Eco-body-story: Ecosomatic journey towards earthly belonging and transdisciplinary education

References

1. Alsaigh, R. and Coyne, I. (2021), ‘Doing a hermeneutic phenomenology research underpinned by Gadamer’s philosophy: A framework to facilitate data analysis’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211047820.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Andrieu, B., da Nobrega, P. and Sirost, O. (2018), ‘Body ecology: A new philosophy through cosmotic emersiology’, Auc Kinanthropologica, 54:1, pp. 16–27, https://doi.org/10.14712/23366052.2018.2.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baldini, C. (2024), ‘Rave, ritual and revolution: From ecstasy to equality’, seminar delivered via Advaya, 19 March, https://advaya.life/courses/dionysus-rave-ritual-and-revolution/from-ecstasy-to-equality. Accessed 19 March 2024.
4. Bardone-Cone, A. M., Wonderlich, S. A., Frost, R. O., Bulik, C. M., Mitchell, J. E., Uppala, S. and Simonich, H. (2007), ‘Perfectionism and eating disorders: Current status and future directions’, Clinical Psychology Review, 27:3, pp. 384–405, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2006.12.005.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Beattie, L. (2022), Symbiotic Autoethnography: Moving Beyond the Boundaries of Qualitative Methodologies, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bellerose, C. (2018), ‘Ancestral bodies dancing snow’, Choreographic Practices, 9:1, pp. 81–96, https://doi.org/10.1386/chor.9.1.81_1.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Branley-Bell, D., Talbot, C. V., Downs, J., Figueras, C., Green, J., McGilley, B. and Murphy-Morgan, C. (2023), ‘It’s not all about control: Challenging mainstream framing of eating disorders’, Journal of Eating Disorders, 11:1, pp. 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00752-9.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cella, M. J. C. (2013), ‘The ecosomatic paradigm in literature: Merging disability studies and ecocriticism’, Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 20:3, pp. 574–96, https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/ist053.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Coleman, D. (2024), ‘Ecosomatic performance research for the pluriverse’, in S. Fraleigh and S. R. Riley (eds), Geographies of Us: Ecosomatic Essays and Practice Pages, New York: Routledge, pp. 64–74.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Enghauser, R. (2007), ‘The quest for an ecosomatic approach to dance pedagogy’, Journal of Dance Education, 7:3, pp. 80–90, https://doi.org/10.1080/15290824.2007.10387342.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Eriksson, E. (2014), No Title, July, unpublished diary.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Eriksson, E. (2015), No Title, February, unpublished diary.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Eriksson, E. (2022), No Title, September, unpublished diary.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Eriksson, E. (2024), ‘Why eco-somatics?’, Cosmoecología | Cosmoecology, 27 February, https://cosmoecologia.wordpress.com/2024/02/27/why-eco-somatics/. Accessed 18 June 2025.
15. Firmino Castillo, M. R. (2016), ‘Dancing the pluriverse: Indigenous performance as ontological praxis’, Dance Research Journal, 48:1, pp. 55–73, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0149767715000480.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fraleigh, S. (2021), ‘Performing everyday things: Somatic ecologies of butoh, phenomenology and Zen’, Dance, Movement & Spiritualities, Special Issue: ‘Somatic Movement Meditations and Embodied Spirituality’, 8:1, pp. 33–55, https://doi.org/10.1386/dmas_00025_1.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fraleigh, S. and Riley, S. R. (2024), Geographies of Us: Ecosomatic Essays and Practice Pages, Burnaby: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hannus, S. (2023), ‘GuiDance of butterflies: Practicing ecosomatics and dancing towards more sensitive bodily presence and planetary feeling’, Nordic Journal of Dance, 14:1, pp. 124–39, https://doi.org/10.2478/njd-2023-0013.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Haraway, D. (1988), ‘Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’, Feminist Studies, 14:3, pp. 575–99, https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jasanoff, S. and Kim, S. H. (2015), Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, London: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. K.N., S. (2023), ‘An ecosomatic investigation of Indra Sinha’s animal’s people: Reading disability through environmental justice studies’, Teresian Journal of English Studies, XV:III, pp. 6–20.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kuppers, P. (2022), Eco Soma: Pain and Joy in Speculative Performance Encounters, Art After Nature, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, https://doi.org/10.5749/9781452968155.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Nelson, R. (2013), Practice as Research in the Arts: Principles, Protocols, Pedagogies, Resistances, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Piper, J. (2024), ‘Portal obscura: Ecology incarnate’, MFA dissertation, Durham, NC: Duke University.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Pittock, A. (2010), ‘How are anorexia nervosa and spirituality connected, and what implications does this have for treatment?’, working paper, London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Polleros, M. (2024), ‘The way out is in: Planetary entanglement – why feeling more, matters more’, in R. Pethybridge (ed.), Animated: Current Issues and Practice in Participatory Dance, Leicester: People Dancing, pp. 37–41.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Rosiek, J. L., Snyder, J. and Pratt, S. L. (2020), ‘The new materialisms and indigenous theories of non-human agency: Making the case for respectful anti-colonial engagement’, Qualitative Inquiry, 26:3–4, pp. 331–46, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419830135.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Rufo, R. (2023), ‘Humans, trees, and the intimacy of movement: An encounter with ecosomatic practice’, European Journal of Ecopsychology, 113:May, pp. 88–113, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7939092.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Rufo, R. (2024), ‘Somatic arts and liveable futures: Embodying ecological connections’, Lagoonscapes, 4:1, pp. 199–218.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Scott, B. A. (2010), ‘Babes and the woods: Women’s objectification and the feminine beauty ideal as ecological hazards’, Ecopsychology, 2:3, pp. 147–58, https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2010.0030.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Shenker, S. D. (2012), ‘Towards a world in which many worlds fit? Zapatista autonomous education as an alternative means of development’, International Journal of Educational Development, 32:3, pp. 432–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.10.001.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Simpson, L. B. (2014), ‘Land as pedagogy: Nishnaabeg intelligence and rebellious transformation’, Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3:3, pp. 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Watts, V. (2016), ‘Smudge this: Assimilation, state-favoured communities and the denial of indigenous spiritual lives’, International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 7:1, pp. 148–70, https://doi.org/10.18357/ijcyfs.71201615676.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Weig, D. (2021), Tensional Responsiveness: Ecosomatic Aliveness and Sensitivity with Human and More-Than, Bielefeld: transcript.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Williamson, A. and Hayes, J. (2014), ‘Dancing the sacred in secular higher education contexts’, Dance, Movement & Spiritualities, 1:1, pp. 11–20, https://doi.org/10.1386/dmas.1.1.11_2.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Williamson, A., Eddy, M., Hartley, L., Talyor, M., Meléndez, E. and Abrams, M. (2015), ‘Somatically inspired movement and prepatriarchal religious symbolism’, Dance, Movement & Spiritualities, 2:3, pp. 323–55, https://doi.org/10.1386/dmas.2.3.323_1.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Zimmermann, A. and Andrieu, B. (2021), ‘Body ecology and emersive exploration of self: The case of extreme adventurers’, Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 15:4, pp. 481–94, https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2020.1856913.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hutchinson, Y., Ochoa, A. A. C., Paulson, J. and Tikly, L. (2023), Decolonizing Education for Sustainable Futures, Bristol: Bristol University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Yusoff, K. and Gabrys, J. (2011), ‘Climate change and the imagination’, WIREs Climate Change, 2:4, pp. 516–34, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.117.
    [Google Scholar]