to be interwoven with this paradigm of poetic evidence. A framework for future case studies based on poetic evidence is attempted, justified and outlined with reference to a previously published dramatherapy case study.

© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Intellect Ltd.
This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows users to copy, distribute and transmit the article as long as the author is attributed, the article is not used for commercial purposes, and the work is not modified or adapted in any way. To view a copy of the licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/dj_00034_1
2025-10-22
2026-01-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/dj/46/1/dj.46.1.99_Schafer.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/dj_00034_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. ‘Aesthetic, n.’ (2016), OED Online, 16th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://www.oed.com/dictionary/aesthetic_n. Accessed 27 March 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alker, Gwendolyn (2015), ‘A feminist rethinking of drama therapy: The role of aesthetics and audience’, Drama Therapy Review, 1:2, pp. 187–99, https://doi.org/10.1386/dtr.1.2.187_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Antić, Ana (2021), ‘Transcultural psychiatry: Cultural difference, universalism and social psychiatry in the age of decolonisation’, Cult Med Psychiatry, 45:3, pp. 359–84, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-021-09719-4.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Arendt, Hannah (1953), ‘Ideologie und terror’ (‘Ideology and terror’), in K. Piper (ed.), Offener Horizont: Festschrift für Karl Jaspers, München: Piper, pp. 229–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Arendt, Hannah (1962), ‘Ideology and terror: A novel form of government’, in The Origins of Totalitarianism, Cleveland, OH and New York: Meridian Books and The World Publishing Company, pp. 460–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Armstrong, Calli R., Frydman, Jason S. and Wood, Shea (2019), ‘Prominent themes in drama therapy effectiveness research’, Drama Therapy Review, 5:2, pp. 173–216, https://doi.org/10.1386/dtr_00002_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb ([1750–58] 2007), ‘Ästhetik, Band 1: §§ 1-613’ (‘Aesthetics, vol. 1: §§ 1-613’) (trans. D. Mirbach), in Philosophische Bibliothek 572a/b, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, n.pag.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bilge, Sirma (2013), ‘Intersectionality undone: Saving intersectionality from feminist intersectionality studies’, Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 20:2, pp. 405–24, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000283.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bourriaud, Nicolas ([1998] 2023), Esthétique relationnelle (‘Relational aesthetics’), Dijon: Les Presses du Réel.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Butler, Jason (2017), ‘Turning the world to glass: Poetic sensibility and the decolonization of imagination’, International Journal of Jungian Studies, 9:3, pp. 148–66, https://doi.org/10.1080/19409052.2017.1331931.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Cochrane, Archie L. (1972), Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services, London: Nuffield Provincial Hospital Trust, https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/research/effectiveness-and-efficiency-random-reflections-on-health-services. Accessed 2 February 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Crenshaw, Kimberlé W. (1991), ‘Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color’, Stanford Law Review, 43:6, pp. 1241–99, https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Dobrow, Mark J., Goel, Vivek and Upshur, Ross E. G. (2004), ‘Evidence-based health policy: Context and utilisation’, Social Science & Medicine, 58:1, pp. 207–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00166-7.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Dotson, Kristie (2011), ‘Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing’, Hypatia, 26:2, pp. 236–57, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Eberhard-Kaechele, Marianne and Evers-Grewe, Beatrix (2018), ‘Die Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft Künstlerische Therapien’, Musiktherapeutische Umschau, 39:4, pp. 388–99, https://doi.org/10.13109/muum.2018.39.4.388.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Fanon, Frantz (1963), The Wretched of the Earth (trans. C. Farrington), New York: Grove Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Foucault, Michel (1982), ‘The subject and power’, Critical Inquiry, 8:4, pp. 777–95, https://doi.org/10.1086/448181.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Frydman, Jason S., Cook, Angelle, Armstrong, Calli R., Rowe, Chyla and Kern, Chelsi (2022), ‘The drama therapy core processes: A Delphi study establishing a North American perspective’, Arts in Psychotherapy, 80:1, pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2022.101939.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Glissant, Édouard ([1990] 2010), Poetics of Relation (trans. B. Wings), Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Glissant, Édouard ([1996] 2007), Introduction to a Poetics of Diversity (trans. J. LaPorte), Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University, https://repository.lsu.edu/honors_etd/10. Accessed 7 August 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Glissant, Édouard ([1997] 2020), Treatise of the Whole-World (trans. C. Britton), Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Glissant, Édouard ([2009] 2021), Philosophie der Weltbeziehung: Poesie der Weite, Heidelberg: Wunderhorn Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Grainger, Roger (1999), Researching the Arts Therapies: A Dramatherapist’s Perspective, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Haraway, D. (2016), Staying with the Trouble, Making Kin with the Chthulucene, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hodermarska, Maria, Duke, Marielle and Hodeib, Lynn (2024), ‘How might we begin to explore a version of drama therapy that celebrates disability?’, Drama Therapy Review, Special Issue: ‘Disability, Chronic Illness and Debility Justice in Drama Therapy: Global-Political Perspectives’, 10, pp. 3–11, https://doi.org/10.1386/dtr_00142_2.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Jennings, Sue (1994), ‘The theatre of healing: Metaphor and metaphysics in the healing process’, in S. Jennings, A. Cattanach, S. Mitchell, A. Chesner and B. Meldrum (eds), The Handbook of Dramatherapy, vol. 1, London: Routledge, pp. 93–113.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Jones, David S. and Podolsky, Scott H. (2015), ‘The art of medicine: The history and fate of the gold standard’, The Lancet, 385, pp. 1502–03, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60742-5.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Jones, Phil (2017), ‘Landy through the lens of “Michael”: A short essay on one case study’, Drama Therapy Review, 3:1, pp. 89–100, https://doi.org/10.1386/dtr.3.1.89_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Keiller, Eleanor, Melvin, Eleanor, Ivers, Meabh, Lambie, Rachel and Bourne, Jane (2023), ‘A systematic review of dramatherapy interventions which are used to support adult participants in mental health in forensic settings’, Arts in Psychotherapy, 86, pp. 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2023.102096.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kleinman, Arthur (1995), Writing at the Margin, Discourse between Anthropology and Medicine, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA and London: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lahad, Mooli and Dent-Brown, Kim (2011), ‘Six-piece story-making revisited’, in D. R. Johnson, S. Pendzik and S. Snow (eds), Assessment in Drama Therapy, Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishers, pp. 121–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Landy, Robert J. (1993), Persona and Performance: The Meaning of Role in Drama, Therapy, and Everyday Life, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Landy, Robert J. and Butler, Jason D. (2011), ‘Assessment through role theory’, in D. R. Johnson, S. Pendzik and S. Snow (eds), Assessment in Drama Therapy, Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, pp. 148–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Lee Soon, Rachel K. M. (2016), ‘Nohona i Waena i nā Mo’olelo/living between the stories: Contextualizing drama therapy within an indigenous Hawaiian epistemology’, Drama Therapy Review, 2:2, pp. 257–71, https://doi.org/10.1386/DTR.2.2.257_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Mayor, Christine (2012), ‘Playing with race: A framework and approach for creative arts therapists’, Arts in Psychotherapy, 39:3, pp. 214–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2011.12.008.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Morgan, Gareth (2010), ‘Evidence-based health policy: A preliminary systematic review’, Health Education Journal, 69:1, pp. 43–47, https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896910363328.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Ochoa Gautier, Ana María (2014), Aurality, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Orkibi, Hod, Keisari, Shoshi, Sajnani, Nisha L. and de Witte, Martina (2023), ‘Effectiveness of drama-based therapies on mental health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled studies’, Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, article first, https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000582.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Patnaik, Utsa (2021), ‘Imperialism, gold standard and the colonised’, Social Scientist, 49:9–10, pp. 45–58, https://www.jstor.org/stable/27096633. Accessed May 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Pendzik, Susana (2006), ‘Dramatic reality and its therapeutic function in drama therapy’, Arts in Psychotherapy, 33:4, pp. 271–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2006.03.001.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Pendzik, Susana (2011), ‘The 6-key-model: An integrative assessment approach’, in D. R. Johnson, S. Pendzik and S. Snow (eds), Assessment in Drama Therapy, Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishers, pp. 197–220.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Pendzik, Susana (2013), ‘The poiesis and praxis of autobiographical therapeutic theatre’, keynote speech, 13 Internationale Sommerakademie Theater & Therapie: Im Labyrinth des Lebens (‘13th International Summer Academy Theatre & Therapy: In the labyrinth of life’), German Association of Theatre-Therapy, Remscheid, Germany, 6 June, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1996.0165.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Pendzik, Susana (2016), ‘Dramatherapy and the feminist tradition’, in S. Jennings and C. Holmwood (eds), The International Handbook of Dramatherapy, London: Routledge, pp. 306–16, https://www.academia.edu/29798699/Dramatherapy_and_the_Feminist_Tradition. Accessed 12 February 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Pendzik, Susana (2018), ‘Drama therapy and the invisible realm’, Drama Therapy Review, 4:2, pp. 183–97, https://doi.org/10.1386/dtr.4.2.183_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Pendzik, Susana (2022), ‘Approaching personal stories through dramatic resonances in group work’, in R. Kowalski, S. Keisari and N. Raz (eds), An Introduction to Psychotherapeutic Playback Theater: Hall of Mirrors on Stage, London: Routledge, pp. 152–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Pendzik, Susana and Wolf Poupko, Gital (2014), ‘Making sense of the acts: Using the 6-key model to assess a drama therapy session with a child’, in R. Ravindra (ed.), How Schools Abuse and Fail Children: Dramatherapy to Heal Emotionally Traumatized Children in Sri Lanka, Colombo: Hare Printer, pp. 119–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Ranasinha, Ravindra (2024), Eight Part Story Method or the Beehive Model: Its Evolution and Application as a Dramatherapy Intervention, Colombo: Ravindra Ranasinha, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33478.48964.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Sajnani, Nisha (2012), ‘The implicated witness: Towards a relational aesthetic in dramatherapy’, Dramatherapy, 34:1, pp. 6–21, https://doi.org/10.1080/02630672.2012.657944.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Sajnani, Nisha (2013), ‘The body politic: The relevance of an intersectional framework for therapeutic performance research in drama therapy’, Arts in Psychotherapy, 40:4, pp. 382–85, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2013.05.001.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Sajnani, Nisha (2016), ‘A critical aesthetic paradigm in drama therapy: Aesthetic distance, action and meaning making in the service of diversity and social justice’, in S. Jennings and C. Holmwood (eds), Routledge International Handbook of Dramatherapy, Abingdon and New York: Routledge and Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 145–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Sajnani, Nisha, Marxen, Eva and Zarate, Rebecca (2017), ‘Critical perspectives in the arts therapies: Response/ability across a continuum of practice’, Arts in Psychotherapy, 54, pp. 28–37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2017.01.007.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Spivak, Gayatri C. (1985), ‘The Rani of Sirmur: An essay in reading the archives’, History and Theory, 24:3, pp. 247–72, https://doi.org/10.2307/2505169.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Spivak, Gayatri C. (1988), ‘Can the subaltern speak?’, in C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, Houndmills: Macmillan, pp. 271–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Tsing, Anna L. (2015), The Mushroom at the End of the World, on the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. de Witte, Martina, Orkibi, Hod, Zarate, Rebecca, Karkou, Vicky, Sajnani, Nisha, Malhotra Bani, Ho, Rainbow T. H., Kaimal, Girija, Baker, Felicity A. and Koch, Sabine C. (2021), ‘From therapeutic factors to mechanisms of change in the creative arts therapies: A scoping review’, Frontiers in Psychology, 12, pp. 1019–45, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678397.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Feniger-Schaal, Rinat and Orkibi, Hod (2019), ‘Integrative systematic review of drama therapy intervention research’, Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14:1, pp. 68–80, https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000257.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Leavy, Patricia (2019), Handbook of Arts Based Research, London and New York: Guilford Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Mertens, Donna M. (2009), Transformative Research and Evaluation, New York: Guilford.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/dj_00034_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): arts-based research; decolonial ethics; dramatic resonances; evidence-based; intersectionality; social justice; sympoiesis; world relation

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test